Re: Cancel Request for lazy Consensus. Was Re: [User Docs] What do we as a community want for user documentation or AOO)

2012-09-24 Thread Kay Schenk



On 09/23/2012 03:13 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Based on much feedback it appears that my enthusiasm got a little wild
and that re Reguest for lazy consensus was not the right approach.


Well I'm not sure I would say this...but...

 Given

that I hereby Rescind the Request or Lazy Consensus on the documentation
and will proceed to JFDI.


Great! I'm sure I speak for quite a few here that we're happy you have 
taken this lead and look forward to the results of the efforts of 
ODFAuthors on the 3.4.x documentation.


 For any that are interested in helping with

this effort more information on working at ODFAuthors can be obtained at
there website: http://www.odfauthors.org/

This will close this thread. Hopefully there will be more as the eort
progresses. Tank you all for your patience with my inexperience and your
guidance. It is truly appreciated.


Thanks again for taking the lead on resuming this effort. I think we'll 
be pleased to link this in when it's complete.




Regards
Keith



Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Greetings All;

In order to stimulate some discussion on user documentation I have added
the hollowing page to the User Documentation Plan on the Plannig Wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted.


It offers 3 scenarios or the creation of the docs. I believe that we can
no longer put this issue aside.

Please take a look at the page and feel free to comment there and on
this
list. Also feel free to add to or change any content there.

Regards
Keith N. McKenna



Based on the discussion in this thread and on the wiki page it appears
for the short term that Scenario 2 is the best way to go. At this point
I would like to ask for lazy consensus to use ODFAuthors site and the
3.4 documents already there to create and publish updated documentation.
I will leave this open until 2012-09-26 at 05:45 UTC.

Regards
Keith N. McKenna








--

MzK

"Just 'cause you got the monkey off your back
 doesn't mean the circus has left town."
-- George Carlin


Cancel Request for lazy Consensus. Was Re: [User Docs] What do we as a community want for user documentation or AOO)

2012-09-23 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Based on much feedback it appears that my enthusiasm got a little wild 
and that re Reguest for lazy consensus was not the right approach. Given 
that I hereby Rescind the Request or Lazy Consensus on the documentation 
and will proceed to JFDI. For any that are interested in helping with 
this effort more information on working at ODFAuthors can be obtained at 
there website: http://www.odfauthors.org/


This will close this thread. Hopefully there will be more as the eort 
progresses. Tank you all for your patience with my inexperience and your 
guidance. It is truly appreciated.


Regards
Keith



Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Keith N. McKenna wrote:

Greetings All;

In order to stimulate some discussion on user documentation I have added
the hollowing page to the User Documentation Plan on the Plannig Wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted.

It offers 3 scenarios or the creation of the docs. I believe that we can
no longer put this issue aside.

Please take a look at the page and feel free to comment there and on this
list. Also feel free to add to or change any content there.

Regards
Keith N. McKenna



Based on the discussion in this thread and on the wiki page it appears
for the short term that Scenario 2 is the best way to go. At this point
I would like to ask for lazy consensus to use ODFAuthors site and the
3.4 documents already there to create and publish updated documentation.
I will leave this open until 2012-09-26 at 05:45 UTC.

Regards
Keith N. McKenna