Re: [oi-dev] fix-includes for g++
On 06/03/2013 17:46, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello, everyone... Maybe I'm wrong, but, for example, OpenCSW gcc 4.8 package contains a big set of fixed includes. Why doesn't our g++ 4.7 package include any? Compare, for example, http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc47%404.7.2%2C5.11-0.151006%3A20130429T221114Z and http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc-47%404.7.3%2C5.11-0.151.1.8.1%3A20130518T182047Z . -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] fix-includes for g++
On 06/03/2013 18:40, Andrzej Szeszo wrote: My cheeky plan was to get someone to fix the headers in illumos itself. Alternative is to ignore the issue and include the fixed-includes contents in the gcc package. Alexander, feel free to add fixed-includes to the gcc package. My initial gcc package is getting rid of the directory in the Makefile altogether. We can look at fixing illumos headers at later time. The problem is the following. From what I've read (mainly http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 ) and gcc mailing lists, Solaris headers are OK, even more OK then on other OSes. But as other are broken, they have to redefine some things. I'd like to try setup fix-includes and to run different C++ tests... If it helps, maybe it's the way. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Re: [oi-dev] fix-includes for g++
What's the big deal about fixing illumos? Please, if at all possible, do not ship fix-includes. It would actually be preferable for you to patch your illumos tree with whatever fix you want than to do that. -- Rich 2013/6/3 Andrzej Szeszo asze...@gmail.com My cheeky plan was to get someone to fix the headers in illumos itself. Alternative is to ignore the issue and include the fixed-includes contents in the gcc package. Alexander, feel free to add fixed-includes to the gcc package. My initial gcc package is getting rid of the directory in the Makefile altogether. We can look at fixing illumos headers at later time. Andrzej On 3 June 2013 15:56, Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote: On 06/03/2013 17:46, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello, everyone... Maybe I'm wrong, but, for example, OpenCSW gcc 4.8 package contains a big set of fixed includes. Why doesn't our g++ 4.7 package include any? Compare, for example, http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc47%404.7.2%2C5.11-0.151006%3A20130429T221114Z and http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc-47%404.7.3%2C5.11-0.151.1.8.1%3A20130518T182047Z . -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
