https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175485
Luigi Toscano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #7 from Luigi Toscano ---
(In reply to p from comment #6)
> yeap, no answer for years... I replied 2009 and you 3 years later. Do you
> think after 3 years I still have these pdfs?
Maybe we should change the bug template and ask people to *always* attach all
the files needed to reproduce an issue. But this bug has a different history
(see below).
(note: this is mostly for people coming up here in the future)
> But if you don't have the time to
> follow up on bug reports on a timely manner then close bugzilla and don't
> pretent that someone is taking care of bugs. Reporting bugs for KDE and do
> testing is a waste of time.
Please check the history of the bug:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175485
It was originally reported against konqueror, then moved to kpdf, and the
(then) maintainer promptly moved it to kghostview, as the output you reported
in the bug description refers to that program.
IIRC at that point, kghostview was mostly unmaintained already.
Fast forward to 2012, when the remaining kghostview bugs have been assigned
back to Okular, as the official "successor" of kghostview and other programs
(even if Okular does not share kghostview code, but took kghostview role), and
the bug triager asked for some feedback again.
So it's a quite specific case, but I wouldn't say that there have been no
reaction on the bug from the maintainers of Okular (and generally from
maintained programs).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
