Re: Testing of SVN Bugzilla Robot enabled (was: [Bug 25920] test issue)
Hi Herbert, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Testing is enabled now for the robot [1] that watches out for commits into our SVN-tree and updates then updates the corresponding bugzilla entry if an issue was referenced in the commit summary. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5004 At the beginning of the commit summary classic issue references such as #i123456# are recognized. Some committers demanded that issue reference such as #123456# (without the 'i') are also accepted, so they are recognized too. Should we ever switch to another tracker like JIRA this will have to be revisited, though. If the test is successful there is a good chance that the automatism will be deployed in the apache infrastructure. Currently the robot adds a one-line comment to an issue, e.g. hdu committed SVN revision 1234567: #i25920# a test commit Would it be helpful if the comment was more or less verbose? E.g. it could mention whether trunk or a branch was updated, which sub-projects (e.g. sw, sc) were touched, whether a commit into the release branch had a matching release-blocker flag, etc. Nice Idea! But why not simply take all the comment instead of trying to 'guess' the first line? I often try to provide a brief description for the commit on the command line and a longer one on the task (including the shorter from the commit plus extra infos). With your change I could simply add a single, more extensive description when comitting. Maybe the 'Patch by:', etc. fields should be filtered out though (by identifyingb them using the ':' or 'by*:'. Just my 2 cent... Herbert -- ALG
Testing of SVN Bugzilla Robot enabled (was: [Bug 25920] test issue)
Testing is enabled now for the robot [1] that watches out for commits into our SVN-tree and updates then updates the corresponding bugzilla entry if an issue was referenced in the commit summary. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5004 At the beginning of the commit summary classic issue references such as #i123456# are recognized. Some committers demanded that issue reference such as #123456# (without the 'i') are also accepted, so they are recognized too. Should we ever switch to another tracker like JIRA this will have to be revisited, though. If the test is successful there is a good chance that the automatism will be deployed in the apache infrastructure. Currently the robot adds a one-line comment to an issue, e.g. hdu committed SVN revision 1234567: #i25920# a test commit Would it be helpful if the comment was more or less verbose? E.g. it could mention whether trunk or a branch was updated, which sub-projects (e.g. sw, sc) were touched, whether a commit into the release branch had a matching release-blocker flag, etc. Herbert
Re: Testing of SVN Bugzilla Robot enabled (was: [Bug 25920] test issue)
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Testing is enabled now for the robot [1] that watches out for commits into our SVN-tree and updates then updates the corresponding bugzilla entry if an issue was referenced in the commit summary. [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-5004https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5004 At the beginning of the commit summary classic issue references such as #i123456# are recognized. Some committers demanded that issue reference such as #123456# (without the 'i') are also accepted, so they are recognized too. Should we ever switch to another tracker like JIRA this will have to be revisited, though. If the test is successful there is a good chance that the automatism will be deployed in the apache infrastructure. Currently the robot adds a one-line comment to an issue, e.g. hdu committed SVN revision 1234567: #i25920# a test commit Would it be helpful if the comment was more or less verbose? E.g. it could mention whether trunk or a branch was updated, which sub-projects (e.g. sw, sc) were touched, whether a commit into the release branch had a matching release-blocker flag, etc. Herbert This would be super! Thanks for getting this started! -- MzK I would rather have a donkey that takes me there than a horse that will not fare. -- Portuguese proverb
