Re: [Calc][Discuss]Interoperability with Excel for SUMIF, COUNTIF, COUNTBLANK, DCOUNT, DSUM, ... with empty cells and "" and ="" empty string criteria.
if false, comparison is against any subpart of the field that matches the criteria. For = and <>, if the value is not empty and can not be interpreted as a Number type or one of its subtypes 3.4 applies. Other Text value. If the host-defined property HOST-SEARCH-CRITERIA-MUST-APPLY-TO-WHOLE-CELL is true, the comparison is against the entire cell contents, if false, comparison is against any subpart of the field that matches the criteria. In your opinion, are you asking that the methods are changed to match 4.11.8 or so that they will not match 4.11.8? Sorry, but I am very interested in this. Andrew Pitonyak
Re: Your website contains 3 (found thus far) spelling errors
On 11.06.2012 07:11, Lynnette Boucher wrote: Good morning all, I have just visited your website and within my first minute of being there, had found 2 spelling errors. Hope this helps you. Absolutely it helps :-)
Re: Your website contains 3 (found thus far) spelling errors
On 11.06.2012 14:57, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2012-06-11 6:44 AM Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Best of all, Apache OpenOffice can be downloaded and used entirely free of any license fees. Please change back to the correct English spelling, licence, used in most of the English speaking world. Spelling is "license" is an American mutation. To call the spelling " licence" incorrect is an insult to most of the English speaking world. Near as I can figure, most languages are a mutation of multiple languages and a particular spelling is typically not insulting. I would, however, expect the site to choose a particular localization and stick to it. If people are horribly offended by a person that uses the wrong localization, then you should probably specify that only people that know that localization be allowed to contribute on the item in question.
Re: Holiday Greetings...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 15:00:22 -0500, drew wrote: > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 14:42 -0500, drew wrote: >> This has been quite a year for the extended community and communities of >> individuals formed since the decision to open source the original >> StarOffice application suite some 12 years ago. Then again the same >> could be said for the entire dozen years - and here is my meager attempt >> to capture that in 2 minutes... >> >> >> soHappyHoliday2011.mp4 > http://youtu.be/J84WQtbcZ1s?hd=1 > > > Merry Christmas !!! >> As usual, very nice Drew Happy Christmas to you... Andrew Pitonyak
RE: What do we want to do with spam on lists?
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:28:04 -0800, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote: > I took care of it as soon as I saw it (after being away all day and > returning about an hour ago). The user is unsubscribed. Excellent. This is a thankless job! > Some lists allow the first post from a new subscriber to be moderated. It > should be easy to have unsubscribe as a moderation reply option. The > advantage is that the spam would never get to the list, and it is actually > easier on the moderator, rather than seeing it on the list first, or having > subscribers yell at -owner@ to have somebody banned. I am a big fan of this method! > Just pointing out the pain point. Being able to provide a solution is > beyond my competency. > > - Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Gavin McDonald [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au] > Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 21:10 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: What do we want to do with spam on lists? > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] >> Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 12:42 PM >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: What do we want to do with spam on lists? >> >> Some spam on the ooo-users list this evening: >> >> http://markmail.org/message/hqvtj76howq5kmjv >> >> The poster is subscribed to the list. This was not moderated in. >> >> What do we want moderators to do in this case? Warn the user? >> Unsubscribe them? >> >> We should probably have a common understanding about how we handle >> this. > > no messing around, just unsubscribe them. > > Gav... > >> >> -Rob
