[OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-03-20 Thread Andre McCurdy
Daisy has now (long since) left upstream maintenance and entered into
community support. As a member of a community which still actively
develops against this version of OE, I would like to propose the
following updates.

Andre McCurdy (4):
  gmp_4.2.1: fix build for MIPS
  ncurses: fix build with gcc 5
  binutils: fix build with gcc 5
  mesa: fix SRC_URI

Khem Raj (1):
  kernel.bbclass: Remove bashism

Krzysztof Sywula (1):
  dtc: old SRC_URI died, changing to new working one

 meta/classes/kernel.bbclass|  2 +-
 .../ncurses/ncurses-5.9/ncurses-5.9-gcc-5.patch| 53 +++
 meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb   |  1 +
 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.24.inc   |  1 +
 ...86.c-Werror-logical-not-parentheses-error.patch | 61 ++
 meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.2.5.bb   |  2 +-
 meta/recipes-kernel/dtc/dtc.inc|  2 +-
 .../avoid-h-asm-constraint-for-MIPS.patch  | 57 
 meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp_4.2.1.bb  |  1 +
 9 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/ncurses-5.9-gcc-5.patch
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-Fix-tc-i386.c-Werror-logical-not-parentheses-error.patch
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp-4.2.1/avoid-h-asm-constraint-for-MIPS.patch

-- 
1.9.1

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-07 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Andre McCurdy  wrote:
> Daisy has now (long since) left upstream maintenance and entered into
> community support. As a member of a community which still actively
> develops against this version of OE, I would like to propose the
> following updates.

Ping.

Are these kind of updates OK? Or are there objections to the community
trying to support historical releases? There are many millions of
devices in the field that I know of which are still being actively
developed and maintained on top of OE 1.6.

> Andre McCurdy (4):
>   gmp_4.2.1: fix build for MIPS
>   ncurses: fix build with gcc 5
>   binutils: fix build with gcc 5
>   mesa: fix SRC_URI
>
> Khem Raj (1):
>   kernel.bbclass: Remove bashism
>
> Krzysztof Sywula (1):
>   dtc: old SRC_URI died, changing to new working one
>
>  meta/classes/kernel.bbclass|  2 +-
>  .../ncurses/ncurses-5.9/ncurses-5.9-gcc-5.patch| 53 +++
>  meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb   |  1 +
>  meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.24.inc   |  1 +
>  ...86.c-Werror-logical-not-parentheses-error.patch | 61 
> ++
>  meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.2.5.bb   |  2 +-
>  meta/recipes-kernel/dtc/dtc.inc|  2 +-
>  .../avoid-h-asm-constraint-for-MIPS.patch  | 57 
>  meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp_4.2.1.bb  |  1 +
>  9 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/ncurses-5.9-gcc-5.patch
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-Fix-tc-i386.c-Werror-logical-not-parentheses-error.patch
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp-4.2.1/avoid-h-asm-constraint-for-MIPS.patch
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Andre McCurdy 
> wrote:
> > 
> > Daisy has now (long since) left upstream maintenance and entered
> > into
> > community support. As a member of a community which still actively
> > develops against this version of OE, I would like to propose the
> > following updates.
> Ping.
> 
> Are these kind of updates OK? Or are there objections to the
> community
> trying to support historical releases? There are many millions of
> devices in the field that I know of which are still being actively
> developed and maintained on top of OE 1.6.

We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest that we
collect together people who are will to maintain such things and let
them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in other
repos eventually where we collect these things together.

Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy? 

If there is common agreement, a group of people could collaborate on
such a branch too...

Cheers,

Richard
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-08 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie
 wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Andre McCurdy 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Daisy has now (long since) left upstream maintenance and entered
>> > into
>> > community support. As a member of a community which still actively
>> > develops against this version of OE, I would like to propose the
>> > following updates.
>> Ping.
>>
>> Are these kind of updates OK? Or are there objections to the
>> community
>> trying to support historical releases? There are many millions of
>> devices in the field that I know of which are still being actively
>> developed and maintained on top of OE 1.6.
>
> We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest that we
> collect together people who are will to maintain such things and let
> them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in other
> repos eventually where we collect these things together.
>
> Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy?
>
> If there is common agreement, a group of people could collaborate on
> such a branch too...

Although there are multiple groups still actively developing against
OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing so
in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and collaborate
on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much.
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 02:06 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie
>  wrote:
> > We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest that we
> > collect together people who are will to maintain such things and
> > let
> > them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in
> > other
> > repos eventually where we collect these things together.
> > 
> > Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy?
> > 
> > If there is common agreement, a group of people could collaborate
> > on such a branch too...
>
> Although there are multiple groups still actively developing against
> OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing so
> in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and collaborate
> on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much.

Maybe, maybe not. I'd happy enough for you to put these changes there,
if others want to join in, great, if not I'm not sure we're in any
worse position. I just wanted to highlight the possibility in the
future...

Cheers,

Richard


-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-08 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Richard Purdie
 wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 02:06 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie
>>  wrote:
>> > We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest that we
>> > collect together people who are will to maintain such things and
>> > let
>> > them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in
>> > other
>> > repos eventually where we collect these things together.
>> >
>> > Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy?
>> >
>> > If there is common agreement, a group of people could collaborate
>> > on such a branch too...
>>
>> Although there are multiple groups still actively developing against
>> OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing so
>> in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and collaborate
>> on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much.
>
> Maybe, maybe not. I'd happy enough for you to put these changes there,
> if others want to join in, great, if not I'm not sure we're in any
> worse position. I just wanted to highlight the possibility in the
> future...

Changes pushed to:

  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/?h=armcc/extended-life/daisy

What happens next?
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-09 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 15:07 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Richard Purdie
>  wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 02:06 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie
> > >  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest
> > > > that we
> > > > collect together people who are will to maintain such things
> > > > and
> > > > let
> > > > them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in
> > > > other
> > > > repos eventually where we collect these things together.
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy?
> > > > 
> > > > If there is common agreement, a group of people could
> > > > collaborate
> > > > on such a branch too...
> > > Although there are multiple groups still actively developing
> > > against
> > > OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing
> > > so
> > > in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and
> > > collaborate
> > > on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much.
> > Maybe, maybe not. I'd happy enough for you to put these changes
> > there,
> > if others want to join in, great, if not I'm not sure we're in any
> > worse position. I just wanted to highlight the possibility in the
> > future...
> Changes pushed to:
> 
>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/?h=armcc/extended
> -life/daisy
> 
> What happens next?

Can you push to:

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/?h=extended-life/dais
y

? If not, we should give you access to do that (halstead can help),
then we publise this on the arch list and see who else, if anyone has
other extended-life branches they want to contribute to or work on
together with others.

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [daisy][PATCH 0/6] SRC_URI updates and minor build fixes

2018-05-09 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Richard Purdie
 wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 15:07 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Richard Purdie
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 02:06 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie
>> > >  wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest
>> > > > that we
>> > > > collect together people who are will to maintain such things
>> > > > and
>> > > > let
>> > > > them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in
>> > > > other
>> > > > repos eventually where we collect these things together.
>> > > >
>> > > > Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy?
>> > > >
>> > > > If there is common agreement, a group of people could
>> > > > collaborate
>> > > > on such a branch too...
>> > > Although there are multiple groups still actively developing
>> > > against
>> > > OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing
>> > > so
>> > > in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and
>> > > collaborate
>> > > on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much.
>> > Maybe, maybe not. I'd happy enough for you to put these changes
>> > there,
>> > if others want to join in, great, if not I'm not sure we're in any
>> > worse position. I just wanted to highlight the possibility in the
>> > future...
>> Changes pushed to:
>>
>>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/?h=armcc/extended
>> -life/daisy
>>
>> What happens next?
>
> Can you push to:
>
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/?h=extended-life/dais
> y

Yes, I can today. Done.

> ? If not, we should give you access to do that (halstead can help),
> then we publise this on the arch list and see who else, if anyone has
> other extended-life branches they want to contribute to or work on
> together with others.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core