[onap-discuss] [dcae][ves][bbs] VES Event ID
Hi, Ben, One question: - In 5G use cases, how the PNF-Registration Event ID field is actually used based on its computing rule or does it really matter? In case of BBS, the event ID is defined as such: o unique per CPE/ONT proxied - incremented as described, which follows the definition here<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/5G+-+PNF+Plug+and+Play#id-5G-PNFPlugandPlay-STAGE3-PNFREGISTRATIONVESEVENT>. oIn case of ONT Re-registration, will the digital portion of the eventId need to be reset? How significantwill it be if we do not do re-set at all? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15463): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15463 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29737276/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [dcae][policy][control loop] FW: Manual Creation of Policy Models
Perfect! Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Liam Fallon [mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech] Sent: 2019年2月7日 AM 9:18 To: Xin Miao ; DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) ; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY ; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL Cc: Swarup Nayak ; Kedar Ambekar ; Atul Shegokar ; Liam Fallon ; Nowak, Damian (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) ; david.perezcapar...@swisscom.com Subject: Re: [dcae][policy][control loop] FW: Manual Creation of Policy Models Hi Xin, Yes, the plan is to unify everything so that CLAMP will support APEX policies. Best Regards Liam On 07/02/2019 15:15, Xin Miao wrote: Hi, Pam, Thanks for your clarification. That is the part I missed. We will have the operational policy defined and make it a complete ‘open loop’. @Liam, CLAMP will support it in Dublin if we define an APEX policy for this operational one, correct? Of course, we are going to have configuration policies defined for RCC, VES Mapper, PRH in the same service model along with this one. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com] Sent: 2019年2月7日 AM 9:02 To: Xin Miao <mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY <mailto:vv7...@att.com>; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL <mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com> Cc: Swarup Nayak <mailto:swarup.nay...@huawei.com>; Kedar Ambekar <mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>; Atul Shegokar <mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>; Liam Fallon <mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>; Nowak, Damian (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <mailto:damian.no...@nokia.com> Subject: Re: [dcae][policy][control loop] FW: Manual Creation of Policy Models Xin, I would not consider that an “Open Loop”. It is an incomplete Control Loop because the DCAE mS will be generating CL event messages that the Policy Framework will not have a policy for. This is poor practice to leave something so open ended and I will not support it. Our definition of an Open Loop requires at least an Operational Policy in this format: # Copyright 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved # # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. # You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. controlLoop: version: 1.0.0 controlLoopName: ControlLoop-Open-fac4ae3d-c3f5-4bab-8e54-0a8581ede132 services: - serviceName: Service resources: - resourceType: VF resourceName: Example trigger_policy: final_openloop timeout: 0 policies: You should at least have this Operational Policy loaded. The Drools understands this and can support it. Regards, Pam From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Date: Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 9:58 AM To: "VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY" mailto:vv7...@att.com>>, "NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL" mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>>, "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>> Cc: Swarup Nayak mailto:swarup.nay...@huawei.com>>, Kedar Ambekar mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>>, Atul Shegokar mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>>, Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>>, "Nowak, Damian (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)" mailto:damian.no...@nokia.com>> Subject: RE: [dcae][policy][control loop] FW: Manual Creation of Policy Models Hi, VJ, Thanks for the quick answer. I prefer to go through SDC and CLAMP for the deployment. My question here is the if there is no operational policy associated with the workflow, can we still deploy the MS through CLAMP since it is not really a ‘closed’ loop conceptually but an ‘open’ one instead? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [id:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY [mailto:vv7...@att.com] Sent: 2019年2月7日 AM 8:51 To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>>; DRAGOSH, PAM mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>> Cc: Swarup Nayak mailto:swarup.nay...@huawei.com>>; Kedar Ambekar mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>>; Atul Shegokar mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>>; Liam
Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs]
