答复: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

2018-07-19 Thread huang.zhuoyao
Hello all,






 Thanks Yang XU for clarifying about the state of Wan Connection. 


 To Michael, if we leverage the relationship types and capability 
types which are already existed and remove the new ones which might be 
duplicate and just leave the node types and data type introduced in wiki page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design-Time+Data+Model%3A+WAN+Service),  is 
it good enough for SDC to support Wan Connection in release 3? 






Best Regards!































黄卓垚huangzhuoyao






职位position 
承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept.









深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 
33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, 
Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 
T: +86 755    F: +86 755  
M: +86 xxx 
E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn 
www.zte.com.cn

 



原始邮件



发件人:yangxu(H) 
收件人:denghui (L) onap-disc...@lists.onap.org 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org 
日 期 :2018年07月18日 23:52
主 题 :Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high 
level requirement


Hi Hui and all,
 
 Regarding the last bullet, AFAIK, the WAN connection has been agreed in 
release 2 and moved from service IM clean page to resource IM clean page 
according to participants' suggestion that the WAN connection should be 
considered as resource.
 
 Best regards,
 Xu


发件人:denghui (L)

收件人:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org,ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org,

时间:2018-07-18 22:33:37

主 题:[onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

 


Hello all


 


Please find the recorded meeting session here:


https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes


 

the meeting minutes are list below:

1) 20180719 9am, the last review from SDC before TSC meeting, will try to 
invite PTLs from SDC/SO/A, the meeting bridge will be sent out tomorrow.

2) Service descriptor/resource composite/PNF/PNF instance/network 
Service/SD-WAN/Element group/Multicloud need to be reviewed tomorrow

3)  the committee will ask the approval for Implementation and documentation 
part, not for low priority and experiemental

4) WAN connection need modeling subcommittee review and approval


 


Thanks a lot


 


DENG Hui





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3458): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3458
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23744999/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



答复: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

2018-07-18 Thread huang . zhuoyao
Hello all,






 Thanks Yang XU for clarifying about the state of Wan Connection. 


 To Michael, if we leverage the relationship types and capability 
types which are already existed and remove the new ones which might be 
duplicate and just leave the node types and data type introduced in wiki page 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design-Time+Data+Model%3A+WAN+Service),  is 
it good enough for SDC to support Wan Connection in release 3? 






Best Regards!































黄卓垚huangzhuoyao






职位position 
承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept.









深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 
33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, 
Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 
T: +86 755    F: +86 755  
M: +86 xxx 
E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn 
www.zte.com.cn

 



原始邮件



发件人:yangxu(H) 
收件人:denghui (L) onap-disc...@lists.onap.org 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org 
日 期 :2018年07月18日 23:52
主 题 :Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high 
level requirement


Hi Hui and all,
 
 Regarding the last bullet, AFAIK, the WAN connection has been agreed in 
release 2 and moved from service IM clean page to resource IM clean page 
according to participants' suggestion that the WAN connection should be 
considered as resource.
 
 Best regards,
 Xu


发件人:denghui (L)

收件人:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org,ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org,

时间:2018-07-18 22:33:37

主 题:[onap-discuss] [modeling] Minutes of SDC review of high level requirement

 


Hello all


 


Please find the recorded meeting session here:


https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes


 

the meeting minutes are list below:

1) 20180719 9am, the last review from SDC before TSC meeting, will try to 
invite PTLs from SDC/SO/A, the meeting bridge will be sent out tomorrow.

2) Service descriptor/resource composite/PNF/PNF instance/network 
Service/SD-WAN/Element group/Multicloud need to be reviewed tomorrow

3)  the committee will ask the approval for Implementation and documentation 
part, not for low priority and experiemental

4) WAN connection need modeling subcommittee review and approval


 


Thanks a lot


 


DENG Hui





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3440): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3440
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23705590/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-