Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hi Stephen,

As discussed in last time breakout session, the intention is both, for open 
source project, we don't have guideline, it is more standard's way like 3GPP or 
ETSI, it will delay at least our release for 3 or 6 months without modeling 
spec.
I will update other 2 revisions tomorrow, thanks a lot for your comments

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 7:13 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc 
Subject: RE: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hi Deng hui,

Regarding the modelling delivery, is this expectation in line with the 
expectation from the projects about who publishes what, and how do you see that 
working?  In the expected deliverables, is it the information models or data 
models or both?

Could I suggest a few wording changes in the scope.  I understand the 
intention, but they could be interpreated more broadly.
*Purpose:
*Publish Guidelines 
  -> publish modelling guidelines
*Facilitate model reviews
*Publish models
*Curate approved models (model lifecycle management, e.g., versioning)
*Coordinate adoption/use across projects -> 
coordinate model adoption/use across projects
*Alignment with industry standards-> 
Alignment with industry standards for modelling.
Scope:
-I thought that parsers were the responsibility of the ONAP modelling 
project, not the sub-committee?
BR,

Steve


From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: 14 June 2017 12:06
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc >
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all.

Thanks Chris Donley for kindly help to simplified the wording on the wiki page,
If that is possible, we would like to request an approval in tomorrow during 
TSC meeting
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:13 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
>
Cc: onap-tsc >
Subject: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[Stephen Terrill]

Hi Deng hui,

Regarding the modelling delivery, is this expectation in line with the 
expectation from the projects about who publishes what, and how do you see that 
working?  In the expected deliverables, is it the information models or data 
models or both?

Could I suggest a few wording changes in the scope.  I understand the 
intention, but they could be interpreated more broadly.
* Purpose:
* Publish Guidelines
   -> publish modelling guidelines
* Facilitate model reviews
* Publish models
* Curate approved models (model lifecycle management, e.g., versioning)
* Coordinate adoption/use across projects -> 
coordinate model adoption/use across projects
* Alignment with industry standards-> 
Alignment with industry standards for modelling.
Scope:

 *   I thought that parsers were the responsibility of the ONAP modelling 
project, not the sub-committee?
BR,

Steve


From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: 14 June 2017 12:06
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all.

Thanks Chris Donley for kindly help to simplified the wording on the wiki page,
If that is possible, we would like to request an approval in tomorrow during 
TSC meeting
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:13 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
>
Cc: onap-tsc >
Subject: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss