Patches are ok. I was wondering if BACKPORTS variable was good enough for
cve patches too. Anyway the patch name ha cve informations
On Jan 25, 2016 12:35 PM, "Armin Kuster" wrote:
> noticed this did not hit the patchwork. resending.
>
> Please consider these for the next fido update.
>
> The following changes since commit
> 9845a542a76156adb5aef6fd33ad5bc5777acf64:
>
> openssh: CVE-2016-077x (2016-01-20 17:08:30 +)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib akuster/fido_glibc_cve_fixes
>
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi//log/?h=akuster/fido_glibc_cve_fixes
>
> Armin Kuster (4):
> glibc: CVE-2015-8777
> glibc: CVE-2015-8779
> glibc: CVE-2015-9761
> glibc: CVE_2015-8776
>
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8776.patch | 176 +++
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8777.patch | 143 ++
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8779.patch | 282
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-9761.patch | 1452
> +
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.21.bb |4 +
> 5 files changed, 2057 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8776.patch
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8777.patch
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-8779.patch
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2015-9761.patch
>
> --
> 2.3.5
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core