Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On 2 March 2016 at 15:23, Richard Purdiewrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 06:30 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Kanavin >> wrote: >> > his probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky >> > > -tiny >> > > defaults to it. It will be good to test >> > > changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch >> > > >> > >> > >> > Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder, >> >> There is a musl job on autobuilder. Not sure if its run daily. Ross ? > > Its run manually at the moment. We've been working to get to the point > where its reliable, then we'll add it to the list of build tests we > run. I think we're now at that point actually. > > Beth: Should we enable musl and no-x11 by default? > Yes, I'll patch nightly today and push it to production after the current build is done. > Cheers, > > Richard -- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Build and Release -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:23:25PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 06:30 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Kanavin > >wrote: > > > his probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky > > > > -tiny > > > > defaults to it. It will be good to test > > > > changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder, > > > > There is a musl job on autobuilder. Not sure if its run daily. Ross ? > > Its run manually at the moment. We've been working to get to the point > where its reliable, then we'll add it to the list of build tests we > run. I think we're now at that point actually. > > Beth: Should we enable musl and no-x11 by default? Can someone enable also read-only and thumb on one of qemuarm builds? You can probably just change current qemuarm builds to do read-only and thumb, because this combination will catch more issues that read-write and without-thumb. See: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9155 https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9155 > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- > ___ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 06:30 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Kanavin >wrote: > > his probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky > > > -tiny > > > defaults to it. It will be good to test > > > changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch > > > > > > > > > Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder, > > There is a musl job on autobuilder. Not sure if its run daily. Ross ? Its run manually at the moment. We've been working to get to the point where its reliable, then we'll add it to the list of build tests we run. I think we're now at that point actually. Beth: Should we enable musl and no-x11 by default? Cheers, Richard -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Kanavinwrote: > On 03/01/2016 04:58 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> The failing patch is applied only when musl is in use (and so the >>> regression >>> went unnoticed). Can you rework it so that it can be applied >>> unconditionally? >> >> >> This probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky-tiny >> defaults to it. It will be good to test >> changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch > > > Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder, There is a musl job on autobuilder. Not sure if its run daily. Ross ? I'm afraid. When doing local changes, > I have to draw the line somewhere about what I test, and what I don't, and > testing builds against various libc providers is outside of that. Thats good to please mention that in your patch submissions especially when you touch a recipe which is using such overrides for anything so maintainers know testing it has received. > > Generally, patches should be unconditional, because a) we should be able to > send them upstream, b) conditional patches create several slightly different > versions of source code, which is a maintenance headache. > We understand that, sometimes its not possible. -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On 03/01/2016 04:58 PM, Khem Raj wrote: The failing patch is applied only when musl is in use (and so the regression went unnoticed). Can you rework it so that it can be applied unconditionally? This probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky-tiny defaults to it. It will be good to test changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder, I'm afraid. When doing local changes, I have to draw the line somewhere about what I test, and what I don't, and testing builds against various libc providers is outside of that. Generally, patches should be unconditional, because a) we should be able to send them upstream, b) conditional patches create several slightly different versions of source code, which is a maintenance headache. Alex -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Alexander Kanavinwrote: > On 02/29/2016 08:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> This broke musl builds see >> >> >> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38154/ > > > The failing patch is applied only when musl is in use (and so the regression > went unnoticed). Can you rework it so that it can be applied > unconditionally? This probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky-tiny defaults to it. It will be good to test changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch > > Alex > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
On 02/29/2016 08:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote: This broke musl builds see http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38154/ The failing patch is applied only when musl is in use (and so the regression went unnoticed). Can you rework it so that it can be applied unconditionally? Alex -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
This broke musl builds see http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38154/ > On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Alexander Kanavin >wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > --- > meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.11.bb => nspr_4.12.bb} | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.11.bb => nspr_4.12.bb} (96%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb > b/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb > similarity index 96% > rename from meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb > rename to meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb > index a38e20c..2fd801f 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb > @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_libc-musl = "\ > UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/; > UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "v(?P\d+(\.\d+)+)/" > > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4f24b2fb88ca03b5d6d6931d6a67ef9a" > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "cb320a9eee7028275ac0fce7adc39dee36f14f02fd8432fce1b7e1aa5e3685c2" > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0de760c1e00a92e180e611cf06ce9589" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "e0b10a1e569153668ff8bdea6c7e491b389fab69c2f18285a1ebf7c2ea4269de" > > S = "${WORKDIR}/nspr-${PV}/nspr" > > -- > 2.7.0 > > -- > ___ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] nspr: update to 4.12
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin--- meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.11.bb => nspr_4.12.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.11.bb => nspr_4.12.bb} (96%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb b/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb similarity index 96% rename from meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb rename to meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb index a38e20c..2fd801f 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.11.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.12.bb @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_libc-musl = "\ UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/; UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "v(?P\d+(\.\d+)+)/" -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4f24b2fb88ca03b5d6d6931d6a67ef9a" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "cb320a9eee7028275ac0fce7adc39dee36f14f02fd8432fce1b7e1aa5e3685c2" +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0de760c1e00a92e180e611cf06ce9589" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e0b10a1e569153668ff8bdea6c7e491b389fab69c2f18285a1ebf7c2ea4269de" S = "${WORKDIR}/nspr-${PV}/nspr" -- 2.7.0 -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core