Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Requirements document for a new view of Evergreen bookings module
Jane, this looks great! I am looking forward to getting a chance to try it out!!! Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138 tmcca...@georgialibraries.org On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Jane Sandbergwrote: > Hi all, > > I drafted some requirements for a new view of Evergreen bookings that > might be better suited for showing bookings of study rooms. I'm > interested in gathering feedback on the document; please feel free to > use the comment feature vigorously, add other views that might meet > your needs better, or email me directly with your questions. Here's > the document: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ngUb3rcRQMz7zLHwqEkS2Hf1LsWO > 0t4QAnSew1Venc/edit# > > If folks seem interested in this feature, I think that one of our CS > students and I may be able to create a new view (or a small handful of > new views). :-) > > Thanks in advance for your feedback, > > -Jane > > -- > Jane Sandberg > Electronic Resources Librarian > Linn-Benton Community College > sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655 > Pronouns: she/her/hers >
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] metabib.browse_entry unused cleanup?
Josh, It's not causing any issues in any instance that EOLI oversees. It's a unique string listing based on a B+Tree index, so until you get past several quintillion entries you should be fine. The one benefit of removing orphaned entries would be for the off chance that the terms in the string are collectively entirely unique and you've disabled the visibility test for autosuggest, where you might get a browse suggestion that would lead to a dead end. If you do clear them out, make sure you vacuum and analyze the table (/not/ vacuum full, mind) afterwords. HTH, -- Mike Rylander | President | Equinox Open Library Initiative | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: mi...@equinoxinitiative.org | web: http://equinoxinitiative.org On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Josh Stomprowrote: > Hello, I’ve been changing around some indexing rules and applied the fix to > the full stop/rda relator code normalization issue and now just noticed that > all the no longer used browse entries are sticking around in > metabib.browse_entry. > > > > There are 175K entries out of 950K that are no longer used according to > metabib.browse_entry_def_map and metabib.browse_entry_simple_heading_map. > > > > Has anyone found this to be an issue and removed those unused entries? I > don’t think this is causing any issues, it just seems strange to hold on to > that data. Any typo that was ever entered in a browse field and corrected > is recorded there. > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org > > Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139 > > LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110 > >
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] metabib.browse_entry unused cleanup?
Hi Josh, I clean these up about once a year. It's never been a problem, though. I just like cleaning things. -b On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Josh Stomprowrote: > Hello, I’ve been changing around some indexing rules and applied the fix > to the full stop/rda relator code normalization issue and now just noticed > that all the no longer used browse entries are sticking around in > metabib.browse_entry. > > > > There are 175K entries out of 950K that are no longer used according to > metabib.browse_entry_def_map and metabib.browse_entry_simple_heading_map. > > > > Has anyone found this to be an issue and removed those unused entries? I > don’t think this is causing any issues, it just seems strange to hold on to > that data. Any typo that was ever entered in a browse field and corrected > is recorded there. > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org > > Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139 <(218)%20233-3757> > > LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110 <(218)%20790-2110> > > >
[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] metabib.browse_entry unused cleanup?
Hello, I've been changing around some indexing rules and applied the fix to the full stop/rda relator code normalization issue and now just noticed that all the no longer used browse entries are sticking around in metabib.browse_entry. There are 175K entries out of 950K that are no longer used according to metabib.browse_entry_def_map and metabib.browse_entry_simple_heading_map. Has anyone found this to be an issue and removed those unused entries? I don't think this is causing any issues, it just seems strange to hold on to that data. Any typo that was ever entered in a browse field and corrected is recorded there. Thanks Josh Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139 LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110
[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Requirements document for a new view of Evergreen bookings module
Hi all, I drafted some requirements for a new view of Evergreen bookings that might be better suited for showing bookings of study rooms. I'm interested in gathering feedback on the document; please feel free to use the comment feature vigorously, add other views that might meet your needs better, or email me directly with your questions. Here's the document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ngUb3rcRQMz7zLHwqEkS2Hf1LsWO0t4QAnSew1Venc/edit# If folks seem interested in this feature, I think that one of our CS students and I may be able to create a new view (or a small handful of new views). :-) Thanks in advance for your feedback, -Jane -- Jane Sandberg Electronic Resources Librarian Linn-Benton Community College sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655 Pronouns: she/her/hers