Re: [onap-tsc] Comments about Holmes

2017-06-07 Thread roberto.kung
Thanks for your comments. This will be discussed and decided at the TSC. Best 
regard. Roberto

De : fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn [mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn]
Envoyé : mercredi 7 juin 2017 16:42
À : KUNG Roberto OLN/QOP
Cc : t...@lists.onap.org
Objet : 答复: Comments about Holmes


Hi Roberto,



Thanks for your information.



For the overlap, I have to clarify again that although Holmes and Policy are 
both based on Drools, the goal of them is totally different. Holmes is targeted 
to find out the correlation among tens of thousands (even more) of alarms while 
Policy is aimed to which action should be taken to accomplish 
auto-scaling/auto-healing tasks. I think systems should be defined by what 
their functions rather than the technologies they adopt.



Besides, to make our systems easier to maintain, we have to hold on to the 
Single Responsibility Principle. If we merge Holmes with Policy, the logic of 
the policy rules will get much more complicated, which makes it rather hard to 
trace or fix the problem/bug if any occurs in the futher.



For the reasons above, I still suggest we make Holmes an independent project in 
ONAP.



Guangrong








原始邮件
发件人: <roberto.k...@orange.com>;
收件人:付光荣10144542;
抄送人: <t...@lists.onap.org>;
日 期 :2017年06月07日 04:17
主 题 :Comments about Holmes


https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Initial+Project+Proposal+Feedback+From+the+TSC.
 I have seen that you have taken into account our feedback.  I have provided a 
summary below.


· Clarity: Project description and scope are clear.

· Overlap: It is felt that the project should be split and combine with 
DCAE (for the correlation engine), Policy engine (for Drools), and CLAMP (for 
designing the open loop).

· Risk management: this addition to other projects should be discussed 
with other projects with the objective to add mature/production level code in 
R1, or could be targeted to subsequent  Rs if delivery may be felt difficult

· Relevance and prioritization: this is relevant to the ONAP release.

I hope this will help with your preparations for next week’s meeting.

Roberto

_
  Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites 
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez 
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les 
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute 
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.  This 
message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information 
that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied 
without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be 
altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or 
falsified. Thank you.






_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc


[onap-tsc] Comments about Holmes

2017-06-06 Thread roberto.kung
Dear Guangrong,

TSC members reviewed the Holmes project.  We would like to provide feedback 
with the goal of streamlining project reviews and approval next week.

Our detailed feedback is available on the wiki: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Initial+Project+Proposal+Feedback+From+the+TSC.
 I have seen that you have taken into account our feedback.  I have provided a 
summary below.


  *   Clarity: Project description and scope are clear.
  *   Overlap: It is felt that the project should be split and combine with 
DCAE (for the correlation engine), Policy engine (for Drools), and CLAMP (for 
designing the open loop).
  *   Risk management: this addition to other projects should be discussed with 
other projects with the objective to add mature/production level code in R1, or 
could be targeted to subsequent Rs if delivery may be felt difficult
  *   Relevance and prioritization: this is relevant to the ONAP release.

I hope this will help with your preparations for next week's meeting.

Roberto

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc


[onap-tsc] Feedback about DCAE

2017-06-06 Thread roberto.kung
Dear Lusheng

TSC members reviewed the DCAE project.  We would like to provide feedback with 
the goal of streamlining project reviews and approval in Beijing.

Our detailed feedback and questions are available on the wiki: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Initial+Project+Proposal+Feedback+From+the+TSC.
 You have already with your comments given some answers to the TSC. I would 
like to underline the following points:


  *   Clarity: Project description and scope are clear. However, the 
subprojects structure should be clarified, especially what is related to the 
platform, and what is related to service/applications (VES, collectors, 
analytics). In particular who are the committers per subproject? Some comments 
in the wiki may be confusing (for instance, cloud events are out of the DCAE 
platform, but part of DCAE applications that is part of the DCAE project as I 
understood it). It has been clarified that DCAE portal is to be used to monitor 
the DCAE. For applications, this is left to the application level. If this 
understanding is correct, it means that other projects (SDC, portal) have to 
take this.
  *   Overlap: the TSC thinks that the relevant part of Holmes should be 
considered.
  *   Risk management: the project should identify relevant part considered as 
mature (production level for R1) and identify additions/modification that could 
be delivered with the similar maturity for R1.
  *   Relevance and prioritization: this is relevant to the ONAP release.


I hope this will help with your preparations for next week's meeting.

Roberto



_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc


[onap-tsc] tsc merting

2017-06-01 Thread roberto.kung
dear all, i will not be able to attend the tsc today. But jamil will attend for 
me, with eric and vincent. Roberto

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc


Re: [onap-tsc] Coordinators

2017-05-17 Thread roberto.kung
Orange (me) is willing to candidate for SDO/Opensource. RK

De : onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
De la part de GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
Envoyé : mercredi 17 mai 2017 13:33
À : onap-tsc
Objet : [onap-tsc] Coordinators

Team ONAP,

This is a reminder that the deadline for self nominations for the
open source coordinator and SDO coordinator is today at 9pm PST

thanks
mazin



_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc