On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:57 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
I think that that looks correct.
That said, you're unlikely to find anyone overly thrilled by the idea
of rebuilding (all of) SFW, so you may want to check if folks are
willing to dock a new package and re-import to get the update, or
whether they'd prefer an oi-build based way to do it, or... well, I
don't know.
To try to put it briefly: if I were really moving forward, I'd that in
oi-build (where a later version of Mercurial is already in place for
sustaining). As I'm just doing some minor shifting (sideways instead of
forward, as it were), it seemed simpler to do this with the existing
build system, which I'm modestly tweaking for the package.
(I'd like to note that I'm suggesting that moving it to oi-build for
sustaining is *correct*, just a lot more likely to get traction as far
as it actually getting published afterward)
-- Rich
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
