Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth par - authorize request with client_id

2020-11-04 Thread Sascha Preibisch
Thank you, Taka!

I will check out the referenced document.

Regards,
Sascha

On Wed., Nov. 4, 2020, 19:15 Takahiko Kawasaki,  wrote:

> Hi Sascha,
>
> The change you found in the draft 04 is the change made to the JAR (JWT
> Secured Authorization Request). Now, "client_id" is mandatory. I summarized
> technical details about JAR in the article below. It describes the reasons
> for the necessity of "client_id". PAR is mentioned there, too.
>
> Implementer's note about JAR (JWT Secured Authorization Request)
> https://darutk.medium.com/implementers-note-about-jar-fff4cbd158fe
>
> Best Regards,
> Taka
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Sascha Preibisch <
> saschapreibi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> A while ago I implemented draft 00 of this spec:
>> - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04
>>
>> Now, in draft 04, I see that a request to the /authorize endpoint is
>> defined with client_id and request_uri. The client_id was added since draft
>> 00 (see: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04#section-4).
>>
>> I am not sure if 'client_id' is now required, that's all.
>>
>> Thanks for clarification,
>>
>> regards,
>> Sascha
>> ___
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth par - authorize request with client_id

2020-11-04 Thread Takahiko Kawasaki
Hi Sascha,

The change you found in the draft 04 is the change made to the JAR (JWT
Secured Authorization Request). Now, "client_id" is mandatory. I summarized
technical details about JAR in the article below. It describes the reasons
for the necessity of "client_id". PAR is mentioned there, too.

Implementer's note about JAR (JWT Secured Authorization Request)
https://darutk.medium.com/implementers-note-about-jar-fff4cbd158fe

Best Regards,
Taka

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Sascha Preibisch 
wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> A while ago I implemented draft 00 of this spec:
> - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04
>
> Now, in draft 04, I see that a request to the /authorize endpoint is
> defined with client_id and request_uri. The client_id was added since draft
> 00 (see: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04#section-4).
>
> I am not sure if 'client_id' is now required, that's all.
>
> Thanks for clarification,
>
> regards,
> Sascha
> ___
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


[OAUTH-WG] oauth par - authorize request with client_id

2020-11-04 Thread Sascha Preibisch
Hi all!

A while ago I implemented draft 00 of this spec:
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04

Now, in draft 04, I see that a request to the /authorize endpoint is
defined with client_id and request_uri. The client_id was added since draft
00 (see: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-par-04#section-4).

I am not sure if 'client_id' is now required, that's all.

Thanks for clarification,

regards,
Sascha
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth