[onap-discuss] [CLAMP][POLICY][DCAE-DS] DCAE-DS vs CLAMP

[Xin Miao]

Hi, RON,

What is the relation between DCAE Design Studio and CLAMP? Is DCAE-DS going to 
replace as the control loop design portal as well as CL monitor and 
provisioner, that also covers Holmes rules and Policy creation?

I do not see any activity and release plan for CLAMP in R3.

Xin Miao
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11968): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11968
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24866759/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

[Keong Lim]

Hi Harish,

I ran that mvn command to build the docker images in aai/resources and 
aai/traversal and both seemed to give BUILD SUCCESS.
However, when I run those containers, there are errors in the logs. Both 
containers give:

===
chown: cannot access '/var/chef': No such file or directory
===

The aai-traversal container has lots of these logs:

===
tee: /opt/app/aai-traversal/logs/misc/updateQueryData.sh.log.2018-08-20: No 
such file or directory
Begin putTool for widget action-1.0.json
/opt/app/aai-traversal/bin/install/updateQueryData.sh[52]: 
/opt/app/aai-traversal/logs/misc/updateQueryData.sh.log.2018-08-20: cannot 
create [No such file or directory]
updateQueryData.sh: failed for 
service-design-and-creation/models/model/af593b4b-490e-4665-ad74-2f6351c0a7ce 
/opt/app/aai-traversal/resources/etc/scriptdata/widget-model-json/action-1.0.json
 on cmd 1
===

Do I need to build more components? Or install more software?

Thanks,
Keong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11967): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11967
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24818784/21656
Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164
Mute #docker: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=docker&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

[Xin Miao]

This really changes the json data format.
If we do it this way, the CL event for previous use cases will have to update 
their documents on CL event description at least.

Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab

From: Guangrong Fu
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L 
(PAM)mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Xin
 
Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-20 19:30:00

Hi Pam,

I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN use 
case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service instances. 
In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in order that 
Policy could digest it?

In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope": 
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a JSON 
object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope": 
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?

Best Regards,
Guagnrong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11966): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11966
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

[Guangrong Fu]

Hi Pam,

I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN
use case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service
instances. In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in
order that Policy could digest it?

In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope":
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a
JSON object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope":
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" :
"service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" :
"service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" :
"service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?

Best Regards,
Guagnrong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11965): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11965
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] License issues with Nexus IQ

[Jessica Wagantall]

Dear ONAP team,

I know few of you have reported license issues in Nexus IQ like this one:

https://jira.onap.org/secure/attachment/12154/Screenshot%202
018-08-20%2010.36.53.png

I have contacted Sonatype Support to verify our product license since this
seems to
be related directly to it. Currently I am still in email exchanges with
them waiting to help me
out with a resolution.

Will let you know once I get an update from them.

Thanks a lot for your patience.
Jess

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11964): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11964
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24829990/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

[Kenny Paul]

As per Subcommittee Chair Elections I am officially opening the self-nomination 
period for the Modeling Subcommittee Chair elections.

The nomination period will end on Friday, Aug 24 @ 2:00 Pm Pacific

 

The members eligible to be a voting member is set to V118 of the Modeling 
Subcommittee Membership Page

I have updated that page, adding a column for Company and a column that says 
"Voting Member", and removing 3 individuals I know are no longer involved with 
ONAP.  One of them never even set up a wiki account.

 

The "Voting Member" column usage is simple. If you are the person from your 
company that will be casting the vote, then put "Yes" in that column. If not, 
leave it blank.

 

Who is eligible to Run: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the wiki 
page) 

Who is eligible to Vote: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the 
wiki page) AND as controlled within the context of Section 4.4.1.4 of the 
Community Document
Process:
Self-Nomination Phase
When appropriate a call for nominations will be sent by the LF to the 
appropriate distribution list, using the subcommittee's specific email tag.  
Individuals interested in running for the Subcommittee Chair position must 
reply-all to that email with your intention to run.  It is recommended that 
candidates include a biography and statement of intent on why you would be a 
good person to hold this position.

·

·
The nomination phase begins with the receipt of the announcement ( as verified 
by checking the appropriate list in groups.io )
The nomination phase ends four (4) full business days after the announcement in 
the same time zone the poll was initiated from
Election Phase
A Condorcet election will be held using the CIVS voting system.  All 
subcommittee members (as indicated above) will receive an invitation to vote.

·

·
The election phase will begin on with the distribution of the CIVS poll via 
email
The election phase will end four (4) full business days later in the same time 
zone the poll was initiated from
 

Election Results 

·

·
The individual receiving the highest number of votes from all votes cast shall 
be declared the winner.
The LF will update the Voting Results History page with their name, date, and 
link to the publicly viewable CIVS results and send an email to the 
distribution list and to onap-tsc
NOTE For the modeling Subcommittee, the decision was made that the Top @ 
finishers in the election would be 
 

 

Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
kp...@linuxfoundation.org, 510.766.5945
San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone

 

 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11963): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11963
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24828833/21656
Mute #modeling: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=modeling&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

[Martial]

There is no way for the time being to do that association, There is development 
needed in Holmes to achieve that.



Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.


 Message d'origine 
De : Xin Miao 
Date : 20/08/18 19:56 (GMT+01:00)
À : "Ngueko, Gervais-Martial" 
Cc : onap-discuss , "SHACHAM, RON" 
, "DRAGOSH, PAM" 
Objet : RE: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp


Thank you for your clarification.

One more question, how does a Homes rule is associated with a control loop from 
CLAMP, or there is no way for the time being?


Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial
To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;SHACHAM,
 RONmailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>;DRAGOSH, 
PAMmailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Subject: RE: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Time: 2018-08-20 12:28:34

Hi,

today, holmes rules in CLAMP is just a drools text. The way mS are configured 
is via a policy, so the holmes rules are sent to Holmes(DCAE) via a policy 
which will contain the drool text as payload for Holmes configuration.
Today that configuration is also supposed to be for the whole Holmes and not 
for a specific Control Loop. This is because of the way Holmes behaves today.

As you can see, the Holmes configuration is an area that needs more design at 
this point, that design will need to be done by Holmes/Policy/DCAE and CLAMP 
team.



Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao 
Sent: lundi 20 août 2018 19:00
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON ; 
DRAGOSH, PAM 
Subject: FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,  Gervais,

How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP  and deployed to 
Holmes?

If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be 
enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com]
Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41
To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, 
RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>
Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,

Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE 
and used by all the mS and all control loops.
So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no 
cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway.
The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the 
control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the 
collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future).

Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>
Subject: New Collector in Clamp

Hi, Gervias,

This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP.  Is there any code change 
to be done in CLAMP  to support  a new type of collector?  If not, what 
template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11962): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11962
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827147/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Problem with helm (server version)

[Michael O'Brien]

Rudolf, 
 In your screencap I see tiller-deploy is "Running" but the  actual tiller 
container in in state: "Terminated" - it has restarted 143 times.
Check you cluster that the host VMs have registered using the correct routable 
IP back to the master
I would expect to see 0/1 in your get pods command

Check that tiller and your cluster is running OK by running the following
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Native+Deployment#CloudNativeDeployment-VerifyyourKubernetesclusterisfunctioningproperly-Tillerisup

I also for openstack VM's usually need to override the derived/computed IP when 
running rancher (but not on AWS)
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/deploy/aws/oom_cluster_host_install.sh#n43
 

An example of a running deployment
ubuntu@a-onap-devops:~$ kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
NAMESPACE NAME   READY STATUS
RESTARTS   AGE
kube-system   heapster-6cfb49f776-9lqt2  1/1   Running   0  
20d
kube-system   kube-dns-75c8cb4ccb-tw992  3/3   Running   0  
20d
kube-system   kubernetes-dashboard-6f4c8b9cd5-rcbp2  1/1   Running   0  
20d
kube-system   monitoring-grafana-76f5b489d5-r99rh1/1   Running   0  
20d
kube-system   monitoring-influxdb-6fc88bd58d-h875w   1/1   Running   0  
20d
kube-system   tiller-deploy-645bd55c5d-bmxs7 1/1   Running   0  
20d
onap  logdemonode-logdemonode-5c8bffb468-phbzd   2/2   Running   0  
20d
onap  onap-log-elasticsearch-7557486bc4-72vpw1/1   Running   0  
20d
onap  onap-log-kibana-fc88b6b79-d88r71/1   Running   0  
20d
onap  onap-log-logstash-9jlf21/1   Running   0  
20d
onap  onap-portal-app-8486dc7ff8-tssd2   2/2   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-portal-cassandra-8588fbd698-dksq5 1/1   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-portal-db-7d6b95cd94-664741/1   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-portal-sdk-77cd558c98-6rsvq   2/2   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-portal-widget-6469f4bc56-hms241/1   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-portal-zookeeper-5d8c598c4c-hck2d 1/1   Running   0  
5d
onap  onap-robot-6f99cb989f-kpwdr1/1   Running   0  
20d
ubuntu@a-onap-devops:~$ kubectl describe pod tiller-deploy-645bd55c5d-bmxs7 -n 
kube-system
Name:   tiller-deploy-645bd55c5d-bmxs7
Namespace:  kube-system
Node:   a-onap-devops/172.17.0.1
Start Time: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 22:20:09 +
Labels: app=helm
name=tiller
pod-template-hash=2016811718
Annotations:
Status: Running
IP: 10.42.0.5
Controlled By:  ReplicaSet/tiller-deploy-645bd55c5d
Containers:
  tiller:
Container ID:  
docker://a26420061a01a5791401c2519974c3190bf9f53fce5a9157abe7890f1f08146a
Image: gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller:v2.8.2
Image ID:  
docker-pullable://gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller@sha256:9b373c71ea2dfdb7d42a6c6dada769cf93be682df7cfabb717748bdaef27d10a
Port:  44134/TCP
Command:
  /tiller
  --v=2
State:  Running
  Started:  Mon, 30 Jul 2018 22:20:14 +
Ready:  True

-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  On Behalf Of 
Rudolf Amirjanyan
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 1:28 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; joe.kid...@5thlayer.com
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Problem with helm (server version)

yes, its running.

 netstat -ntplu |grep 8879

tcp    0  0 127.0.0.1:8879  0.0.0.0:* LISTEN  11372/helm 

attaching screen shot of describe to see more details. --->

kubectl --namespace kube-system describe pod tiller-deploy-f44659b6c-px695

Thanks.



On 08/18/2018 05:07 PM, Joe Kidder wrote:
> Is tiller already running (and using port 8879)?
>
>> On Aug 18, 2018, at 7:53 AM, Rudolf Amirjanyan  wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Who can help me to understand why the tiller stops running at some point.
>>
>> When I run  --> helm serve &
>>
>>
>> root@myserver:/home/onaptest/oom/kubernetes# Regenerating index. This 
>> may take a moment.
>> Now serving you on 127.0.0.1:8879
>> Error: listen tcp 127.0.0.1:8879: bind: address already in use
>>
>> helm status -->
>> Error: could not find a ready tiller pod
>>
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Rudolf
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
>
>

-- 




This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11961): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11961
Mute T

[onap-discuss] Error during service distribution #sdc

[Geora Barsky]

Hello,

I am trying to instantiate vFW service instance

I onboarded vFW VSP and created vFW service in SDC Catalog

 

Next step is the service distribution and service instance creation.

 

I am getting an error  after pressing “Distribute” button.

 

Could you  please advise, what could be the reason and what should I check

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11960): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11960
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24828480/21656
Mute #sdc: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=sdc&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Logging M3 template ready #logging

[Michael O'Brien]

Gildas,
  As per instructions I have posted the M3 template link to this list.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Logging+Casablanca+M3+Deliverables+for+API+Freeze+Milestone+Checklist+Template

  Thank you
   /michael
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11959): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11959
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24828468/21656
Mute #logging: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=logging&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Rerun DCAE2GEN Bootstrap Job #dcaegen2 #oom

[Andreas Geissler]

Hi,
my DCAE2GEN OOM installation did not completely run through, as the boostrap 
job was unsucessfully executed a couple of times.

So finally all the "dep..." Pods could not be created through Cloudify.

Is there a way to manually re-execute the dcae-bootstrap job after that or do I 
need to purge dcaegen2 and reinstall? 

Thanks for your help.

Andreas

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11958): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11958
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827853/21656
Mute #dcaegen2: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=dcaegen2&subid=2740164
Mute #oom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=oom&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

[Xin Miao]

Thank you for your clarification.

One more question, how does a Homes rule is associated with a control loop from 
CLAMP, or there is no way for the time being?


Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial
To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;SHACHAM,
 RONmailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>;DRAGOSH, 
PAMmailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Subject: RE: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Time: 2018-08-20 12:28:34

Hi,

today, holmes rules in CLAMP is just a drools text. The way mS are configured 
is via a policy, so the holmes rules are sent to Holmes(DCAE) via a policy 
which will contain the drool text as payload for Holmes configuration.
Today that configuration is also supposed to be for the whole Holmes and not 
for a specific Control Loop. This is because of the way Holmes behaves today.

As you can see, the Holmes configuration is an area that needs more design at 
this point, that design will need to be done by Holmes/Policy/DCAE and CLAMP 
team.



Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao 
Sent: lundi 20 août 2018 19:00
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON ; 
DRAGOSH, PAM 
Subject: FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,  Gervais,

How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP  and deployed to 
Holmes?

If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be 
enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com]
Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41
To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, 
RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>
Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,

Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE 
and used by all the mS and all control loops.
So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no 
cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway.
The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the 
control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the 
collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future).

Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>
Subject: New Collector in Clamp

Hi, Gervias,

This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP.  Is there any code change 
to be done in CLAMP  to support  a new type of collector?  If not, what 
template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11957): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11957
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827147/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] LAB Upgrade Progress - POD-ONAP-01

[Gooch, Stephen]

Hello,

Over the last 3 days 8 of the 13 compute nodes in the integration lab have been 
upgraded to PIKE.   The plan for the remaining 5 nodes was to upgrade one a day 
to minimize the removal of resources from the lab during the work week.  
However some nova commands associated with adding or modifying configurations 
are blocked while upgrades are in process.   The daily staging stacks need at 
least of these locked commands.   Because of this we will complete the upgrades 
for the 5 remaining nodes in the next few hours.   This will cause a resource 
constraint during this time.

I'll send out an update when the upgrade is complete, and the resources are 
back on line.

Br,
- Stephen

Stephen Gooch | Senior Member of Technical Staff | Wind River
+1.510.965.7909 , Skype ID: stephen.gooch


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11956): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11956
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827197/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

[Martial]

Hi,

today, holmes rules in CLAMP is just a drools text. The way mS are configured 
is via a policy, so the holmes rules are sent to Holmes(DCAE) via a policy 
which will contain the drool text as payload for Holmes configuration.
Today that configuration is also supposed to be for the whole Holmes and not 
for a specific Control Loop. This is because of the way Holmes behaves today.

As you can see, the Holmes configuration is an area that needs more design at 
this point, that design will need to be done by Holmes/Policy/DCAE and CLAMP 
team.



Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao 
Sent: lundi 20 août 2018 19:00
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON ; 
DRAGOSH, PAM 
Subject: FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,  Gervais,

How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP  and deployed to 
Holmes?

If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be 
enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com]
Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41
To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, 
RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>
Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,

Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE 
and used by all the mS and all control loops.
So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no 
cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway.
The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the 
control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the 
collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future).

Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>
Subject: New Collector in Clamp

Hi, Gervias,

This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP.  Is there any code change 
to be done in CLAMP  to support  a new type of collector?  If not, what 
template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11955): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11955
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827147/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [VVP] HEAT template validation

[ss820f]

hi vamshi, would be happy to walk through how to use these scripts and decipher 
the output.

Are you able to join one of our weekly VVP meetings (every Tuesday at 8AM PT)? 
Attendance is usually pretty light and we could spend some time walking through 
the scripts and any other questions you have.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VVP+Project+Team+Meetings

Thanks
Steven

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11954): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11954
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24817862/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

[Xin Miao]

Hi,  Gervais,

How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP  and deployed to 
Holmes?

If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be 
enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]

From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com]
Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41
To: Xin Miao 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON 
Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp

Hi,

Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE 
and used by all the mS and all control loops.
So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no 
cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway.
The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the 
control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the 
collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future).

Br,
Martial

From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14
To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>
Subject: New Collector in Clamp

Hi, Gervias,

This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP.  Is there any code change 
to be done in CLAMP  to support  a new type of collector?  If not, what 
template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11953): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11953
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24826500/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

[Jessie Jewitt]

Hi Xu-
 The link you refer to in your email to Network Service (which I assume
is Descriptor) is not a model that is acceptable to me. I certainly don't
remember voting on this in R2. Here are some of the reasons I personally
cannot accept it:
1. There is no class diagram showing the relationships between entities, so
I don't really know what concepts you are trying to model.
2. The relationship that should exist is between NSD and VirtualLinkDesc,
and not NsVirtualLink. The attribute in NSD called virtualLinkDesc (which
should be the endpoint of the association) is of type string. That is
incorrect.
3. I believe you mean NsVirtualLink to VirtualLinkDesc, as the first
attribute is virtualLinkDescId.
4. Many of the attributes in NSD refer to types that are not defined in the
model (Sapd, Vnffgd, NsDf...)
5. Same comment above regarding NsVirtualLink. It contains types that are
not in your model, like SecurityParameters
6. ConnectivityType, as a datatype, has been moved to our Common model,
which we will need to define as part of our final resource IM in clean, and
not a NSD model. The benefit of putting datatypes like these in "Common" is
that we define them once, and then reference them from multiple models,
like Resource (where NSD lives) and VNF.
7. There is nothing in the model that refers to a VnfExtCp and its
relationship to NSD.

These are just some of the issues.
I believe a better approach is to take the NSD model defined that is based
on ETSI (that addresses the above issues) and pare it down to something
equivalent, if you want.  I'd be happy to update the NSD model to show what
it would look like.

-Jessie


On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:35 AM, yangxu (H)  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Thank you for joining today’s resource IM call and having the meaningful
> discussion.
>
> My apologize for not allocating much time reviewing the NSD model, as M3
> is approaching, I think we need to trigger offline discussion to help
> accelerate the progress.
>
>
>
> The main issue I see for the NSD model is the scope for R3 documentation.
> The current proposal from Jessie is based on IFA014 spec, while the model
> agreed in R2 (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService) is only
> subset of the spec. And whether we need to include PNFD model as part of
> the NSD model (like ETSI does), and how we document the PNFD model in R3
> remains a question.
>
>
>
> My suggestion is we keep aligned with the previous agreement and
> implementation in R3. Which means we only document the trimmed NSD in R3
> and try to capture the PNFD model which would be implemented by the SDC
> team.
>
>
>
> Please share your opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the
> clean model before the deadline, thanks.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xu
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jessie Jewitt
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 7, 2018 3:09 AM
> *To:* onap-discuss 
> *Subject:* [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model
>
>
>
> Please review and provide comments by 8/13 (on the wiki) for the proposed 
> Network
> Service Descriptor
> 
> model. It was aligned with ETSI IFA014 v2.4.4.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jessie
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11952): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11952
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24212025/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Usecase subcommittee - meeting summary for 20/08/2018

[Alla Goldner]

Hi all,

Thanks to all meeting's participants!
Here is the meeting summary:


1.   We discussed a possibility of having dedicated discussions with EUAG 
at the beginning of October, targeting Dublin release requirements. Teams will 
do their best to be prepared with their plans till then

a.   I will approach EUAG members with this request and also question 
raised last time about TOSCA support by VNFs and demand for it

   i.  
Intel/Alex will raise TOSCA support topic at one of the upcoming TSC meetings

 ii.  Scott and 
Alex will have offline discussion on Scaling functionality Roadmap and its 
applicability to a different features developed in parallel

2.   Cloud region ID requirement progress was presented by Bin

3.   OSAM progress was presented by Bora. Bora will also bring their Dublin 
plans and present it at our next meeting

ALL - please bring functional requirements and use cases you plan for Dublin 
submission! (Please let me know in advance - I will schedule it for the next 
meeting)

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D438BC.61B6BD00]

From: Alla Goldner
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:29 PM
To: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 'Yang, 
Bin' ; Bora Eliacik ; 
MAVROGIORGIS, EMMANUIL (EMMANUIL) ; Alex Vul 

Subject: Usecase subcommittee - agenda for 20/08/2018

Hi all,

Here is the agenda for next Monday's meeting:


1.   Status of Casablanca use cases and functional requirements (those we 
were not able to cover this week)

2.   Integration test status (HPA)

3.   Plans for Dublin (also, those we were not able to cover this week)

Use case/functional requirements leads - please prepare the status and, if 
possible, your Roadmap thoughts.


Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D438BC.61B6BD00]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11951): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11951
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24824595/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] CLM CVE links from jenkins CLM jobs stopped working around 1030 due to intermittent IQ sonar license issue?

[Michael O'Brien]

Team,
   30 min ago during the PTL meeting I was able to navigate the CVE links (see 
which later versions of libraries are marked as OK) - no problem
   As of about 30 min ago I am getting a license and more general error with 
the link from the Jenkins CLM  job


https://jira.onap.org/secure/attachment/12153/Screenshot%202018-08-20%2010.34.08.png
https://jira.onap.org/secure/attachment/12154/Screenshot%202018-08-20%2010.36.53.png

/michael
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11950): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11950
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24819369/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

[Xu Yang]

Hi All,

Thank you for joining today’s resource IM call and having the meaningful 
discussion.
My apologize for not allocating much time reviewing the NSD model, as M3 is 
approaching, I think we need to trigger offline discussion to help accelerate 
the progress.

The main issue I see for the NSD model is the scope for R3 documentation. The 
current proposal from Jessie is based on IFA014 spec, while the model agreed in 
R2 (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService) is only subset of the 
spec. And whether we need to include PNFD model as part of the NSD model (like 
ETSI does), and how we document the PNFD model in R3 remains a question.

My suggestion is we keep aligned with the previous agreement and implementation 
in R3. Which means we only document the trimmed NSD in R3 and try to capture 
the PNFD model which would be implemented by the SDC team.

Please share your opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the clean 
model before the deadline, thanks.

Best regards,
Xu

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 3:09 AM
To: onap-discuss 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

Please review and provide comments by 8/13 (on the wiki) for the proposed 
Network Service 
Descriptor
 model. It was aligned with ETSI IFA014 v2.4.4.

Thanks,
Jessie


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11949): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11949
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24212025/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] vcpe depoly customer service failed

[Kang Xi]

Were you able to run 'vcpe.py infra' successfully?

Regards,
Kang

From: ke.liang [mailto:lia...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 2:03
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Kang Xi 
Cc: lxinhui ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: vcpe depoly customer service failed

Hi brian, kang:

There is a  error information as below running 'vcpe.py customer':

Parser found a VNF: vcpe_tunnelxcon_0615 0
Parser found a VNF: vcpe_vgw_0615 0
Parser found a VNF: vcpe_vbgr_0615 0
Parser found a VF module: VcpeVgw0615..base_vcpe_vgw..module-0
Parser found a VF module: VcpeVbgr0615..base_vcpe_vbrgemu..module-0
{
  "requestDetails": {
"cloudConfiguration": {
  "lcpCloudRegionId": "vio",
  "tenantId": "4774d2da496d43b19c10370690e504ec"
},
"modelInfo": {
  "modelInvariantId": "c47005c7-3af3-4238-bc74-de4fc486b84c",
  "modelName": "vcpesvc_rescust_0615",
  "modelType": "service",
  "modelVersion": "1.0",
  "modelVersionId": "32ebf29f-5eb7-440d-bc0c-1d714848cd7a"
},
"owningEntity": {
  "owningEntityId": "520cc603-a3c4-4ec2-9ef4-ca70facd79c0",
  "owningEntityName": "OE-Demonstration"
},
"project": {
  "projectName": "Project-Demonstration"
},
"requestInfo": {
  "instanceName": "vcpe_svc_vcpesvc_rescust_0615_201808201345",
  "productFamilyId": "a9a77d5a-123e-4ca2-9eb9-0b015d2ee0fb",
  "requestorId": "vCPE-Robot",
  "source": "VID",
  "suppressRollback": "true"
},
"requestParameters": {
  "aLaCarte": "false",
  "subscriptionServiceType": "vCPE",
  "userParams": [
{
  "name": "BRG_WAN_MAC_Address",
  "value": "fa:16:3e:8a:a0:90"
},
{
  "name": "Customer_Location",
  "value": {
"customerLatitude": "32.897480",
"customerLongitude": "-97.040443",
"customerName": "some_company"
  }
},
{
  "name": "Homing_Solution",
  "value": "sniro"
}
  ]
},
"subscriberInfo": {
  "globalSubscriberId": "demoinst",
  "subscriberName": "Kaneohe"
}
  }
}
Creating custom service vcpe_svc_vcpesvc_rescust_0615_201808201345.
http://172.30.3.24:8080/ecomp/mso/infra/serviceInstances/v5
Error when checking SO request progress, invalid request ID:

Here is the  output of  testlab_mso_1 docker image  as below :
05:45:14,635 INFO  [stdout] (default task-64) URL : 
http://mso:8080/mso/async/services/CreateVcpeResCustService
05:45:14,805 INFO  [stdout] (Thread-300) createVcpeServiceRequest - 
{"requestDetails":{"modelInfo":{"modelInvariantUuid":"c47005c7-3af3-4238-bc74-de4fc486b84c","modelType":"service","modelName":"vcpesvc_rescust_0615","modelVersion":"1.0","modelUuid":"32ebf29f-5eb7-440d-bc0c-1d714848cd7a"},"requestInfo":{"productFamilyId":"a9a77d5a-123e-4ca2-9eb9-0b015d2ee0fb","source":"VID","instanceName":"vcpe_svc_vcpesvc_rescust_0615_201808201345","suppressRollback":true,"requestorId":"vCPE-Robot"},"subscriberInfo":{"globalSubscriberId":"demoinst","subscriberName":"Kaneohe"},"cloudConfiguration":{"tenantId":"4774d2da496d43b19c10370690e504ec","lcpCloudRegionId":"vio"},"requestParameters":{"alaCarte":false,"subscriptionServiceType":"vCPE","userParams":[{"name":"BRG_WAN_MAC_Address","value":"fa:16:3e:8a:a0:90"},{"name":"Customer_Location","value":{"customerLatitude":"32.897480","customerName":"some_company","customerLongitude":"-97.040443"}},{"name":"Homing_Solution","value":"sniro"}],"aLaCarte":false},"project":{"projectName":"Project-Demonstration"},"owningEntity":{"owningEntityId":"520cc603-a3c4-4ec2-9ef4-ca70facd79c0","owningEntityName":"OE-Demonstration"}}}
05:45:15,038 INFO  [stdout] (AsyncAppender-Worker-asyncEELFError) 05:45:15,038 
|-INFO in c.q.l.core.rolling.DefaultTimeBasedFileNamingAndTriggeringPolicy - 
Elapsed period: Sun Aug 19 12:38:49 UTC 2018
05:45:15,038 INFO  [stdout] (AsyncAppender-Worker-asyncEELFError) 05:45:15,038 
|-INFO in c.q.l.co.rolling.helper.RenameUtil - Renaming file 
[/var/log/ecomp/MSO/RequestDB/errormso.log] to 
[/var/log/ecomp/MSO/RequestDB/errormso.log.2018-08-19]
05:45:15,042 INFO  [org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain] (default 
task-68) Application 
{http://org.openecomp.mso/requestsdb}RequestsDbAdapter#{http://org.openecomp.mso/requestsdb}updateInfraRequest
 has thrown exception, unwinding now: 
org.openecomp.mso.adapters.requestsdb.exceptions.MsoRequestsDbException: 
Request ID does not exist in MSO Requests DB:

Idea how to resolve this? any help is appreciated.







-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11948): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11948
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24807330/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

[Venkata Harish K Kajur]

Hi Keong,

Please run the following command to build the docker image.

mvn -Pdocker clean install -DskipTests

docker.push.registry value is set to localhost:5000
aai.docker.namespace value is set to onap
You can override them by runtime setting those properties.

Thanks,
Harish

-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  On Behalf Of 
Keong Lim
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 9:35 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker 
images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

Hi Jimmy,

I have anUbuntu VM with builds of aai/resources and aai/traversal components.
I also have a local Docker repository for testing.
I found Dockerfiles for example:

./aai-traversal/src/main/docker/Dockerfile
./aai-traversal/target/aai-traversal-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT-build/Dockerfile
./aai-resources/src/main/docker/Dockerfile
./aai-resources/target/aai-resources-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT-build/Dockerfile

but when using the "docker build" command on these, it gives an error for a 
directory not found for a COPY command.

What commands and configuration do I need to build new Docker images and push 
it only to my local Docker repository?

Thanks,
Keong




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11947): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11947
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24818784/21656
Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164
Mute #docker: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=docker&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

[Keong Lim]

Hi Jimmy,

I have anUbuntu VM with builds of aai/resources and aai/traversal components.
I also have a local Docker repository for testing.
I found Dockerfiles for example:

./aai-traversal/src/main/docker/Dockerfile
./aai-traversal/target/aai-traversal-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT-build/Dockerfile
./aai-resources/src/main/docker/Dockerfile
./aai-resources/target/aai-resources-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT-build/Dockerfile

but when using the "docker build" command on these, it gives an error for a 
directory not found for a COPY command.

What commands and configuration do I need to build new Docker images and push 
it only to my local Docker repository?

Thanks,
Keong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11946): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11946
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24818784/21656
Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164
Mute #docker: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=docker&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [VVP] HEAT template validation

[vamshi]

Hi,

I'm trying to validate HEAT files via -  vvp/validation-scripts.  When 
executing python scripts I saw few failures like below.
Wanted to know any wiki documentation on how to understand such failures.

tests/test_fixed_ips_format.py::test_fixed_ips_format[/home/ubuntu/work_vamshi/vFW_testing/base_vfw.yaml]
 FAILED

E   AssertionError: assert not set(['vfw_private_ip_2', 'vpg_private_ip_1', 
'vsn_private_ip_1'])
E+  where set(['vfw_private_ip_2', 'vpg_private_ip_1', 
'vsn_private_ip_1']) = set(['vsn_private_ip_1', 'vpg_private_ip_1', 
'vfw_private_ip_2'])

tests/test_fixed_ips_format.py:124: AssertionError

tests/test_fixed_ips_include_vm_type_network_role.py::test_fixed_ips_include_vm_type_network_role[/home/ubuntu/work_vamshi/vFW_testing/base_vfw.yaml]
 FAILED
tests/test_nova_servers_vm_types.py::test_vm_type_consistent_on_nova_servers[/home/ubuntu/work_vamshi/vFW_testing/base_vfw.yaml]
 FAILED
.
.

Would appreciate any suggestions/insights. Many thanks.


Thanks & Regards,

Vamshi Krishna | Tech Mahindra














Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html 
 externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html 
 internally within 
TechMahindra.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11945): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11945
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24817862/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

[LinMeng]

Hi all,

I’ve already changed the item 6 in the minutes to :

For R4+, the relationship between Service template and Network Service Template 
would bette be guided jointly by Architecture and Modeling subcommittee, for 
NSD in R3, please Maopeng’s help to propose to SDC and check whether it could 
be acceptable in SDC for such new node type.

 

Best regards,

Lin

---

 

Meng Lin

Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D

China Mobile Research Institute

No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

 

Mobile: +86 13810012241

Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com

-

 

 

 

发件人:  代表 "denghui (L)" 
答复: , 
日期: 2018年8月20日 星期一 15:58
收件人: LinMeng 
抄送: "'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
主题: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

 

Hi Menglin

 

For Item 6:, I would suggest to revise it as below:

6: For R4+, the relationship between Service template and Network Service 
Template would bette be guided jointly by Architecture and Modeling 
subcommittee, for NSD in R3, please Maopeng’s help to propose to SDC and check 
whether it could be acceptable in SDC for such new node type.

 

Thanks a lot

 

DENG Hui

 

 

From: LinMeng [mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com] 


Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

 

Hi all,

This is the minutes of Service IM Call on Wednesday. Please check and make sure 
that we have consensus on it.



1. Yan presents VFC requirements for NSD. VFC project implement ETSI NFVO, 
which needs to consume the NSD. VFC also needs standard NSD. VFC would like to 
receive the NSD from SDC. In the long run, VFC also needs to receive NSD from 
OSS and BSS.
2. YangXu presents NSD updates from the resource IM calls ?Proposed Network 
Service Descriptor Model?. From his understanding of previous calls of reousrce 
IM CALL, NS is a composition of VNFs, VLs and topology of how to construct a 
service, which are all in the domain of resource. NS is different from the 
service we want ONAP to handle.
3. From Lingli and Andy's discussion: For IM, we agreed to move NSD to resource 
domain for Casablanca. But for Dublin+, there are considerations on having also 
service domain reflection on resources (including network service).
4. MaoPeng presents NSD proposal: NSD requires to do some limitation in NFV 
resoures composition, not all the SDC resources and substitution mappings to NS 
TOSCA node.
5. Currently we are working on enabling interworking commercial NFVO deployment 
with ONAP community version
6. Agreed to continue with a special service type for network service design 
and distribution to be supported by SDC/SO/VFC for Casablanca.

 

Best Regards,

Lin

---

孟琳

人工智能和智慧运营研发中心

中国移动通信有限公司研究院

中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

 

Meng Lin

Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D

China Mobile Research Institute

No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

 

Mobile: +86 13810012241

Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com

-

 

 

 

发件人:  代表 LinMeng 
答复: , 
日期: 2018年8月15日 星期三 14:44
收件人: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , Yan Yang 
, "yangxu (H)" , maopeng 
, "Katzman, Anatoly" 
抄送: 邓灵莉 , "denghui (L)" 
主题: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Agenda]

 

Hi all,

For today’s service IM call, we will continue the remaining agenda of 
yesterday’s modeling subcommittee call,  will mainly focus on NSD/SD Discussion:

1.  VFC requirements for NSD (Yan Yang)

2.  Resource/Service IM decision on NSD  (Xu Yang)

3. NSD Proposal (Maopeng Zhang)

4. Service DM proposal (Anatoly Katzman)

5. NSD/SD next step

 

Thanks!

 

Best regards,

Lin

 

---

孟琳

人工智能和智慧运营研发中心

中国移动通信有限公司研究院

中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

 

Meng Lin

Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D

China Mobile Research Institute

No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

 

Mobile: +86 13810012241

Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com

-

 

 

 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11944): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11944
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24576204/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

[denghui (L)]

Hi Menglin

For Item 6:, I would suggest to revise it as below:
6: For R4+, the relationship between Service template and Network Service 
Template would bette be guided jointly by Architecture and Modeling 
subcommittee, for NSD in R3, please Maopeng’s help to propose to SDC and check 
whether it could be acceptable in SDC for such new node type.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: LinMeng [mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com]

Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

Hi all,
This is the minutes of Service IM Call on Wednesday. Please check and make sure 
that we have consensus on it.

1. Yan presents VFC requirements for 
NSD. VFC 
project implement ETSI NFVO, which needs to consume the NSD. VFC also needs 
standard NSD. VFC would like to receive the NSD from SDC. In the long run, VFC 
also needs to receive NSD from OSS and BSS.
2. YangXu presents NSD updates from the resource IM calls ?Proposed Network 
Service Descriptor 
Model?.
 From his understanding of previous calls of reousrce IM CALL, NS is a 
composition of VNFs, VLs and topology of how to construct a service, which are 
all in the domain of resource. NS is different from the service we want ONAP to 
handle.
3. From Lingli and Andy's discussion: For IM, we agreed to move NSD to resource 
domain for Casablanca. But for Dublin+, there are considerations on having also 
service domain reflection on resources (including network service).
4. MaoPeng presents NSD 
proposal: 
NSD requires to do some limitation in NFV resoures composition, not all the SDC 
resources and substitution mappings to NS TOSCA node.
5. Currently we are working on enabling interworking commercial NFVO deployment 
with ONAP community version
6. Agreed to continue with a special service type for network service design 
and distribution to be supported by SDC/SO/VFC for Casablanca.

