Re: [Ogf-l] New Material Added to SRDs
On Saturday, January 24, 2004, at 02:32 AM, Guilhem wrote: the Arcana advanced classes refer to the Mage advanced class... but this class (from d20 Modern) doesn't appear in the MSRD... It may not have done before, but take a look in Advanced Classes II on the Modern SRD page. :-) Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
Re: [Ogf-l] SRD released (apparantly)
At 06:35 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, Steven \"Conan\" Trustrum wrote: I'm thinking that I'll wait a while before I download the new SRD. I'd hate to start work on something only to later find out that half of what I was using were 3.0 files mistakenly left on the site, or something of the sort. It should be pretty easy to tell. The modifications dates on the files are vastly different, for one thing, and the formatting of the document contents is, as far as I've seen, quite distinct. Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
Re: [Ogf-l] SRD released (apparantly)
At 11:31 PM 7/21/2003 +0100, David Chart wrote: As Doug said, the big zip still has the old SRD in. The smaller zips do seem to have the new one, though. True. The Psionics zip seems to be MIA, though. Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
Re: [Ogf-l] SRD released (apparantly)
At 05:32 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, Joe Mucchiello wrote: No more "Wizards doesn't have PI" rebuttals. Do any of those terms actually occur in the files? (I'm looking, but I just discovered that the ZIP versions are still the 3.0 SRD files, and have NOT been updated.) Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
RE: [Ogf-l] SRD released (apparantly)
At 02:20 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, Smith, Andrew wrote: Let's just blame that on burnout from working on the SRD for a month straight. Well, from what I've seen of your work so far, let me commend you on the result. The revised SRD looks great! Thanks for all of your hard (and, I'm sure, tedious) work. Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
Re: [Ogf-l] 3.5
At 05:45 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Matthew Hodgson wrote: Does anyone know if the system reference documents have been updated to reflect the new 3.5 material? Sure enough. As soon as I sent that last message... :-) http://pub17.ezboard.com/fseankreynoldsboardsfrm1.showMessage?topicID=1219.topic&index=8 Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
Re: [Ogf-l] 3.5
At 05:45 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Matthew Hodgson wrote: Does anyone know if the system reference documents have been updated to reflect the new 3.5 material? According to Andy Collins, this will apparently happen next week. (I'd furnish a link to the messageboard posting in question, but I can't seem to reach ENWorld at the moment...) Sixten ___ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
