Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] cmake formats
> Is there any reason why formats/CMakeLists.txt couldn't include > formats.cmake? Or, alternatively, src/CMakeLists.txt could include > src/formats/CMakeLists.txt directly? The latter seems like a bad idea (i.e., breaking compartmentalization) but I don't know the reasoning behind creating formats.cmake. If you send a patch that pulls that into formats/CMakeLists.txt I'll gladly merge it. -Geoff -- Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK. Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment. Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911=/4140 ___ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
[OpenBabel-Devel] cmake formats
Hi all, Is there anyway that src/formats/formats.cmake src/formats/CMakeLists.txt could be refactored so that they don't contain essentially duplicated information? Not being a cmake expert, it's not immediately clear to me why two different files are necessary, but if formats.cmake is not updated with new formats (as happened with exyzformat and orcaformat), then static builds start to fail. Is there any reason why formats/CMakeLists.txt couldn't include formats.cmake? Or, alternatively, src/CMakeLists.txt could include src/formats/CMakeLists.txt directly? Thanks, David Koes Assistant Professor Computational and Systems Biology University of Pittsburgh -- ___ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
