Re: [onap-tsc] URGENT: ONAP Casablanca RC2 Vote
+1 Yan Chen China Telecom -- 原始邮件 --发件人：Kenny Paul "kp...@linuxfoundation.org"时 间：2018/11/28 01:05:21 星期三收件人："onap-tsc-v...@lists.onap.org" "onap-tsc-v...@lists.onap.org"抄送人：主 题：[onap-tsc] URGENT: ONAP Casablanca RC2 Vote (bcc to onap-tsc list for general visibility) We were just about to go to a vote on RC2 when everyone was dropped from the bridge. Unable to regain quorum following the disconnect, an email vote must be taken. Does the TSC approve the recommendations made during the Nov. 27th TSC RC2 Review meeting that all projects pass the RC2 milestone? +1, 0, -1 _._,_._,_ Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4193) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [arch...@mail-archive.com] _._,_._,_
Re: [onap-tsc] URGENT M4 Milestone Approvals Needed by 6AM Pacific, Monday Sept. 24.
+1 all Best Regards Yan Chen -- 此邮件发自189邮箱客户端，安全、高效管理邮箱http://t.mail.189.cn/rcyyzhw Kenny Paul 写到： (bcc'd to onap-tsc for visibility) TSC Members - There are two separate items you are voting on in this message. If you approve both you can respond with "+1 all", otherwise please respond to each item independently. VOTE #1: Does the TSC confirm the Release Manager's recommendations for projects which have the met the M4 checklist requirements as presented in today's TSC meeting and documented here ( https://wiki.onap.org/pages/worddav/preview.action?fileName=ONAP+Casablanca+Release+Checklist+V41.pdf&pageId=41422254 ) as passing the M4 milestone? +1, 0, -1 VOTE #2: Does the TSC agree to grant projects which failed to meet the M4 checklist requirements as presented in today's TSC meeting and documented here ( https://wiki.onap.org/pages/worddav/preview.action?fileName=ONAP+Casablanca+Release+Checklist+V41.pdf&pageId=41422254 ) a one-week extension to meet the M4 milestone? +1, 0, -1 _._,_._,_ Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3714) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [arch...@mail-archive.com] _._,_._,_
Re: [onap-tsc] CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: ONAP TSC ELECTION
Dear ONAP Community, I would like to self-nominate for the ONAP TSC election, representing China Telecom (Platinum Service Provider Seat). In the past 2 years, I have been serving on the open source communities extensively, including the contribution to ODL,working as the Open-O project TSC, and leading China Telecom contributions in ONAP Benchmark sub-Project. Meanwhile our team established ONAP Lab at China Telecom, successfully achieved vCPE use case E2E connection based on ONAP Beijing Release. Also I was the main contact for the past Casablanca Developer Event hosted in Beijing. And currently, I am ONAP EUG member and LFN MAC member, created and kept promoting the ONAP Tencent Channel. I would enjoy the opportunity to continue working in the ONAP community as a TSC representative, and engage myself in improving ONAP maturity and accelerating its potential adoption by operators as the de-facto automation platform. Please refer to below link for my Bitergia stats as an active community/code contributor: https://onap.biterg.io/goto/229c081f65d6ab8285c664cf117a82e6 Short Bio: I am a Project Manager at China Telecom Beijing Research Institute and have worked in the telecommunications industry for more than 10 years, including the past 4 years focused on SDN/NFV, mobile network and cloud. Currently I am a core member of the team for architecture and service enabling design of future operation support platform. Thank You & All the Best Yan Chen China Telecom Email: chenyan@chinatelecom.cn -- 原始邮件 --发件人：Kenny Paul "kp...@linuxfoundation.org"时 间：2018/07/18 08:02:36 星期三收件人：onap-tsc "ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org"抄送人：主 题：[onap-tsc] CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: ONAP TSC ELECTION Nominations for seats on the ONAP TSC officially open @ 17:00 Pacific Time, Tuesday, July 17, 2018 If you are interested in running for a seat on the TSC, please read all of this information carefully Who is eligible to Run: Any Active Community Members as of 17:00 Pacific Time, Tuesday, July 17, 2018- There is NO limit to the number of candidates from any single company that can run for a seat. 4.1.1.1 TSC Membership Definitions Active Community Member: Anyone from the ONAP community with twenty (20) or more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, inclusive of code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA activities Self-Nomination Phase Individuals interested in running for a TSC position MUST REPLY-ALL TO THIS ORIGINAL EMAIL with your intention to run before 17:00 Pacific time, July 31st. NOTE: Replying to another candidate's self-nomination email announcing your own self-nomination is considered a blatant disregard for open source community norms. If you do that, you should probably re-assess both your qualifications and motivations for leading a collaborative community such as this. Your self-nomination email must include a link to your stats in Bitergia (instructions on how to do this). It is strongly recommended that candidates also include a small head-shot, a short biography and statement of intent on why you would be a good person to hold a seat on the TSC. As a courtesy, it is also requested that you fill in the 2018 TSC Election Candidates wiki page with that same information. Filling out the wiki page is NOT in lieu of sending the email as required, but it will greatly help facilitate the process of the elections. Special Provision for the original 9 ONAP Operators: There are 9 seats reserved for the nine original ONAP Platinum Service Provider members. Each of these Operators is REQUIRED to have at least one person nominate themselves for their seat on the TSC. If and only if an Operator does not have any eligible Active Community Members at the time of nomination process, they may appoint a nominee to run in the election. In such cases, the nominee must indicate that they are exercising a provisional nomination in their email. (Refer to 4.2.3.2 TSC Member Candidates) · · The nomination phase begins 17:00 Pacific Time, Tuesday, July 17, 2018 · The nomination phase ends 17:00 Pacific Time, Tuesday, July 31, 2018 · Election Phase Who is eligible to Vote: Any Active Community Members as of 17:00 Pacific Time, Tuesday, July 17, 2018 A Condorcet election will be held using the CIVS voting system. Active Community Members will receive an invitation to vote from CIVS. · The election phase will begin with the distribution of the CIVS poll via email from the application · The election phase will end two (2) weeks later in the same time zone the poll was initiated from Election Results · The election of TSC Members shall consist of a single stack ranked vote of all candidates Only the top ranked candidates from any single company will be elected; if the top 10 vote getters are all from the same co
Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-tsc-private] Lab and Intgeration
Dear TSC, >From the above discussions we learned the opinions of the ONAP members on Open >Lab. As Xiaojun mentioned, China Telecom would like to provide a physical lab >for ONAP. Actually, in last year, China Telecom has already established a >Physical Lab for Open-O mercury release, and finished the E2E connection test >for vCPE extension use case. In the near future, a Physical Lab is still important and necessary, especially for operators with intention to deploy operational systems to manage not only the NFV networks/VNFs but also PNFs. China Telecom is going to introduce SDN techniques in our Backbone Network, e.g. Segment routing and TE. In this case, SDN enabled Physical Network and a corresponding Lab is our scope of works. I would suggest to build up multiple labs, including Virtual labs and Physical labs, and solving connectivity issues under integration team/LF governance, in order to address on different use cases covering most of the operators interests. Best Regards Chen Yan 发件人: xiexj...@chinatelecom.cn [mailto:xiexj...@chinatelecom.cn] 发送时间: 2017年5月23日,星期二 09:56 收件人: Deng邓灵莉/Lingli; roberto.k...@orange.com <mailto:roberto.k...@orange.com> ; Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA); Christopher.Donley; 'Jason Hunt'; MAZIN E GILBERT; sunqiong.bri 抄送: tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org <mailto:tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org> ; SPATSCHECK, OLIVER \(OLIVER\); 'Yunxia Chen' 主题: Re: Re: [onap-tsc-private] Lab and Intgeration China Telecom also has a lab for OPEN-O. Based on this lab, China Telecom is willing to provide a physical lab for ONAP too. Best Regards, Xiaojun From: Lingli Deng <mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com> Date: 2017-05-23 09:05 To: roberto.k...@orange.com <mailto:roberto.k...@orange.com> ; 'Haiby, Ranny \(Nokia - US/San Jose USA\)' <mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com> ; 'Christopher Donley \(Chris\)' <mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com> ; 'Jason Hunt' <mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> ; ma...@research.att.com <mailto:ma...@research.att.com> CC: tsc-private <mailto:tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org> ; spatsch <mailto:spat...@research.att.com> ; 'Yunxia Chen' <mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc-private] Lab and Intgeration China Mobile is willing to provide a physical lab too, based on the existing OPEN-O lab and do enhancement as needed. Lingli From: onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of roberto.k...@orange.com <mailto:roberto.k...@orange.com> Sent: 2017年5月23日 8:28 To: Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA) mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com> >; Christopher Donley (Chris) mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com> >; Jason Hunt mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> >; ma...@research.att.com <mailto:ma...@research.att.com> Cc: Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com> >; tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org <mailto:tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org> ; spat...@research.att.com <mailto:spat...@research.att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc-private] Lab and Intgeration Orange is willing to provide a physical lab with connectivity from remote, or be part of the set up of the virtual lab. I think that what is important is to have clear specification of what is required (Open-O experience would help) asap, so that we can start to implement. This may be independent from the integration project if it allows us to be more efficient. RK PS: actually, today we have an operation lab that is shared (from our internal research, our work with universities to our testing for deployment). So the set up would be done marginally. We need to see the tooling of course. De : onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-private-boun...@lists.onap.org] De la part de Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA) Envoyé : mardi 23 mai 2017 02:03 À : Christopher Donley (Chris); Jason Hunt; ma...@research.att.com <mailto:ma...@research.att.com> Cc : tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org <mailto:tsc-priv...@lists.onap.org> ; spat...@research.att.com <mailto:spat...@research.att.com> ; Yunxia Chen Objet : Re: [onap-tsc-private] Lab and Intgeration Chris, You actually bring up an excellent point. In order to demonstrate and test real life scenarios we will need to tie in physical equipment. However, it may not be practical to have all the necessary physical equipment in the lab. Therefore a more practical approach could be providing connectivity from the lab to physical equipment located on an operator or vendor premise. This could be done using some sort of VPN or secure tunnels over the internet. Consider the vVoLTE use case. It could be possible to test a
