[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2016-06-16 Thread via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

sombrag...@sombragris.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sombrag...@sombragris.org

--- Comment #16 from sombrag...@sombragris.org ---
Second this,. A "Typewriter Tool" equivalent (for an explanation in case it's
necessary:
http://documentgeek.blogspot.com/2011/01/acrobat-typewriter-tool-just-embrace-it_05.html)
is something I sorely need to cut ties with the likes of Acrobat.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2016-02-27 Thread ANKIT YADAV via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

ANKIT YADAV  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||any65...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2016-01-16 Thread Simone Gaiarin via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

Simone Gaiarin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||simg...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2016-01-16 Thread Simone Gaiarin via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #15 from Simone Gaiarin  ---
*** Bug 358062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-12-06 Thread noric via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #14 from noric  ---
This is where I asked Poppler's devs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93213
Yesterday I reported your findings to them. Let's see if they can help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-12-03 Thread Sumit Sahrawat via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #11 from Sumit Sahrawat  ---
I looked through the poppler source once again. I realized that even though the
freeText annotation is implemented internally, the poppler-qt4 package doesn't
export it.

Specifically, the Annotation class from poppler-qt4 has a SubType enumeration,
which contains only 15 values. The Annot class from poppler has an AnnotSubtype
enumeration, which contains 27 values. FreeText is one of the values in poppler
but not in poppler-qt4.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-12-02 Thread noric via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #9 from noric  ---
I asked Poppler's devs and they say FreeText is already implemented in Poppler.
They say the actual typewriter tool needs to be implemented by Okular (and
other readers relying on Poppler).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-28 Thread Sumit Sahrawat via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #8 from Sumit Sahrawat  ---
Seems like I underestimated the issues. 2-3 cannot be implemented without
poppler support, sadly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-27 Thread Sumit Sahrawat via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #6 from Sumit Sahrawat  ---
I forgot to mention it here, the review request I made has been merged.

1) There are still some improvements to be made, but the code that was merged
works perfectly when it comes to removing borders. Issue #332887.
2-3) They are valid feature requests, and would make for good junior jobs I
think. I will see if I can get atleast one of them done.
4) I will work on this in the current season of KDE session. Issue #18.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-05 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

Manuel López-Ibáñez  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez  ---
I think this can be approximated already with an inline note with white
background. The downside is that currently is not possible to remove the border
around the note, nor set the background to transparent. If those two things
were possible, it would be exactly what is needed (and perhaps it could be
provided by default).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-05 Thread Gus Gustafson via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

Gus Gustafson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||efelthau...@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Gus Gustafson  ---
Some thoughts:
--What if the color of the "page" is not white? User will have to try to match
the comment background color to page color, as best as possible. This can be
difficult. Transparent background option would be important.
--Also, what will the experience be if there are very many places needing
"typewriter"-type function on a page or document, if using inline comments?
Have to change background color and border width for every one? That can be
very user-unfriendly... Will Okular remember the last-used style setting for
comments, and replicate it for next inline comment?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-05 Thread Sumit Sahrawat via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

Sumit Sahrawat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sumit.sahrawat.apm13@iitbhu
   ||.ac.in

--- Comment #2 from Sumit Sahrawat  ---
I'm working on making the border width customizable, which when set to 0
removes the border entirely.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel


[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

2015-11-05 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401

--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez  ---
(In reply to Gus Gustafson from comment #3)
> --Also, what will the experience be if there are very many places needing
> "typewriter"-type function on a page or document, if using inline comments?
> Have to change background color and border width for every one? That can be
> very user-unfriendly... Will Okular remember the last-used style setting for
> comments, and replicate it for next inline comment?

You can create customized annotation styles. See the Okular Settings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel