[OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
package.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
---
https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary
meta-lsb layer, looking for a maintainer.
---
 README.LSB|  29 -
 meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc |   6 -
 meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc  |   6 +-
 meta/lib/oeqa/manual/bsp-hw.json  |   2 +-
 meta/lib/oeqa/manual/compliance-test.json |  32 +-
 .../lib/oeqa/manual/toaster-managed-mode.json |  14 +-
 .../packagegroups/packagegroup-self-hosted.bb |   2 +-
 .../bootchart2/bootchart2_0.14.8.bb   |   2 +-
 .../images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb  |   7 -
 .../images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb  |  12 -
 .../recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb |  14 -
 ...e-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch |   0
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb  |  37 ++
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions  |  44 --
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc|   6 -
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message |  27 -
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc   |   6 -
 .../recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon |  45 --
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb  | 136 -
 ...exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch |  21 -
 .../lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch|  33 --
 .../lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb|  31 --
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh | 525 --
 .../lsb/lsbtest/packages_list |  49 --
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session | 176 --
 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb  |  49 --
 .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb| 240 
 meta/recipes.txt  |   2 +-
 28 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1503 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 README.LSB
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
 rename meta/recipes-extended/lsb/{lsb => 
lsb-release}/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch 
(100%)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb
 delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions
 delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc
 delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message
 delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc
 delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
 delete mode 100644 
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/0001-functions-avoid-exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/packages_list
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb

diff --git a/README.LSB b/README.LSB
deleted file mode 100644
index fecbe548b7..00
--- a/README.LSB
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-OE-Core aims to be able to provide basic LSB compatible images. There
-are some challenges for OE as LSB isn't always 100% relevant to its
-target embedded and IoT audiences. 
-
-One challenge is that the LSB spec is no longer being actively
-developed [https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/lsb] and has 
-components which are end of life or significantly dated. OE 
-therefore provides compatibility with the following caveats:
-
-* Qt4 is provided by the separate meta-qt4 layer. Its noted that Qt4 
-  is end of life and this isn't something the core project regularly 
-  tests any longer. Users are recommended to group together to support
-  maintenance of that layer. 
[http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt4/]
-
-* GTK+ 2 is provided by meta-oe.  It is noted that GTK+ 2 is end of life
-  and use of GTK+ 2 isn't recommended.
-
-* mailx has been dropped since its no longer being developed upstream 
-  and there are better, more modern replacements such as s-nail 
-  (http://sdaoden.eu/code.html) or mailutils (http://mailutils.org/).
-
-* A few perl modules that were required by LSB 4.x aren't provided:
-  libclass-isa, libenv, libdumpvalue, libfile-checktree,
-  libi18n-collate, libpod-plainer.
-
-* libpng 1.2 isn't provided; oe-core includes the latest release of libpng
-  instead.
-
-* pax (POSIX standard archive) tool is not provided.
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc 
b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc
index ab6ebdb899..7ab3b12cd5 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/i

[OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support bits

2019-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
---
 .../distro/include/poky-distro-alt-test-config.inc  |  2 +-
 meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf | 13 -
 meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf|  3 ---
 meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended   |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf

diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/include/poky-distro-alt-test-config.inc 
b/meta-poky/conf/distro/include/poky-distro-alt-test-config.inc
index 081584f397..dff5804530 100644
--- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/include/poky-distro-alt-test-config.inc
+++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/include/poky-distro-alt-test-config.inc
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " pam"
-PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto_linuxstdbase ?= "4.19%"
+PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "4.19%"
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf 
b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf
deleted file mode 100644
index 9b36c87c48..00
--- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-
-require conf/distro/poky.conf
-
-DISTRO = "poky-lsb"
-DISTROOVERRIDES = "poky:linuxstdbase"
-
-DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " pam"
-
-# Ensure the kernel nfs server is enabled
-KERNEL_FEATURES_append_pn-linux-yocto = " features/nfsd/nfsd-enable.scc"
-
-# Use the LTSI Kernel for LSB Testing
-PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto_linuxstdbase ?= "4.19%"
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf 
b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf
index 1f8b6e8ff3..8236b6f273 100644
--- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf
+++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf
@@ -117,9 +117,6 @@ PNBLACKLIST[build-appliance-image] = "not buildable with 
poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-base] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-clutter] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-full-cmdline] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
-PNBLACKLIST[core-image-lsb] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
-PNBLACKLIST[core-image-lsb-dev] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
-PNBLACKLIST[core-image-lsb-sdk] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-rt] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-rt-sdk] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
 PNBLACKLIST[core-image-sato] = "not buildable with poky-tiny"
diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended 
b/meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
index 77e8be26fa..dc92a16f6c 100644
--- a/meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
+++ b/meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ DISTRO_FEATURES_remove = "x11"
 #
 # By including the security_flags include file you enable flags
 # to the compiler and linker that cause them to generate more secure
-# code, this is enabled by default in the poky-lsb distro.
+# code.
 # This does affect compile speed slightly.
 #
 # Use the following line to enable the security compiler and linker flags to 
your build
-- 
2.17.1

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-25 Thread akuster808



On 8/25/19 10:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
> which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
> package.

Thank you for doing this work.

There was talk about creating a layer for those folks needing lsb
support. This helps identify what is currently there.


- armin
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
> ---
> https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary
> meta-lsb layer, looking for a maintainer.
> ---
>  README.LSB|  29 -
>  meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc |   6 -
>  meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc  |   6 +-
>  meta/lib/oeqa/manual/bsp-hw.json  |   2 +-
>  meta/lib/oeqa/manual/compliance-test.json |  32 +-
>  .../lib/oeqa/manual/toaster-managed-mode.json |  14 +-
>  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-self-hosted.bb |   2 +-
>  .../bootchart2/bootchart2_0.14.8.bb   |   2 +-
>  .../images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb  |   7 -
>  .../images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb  |  12 -
>  .../recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb |  14 -
>  ...e-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch |   0
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb  |  37 ++
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions  |  44 --
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc|   6 -
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message |  27 -
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc   |   6 -
>  .../recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon |  45 --
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb  | 136 -
>  ...exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch |  21 -
>  .../lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch|  33 --
>  .../lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb|  31 --
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh | 525 --
>  .../lsb/lsbtest/packages_list |  49 --
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session | 176 --
>  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb  |  49 --
>  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb| 240 
>  meta/recipes.txt  |   2 +-
>  28 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1503 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 README.LSB
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
>  rename meta/recipes-extended/lsb/{lsb => 
> lsb-release}/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch 
> (100%)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb
>  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions
>  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc
>  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message
>  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc
>  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
>  delete mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/0001-functions-avoid-exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/packages_list
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb
>  delete mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
>
> diff --git a/README.LSB b/README.LSB
> deleted file mode 100644
> index fecbe548b7..00
> --- a/README.LSB
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
> -OE-Core aims to be able to provide basic LSB compatible images. There
> -are some challenges for OE as LSB isn't always 100% relevant to its
> -target embedded and IoT audiences. 
> -
> -One challenge is that the LSB spec is no longer being actively
> -developed [https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/lsb] and has 
> -components which are end of life or significantly dated. OE 
> -therefore provides compatibility with the following caveats:
> -
> -* Qt4 is provided by the separate meta-qt4 layer. Its noted that Qt4 
> -  is end of life and this isn't something the core project regularly 
> -  tests any longer. Users are recommended to group together to support
> -  maintenance of that layer. 
> [http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt4/]
> -
> -* GTK+ 2 is provided by meta-oe.  It is noted that GTK+ 2 is end of life
> -  and use of GTK+ 2 isn't recommended.
> -
> -* mailx has been dropped since its no longer being developed upstream 
> -  and there are better, more modern replacements such as s-nail 
> -  (http://sdaoden.eu/code.html) or mailutils (http://mailutils.org/).
> -
> -* A few perl modules that were required by LSB 4.x aren't provided:
> -  libcla

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 10:37:16AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> On 8/25/19 10:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
> > which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
> > package.
> 
> Thank you for doing this work.
> 
> There was talk about creating a layer for those folks needing lsb
> support. This helps identify what is currently there.
> 
> 
> - armin
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
> > ---
> > https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary
> > meta-lsb layer, looking for a maintainer.
>...

This is a preliminary version of such a layer.

The current state should be enough to avoid regressions compared to 
having LSB support in OE-core, but further improvements should be
done by people needing LSB support.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-29 Thread Robert Yang

Hi Adrian,

On 8/26/19 1:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:

The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
package.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
---
https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary


Do you have a plan to move it to git.yoctoproject.org or git.openembedded.org, 
please?


// Robert


meta-lsb layer, looking for a maintainer.
---
  README.LSB|  29 -
  meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc |   6 -
  meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc  |   6 +-
  meta/lib/oeqa/manual/bsp-hw.json  |   2 +-
  meta/lib/oeqa/manual/compliance-test.json |  32 +-
  .../lib/oeqa/manual/toaster-managed-mode.json |  14 +-
  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-self-hosted.bb |   2 +-
  .../bootchart2/bootchart2_0.14.8.bb   |   2 +-
  .../images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb  |   7 -
  .../images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb  |  12 -
  .../recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb |  14 -
  ...e-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch |   0
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb  |  37 ++
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions  |  44 --
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc|   6 -
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message |  27 -
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc   |   6 -
  .../recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon |  45 --
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb  | 136 -
  ...exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch |  21 -
  .../lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch|  33 --
  .../lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb|  31 --
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh | 525 --
  .../lsb/lsbtest/packages_list |  49 --
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session | 176 --
  meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb  |  49 --
  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb| 240 
  meta/recipes.txt  |   2 +-
  28 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1503 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 README.LSB
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
  rename meta/recipes-extended/lsb/{lsb => 
lsb-release}/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch (100%)
  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb-release_1.4.bb
  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/init-functions
  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc
  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message
  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc
  delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
  delete mode 100644 
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/0001-functions-avoid-exit-1-which-causes-init-scripts-to-.patch
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.79.bb
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/LSB_Test.sh
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/packages_list
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest/session
  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb
  delete mode 100644 
meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb

diff --git a/README.LSB b/README.LSB
deleted file mode 100644
index fecbe548b7..00
--- a/README.LSB
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-OE-Core aims to be able to provide basic LSB compatible images. There
-are some challenges for OE as LSB isn't always 100% relevant to its
-target embedded and IoT audiences.
-
-One challenge is that the LSB spec is no longer being actively
-developed [https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/lsb] and has
-components which are end of life or significantly dated. OE
-therefore provides compatibility with the following caveats:
-
-* Qt4 is provided by the separate meta-qt4 layer. Its noted that Qt4
-  is end of life and this isn't something the core project regularly
-  tests any longer. Users are recommended to group together to support
-  maintenance of that layer. 
[http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-qt4/]
-
-* GTK+ 2 is provided by meta-oe.  It is noted that GTK+ 2 is end of life
-  and use of GTK+ 2 isn't recommended.
-
-* mailx has been dropped since its no longer being developed upstream
-  and there are better, more modern replacements such as s-nail
-  (http://sdaoden.eu/code.html) or mailutils (http://mailutils.org/).
-
-* A few perl modules that were required by LSB 4.x aren't provided:
-  libclass-isa, libenv, libdumpvalue, libfile-checktree,
-  libi18n-collate, libpod-plainer.
-
-* libpng 1.2 isn't provided; oe-core includes the latest release of libpng
-  instead.
-
-* pax (POSIX s

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:04:52AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> Hi Adrian,

Hi Robert,

> On 8/26/19 1:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
> > which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
> > package.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
> > ---
> > https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary
>
> Do you have a plan to move it to git.yoctoproject.org or
> git.openembedded.org, please?
>
> // Robert
>
> > meta-lsb layer, looking for a maintainer.
>...

I am hoping that someone who has an actual interest in LSB will
adopt it, and then it's not up to me where it will be hosted.

If you are interested, feel free to adopt it and host it
wherever you want.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support

2019-08-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 11:04 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On 8/26/19 1:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
> > which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
> > package.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk 
> > ---
> > https://github.com/AdrianBunk/meta-lsb contains a preliminary
> 
> Do you have a plan to move it to git.yoctoproject.org or
> git.openembedded.org, 
> please?

I'm happy to have it on git.yoctoproject.org but we need a
maintainer...

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Remove LSB support bits

2019-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Please ignore this patch, wrong list.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core