[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla...@proton.me --- Comment #13 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** Bug 471839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471839] Dark theme not working, menu element not visible, elements made white
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471839 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 471347 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||micha...@bluewin.ch --- Comment #12 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** Bug 471818 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471818] Darkmode does not work correctly on Windows.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471818 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||aa...@kde.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 471347 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471858] Dark mode UI bug on windows, white text on white background
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471858 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||aa...@kde.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 471347 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xelih70...@fitwl.com --- Comment #11 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** Bug 471858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tofar91...@fitwl.com --- Comment #10 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** Bug 471860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471860] dark mode is not working in okular with windows 11
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471860 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||aa...@kde.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 471347 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 359932] Okular is very slow at opening some EPUB's
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359932 --- Comment #24 from Albert Astals Cid --- "Is anyone working on this atm.?" It's impossible to answer this question with certainty, my guess is "no", but I can't know if some random person that I know nothing about is working on this and will submit a patch tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 --- Comment #9 from Vadim <8bb91edf1...@mail.ru> --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #8) > please update and the issue should be fixed Yes, thanks, problem solved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471347] Windows: Dark Scheme Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471347 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Albert Astals Cid --- please update and the issue should be fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471792] Annotations greatly increase PDF file size and massively slow down Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471792 Joe Breuer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Joe Breuer --- (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #4) > (In reply to Joe Breuer from comment #3) > > What method/tool do you use to obtain this information? > > poppler source package (Often in a binary package like poppler-utils or > poppler-tools) contains pdffonts tool that list all of the fonts in the pdf > file. Ah, that's great to know! > > > With poppler 23.06, adding annotations should grow the document with > > > approximately 600k. With poppler 23.07, it should grow the document with > > > approximately 300 k, assuming noto sans (okular default) is used. > > > > Is that to be expected "per each annotation", or once per adding annotations > > at all, or per annotation type, ...? > > Technically, it is per different font, assuming every font is as big as Noto > Sans and compresses with zlib similar to Noto Sans. Ah thanks, I get it and know where to look now! I've added another example using Okular 23.02.4 (with/against Poppler 23.06.0), and that noticeably keeps a stable file size also when adding multiple annotations. It is somewhat smaller than the Okular 22.12.3/Poppler 23.06.0/built against Poppler 23.01.0 sample, the difference seems to be down to Okular 23 only embedding Noto Sans, not Noto Sans and Noto Sans Regular both. So - for my purposes - Poppler 23.06.0 and possibly Okular 23.02.4 are the required combination for a PDF annotation workflow without... "file size and performance surprises." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471792] Annotations greatly increase PDF file size and massively slow down Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471792 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Joe Breuer from comment #3) > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #1) > > Some versions did embed the same fonts multiple times, and your "big" > > document contains ~140 copies of noto fonts > > What method/tool do you use to obtain this information? poppler source package (Often in a binary package like poppler-utils or poppler-tools) contains pdffonts tool that list all of the fonts in the pdf file. > I've added a corresponding sample: > https://github.com/jmbreuer/heap/tree/main/kde-okular-bug-20230630 That file embeds noto sans and noto sans regular. It seems to have grown with 1.5 mb. For two fonts that's not that much off. > > With poppler 23.06, adding annotations should grow the document with > > approximately 600k. With poppler 23.07, it should grow the document with > > approximately 300 k, assuming noto sans (okular default) is used. > > Is that to be expected "per each annotation", or once per adding annotations > at all, or per annotation type, ...? Technically, it is per different font, assuming every font is as big as Noto Sans and compresses with zlib similar to Noto Sans. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
