Re: [oi-dev] Xnv_161 JDS updates
On 07/22/13 07:00 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, On po, 2013-07-22 at 06:31 +0200, Nikola M. wrote: On 07/19/13 09:28 AM, Nikola M. wrote: On 07/18/13 06:47 PM, ken mays wrote: Hello, Please update your systems for test and review of Milan Jurik's JDS update: 1. /hipster (= 07-18-2013 edition) 2. JDS (07-15-2013 edition, http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/en/index.shtml) This is so great, I feel so good knowing that things get updated. :) (I added again JDS publisher, this time on top of Hipster, using 'pfexec pkg set-publisher --non-sticky -O http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/ jds.openindiana.org)' Ok, upgrading from 151a7 to new JDS now does not work for me. Milan, can you check updating from 151a7 to JDS without Hipster, it seems like it is not working here. (worked on Hipster few weeks ago). no big surprise, JDS on opensolaris.cz is built on top of dev-test, not a7. You have to look at verbose update to see what is broken. Milan Oh, wow. I didn't know /dev-test exists till now. a7 does not give any info on pkg update -v after adding JDS. I guess ken mays was thinking of /dev-test for testing JDS, then. N. ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Xnv_161 JDS updates
On 07/22/13 06:25 AM, Nikola M. wrote: On 07/22/13 12:32 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote: Okay, I've upgraded to /hipster as of 21-jul ~ 10pm ish gnome-wm still fails for me ... maybe I'm doing something wrong. gnome-wm --replace in a terminal gives: gtk-window-decorator: Screen 0 on display :0.0 already has a decoration manager; try using the --replace option to replace the current decoration manager. Segmentation Fault (core dumped) Core dumped sounds like the unfortunate benefit of upgrading from zlib 1.2.3 to 1.2.8 without testing of any kind... Try booting from old BE of 151a7 (and keep it for direct upgrade in the future) and setting pfexec pkg freeze pkg:/library/zlib@1.2.3 . and then update keeping zlib at that version. I don't know how to directly downgrade zlib to older version without old BE and freezing, but I know changes need to be tested before going into the Hipster. Nevermind this, seems like like newest Hipster update comes with zlib 1.2.8 that is fixed for this kind of problems with dumping core (https://www.illumos.org/issues/3896) (-O2) Jonathan Adams: Try updating hipster and see if problems are gone. N. ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Garrett D'Amore garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote: CDDL should not contain changes to itself, nor additional copyright notices of any kind. Its inappropriate (and in violation of the license terms) to modify the CDDL license or boilerplate on code that you are not the sole author of. That boiler plate has *nothing* to do do with the copyright notices, except that without a copyright notice, it becomes impossible to verify *ownership* of the contribution, which is vital. I am not sure what you understand by boilerplate, but I believe that people usually understand by boilerplate the copyright notice that is typically at the beginning of a file. It is of course apropriate to change the boilerplate, in special as Sun agreed with the community to put CDDL version 1.0 only in that text and this text was later mofified to read any CDDL version... Now that Sun was sold to Oracle and Oracle stopped contributing to the project, we need to be very careful and I thus strongly recommend to change the CDDL boilerplate to again contain CDDL version 1.0 only in case someone edited a file. Without doing that, Oracle could in theory create a CDDL-1.x or a CDDL-2.x that says everything could be used by Oracle as closed source. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Another hipster zlib/gcrypt issue?
Looks like SHA224 is missing from libgcrypt. I try to solve it. -- David On 22 July 2013 12:39, Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com wrote: My personal build of AIDE (Intrusion detection program) stopped running. When I tried to build again (static linkage), configure dies when it hits zlib and says that it can't find deflate(). Configuring for dynamic linkage works for the git head (not the last official release with gcc 4.7 because of missing definitions like off_t) and builds fine. When it runs it complains: DBG: md_enable: algorithm 7 not available which sounds more like a gcrypt issue. Anyone see this before? Gary ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Another hipster zlib/gcrypt issue?
On 22 July 2013 12:39, Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com wrote: of missing definitions like off_t) and builds fine. When it runs it complains: DBG: md_enable: algorithm 7 not available Sorry, mixed up the numbers looked at 11. GCRY_MD_TIGER = 6, /* TIGER/192 as used by gpg = 1.3.2. */ GCRY_MD_HAVAL = 7, /* HAVAL, 5 pass, 160 bit. */ GCRY_MD_SHA256 = 8, GCRY_MD_SHA384 = 9, GCRY_MD_SHA512 = 10, GCRY_MD_SHA224 = 11, ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Xnv_161 JDS updates
unless the update is in the RPM package, I don't think updating it now will fix it ... the changes may not have made their way into the system yet though, so I will try again later. root@jadlaptop:~# pkg publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI jds.openindiana.org origin online http://opensolaris.cz:1/ openindiana.org origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/ sfe-encumberedorigin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered/ sfe (non-sticky) origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/ localhost(non-sticky, disabled) origin online http://localhost:1/ root@jadlaptop:~# pkg update -v | tee jul-22-update.log Packages to update: 1 Estimated space available: 13.09 GB Estimated space to be consumed: 154.35 MB Create boot environment:No Create backup boot environment: Yes Rebuild boot archive:No Changed packages: openindiana.org package/rpm 0.5.11,5.11-0.151.1.8.1:20130721T121727Z - 0.5.11,5.11-0.151.1.8.1:20130722T124104Z Update Phase ... Done Package State Update Phase ... Done Package Cache Update Phase ... Done Image State Update Phase ... Done Reading Existing Index ... Done Indexing Packages ... Done --- NOTE: Please review release notes posted at: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Release+Notes --- On 22 July 2013 07:52, Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/22/13 06:25 AM, Nikola M. wrote: On 07/22/13 12:32 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote: Okay, I've upgraded to /hipster as of 21-jul ~ 10pm ish gnome-wm still fails for me ... maybe I'm doing something wrong. gnome-wm --replace in a terminal gives: gtk-window-decorator: Screen 0 on display :0.0 already has a decoration manager; try using the --replace option to replace the current decoration manager. Segmentation Fault (core dumped) Core dumped sounds like the unfortunate benefit of upgrading from zlib 1.2.3 to 1.2.8 without testing of any kind... Try booting from old BE of 151a7 (and keep it for direct upgrade in the future) and setting pfexec pkg freeze pkg:/library/zlib@1.2.3 . and then update keeping zlib at that version. I don't know how to directly downgrade zlib to older version without old BE and freezing, but I know changes need to be tested before going into the Hipster. Nevermind this, seems like like newest Hipster update comes with zlib 1.2.8 that is fixed for this kind of problems with dumping core ( https://www.illumos.org/issues/3896) (-O2) Jonathan Adams: Try updating hipster and see if problems are gone. N. ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Xnv_161 JDS updates
On 07/22/2013 02:32, Jonathan Adams wrote: Okay, I've upgraded to /hipster as of 21-jul ~ 10pm ish gnome-wm still fails for me ... maybe I'm doing something wrong. gnome-wm --replace in a terminal gives: gnome-wm doesn't pass --replace option to the actual window manager. What are you trying to do? -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] xchat, Firefox dumps core, OI logo xlock broken, last 2 hipster updates
On 07/21/13 10:22 PM, a...@sfedu.ru wrote: I've tried with FF 10 coming with /hipster and Adobe Flash 10.1r85.3 (it was a version Jon Tibble advised in oi-discuss). It worked, didn't crash, but was extremely slow (tried to watch vimeo - it was hardly possible). Perhaps, it's related to VirtualBox environment, I don't know. What exact version do you use? Hi, can you please answer blow quotes on public list, thanks a lot. Latest Flash for Solaris x86 is 11.2 r202 It works just fine up to OI /dev 151a7 , and is crashing in Hipster from the start. I am yet to test /dev-test+JDS. I am on hardware (C2Duo, i945), Flash is not very performant but it was running much better for youtube videos, then HTML5. I also think that making Flash working again is most important. If needed I could try older Flash, but I guess that is not the final goal. ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
On 07/22/13 07:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: unless it had explicit approval to do so from any joint contributors. Remember the terms of the Sun Contributor Agreement granted Sun co-ownership and the right to release the code under any license of Sun's choosing, such as a proprietary license in any Solaris 10 backport. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] libtool update
On 21 July 2013 13:15, Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote: It is installed: $ pkg list |grep automake developer/build/automake 1.11.2-0.151.1.8.1 i-- developer/build/automake-110 1.10-0.151.1.8.1 i-- developer/build/automake-111 1.11.2-0.151.1.8.1 i-- developer/build/automake-19 1.9.6-0.151.1.8i-- I'm just a bit worried about testing. Strange, maybe automake-110 was installed later. From the log: autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheader --force autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing configure.ac:130: require Automake 1.11.1, but have 1.10 autom4te: closing standard output: Broken pipe autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 gmake[2]: *** [/data/jenkins/jobs/oi-userland/workspace/components/libtool/libtool-2.4.2/.prep] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oi-userland/workspace/components/libtool' -- David ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Another hipster zlib/gcrypt issue?
On 22 July 2013 12:39, Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com wrote: My personal build of AIDE (Intrusion detection program) stopped running. When I tried to build again (static linkage), configure dies when it hits zlib and says that it can't find deflate(). Can't see a static version in the zlib package. Configuring for dynamic linkage works for the git head (not the last official release with gcc 4.7 because of missing definitions like off_t) and builds fine. When it runs it complains: DBG: md_enable: algorithm 7 not available which sounds more like a gcrypt issue. Anyone see this before? libgcrypt has no implementation of HAVAL. I pushed libmhash to hipster. -- David ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote: On 2013-07-22 17:59, Garrett D'Amore wrote: On Jul 22, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 07:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: unless it had explicit approval to do so from any joint contributors. Remember the terms of the Sun Contributor Agreement granted Sun co-ownership and the right to release the code under any license of Sun's choosing, such as a proprietary license in any Solaris 10 backport. Oh right. The SCA. Damn, forgot about that! Would I be wrong to assume that this was in place for OpenSolaris code (and indeed Oracle closed up their Solaris), while the new illumos contributors did not sign an SCA with Sun and thus are not subject to its terms? Did the (ex-)Sun/Oracle employees, including those currently active in illumos community, sign it? Even if yes, does it hold valid for post-split codebase? I think this needs a lawyer to answer. My feeling is that even for those of who did sign the SCA (I did), I think it would be difficult for Oracle to state that contributions to illumos constitute contributions to OpenSolaris and are therefore subject to the SCA. If they did, I'd be willing to go to court to fight that. - Garrett ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
[oi-dev] subversion update
Hello. I have updated subversion https://github.com/pyhalov/oi-userland/compare/subversion Two notable things: 1) This upgrade removes perl 5.10 subversion component ( library/perl-5/subversion). subversion component doesn't support perl versioning, so we ship only perl 5.16 subversion modules (in library/perl-5/subversion). 2) svn repositories should be upgraded to work with this version. Waiting for your comments and suggestions before committing this. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote: Would I be wrong to assume that this was in place for OpenSolaris code (and indeed Oracle closed up their Solaris), while the new illumos contributors did not sign an SCA with Sun and thus are not subject to its terms? Did the (ex-)Sun/Oracle employees, including those currently active in illumos community, sign it? Even if yes, does it hold valid for post-split codebase? BTW: Sun was not very effective with their attempt to get a signed SCA. The Joliet and ISO-9660:1999 extensions in hsfs have been written by me and added to OpenSolaris without a written SCA. As a result, Oracle cannot legally distribute hsfs as closed source... Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Hi guys, I will be removing copyright templates with old CCDL with the illumos one in oi-userland. This will cause that running make sample-manifest will generate p5m with current licensing. Other packages should get changed to the newer one, but keeping Oracle copyright. However, I am not entirely sure if we can change the license.. anyone on this? Cheers, Adam On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. But this does not cover the CDDL template text... ...anyway, this template text needs a change in any case as opensolaris.org is no longer existent. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing does not reproduce the license text. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. But this does not cover the CDDL template text... ...anyway, this template text needs a change in any case as opensolaris.org is no longer existent. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing does not reproduce the license text. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Basically, moving this into the oi-userland transforms dir - https://hg.openindiana.org/users/xenol/oi-build/file/3e7752f531e1/transforms/manifest-metadata-template and also modifying https://hg.openindiana.org/users/xenol/oi-build/file/3e7752f531e1/transforms/copyright-template this to contain illumos CDDL. Adam On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Adam ?tevko adam.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I will be removing copyright templates with old CCDL with the illumos one in oi-userland. This will cause that running make sample-manifest will generate p5m with current licensing. Other packages should get changed to the newer one, but keeping Oracle copyright. However, I am not entirely sure if we can change the license.. anyone on this? You cannot change the license. BTW: What kind of license change do you have in mind? Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Adam ?tevko adam.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Basically, moving this into the oi-userland transforms dir - https://hg.openindiana.org/users/xenol/oi-build/file/3e7752f531e1/transforms/manifest-metadata-template and also modifying https://hg.openindiana.org/users/xenol/oi-build/file/3e7752f531e1/transforms/copyright-template this to contain illumos CDDL. Doing this in general does not look OK. In special if you did not change content... Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
