[oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

[Adam Števko]

Hello,

As part of a larger effort at providing a more formal governance structure for 
the OpenIndiana project, I’d like to announce on the behalf of OI developers 
the adoption of an OpenIndiana Code of Conduct. The draft text for this new 
document can be found at http://www.openindiana.org/community/code-of-conduct/ 
.

We would also like to point out this draft document is open to discussion and 
acceptance by the community.
Our desire is for the discussion to be civil and for it to center around the 
verbiage of the Code of Conduct.
We do not wish for the discussion to go off topic, or question the need for 
such a document.

Please compose your thoughts and comment with as few replies as necessary so 
the community may solidify the final text of this document.

Cheers,
Adam


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] OpenJDK 8

[Peter Tribble]

> oppenjdk ?
>>
>
> We currently ship openjdk 7 as the only Java implementation.
>

Sorry, what I meant was the typo "oppenjdk". At least, I presumae it's
a typo.


>
>> As a matter of interest, what does the version string look like?
>> (The output of 'java -version'; I had to play a bit with the options
>> to get it into a format that a number of tools expected, although I
>> don't appear to have made a note of which tools were particularly
>> fussy about the exact layout of the version string.)
>>
>
> $ /usr/jdk/openjdk1.7.0/bin/java -version
> openjdk version "1.7.0_080-internal"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
> 1.7.0_080-internal-alp_2016_07_17_16_02-b00)
> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode)
>
> $ /usr/jdk/openjdk1.8.0/bin/java -version
> openjdk version "1.8.0_92-internal"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-internal-oi-1.8.92-b00)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b00, mixed mode)
>

It's unfortunate that pkgsrc don't put the tag that the tarball matches
in the file name. As it is, it's difficult to be sure exactly what they've
checked out.

You should probably set the build number, which ought to be b14
assuming the source matches the release.

Eg, I have:

# /usr/jdk/openjdk1.8.0_92/bin/java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_92"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-b14)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b14, mixed mode)


-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] OpenJDK 8

[Alexander Pyhalov]

Peter Tribble писал 18.07.2016 23:32:

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Alexander Pyhalov  wrote:


Hi, people.

Does someone want to review or test OpenJDK 8 changeset?

I could run toy programs and build OpenJDK  8 with OpenJDK 8.
Additional testing is welcome.

https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2246





That's quite a diff, although I guess that's because you're building
with gcc rather than studio?


Yes, there are a lot of changets related to building with gcc.
The component, as you can see, is based on pkgsrc port.
I've removed all changes, specific to other OSes, supported by pkgsrc,
added changes related to directories and files layout, changed some 
flags

for build tools and corrected RPATH.


OpenJDK 7 stays default one for now.


oppenjdk ?


We currently ship openjdk 7 as the only Java implementation.



As a matter of interest, what does the version string look like?
(The output of 'java -version'; I had to play a bit with the options
to get it into a format that a number of tools expected, although I
don't appear to have made a note of which tools were particularly
fussy about the exact layout of the version string.)


$ /usr/jdk/openjdk1.7.0/bin/java -version
openjdk version "1.7.0_080-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 
1.7.0_080-internal-alp_2016_07_17_16_02-b00)

OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode)

$ /usr/jdk/openjdk1.8.0/bin/java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_92-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-internal-oi-1.8.92-b00)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b00, mixed mode)

---
System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center


___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] OpenJDK 8

[Peter Tribble]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Alexander Pyhalov  wrote:

> Hi, people.
>
> Does someone want to review or test OpenJDK 8 changeset?
>
> I could run toy programs and build OpenJDK 8 with OpenJDK 8.
> Additional testing is welcome.
>
> https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2246
>

That's quite a diff, although I guess that's because you're building
with gcc rather than studio?


> OpenJDK 7 stays default one for now.


oppenjdk ?

As a matter of interest, what does the version string look like?
(The output of 'java -version'; I had to play a bit with the options
to get it into a format that a number of tools expected, although I
don't appear to have made a note of which tools were particularly
fussy about the exact layout of the version string.)

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

[oi-dev] OpenJDK 8

[Alexander Pyhalov]

Hi, people.

Does someone want to review or test OpenJDK 8 changeset?

I could run toy programs and build OpenJDK 8 with OpenJDK 8.
Additional testing is welcome.

https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2246

OpenJDK 7 stays default one for now.
--
System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center

___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] mate components

[Till Wegmüller]

Hi Alexander.

Current State is, MATE minimal is shipped. You can install and launch a 
MATE session. No Metapackage or mate-gate in userland yet.


I currently have mate-applets and mint-menu on my backlog.
Mint-menu is optional and has a problem starting which i haven't yet 
figured out.
Mate-applets is nearly ready for PR. I only need to look that we deliver 
both 32 and 64 bit libexec applets.


If you could look at the remaining components would be great.

Greetings
Till


On 17.07.2016 09:07, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:

Hi, Till.

I'd like to know current Mate state. Do you have more components ready?
If you do, what prevents us from shipping them? If you don't I'd like to
look at remaining mate components.



___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev