Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

[denghui (L)]

Hello modelers

Below page has been created:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/20180225+Progress+summary

feel free to comment if any update are needed.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 8:48 AM
To: Stephen Terrill ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] nameserver issue

[Joe Kidder]

Harry,
  Do you have an onap_dns server in your setup?  In the heat-based ONAP, it 
looks like there’s an onap_dns server that provides name resolution for the 
various components, and then it may use some openstack DNS service called 
designate to get out to the real world (e.g. 8.8.8.8).  
  Two things that might come out of that - if you just jump out to 8.8.8.8, you 
may not get local name resolution.  Secondly, perhaps the 10.43.0.10 is 
supposed to be the local onap_dns server?  That doesn’t sound like the address 
defaulted in the heat template for ONAP on O.S., however.

Joe

> On Feb 24, 2018, at 1:43 AM, huangxiangyu  wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael
>  
> I’m using OOM Amsterdam branch and found that the nameserver in each 
> container is configured to 10.43.0.10. This address is unreachable and 
> therefore cause package installation failure in pod like heat-bootstrap- 
> under onap-dcaegen2. I can manually change nameserver to 8.8.8.8 to install 
> package but is there a way to configure nameserver to 8.8.8.8 ?
>  
> Thanks
> Harry
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss 
> 
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

[denghui (L)]

Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss