Re: [Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
El dilluns, 25 de juliol de 2016, a les 0:40:53 CEST, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > To help with this (and see if I can regain some of my motivation) I'd like > to have an Okular sprint here in Barcelona, tentative dates 8 to 12 of > October, would anyone be able to attend? There seems not much people is interested to attend besides the two guys from Barcelona (Aleix and Albert) so we can just do it on a date that suits us better or just over a regular weekend, etc. Let's put the sprint idea to a pause for now then. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Albert > ___ > Okular-devel mailing list > Okular-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
Re: [Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
As a happy user of the frameworks branch, I will try to join the sprint too so we can get it merged and make a release soon :) On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Two more branches that need attention are gsoc2015_linearization and > gsoc2015_tag_feature, they looked good enough last year when i did the > review > for GSoC but never had time to properly merge them, i do think they needed > some poppler patches too, i can help merging them if someone reviews the > features and they work fine https://github.com/sahebpreet/poppler The > notes i > have are at http://paste.ubuntu.com/20799691/ Maybe the student who worked on this can port it to kf5 so it can be merged *after* we merge the frameworks branch into master? Otherwise, it looks like this (plus other pending reviews) will block the merge for a very long time. ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
Re: [Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
El dilluns, 25 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:42:43 CEST, Olivier Churlaud va escriure: > Hey! > > I'd love to go to Barcelona. If I'm not already having a job or not too > actively searching, I would love to come :) > > What does it mean for the framework branch: do you intend to work on > this there? There where? On the sprint? Depends on who comes and if it happens what we'd be working on. > Or if someone feels like taking care of it, he should? Yes > Not > me, but I see that Martin Sandsmark made a *lot* of fixes. > > Cheers > Olivier > > Le 25/07/2016 à 00:40, Albert Astals Cid a écrit : > > Hi guys, I have come to the obvious realization, at the moment I do not > > have enough stamina to review and take care of what needs to be done for > > Okular, i have 162 unread emails in the Okular mail folder, an order of > > magnitude more than the rest of my other folders combined. > > > > So I've decided to take a break, I've been the stalling factor for some > > reviews and that is bad. Okular currently has 31 open review requests in > > reviewboard, not all of them are waiting for me, but some are, sorry for > > that. > > > > Then there's the dont-use-docdata-for-annots-and-forms branch that Fabio > > [almost] finished years ago. This branch is *very* important since it > > fixes > > the long standing issue with annotations and form content being silently > > saved but only locally and not on the .pdf file itself. Someone with > > energy needs to go over it and see if it's good enough to be merged, my > > hunch is that it is. > > > > Two more branches that need attention are gsoc2015_linearization and > > gsoc2015_tag_feature, they looked good enough last year when i did the > > review for GSoC but never had time to properly merge them, i do think > > they needed some poppler patches too, i can help merging them if someone > > reviews the features and they work fine > > https://github.com/sahebpreet/poppler The notes i have are at > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/20799691/ > > > > And then there's the obvious elephant in the room, I don't feel confident > > on merging the frameworks branch into master because I do not see myself > > having the stamina to make sure everything works well enough, but it > > seems there's people around that do, again I don't want to be the > > stopping factor, > > > > So I will be taking a step sideways and hope for someone to step up with > > all the important work that needs doing. > > > > Obviously I won't be going anywhere, but as I said I don't have much > > energy > > currently, so things on my side will be slow. > > > > To help with this (and see if I can regain some of my motivation) I'd like > > to have an Okular sprint here in Barcelona, tentative dates 8 to 12 of > > October, would anyone be able to attend? > > > > Cheers, > > > >Albert > > ___ > Okular-devel mailing list > Okular-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
Re: [Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, I have come to the obvious realization, at the moment I do not have > enough stamina to review and take care of what needs to be done for Okular, i > have 162 unread emails in the Okular mail folder, an order of magnitude more > than the rest of my other folders combined. > > So I've decided to take a break, I've been the stalling factor for some > reviews and that is bad. Okular currently has 31 open review requests in > reviewboard, not all of them are waiting for me, but some are, sorry for that. > > Then there's the dont-use-docdata-for-annots-and-forms branch that Fabio > [almost] finished years ago. This branch is *very* important since it fixes > the long standing issue with annotations and form content being silently saved > but only locally and not on the .pdf file itself. Someone with energy needs to > go over it and see if it's good enough to be merged, my hunch is that it is. > > Two more branches that need attention are gsoc2015_linearization and > gsoc2015_tag_feature, they looked good enough last year when i did the review > for GSoC but never had time to properly merge them, i do think they needed > some poppler patches too, i can help merging them if someone reviews the > features and they work fine https://github.com/sahebpreet/poppler The notes i > have are at http://paste.ubuntu.com/20799691/ > > And then there's the obvious elephant in the room, I don't feel confident on > merging the frameworks branch into master because I do not see myself having > the stamina to make sure everything works well enough, but it seems there's > people around that do, again I don't want to be the stopping factor, > > So I will be taking a step sideways and hope for someone to step up with all > the important work that needs doing. > > Obviously I won't be going anywhere, but as I said I don't have much energy > currently, so things on my side will be slow. > > To help with this (and see if I can regain some of my motivation) I'd like to > have an Okular sprint here in Barcelona, tentative dates 8 to 12 of October, > would anyone be able to attend? > > Cheers, > Albert Hi Albert, It's unfortunate to read, I'll be happy to join the sprint. Aleix ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
Re: [Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
Hey! I'd love to go to Barcelona. If I'm not already having a job or not too actively searching, I would love to come :) What does it mean for the framework branch: do you intend to work on this there? Or if someone feels like taking care of it, he should? Not me, but I see that Martin Sandsmark made a *lot* of fixes. Cheers Olivier Le 25/07/2016 à 00:40, Albert Astals Cid a écrit : Hi guys, I have come to the obvious realization, at the moment I do not have enough stamina to review and take care of what needs to be done for Okular, i have 162 unread emails in the Okular mail folder, an order of magnitude more than the rest of my other folders combined. So I've decided to take a break, I've been the stalling factor for some reviews and that is bad. Okular currently has 31 open review requests in reviewboard, not all of them are waiting for me, but some are, sorry for that. Then there's the dont-use-docdata-for-annots-and-forms branch that Fabio [almost] finished years ago. This branch is *very* important since it fixes the long standing issue with annotations and form content being silently saved but only locally and not on the .pdf file itself. Someone with energy needs to go over it and see if it's good enough to be merged, my hunch is that it is. Two more branches that need attention are gsoc2015_linearization and gsoc2015_tag_feature, they looked good enough last year when i did the review for GSoC but never had time to properly merge them, i do think they needed some poppler patches too, i can help merging them if someone reviews the features and they work fine https://github.com/sahebpreet/poppler The notes i have are at http://paste.ubuntu.com/20799691/ And then there's the obvious elephant in the room, I don't feel confident on merging the frameworks branch into master because I do not see myself having the stamina to make sure everything works well enough, but it seems there's people around that do, again I don't want to be the stopping factor, So I will be taking a step sideways and hope for someone to step up with all the important work that needs doing. Obviously I won't be going anywhere, but as I said I don't have much energy currently, so things on my side will be slow. To help with this (and see if I can regain some of my motivation) I'd like to have an Okular sprint here in Barcelona, tentative dates 8 to 12 of October, would anyone be able to attend? Cheers, Albert ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
[Okular-devel] Taking a break and an Okular sprint in October
Hi guys, I have come to the obvious realization, at the moment I do not have enough stamina to review and take care of what needs to be done for Okular, i have 162 unread emails in the Okular mail folder, an order of magnitude more than the rest of my other folders combined. So I've decided to take a break, I've been the stalling factor for some reviews and that is bad. Okular currently has 31 open review requests in reviewboard, not all of them are waiting for me, but some are, sorry for that. Then there's the dont-use-docdata-for-annots-and-forms branch that Fabio [almost] finished years ago. This branch is *very* important since it fixes the long standing issue with annotations and form content being silently saved but only locally and not on the .pdf file itself. Someone with energy needs to go over it and see if it's good enough to be merged, my hunch is that it is. Two more branches that need attention are gsoc2015_linearization and gsoc2015_tag_feature, they looked good enough last year when i did the review for GSoC but never had time to properly merge them, i do think they needed some poppler patches too, i can help merging them if someone reviews the features and they work fine https://github.com/sahebpreet/poppler The notes i have are at http://paste.ubuntu.com/20799691/ And then there's the obvious elephant in the room, I don't feel confident on merging the frameworks branch into master because I do not see myself having the stamina to make sure everything works well enough, but it seems there's people around that do, again I don't want to be the stopping factor, So I will be taking a step sideways and hope for someone to step up with all the important work that needs doing. Obviously I won't be going anywhere, but as I said I don't have much energy currently, so things on my side will be slow. To help with this (and see if I can regain some of my motivation) I'd like to have an Okular sprint here in Barcelona, tentative dates 8 to 12 of October, would anyone be able to attend? Cheers, Albert ___ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