The prototypes follow this (the following is the file usr/src/prototypes/README in illumos-gate): To ensure that everyone can use the same boilerplate text without triggering copyright ownership because of the boilerplate itself, I hereby place the following text in the public domain, which should be used to reference the CDDL version 1.0 for each new file introduced in illumos. - Garrett D'Amore /* * This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the * Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), version 1.0. * You may only use this file in accordance with the terms version * 1.0 of the CDDL. * * A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this * source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at * http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL. */ /* * Copyright 2012 contributor. All rights reserved. */ On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. But this does not cover the CDDL template text... ...anyway, this template text needs a change in any case as opensolaris.org is no longer existent. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing does not reproduce the license text. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Garret, but is legal for us to change that stuff in oi-userland? I personally don't see any reasons why I shouldn't, but I am not a lawyer, so I am asking as you two seem to know more than me.. Adam On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Garrett D'Amore garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote: The prototypes follow this (the following is the file usr/src/prototypes/README in illumos-gate): To ensure that everyone can use the same boilerplate text without triggering copyright ownership because of the boilerplate itself, I hereby place the following text in the public domain, which should be used to reference the CDDL version 1.0 for each new file introduced in illumos. - Garrett D'Amore /* * This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the * Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), version 1.0. * You may only use this file in accordance with the terms version * 1.0 of the CDDL. * * A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this * source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at * http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL. */ /* * Copyright 2012 contributor. All rights reserved. */ On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. But this does not cover the CDDL template text... ...anyway, this template text needs a change in any case as opensolaris.org is no longer existent. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing does not reproduce the license text. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Garrett D'Amore garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote: The prototypes follow this (the following is the file usr/src/prototypes/README in illumos-gate): To ensure that everyone can use the same boilerplate text without triggering copyright ownership because of the boilerplate itself, I hereby place the following text in the public domain, which should be used to reference the CDDL version 1.0 for each new file introduced in illumos. - Garrett D'Amore /* * This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the * Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), version 1.0. * You may only use this file in accordance with the terms version * 1.0 of the CDDL. * * A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this * source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at * http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL. */ /* * Copyright 2012 contributor. All rights reserved. */ Schillix-ON uses this: /* * This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the * Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), version 1.0. * You may only use this file in accordance with the terms of version * 1.0 of the CDDL. * * A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this * source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.txt */ /* * Copyright 2011 contributor. All rights reserved. */ I believe it is better to refer to a neutral entity such as opensource.org. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
Adam ?tevko adam.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Garret, but is legal for us to change that stuff in oi-userland? I personally don't see any reasons why I shouldn't, but I am not a lawyer, so I am asking as you two seem to know more than me.. I am not sure if I understand you correctly. If you modify a file, I would recommend to modify the CDDL header to point to something neutral that still exists. This is why I use http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.txt If you like to be sure, I also recommend to mention CDDl version 1.0 only. If you don't change files, I do not recommend such a change. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility
On 07/22/13 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that identifies You as the Contributor of the Modification. You may not remove or alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. But this does not cover the CDDL template text... The CDDL template text sounds like any notices of licensing to me - but I'm neither a lawyer nor a corporate spokesman, so I can't say definitively. ...anyway, this template text needs a change in any case as opensolaris.org is no longer existent. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing does not reproduce the license text. It redirects to https://solaris.java.net/ which has a License link at the top which provides the CDDL text. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