Martial/Pam, Thank you for your clarification! Xin Miao From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2019年1月31日 AM 8:03 To: DRAGOSH, PAM ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Xin Miao ; Liam Fallon ; Liam Fallon Cc: VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] To be more précised with my example with 1 service and 4 vnf, you will have a total of 4 CL(blueprints) in the service (one for each vnf). Martial From: DRAGOSH, PAM Sent: jeudi 31 janvier 2019 14:57 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech>>; Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>> Cc: onap-...@groups.io<mailto:onap-...@groups.io>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] For Policy there is no limitation on the number of control loops you can have. All the use cases in ONAP that have control loops should be able to work together in one Drools controller. But we recommend separate Drools controllers for each for simplicity. Pam From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of "NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL" mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>> Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL" mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>> Date: Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 8:49 AM To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>, Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech>>, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>> Cc: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>, "onap-...@groups.io<mailto:onap-...@groups.io>" mailto:onap-...@groups.io>>, "VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY" mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Currently there is an historic limitation in CLAMP which means you can only have one blueprint per vnf in a service. Meaning if you have one service with 4 vnf, you can only associate one blueprint and therefore on CL for each vnf. We plan to remove that limitation in Dublin. Secondly for a given blueprint(for a vnf inside a service, see previous remark), you can only deploy it once in DCAE, meaning you cannot make several deployment of the same “blueprint_id”(identifier of the blueprint) in DCAE(which makes sense actually). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: jeudi 31 janvier 2019 14:36 To: Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>> Cc: DRAGOSH, PAM mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>; Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>>; onap-...@groups.io<mailto:onap-...@groups.io> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] Thanks, I think it is the case but just want to make sure. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao From: Liam Fallon [mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech] Sent: 2019年1月31日 AM 4:53 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; Liam Fallon mailto:liam.fal...@ericsson.com>> Cc: DRAGOSH, PAM mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL mailto:gervais-martial.ngu...@intl.att.com>>; onap-...@groups.io<mailto:onap-...@groups.io> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] Hi Xin, My understanding is that multiple control loops are supported but it would be best to get a response from Martial or Pam on this question. Best Regards Liam On 31/01/2019 05:21, Xin Miao wrote: Hi, Liam, One quick question: - By design, does ONAP support multiple closed loops instantiated for one ONAP service instance? If yes, is it supported in Casablanca? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15268): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15268 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29603461/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs]
Thanks, I think it is the case but just want to make sure. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao From: Liam Fallon [mailto:liam.fal...@est.tech] Sent: 2019年1月31日 AM 4:53 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Xin Miao ; Liam Fallon Cc: DRAGOSH, PAM ; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL ; onap-...@groups.io Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] Hi Xin, My understanding is that multiple control loops are supported but it would be best to get a response from Martial or Pam on this question. Best Regards Liam On 31/01/2019 05:21, Xin Miao wrote: Hi, Liam, One quick question: - By design, does ONAP support multiple closed loops instantiated for one ONAP service instance? If yes, is it supported in Casablanca? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15262): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15262 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29603461/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs] Service Instance vs Closed Loops
Added subjective to the message… From: Xin Miao Sent: 2019年1月30日 PM 11:21 To: 'Liam Fallon' Cc: DRAGOSH, PAM ; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL ; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; onap-...@groups.io Subject: [closed loop][policy][bbs] Hi, Liam One quick question: - By design, does ONAP support multiple closed loops instantiated for one ONAP service instance? If yes, is it supported in Casablanca? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15255): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15255 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29603491/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [closed loop][policy][bbs]
Hi, Liam, One quick question: - By design, does ONAP support multiple closed loops instantiated for one ONAP service instance? If yes, is it supported in Casablanca? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15254): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15254 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29603461/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario
That is VES Collector, maybe. Either way, some component on the path needs to do it. I just thought UVA may be the logic place to generate the eventId since that is where the VES Event is finally built. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Cloudify Network OSDT Standard Development Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Kedar Ambekar [mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com] Sent: 2019年1月24日 AM 8:46 To: Xin Miao ; Atul Shegokar Cc: Pooja Rajkumar Malik Subject: RE: VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario Hi Xin Miao, For SNMP collector, eventID is currently same hardcoded string on mapper side for all the events. If I remember right, Alok from ATT had mentioned in a DCAE call that, collector will add a field for it which Mapper will use. May be we can talk on this with Vijay. KeDar Ambekar | Network Services | Tech Mahindra * Desk: +91 20 66018100 x 2879 Mobile: +91 95616 50414 From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:11 PM To: Kedar Ambekar mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>>; Atul Shegokar mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>> Cc: Pooja Rajkumar Malik mailto:pm00501...@techmahindra.com>> Subject: RE: VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario Hi, Kedar, How the eventID is mapped in case of SNMP? I think VES Mapper need to handle all VES related logic. Restconf Collector has no idea of VES Event. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Cloudify Network OSDT Standard Development Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Kedar Ambekar [mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com] Sent: 2019年1月24日 AM 7:12 To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; Atul Shegokar mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>> Cc: Pooja Rajkumar Malik mailto:pm00501...@techmahindra.com>> Subject: RE: VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario Hi Xin Miao, Thanks. One comment on �C eventId// “cpe_Authentication_y” generated by VES Mapper We can’t have any programming logic in the mapping file. Suggest you add a field for eventId in the payload published by RCC. Mapper will pick that value. Btw, do you not have defined VES events for these 2 notifications ? KeDar Ambekar | Network Services | Tech Mahindra * Desk: +91 20 66018100 x 2879 Mobile: +91 95616 50414 From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 10:30 PM To: Atul Shegokar mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com>>; Kedar Ambekar mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>> Cc: Pooja Rajkumar Malik mailto:pm00501...@techmahindra.com>> Subject: RE: VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario Hi, Atul, Please see my answer down below. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Cloudify Network OSDT Standard Development Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Atul Shegokar [mailto:as00500...@techmahindra.com] Sent: 2019年1月23日 AM 7:41 To: Kedar Ambekar mailto:ake...@techmahindra.com>>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: Pooja Rajkumar Malik mailto:pm00501...@techmahindra.com>> Subject: RE: VES Mapper enhancement for BBS Nomadic ONT Scenario Hi Xin Miao, Can you please us with the questions we have mentioned below ? 1. vendorName Maps to AAI equip-vendor used when registering the PNF Are you suggesting to take this field value from AAI ? Mapper is currently not talking to AAI and no plans to do that as such. [xmiao]: Vendor Name directly mapped to Huawei since the mapping rule XML is per vendor and distinguished by the rule_id. Correct? 2. Which field from input payload to refer to for populating these fields in VES event ? Don’t see required input fields for these. eventId// “cpe_Authentication_y” generated by VES Mapper sourceName // “target” reportingEntityName // ..optional (ignore for now) serialNumber// from content.Gateway.gatewaySN) modelNumber // …optional (ignore for now) newState/oldState:// from content.Gateway.state(… if ‘state’ is ‘Online’ then mapping to ‘In-service’, etc) [xmiao]: Need to remove pnfRegistrationFields and put the attributes to additionalFields in your below example for CPE Authentication and those will be mapped from the content.gateway. As per the CPE Authentication VES Event table, VES event could look something like below. But we need to know from where to get values of V
[onap-discuss] [oom] Helm Installation failure
Hi, Team, Please help. After I ran 'helm del -purg ' and then ran 'helm install local/onap -n --namespace onap' again. I received the following error: 'Error: release faild: object is being deleted: persistentvolumes "-dbc-pd-data1" already exists' Please help. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao Cloudify Network OSDT Standard Development Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5700 Tennyson Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13813): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13813 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28181198/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] # of topicSink > 1 Error
Hi, Vidya, If the problem is still there, feel free to post an help request to onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> with label [policy][ccvpn] in the subjective along with the exceptional error message in the mail body. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12558): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12558 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25835890/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [sdc][dcae-ds]
Hi，Seb, Thank you for your quick response. Could you point me to the how-to of attaching a blueprint to a VF in SDC? BTW, you meant the blueprint for each of the DCAE component to be manually created first, right? Is there an example of a complete CL blueprint? Thanks a lot. Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> From: Determe, Sebastien To: onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Subject: RE: [sdc][dcae-ds] Time: 2018-08-31 03:52:07 Hi, Unless I’m mistaken, you can’t, as DCAE-ds is not part of the Beijing release. I’m not even sure it will be delivered in Casablanca You have to create manually the blueprint and attach it to a VF in SDC, then deploy it Seb From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Xin Miao Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 7:52 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [sdc][dcae-ds] Anybody knows how to enable DCAE-DS plugin in SDC at the portal in Beijing Release? Or, point me to the right documents or demo? Has anyone really use DCAE-DS to create CL blueprint for CLAMP in R2? Thanks a lot! ________ Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12179): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12179 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25137075/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [sdc][dcae-ds]
Anybody knows how to enable DCAE-DS plugin in SDC at the portal in Beijing Release? Or, point me to the right documents or demo? Has anyone really use DCAE-DS to create CL blueprint for CLAMP in R2? Thanks a lot! Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12176): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12176 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25137075/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [clamp][policy][control-loop]
Hi, Adam, Thanks for the instructions on Clamp configuration. One more question: Is there a user guid or how to for DCAE-Design Studio at SDC? Clamp migrates to DCAE-DS. Correct? In Beijing release, can use see DCAE-DS tab at SDC by default? Thanks, Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> 2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab From: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) To: SHACHAM, RONmailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>;onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re: [clamp][policy](control-loop] Time: 2018-08-28 03:16:30 Hi Xin, Please check out applicationProperties.json in clamp. There is a param called clamp.config.files.globalProperties. By default it's assigned to file globalProperties.json and I suppose this is file you're looking for. To use other recipe than those defined in globalProperties.json just edit it. In case you don't want to build new image you can pass external params to spring app. Here you have documentation: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-external-config.html 24. Externalized Configuration - Spring Framework<https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-external-config.html> docs.spring.io Spring Boot lets you externalize your configuration so that you can work with the same application code in different environments. You can use properties files, YAML files, environment variables, and command-line arguments to externalize configuration. If you're using OOM external parameters are passed to clamp already. Check out file oom/kubernetes/clamp/values.yaml. You can base on clamp.config.files.sdcController. Br, Adam Krysiak Software Engineer MN MANO RD&Pz ONAP-UI-ML DEVOPS WRO 2 SG Nokia Contact number: +48691441316 ____ From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org on behalf of Xin Miao Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 9:00:57 PM To: SHACHAM, RON; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [clamp][policy](control-loop] Hi, Ron, On CLAMP, is there a way by configuration to enable new recipe(s) and/or new actors from which a user can select at operational policy creation and CL deployment or code has to be changed at CLAMP to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12140): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12140 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25106819/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [clamp][policy](control-loop]
Hi, Ron, On CLAMP, is there a way by configuration to enable new recipe(s) and/or new actors from which a user can select at operational policy creation and CL deployment or code has to be changed at CLAMP to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12085): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12085 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24976943/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [Policy][Control-loop] Delay Policy Execution
Hi, Folks, Have we ever had a requirement or thought that user can control the execution of a recipe by some delay, say, delaying some action by certain amount of time at operational policy execution? And it can be controlled through Policy creation/configuration, i. e., by adding in another dimension/parameter of 'delay time' into operational policy? I have not seen a definition of this or any examples from the existing use cases. Any idea? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12055): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12055 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24945664/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
One way of addressing this is that in case like this we may ‘provision’
(instead of hard coding) or modeling the policy triggering in a way that
analytics or correlation component in general can publish multiple events
driven by the output of the AAI loop up/query to DMAAP to trigger policy
multiple times one time per service instance.
This could lead to CL requirement that supports any future use cases that one
alarm from lower layer may affect multiple services at higher layer, i. e,
one CL multiple service instances cases.
Some thoughts.
Thanks,
Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab
From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;Guangrong
Fumailto:steven20...@gmail.com>>
Cc:
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: Re: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-21 06:15:21
I will not entertain such drastic change which will endanger the use cases that
the Policy team did commit to.
The point of the CL event is to identify the SINGLE VM or VNF that is having
issues. The Operational Policies express what services/vms/vnfs are going to be
taken action upon, not the CL event.
There are many other reasons which I will not go into on this thread.
Pam
From: Xin Miao
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 10:54 PM
To: Guangrong Fu , "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)"
Cc: onap-discuss , guobiaomo
, "fu.guangrong"
Subject: RE: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
This really changes the json data format.
If we do it this way, the CL event for previous use cases will have to update
their documents on CL event description at least.
Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab
From: Guangrong Fu
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L
(PAM)mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Cc:
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Xin
Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-20 19:30:00
Hi Pam,
I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN use
case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service instances.
In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in order that
Policy could digest it?
In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope":
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}
Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a JSON
object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope":
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}
If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?
