[Ogf-l] Final Email from Lists

2007-10-27 Thread Ryan Dancey
Well folks, they served us well and honorably, but the time has come to put
the Open Gaming Foundation lists out to pasture.  This is the final official
message from the lists.  They'll be shut down shortly.

I have asked, and the ENWorld Team has graciously agreed, to move the OGF
discussions to ENWorld.

Two new forums have been created to mimic these lists.  With 4E coming up,
and WotC appearing to be planning to tinker with its licensing regimes, I
suspect interest in these topics will revive.  And I don't have the time to
do list management and administration tasks.  Rather than ignore the
problem, I think proactively finding a more suitable host was the right way
to go.

Thanks to all who subscribed and participated.  You are all the keys to the
success of the Open Gaming Movement.

Ryan


___
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l


Re: [Ogf-l] OGC contamination?

2006-09-07 Thread Ryan Dancey
On 9/5/06 8:04 PM, Vicki Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I maintain that, since the fluff text will be published again by the original
 publisher, that company can publish it without having to do so under the Open
 Game License.

You are correct.  All the non-derivative work they created can be
re-licensed as many times as they wish, under as many licensing regimes as
they choose to use.

Ryan


___
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l


Re: [Ogf-l] 2nd still

2006-08-17 Thread Ryan Dancey
Title: Re: [Ogf-l] 2nd still



Re:OSRIC

Their license page is simply incorrect in many of its assertations.

To the extent that the charts of ability scores do not represent a non-linear mathmatical function (i.e., the figures are arbitrarily made up by the original writer) they're protected by copyright and can't be reused without permission.

To the extent that the class  racial limitations and individual power descriptions and level dependent abilities and game modifiers match those of ADD (any edition) and are not the result of a simple linear mathematical function, those templates represent selection, arrangement and presentation copyrights inherent in ADD and suffer the same limitations.

Spell names which are not OGC but are in ADD and are not obvious (i.e. they contain some creative element) are copyright by WotC.

The 'to hit' charts, to the extent that they represent non-linear functions, are protected by WotC copyright.

In summary: I wouldn't touch this without SERIOUS work to ensure everything I used was actually OGC.

Ryan



___
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l