Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Hi, Currently, we have TSC structured and including e.g. architecture, use case, modelling subcommittees etc. i.e. not split per particular technical area (e.g. Edge Automation, cloud native etc.), but per tasks the group must accomplish. I am in favor of continuing with the existing structure. Each of the "task forces" has no limitations on contacting with external Open source or Standards communities. I tend to agree with Ramki we should not call it "task force" any longer, as task force has (typically) limited timeframe and responsibility. One way is (similar to standards) to appoint/elect Rapporteur (we can call it coordinator or any other appropriate word) and call it "work" or "study" item (or any other more appropriate word) - terminology is rather a minor thing and can easily be resolved. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image002.png@01D4626F.07225750] From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 7:10 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi Pasi and all, Thank you for the input. I sent one response to Catherine. Our emails crossed. This group is trying to gather requirements(such as MEC, Distributed analytics, scaling, security, regulatory, constrained environments), figure out the architecture with ONAP to meet those requirements, identify gaps and feed them to various existing subcommittees. I agree that much of the output (can be new) that comes out of Edge group may be generic in nature. Team is also very flexible in listening for ideas on best way to take this forward - Status Quo as it is today (working group under use case subcommittee with additional coordinator position), Edge subcommittee or a task force under TSC. The term 'task force' does not appeal to me as it appears that it is for a task and give impression that it is temporary. I don't want to get ahead of what the edge group plans to present in TSC :). I think team will get chance to present this in next TSC and we can go from there. Thanks Srini [cid:image003.png@01D4626F.07225750] From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Pasi Vaananen Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 8:01 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal On 10/12/2018 07:30 AM, Catherine LEFEVRE wrote: Good morning Srini, Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the "Edge Automation" working group. One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of our activities. I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase the complexity we are already facing today to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments on time and quality. Have you explored the possibility that the "Edge Automation" working group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. Architecture or Use Case subcommittees even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related to this topic ? +1 - what is fundamentally required to enable edge use cases with ONAP services with minimal duplication of efforts / maximum re-use are enabling architectural changes, not entirely new "thing" on the side. As such, IMHO, this would be a better fit as an Architecture subcommittee related task force. Best regards, Pasi Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub
Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Hi Pasi and all, Thank you for the input. I sent one response to Catherine. Our emails crossed. This group is trying to gather requirements(such as MEC, Distributed analytics, scaling, security, regulatory, constrained environments), figure out the architecture with ONAP to meet those requirements, identify gaps and feed them to various existing subcommittees. I agree that much of the output (can be new) that comes out of Edge group may be generic in nature. Team is also very flexible in listening for ideas on best way to take this forward - Status Quo as it is today (working group under use case subcommittee with additional coordinator position), Edge subcommittee or a task force under TSC. The term 'task force' does not appeal to me as it appears that it is for a task and give impression that it is temporary. I don't want to get ahead of what the edge group plans to present in TSC :). I think team will get chance to present this in next TSC and we can go from there. Thanks Srini [cid:image001.png@01D46209.17E37F80] From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Pasi Vaananen Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 8:01 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal On 10/12/2018 07:30 AM, Catherine LEFEVRE wrote: Good morning Srini, Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the "Edge Automation" working group. One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of our activities. I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase the complexity we are already facing today to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments on time and quality. Have you explored the possibility that the "Edge Automation" working group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. Architecture or Use Case subcommittees even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related to this topic ? +1 - what is fundamentally required to enable edge use cases with ONAP services with minimal duplication of efforts / maximum re-use are enabling architectural changes, not entirely new "thing" on the side. As such, IMHO, this would be a better fit as an Architecture subcommittee related task force. Best regards, Pasi Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=> Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=> Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3898): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3898 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
On 10/12/2018 07:30 AM, Catherine LEFEVRE wrote: > > Good morning Srini, > > > > Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the “Edge > Automation” working group. > > > > One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of > our activities. > > I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase > the complexity we are already facing today > > to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering > our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments > on time and quality. > > > > Have you explored the possibility that the “Edge Automation” working > group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. > Architecture or Use Case subcommittees > > even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related > to this topic ? > > > +1 - what is fundamentally required to enable edge use cases with ONAP services with minimal duplication of efforts / maximum re-use are enabling architectural changes, not entirely new "thing" on the side. As such, IMHO, this would be a better fit as an Architecture subcommittee related task force. Best regards, Pasi > > Best regards > > Catherine > > *From:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] *On > Behalf Of *Srini > *Sent:* Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM > *To:* ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org > *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal > > > > Hi TSC, > > > > As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May > of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP > requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge > applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed > loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is > being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis > and continue to attract multiple stake holders. > > > > Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge > automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide > visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of > the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. > > > > Please see the proposal here: > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=> > > Presentation deck here: > > https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=> > > > > Looking forward to your support. > > > > Thanks > > Srini > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3896): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3896 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Hi Catherine, Thank you for the email. Based on the discussions in last edge-automation working group and also the slide deck, the working model is no different from current model. That is, output of this group will be fed as another input to various other subcommittees. So, there is no additional complexity. Group is only asking to increase the visibility in ONAP member companies as well as to other edge related open source projects/standard-bodies by making official ONAP entity. Also, group provided two options. 1. Making it subcommittee 2. Increase visibility by other means + creating coordinator position. Group preference is option 1. But, it is up to TSC to decide. Just for easy reference, I am adding the picture from the presentation deck. This is the working model now and continue to be working model even after making it as subcommittee. [cid:image001.png@01D46201.A7A7FA40] From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 4:31 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Good morning Srini, Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the "Edge Automation" working group. One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of our activities. I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase the complexity we are already facing today to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments on time and quality. Have you explored the possibility that the "Edge Automation" working group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. Architecture or Use Case subcommittees even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related to this topic ? Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=> Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=> Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3895): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3895 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Good morning Srini, Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the "Edge Automation" working group. One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of our activities. I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase the complexity we are already facing today to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments on time and quality. Have you explored the possibility that the "Edge Automation" working group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. Architecture or Use Case subcommittees even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related to this topic ? Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=> Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=> Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3891): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3891 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Dear Srini, Many thanks for the introduction. Dear TSC, Since we ran out time in today's TSC meeting, we are planning on presenting on this topic in the TSC meeting on 10/18. Meanwhile, looking forward to your offline feedback as well. Thanks, Ramki From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 4:31 PM To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdisplay%2FDW%2FEdge%2BSub-committee%2Bcreation%2Bproposal&data=02%7C01%7Cramkik%40vmware.com%7C34b03351b51340c31d4308d62f086bfd%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C1%7C0%7C636748110570253274&sdata=2kNjOrBamEtk32kBIsAKQLI8q3JJ%2Bj5VsxXw%2Bhas5v0%3D&reserved=0> Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F28379482%2FONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx%3Fapi%3Dv2&data=02%7C01%7Cramkik%40vmware.com%7C34b03351b51340c31d4308d62f086bfd%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C1%7C0%7C636748110570263274&sdata=fDlzVJa05CMij1GsFja3xLPKthqVSNs%2BV5IoM1ahOP0%3D&reserved=0> Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3873): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3873 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2 Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3870): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3870 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-