Best Regards,
Guagnrong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11973): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11973
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [Policy][DCAE][Holmes] CCVPN CL Test Steps for Phase 1
Let’s continue with this thread for input as well as tracking all the issue discussion during the Pair and/or E2E CCVPN test. Thanks. Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: Rama Subba Reddy Smailto:rama.subba.redd...@huawei.com>>;莫国彪mailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Vidyashree Ramamailto:vidyashree.r...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Time: 2018-08-20 11:40:06 Please follow https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Developer+Best+Practices What you create should follow the tutorials underneath this wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R3+Deploying+and+Debugging+the+Policy+Platform Pam From: Xin Miao Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:21 PM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" Cc: Rama Subba Reddy S , 莫国彪 , Vidyashree Rama Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Pam, We are modifying drools-applications code to support CCVPN closed loop with new SO recipes. What will be the best way for us to conduct our unit or module test? Is there any instruction or wiki page that we can follow? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [id:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com] Sent: 2018年8月20日 AM 7:20 To: Xin Miao Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Abatement is optional �C but you should specify that in the policy so the policy enforcement knows to not wait for it. We know that sometimes it is difficult in the DCAE side to determine if an abatement has happened, thus we enabled that option in the Policy Operational YAML specification. Just be sure that we don’t get subsequent ONSET’s after we have done all the SO work. If that is not possible then utilize a Frequency Limiter Guard policy as a last resort to prevent the whole process from being initiated immediately after it was done. I would test and develop everything first, see how the system works before going down that route. Pam From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:03 AM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>> Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Pam, For CCVPN Closed loop phase 1 runtime test step below. Do the last 3 steps have to be there? Or, these Abated steps/events processing are optional? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image002.jpg@01D43882.DC5BE1A0] From: Xin Miao Sent: 2018年8月19日 PM 10:59 To: Rama Subba Reddy S mailto:rama.subba.redd...@huawei.com>>; Vidyashree Rama mailto:vidyashree.r...@huawei.com>> Cc: Gaurav agrawal mailto:gaurav.agra...@huawei.com>>; yuchaode mailto:yucha...@huawei.com>> Subject: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Rama/Vidya, The following are the closed loop test steps at runtime: * Link between TP1 from site A and TP2 from site B is brought down * ACTN from site A sends TP1 Status ‘down’ notification to Restconf collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP * ACTN from site B sends TP2 Status ‘down’ notification to the same Restconf collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP * Both of the notifications are consumed by VES Mapper and converted to VES Fault_Route_Status events. * Holmes receives the two events * Holmes does correlation of the two events and generate one signature event and sends it to Policy * Policy triggers operational policy and healing action is sent to SO * SO deletes the associated 3 service instances. * SO recreates these 3 service instances again over a new link between TP3 and TP4 across site A and site B Need to decide about if the following steps has to be done at the closed loop: (may not be necessary ??) * Service ‘up’ notifications are sent from ACTN when service is recovered. * Holmes does the event correlation and sends Clear signature event to Policy * Policy stops the healing action Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image002.jpg@01D43882.DC5BE1A0] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11972): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11972 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24875324/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [CLAMP][POLICY][DCAE-DS] DCAE-DS vs CLAMP
Hi, RON, What is the relation between DCAE Design Studio and CLAMP? Is DCAE-DS going to replace as the control loop design portal as well as CL monitor and provisioner, that also covers Holmes rules and Policy creation? I do not see any activity and release plan for CLAMP in R3. Xin Miao xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11968): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11968 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24866759/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
This really changes the json data format.
If we do it this way, the CL event for previous use cases will have to update
their documents on CL event description at least.
Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab
From: Guangrong Fu
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L
(PAM)mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Cc:
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Xin
Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-20 19:30:00
Hi Pam,
I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN use
case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service instances.
In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in order that
Policy could digest it?
In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope":
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}
Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a JSON
object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope":
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName":
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}
If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?
Best Regards,
Guagnrong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11966): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11966
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Thank you for your clarification. One more question, how does a Homes rule is associated with a control loop from CLAMP, or there is no way for the time being? Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> 2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;SHACHAM, RONmailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>;DRAGOSH, PAMmailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>> Subject: RE: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Time: 2018-08-20 12:28:34 Hi, today, holmes rules in CLAMP is just a drools text. The way mS are configured is via a policy, so the holmes rules are sent to Holmes(DCAE) via a policy which will contain the drool text as payload for Holmes configuration. Today that configuration is also supposed to be for the whole Holmes and not for a specific Control Loop. This is because of the way Holmes behaves today. As you can see, the Holmes configuration is an area that needs more design at this point, that design will need to be done by Holmes/Policy/DCAE and CLAMP team. Br, Martial From: Xin Miao Sent: lundi 20 août 2018 19:00 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON ; DRAGOSH, PAM Subject: FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervais, How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP and deployed to Holmes? If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41 To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway. The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>> Subject: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervias, This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP. Is there any code change to be done in CLAMP to support a new type of collector? If not, what template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11957): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11957 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827147/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] FW: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Hi, Gervais, How exactly Holmes rule is going to be created from CLAMP and deployed to Holmes? If a new recipe from Policy drools-applications is implemented, how will it be enabled at CLAMP to be selected at policy creation? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41 To: Xin Miao Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway. The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>> Subject: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervias, This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP. Is there any code change to be done in CLAMP to support a new type of collector? If not, what template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11953): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11953 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24826500/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp
What is the relation between the blueprint of each individual MS and the blueprint of a control loop? The CL blueprint is built from the individual ones? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: LUCAS, JOHN (JACK) [mailto:jflu...@research.att.com] Sent: 2018年8月9日 AM 7:52 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL ; Xin Miao ; JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) ; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY ; Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) Cc: SHACHAM, RON (RON) Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Yes, a blueprint can contain multiple nodes, each representing a microservice. It can also contain one or more policy nodes for each microservice, assuming that the microservice has been designed to be configured via policy. Jack Lucas From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 4:52 PM To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) mailto:l...@research.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>>; Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON (RON) mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Vijay, Lusheng, I feel your clarifications are lacking some aspects, because a blueprint is theoretically related to a complete Control-Loop flow and not just One micro-service. So can you give even more clarification on that aspect, meaning today is it possible to have a blueprint representing a complete control-loop flow with several micro-service ,each of the micro-service being configurable via a policy? Also today are those dynamic micro-service configurable by policy? meaning is there a policy-model existing for each of those micro-service? Thanks, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: mercredi 8 août 2018 18:55 To: JI, LUSHENG mailto:l...@research.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>>; Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp HI, Lusheng, Very nice review and background introduction. Really appreciated! Ron, Is there any document on how the blueprint template for each DCAE component works? How multiple blueprints for the same micro-services are grouped per control loop deployment? We can see and provide the blueprints for a component to repo. Can we run the bootstrap manually to launch a control loop for testing or demo purpose? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) [mailto:l...@research.att.com] Sent: 2018年8月8日 AM 9:48 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON (RON) mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Miao, More details following what Vijay said. DCAE service components (collectors, analytics, etc) can be deployed in two ways: 1. Dynamic deployment: CLAMP triggered deployment. CLAMP tells DCAE to deploy a particular blueprint, which specifies a set of service components for realizing a particular service design. These components are then launched from DCAE platform. Life cycle and configuration of dynamically deployed components can be managed from CLAMP and Policy. 1. Static deployment: deployed at ONAP startup time by DCAE bootstrap process. A startup script will call Cloudify Manager for deploying preloaded blueprints, each specifies a set of DCAE service components, and resulting these DCAE service components launched at this bootstrap. These components can be managed for c
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp
HI, Lusheng, Very nice review and background introduction. Really appreciated! Ron, Is there any document on how the blueprint template for each DCAE component works? How multiple blueprints for the same micro-services are grouped per control loop deployment? We can see and provide the blueprints for a component to repo. Can we run the bootstrap manually to launch a control loop for testing or demo purpose? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) [mailto:l...@research.att.com] Sent: 2018年8月8日 AM 9:48 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY ; Xin Miao ; NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL ; Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) Cc: SHACHAM, RON (RON) Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Miao, More details following what Vijay said. DCAE service components (collectors, analytics, etc) can be deployed in two ways: 1. Dynamic deployment: CLAMP triggered deployment. CLAMP tells DCAE to deploy a particular blueprint, which specifies a set of service components for realizing a particular service design. These components are then launched from DCAE platform. Life cycle and configuration of dynamically deployed components can be managed from CLAMP and Policy. 1. Static deployment: deployed at ONAP startup time by DCAE bootstrap process. A startup script will call Cloudify Manager for deploying preloaded blueprints, each specifies a set of DCAE service components, and resulting these DCAE service components launched at this bootstrap. These components can be managed for configuration and lifecycle by DCAE, but they are not known in CLAMP and Policy therefore cannot be reconfigured through CLAMP. Dynamic deployment has been the intention of DCAE and static deployment as testing methodology for our internal uses. However, because CLMAP has not been part of the ONAP automated testing and use flows, we use static deployment for all DCAE service components (including TCA for use cases other than vCPE) for ONAP R1 and R2 testing flows. Only in R2 the TCA instance used by R2 vCPE use case is dynamically deployed by CLAMP because that testing flow allows manual intervention. For any service components (including the new restconf collector) to be dynamically deployed, it will need to be on-boarded to SDC. That is, the DCAE service component’s TOSCA model is added to SDC catalog. Then someone uses SDC Design Studio to make a DCAE service design. SDC will generate a blueprint template for as the result and push to DCAE. At run-time someone will use CLAMP GUI to trigger the deployment of this blueprint. Because dynamic deployment involves multiple project teams, the best forum for discussing the details is Pam’s Close Loop subcommittee. Also Ron Shacham (cc-ed) worked through the TCA for vCPE use case. He would be the person most knowledgeable in the whole process of walking a blueprint through the steps. Thanks, Lusheng Ji From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of "VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY" mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY" mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 9:44 AM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>" mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>, "NGUEKO, GERVAIS-MARTIAL" mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>, "Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)" mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Just to clarify, any services in DCAE can be deployed dynamically. Only TCA is handled via CLAMP currently though (models/blueprint are pre-loaded in SDC/CLAMP to distribute/deploy). All the other services when onboarded through SDC/Tosca_lab can be instantiated dynamically. For VESCollector, we have blueprint which takes topics an input. This blueprint can be loaded into SDC catalog manually and distributed by designer/clamp operator on demand to support specific control loop if required. However as the collectors are generic (not tied to specific usecase) – they can be shared across different CL cases as done in R1/R2. Thanks, Vijay From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-discuss@
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Understood. Thanks a lot for the clarification. How about Policy? CLAMP only creates new policy and deploys them. Does CLAMP support to create more than one policy chaining (sequential action type of operational policy )per control loop at design time? Thanks, Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> 2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial To: onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com>> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Time: 2018-08-08 07:22:52 Hi Xin, I confirm what Adam said. At this stage you will need to create a new blueprint with the correct DMAAP configuration and then distribute it to CLAMP so that it can be deployed. Note that on-demand collector deployment is not supported by DCAE itself at this point, so it has to be supported by DCAE first before CLAMP can support it. Also, one Holmes instance per Control Loop is not supported by Holmes/DCAE, so this is also an area that will need Holmes/DCAE support before it can be done via CLAMP. Br, Martial From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Xin Miao Sent: mardi 7 août 2018 16:41 To: Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Linda, Please refer to the following CCVPN Close Loop wiki page for the Restconf collector in DCAE session from the high level. The page is under construction. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Close+Loop<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_CCVPN-2BClose-2BLoop&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=_9Jlwl24cXmOrt_XOMKtC3aGkkZwuKoKxSPqhA05BWk&m=IzLUgi1XcssgabsQcEs8UPGkBv0u3uWH7wPhwDGCqUQ&s=EsuXrJpKYwWKffGDgInJnQV23gU__Zxvw73KGXB19QI&e=>. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) [mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com] Sent: 2018年8月7日 AM 9:01 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp What is a Restconf Collector and for what types of events is it used? How is it different from the normal VES Collector? Linda --- Linda S. Horn, DMTS ATF Architecture Open RAN Initiatives Mobile Networks, Nokia Phone: +1-908-679-6580 From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Xin Miao Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 9:47 AM To: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) mailto:adam.krys...@nokia.com>>; Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Sébastien Determe mailto:sd3...@intl.att.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Thanks, Adam. In my case, I am using an new type of collector, Restconf collector (going to be added into DCAE), and Holmes. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) [mailto:adam.krys...@nokia.com] Sent: 2018年8月7日 AM 8:40 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; Sébastien Determe mailto:sd3...@intl.att.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi Xin, I will try to answer your question, please someone correct me if I'm wrong. Deploy of closed loop means that Clamp will send request to DCAE platform to start new instance of TCA (may be different tool but Clamp UI supports only TCA and Holmes). You're writing that you want to receive different event data so I assume you're not interested in measurements. It means you have to use other type of analytic to
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Hi, Linda, Please refer to the following CCVPN Close Loop wiki page for the Restconf collector in DCAE session from the high level. The page is under construction. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Close+Loop. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Horn, Linda (Nokia - US/Murray Hill) [mailto:linda.h...@nokia.com] Sent: 2018年8月7日 AM 9:01 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Xin Miao Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp What is a Restconf Collector and for what types of events is it used? How is it different from the normal VES Collector? Linda --- Linda S. Horn, DMTS ATF Architecture Open RAN Initiatives Mobile Networks, Nokia Phone: +1-908-679-6580 From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Xin Miao Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 9:47 AM To: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) mailto:adam.krys...@nokia.com>>; Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Sébastien Determe mailto:sd3...@intl.att.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Thanks, Adam. In my case, I am using an new type of collector, Restconf collector (going to be added into DCAE), and Holmes. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) [mailto:adam.krys...@nokia.com] Sent: 2018年8月7日 AM 8:40 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>; Sébastien Determe mailto:sd3...@intl.att.com>> Cc: SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>>; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY mailto:vv7...@att.