Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
---

(Updated May 31, 2016, 12:13 a.m.)


Status
--

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for Okular.


Changes
---

Submitted with commit 32b62e919a6493cca9d5d2b272872b53f9b5e41d by Aleix Pol to 
branch frameworks.


Repository: okular


Description
---

Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
KFileDialog usage that I ported.


Diffs
-

  shell/shell.cpp c97054a 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/


Testing
---

Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf


Thanks,

Aleix Pol Gonzalez

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review96059
---


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Albert Astals Cid


On Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

> On Feb. 10, 2016, 12:23 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's 
> giving me the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious 
> regression to what we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> As I see it, there's no non-_Plasma Experience_. In Gnome, it should use 
> the GTK thingie, in Plasma it should use the Plasma dialog, and on Windows or 
> Android, whatever they use there: so it's not a regression but a feature.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> There's more things in Linux land than Plasma and Gnome, i'm worried 
> about such an ugly dialog for those people.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> Let's create a wiki for them to install the Plasma integration? This way 
> they'll be fixing all of it, not just this precise dialog.
> 
> Or I can discard this review and port it to use KFileWidget. Or 
> undeprecate KFileDialog?
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Any idea why i have 3 commic book entries and 2 PDF entries? 
> http://i.imgur.com/trqsguU.png

PDF is because there's 2 PDF mimetypes supported (?):
```
"application/x-pdf", "application/pdf"
```

There's 3 comic book entries because these 3 mimetypes have the same 
description (!):
```
"application/x-cbz" "comic book archive"
"application/x-cbr" "comic book archive"
"application/x-cbt" "comic book archive"
```

First one could probably be filtered in the okular side, but also should be 
fixed in KIO. In fact, `QMimeType` is smart enough to tell they're the same.

Second one, we can either include the suffix in the description or merge them. 
Opinions?


- Aleix


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On Feb. 9, 2016, 11:23 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's 
> giving me the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious 
> regression to what we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> As I see it, there's no non-_Plasma Experience_. In Gnome, it should use 
> the GTK thingie, in Plasma it should use the Plasma dialog, and on Windows or 
> Android, whatever they use there: so it's not a regression but a feature.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> There's more things in Linux land than Plasma and Gnome, i'm worried 
> about such an ugly dialog for those people.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> Let's create a wiki for them to install the Plasma integration? This way 
> they'll be fixing all of it, not just this precise dialog.
> 
> Or I can discard this review and port it to use KFileWidget. Or 
> undeprecate KFileDialog?

Any idea why i have 3 commic book entries and 2 PDF entries? 
http://i.imgur.com/trqsguU.png


- Albert


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

> On Feb. 10, 2016, 12:23 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's 
> giving me the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious 
> regression to what we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> As I see it, there's no non-_Plasma Experience_. In Gnome, it should use 
> the GTK thingie, in Plasma it should use the Plasma dialog, and on Windows or 
> Android, whatever they use there: so it's not a regression but a feature.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> There's more things in Linux land than Plasma and Gnome, i'm worried 
> about such an ugly dialog for those people.

Let's create a wiki for them to install the Plasma integration? This way 
they'll be fixing all of it, not just this precise dialog.

Or I can discard this review and port it to use KFileWidget. Or undeprecate 
KFileDialog?


- Aleix


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On Feb. 9, 2016, 11:23 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's 
> giving me the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious 
> regression to what we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> As I see it, there's no non-_Plasma Experience_. In Gnome, it should use 
> the GTK thingie, in Plasma it should use the Plasma dialog, and on Windows or 
> Android, whatever they use there: so it's not a regression but a feature.

There's more things in Linux land than Plasma and Gnome, i'm worried about such 
an ugly dialog for those people.


- Albert


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

> On Feb. 10, 2016, 12:23 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's 
> giving me the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious 
> regression to what we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?

As I see it, there's no non-_Plasma Experience_. In Gnome, it should use the 
GTK thingie, in Plasma it should use the Plasma dialog, and on Windows or 
Android, whatever they use there: so it's not a regression but a feature.


- Aleix


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On Feb. 9, 2016, 11:23 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
> KFileWidget-based dialog.

I know i don't have it setup to give me the "Plasma experience", it's giving me 
the "Okular experience outside plasma", and it is a serious regression to what 
we have by using KFileDialog, don't you think?


- Albert


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

> On Feb. 10, 2016, 12:23 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog 
> i guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?

You don't have it set up properly, you should be getting the normal 
KFileWidget-based dialog.


- Aleix


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On Feb. 9, 2016, 11:23 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/
> 
> :)

that won't fix http://i.imgur.com/AwIzhqr.png right? That's the Qt dialog i 
guess? Is it really supposed to be that ugly?


- Albert


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 2:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
---

(Updated Feb. 10, 2016, 3:23 a.m.)


Review request for Okular.


Repository: okular


Description
---

Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
KFileDialog usage that I ported.


Diffs (updated)
-

  shell/shell.cpp c97054a 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/


Testing
---

Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf


Thanks,

Aleix Pol Gonzalez

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

> On Feb. 10, 2016, 12:23 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" 
> > anymore.

https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127024/

:)


- Aleix


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---


On Feb. 9, 2016, 3:51 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 9, 2016, 3:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 4530c33 
>   generators/mobipocket/CMakeLists.txt 87995e3 
>   shell/CMakeLists.txt 7a6af74 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Albert Astals Cid]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92202
---



The new dialog "file type" looks fugly and tehre's no "all file types" anymore.

- Albert Astals Cid


On Feb. 9, 2016, 2:51 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 9, 2016, 2:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 4530c33 
>   generators/mobipocket/CMakeLists.txt 87995e3 
>   shell/CMakeLists.txt 7a6af74 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Kai Uwe Broulik]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/#review92196
---




shell/shell.cpp (lines 401 - 402)


Braces (I guess?)

Also, range-for


- Kai Uwe Broulik


On Feb. 9, 2016, 2:51 nachm., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 9, 2016, 2:51 nachm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
> KFileDialog usage that I ported.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 4530c33 
>   generators/mobipocket/CMakeLists.txt 87995e3 
>   shell/CMakeLists.txt 7a6af74 
>   shell/shell.cpp c97054a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
> I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

[Okular-devel] Review Request 127021: Remove most KDELibs4Support linking

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/
---

Review request for Okular.


Repository: okular


Description
---

Drops KDELibs4Support usage, mostly it wasn't actually used, except for that 
KFileDialog usage that I ported.


Diffs
-

  autotests/CMakeLists.txt 4530c33 
  generators/mobipocket/CMakeLists.txt 87995e3 
  shell/CMakeLists.txt 7a6af74 
  shell/shell.cpp c97054a 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127021/diff/


Testing
---

Opening dialog seems to work fine, tests still pass except for parttest, but 
I'm unsure it's related: https://paste.kde.org/p37pdubgf


Thanks,

Aleix Pol Gonzalez

___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel