[OpenAFS] 2 simple questions

2005-11-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Hi,

I have two questions regarding AFS administration best practices:

1) For users home directories in AFS, is it save to remove 
system:administrators from the ACLs (the users have rlidwka on their 
$HOME)?

2) I currently have /afs and /afs/mydomain owned by root:root, but 
i.e. /afs/mydomain/data is owned by afsadm:afs (150:150), afsadm being a 
member of system:administrators. Is it ok to have /afs (the volume, not the 
mount point) and /afs/mydomain be owned by afsadm:afs?

Thanx...

Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs  | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hambornerstraße 55  | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40472 Düsseldorf  | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net


pgpBoPb6HE6KV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [OpenAFS] 2 simple questions

2005-11-16 Thread Klaas Hagemann

Hi Dirk,

1) For users home directories in AFS, is it save to remove 
system:administrators from the ACLs (the users have rlidwka on their 
$HOME)?
 

there is no problem removing system:administrators from acls, this can 
be added from members of system:administrators again with no problems. 
Afaik it is not possible to lock out administrators.


2) I currently have /afs and /afs/mydomain owned by root:root, but 
i.e. /afs/mydomain/data is owned by afsadm:afs (150:150), afsadm being a 
member of system:administrators. Is it ok to have /afs (the volume, not the 
mount point) and /afs/mydomain be owned by afsadm:afs?


I do not see any problems regarding the ownership of these directories, 
acl's are the important point.



Thanx...

 


Hopy, i could help.


Dirk
 


Klaas
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] 2 simple questions

2005-11-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Klaas Hagemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hi Dirk,

 2) I currently have /afs and /afs/mydomain owned by root:root, but
 i.e. /afs/mydomain/data is owned by afsadm:afs (150:150), afsadm being
 a member of system:administrators. Is it ok to have /afs (the volume,
 not the mount point) and /afs/mydomain be owned by afsadm:afs?

 I do not see any problems regarding the ownership of these directories, 
 acl's are the important point.

Be aware that if afsadm owns the top level directory of those volumes,
afsadm will be able to change the ACLs in those volumes regardless of
ACLs.  Since it's a member of system:administrators anyway, that shouldn't
be a problem, but it's something to keep in mind.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info