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi Xin, I will try to answer your question, please someone correct me if I'm wrong. Deploy of closed loop means that Clamp will send request to DCAE platform to start new instance of TCA (may be different tool but Clamp UI supports only TCA and Holmes). You're writing that you want to receive different event data so I assume you're not interested in measurements. It means you have to use other type of analytic tool (I will call it AT) then those already available. It's your AT's responsibility to pull events from DMaaP. From Clamp perspective it's transparent what's the event type and topic. Clamp will just send configuration parameters before deployment. Unfortunately currently using own AT is not supported by Clamp. Br, Adam Krysiak Software Engineer MN MANO RD&Pz ONAP-UI-ML DEVOPS WRO 2 SG Nokia Contact number: +48691441316 ____ From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: Saturday, August 4, 2018 6:43:56 PM To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SHACHAM, RON; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp So at runtime if I want to bring up new instance of control loop that would have the VES collector receiving different event data and publish them on DMAAP with different topics from existing control loop, what I am going to do? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41 To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Thanks, Adam. In my case, I am using an new type of collector, Restconf collector (going to be added into DCAE), and Holmes. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Krysiak, Adam (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) [mailto:adam.krys...@nokia.com] Sent: 2018年8月7日 AM 8:40 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Xin Miao ; Sébastien Determe Cc: SHACHAM, RON ; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE][control-loop]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi Xin, I will try to answer your question, please someone correct me if I'm wrong. Deploy of closed loop means that Clamp will send request to DCAE platform to start new instance of TCA (may be different tool but Clamp UI supports only TCA and Holmes). You're writing that you want to receive different event data so I assume you're not interested in measurements. It means you have to use other type of analytic tool (I will call it AT) then those already available. It's your AT's responsibility to pull events from DMaaP. From Clamp perspective it's transparent what's the event type and topic. Clamp will just send configuration parameters before deployment. Unfortunately currently using own AT is not supported by Clamp. Br, Adam Krysiak Software Engineer MN MANO RD&Pz ONAP-UI-ML DEVOPS WRO 2 SG Nokia Contact number: +48691441316 From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: Saturday, August 4, 2018 6:43:56 PM To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SHACHAM, RON; VENKATESH KUMAR, VIJAY Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp So at runtime if I want to bring up new instance of control loop that would have the VES collector receiving different event data and publish them on DMAAP with different topics from existing control loop, what I am going to do? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41 To: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SHACHAM, RON mailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway. The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>> Subject: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervias, This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP. Is there any code change to be done in CLAMP to support a new type of collector? If not, what template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11711): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11711 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24220548/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
So at runtime if I want to bring up new instance of control loop that would have the VES collector receiving different event data and publish them on DMAAP with different topics from existing control loop, what I am going to do? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial [mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com] Sent: 2018年7月30日 PM 3:41 To: Xin Miao Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; SHACHAM, RON Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway. The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial mailto:gn4...@intl.att.com>> Subject: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervias, This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP. Is there any code change to be done in CLAMP to support a new type of collector? If not, what template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11666): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11666 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23863753/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-discuss] [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp
Thanks a lot for the clarification! Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 E: xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> 2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab From: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;SHACHAM, RONmailto:rshac...@research.att.com>> Subject: [CLAMP][DCAE]RE: New Collector in Clamp Time: 2018-07-30 15:41:20 Hi, Currently collector’s are not deployed on-demand, they are pre-deployed in DCAE and used by all the mS and all control loops. So the collector’s, currently, are not deployed via CLAMP and there is no cloudify blueprint available to do so anyway. The collector box you see in CLAMP GUI is just a virtual box to show the control loop flow, in reality there is no configuration made by CLAMP for the collector(at least at this stage of ONAP, it might change in the future). Br, Martial From: Xin Miao Sent: lundi 30 juillet 2018 21:14 To: Ngueko, Gervais-Martial Subject: New Collector in Clamp Hi, Gervias, This is Xin Miao from Huawei and I am new to CLAMP. Is there any code change to be done in CLAMP to support a new type of collector? If not, what template or configuration files need to be created or updated to support it? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11537): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11537 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23863753/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [ves] Build Failure
Dcaegen2/collectors/ves build failure: -- Step to reproduce: 1. Git clone dcaegen2 from gerrit.onap.org 2. Git clone dcaegen2/collectors gerrit.onap.org 3. Git clone dcaegen2/collectors/ves gerrit.onap.org 4. Do maven build - 'mvn clean install' - at dcaegen2 // Failed without modifying the pom.xml file 5. Do maven build - 'mvn clean install' - at dcaegen2/collectors // Failed without modifying the pom.xml file and commenting out the SETTINGSFILE checking from the *.sh scripts 6. Do maven build - 'mvn clean install' - at dcaegen2/collectors/ves // Failure encountered still All the above were done sequentially after onap/oparent was built successfully in a clean environment on a Ubuntu server. Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 xin.m...@huawei.com<mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420] ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