Best Regards,
Lin
---
孟琳
人工智能和智慧运营研发中心
中国移动通信有限公司研究院
中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

Meng Lin
Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

Mobile: +86 13810012241
Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com
-



发件人: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> 代表 
LinMeng mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>>
答复: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com>>
日期: 2018年8月15日 星期三 14:44
收件人: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yan Yang 
mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>, "yangxu (H)" 
mailto:yang...@huawei.com>>, maopeng 
mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>>, "Katzman, 
Anatoly" mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>
抄送: 邓灵莉 mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>, 
"denghui (L)" mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
主题: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Agenda]

Hi all,
For today’s service IM call, we will continue the remaining agenda of 
yesterday’s modeling subcommittee call,  will mainly focus on NSD/SD Discussion:

1.  VFC requirements for NSD (Yan Yang)

2.  Resource/Service IM decision on NSD  (Xu 
Yang)

3. NSD Proposal (Maopeng Zhang)

4. Service DM proposal (Anatoly 
Katzman)

5. NSD/SD next step



Thanks!



Best regards,

Lin

---
孟琳
人工智能和智慧运营研发中心
中国移动通信有限公司研究院
中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053）

Meng Lin
Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R&D
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen west street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

Mobile: +86 13810012241
Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com
-





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11943): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11943
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24576204/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]- Configuring VNF with CLI

[Chandra]

Thanks Taka for  your response.  I have few more queries .

1.   Do we have any specific schema defined against which the CLI templates 
are validated?

2.   Would you  be able to share any sample format of CLI templates that 
CDT  expects?

3.   Do we have any tutorials available to demonstrate how CLI can be used 
to configure VNF(both design time APPC-CDT and runtime with APPC APIs like 
Configure)?

4.   Is it possible to use CLI as protocol for ConfigScaleout action?


Regards
Chandrashekhar Thakare

From: CHO, TAKAMUNE [mailto:tc0...@att.com]
Sent: 13 August 2018 22:10
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Chandrashekhar Thakare 

Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [APPC]- Configuring VNF with CLI

Hi Chandrashekhar

Sorry for the late response,

Please see inline comment

Taka

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Chandra
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 1:00 PM
To: CHO, TAKAMUNE mailto:tc0...@att.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]- Configuring VNF with CLI

Thanks a lot Taka for your response.

Yes I am looking for CLI template support from APPC-CDT.  To elaborate it in 
more detail -The end goal is to connect the VNF via SSH and apply the 
predefined configuration with set of commands.

In order to achieve this, I was looking to utilize APPC capabilities -
Design time Capabilities - Onboard the VNF with CLI templates containing set of 
commands and the parameters require for specific configuration. Currently;  
APPC -CDT provides the protocol option as CLI and I hope we can define the 
parameter definitions and also the templates( set of commands).  However; there 
is no tutorial to demonstrate the CLI protocol support. I have attended Scott's 
session but it demonstrates how Netconf can be utilized.
Run time Capabilities - Invoke the APPC's Configure API to perform 
configuration on VNF via SSH (The username and password at the design time) . 
This will in turn utilize the templates( set of commands) pre-defined during 
design time and append the values supplied under the payload in configure 
request.


The queries are -

1.   Can we use the CDT to define parameter definition and the templates 
containing set of commands which VNF vendor recommends?
YES

2.   Can we define multiple templates against the same action. For e.g. for 
same VNF type, I may apply different configurations based on how this VNF being 
utilized under E2E service.
YES

3.   If answer of above query is Yes then , How these different templates 
can be picked up while configuration is invoked via rest API?  What 
differential factor we could provide in the Configure request?
You can test multiple templates via CDT. But each time you have to upload the 
template before you start Configuration. Runtime will always pick up the latest 
template from db. If you upload multiple templates at a time before testing 
Configuration then it will pick up only the latest template. So, upload the 
template each time before you start configuration


4.   Do we have generic CLI adapter which assists to run the Command 
templates on VNF?  Would it utilize appc-ssh-adapter?
Would you please elaborate more details about this?


Thanks
Chandrashekhar Thakare

From: CHO, TAKAMUNE [mailto:tc0...@att.com]
Sent: 09 August 2018 19:35
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; CHO, 
TAKAMUNE mailto:tc0...@att.com>>; Chandrashekhar Thakare 
mailto:ct00548...@techmahindra.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [APPC]- Configuring VNF with CLI

Chandrashekhar

There is a link: 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5734727
 on 7/9, Scott had a demo for APPC/CDT.

Let me know you need more help

Taka

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of CHO, TAKAMUNE
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 9:50 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; CHO, 
TAKAMUNE mailto:tc0...@att.com>>; 
ct00548...@techmahindra.com
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]- Configuring VNF with CLI

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi,

Let me rephrase my answer.

CDT is a self-onboard GUI for VNF. But if you are referring to use CLI template 
to APPC, then yes. APPC does the support.

Taka

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of CHO, TAKAMUNE
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 8:20 AM
To: onap-discuss@li