[OE-core] [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL
The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version of Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch reverts the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols required by 1.0.2h. Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. The following changes since commit e7c46ce3e59cb4fd770e76ae006c0166d0dd5265: build-appliance-image: Update to fido head revision (2016-05-11 18:00:15 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib joshuagl/fido-next http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=joshuagl/fido-next Joshua Lock (1): openssl: prevent ABI break from earlier fido releases .../openssl/debian1.0.2/version-script.patch | 31 +++--- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.5.5 -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version of > Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. > This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch reverts > the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols required by > 1.0.2h. > > Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which was also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? Small downside is that the same 1.0.2h version in fido and jethro will have different ABI than 1.0.2h in krogoth (unless someone updates the version there as suggested by Andre in: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/118433.html ). Krogoth was released with this ABI, so it's something users have to deal with when upgrading to newer Yocto release (and this won't be the only component with different ABI). > The following changes since commit e7c46ce3e59cb4fd770e76ae006c0166d0dd5265: > > build-appliance-image: Update to fido head revision (2016-05-11 18:00:15 > +0100) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib joshuagl/fido-next > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=joshuagl/fido-next > > Joshua Lock (1): > openssl: prevent ABI break from earlier fido releases > > .../openssl/debian1.0.2/version-script.patch | 31 > +++--- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.5.5 > > -- > ___ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > > The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version > > of > > Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. > > This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch > > reverts > > the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols > > required by > > 1.0.2h. > > > > Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. > > Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. > > It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which > was > also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? I'm hoping someone will give me a patch series which does this correctly for jethro. Its why I haven't taken the previous pull request. Cheers, Richard -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL
On 05/13/2016 09:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version >>> of >>> Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. >>> This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch >>> reverts >>> the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols >>> required by >>> 1.0.2h. >>> >>> Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. >> >> Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. >> >> It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which >> was >> also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? > > I'm hoping someone will give me a patch series which does this > correctly for jethro. Its why I haven't taken the previous pull > request. I will spin one - armin > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL
On 05/13/2016 09:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version >>> of >>> Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. >>> This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch >>> reverts >>> the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols >>> required by >>> 1.0.2h. >>> >>> Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. >> >> Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. >> >> It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which >> was >> also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? > > I'm hoping someone will give me a patch series which does this > correctly for jethro. Its why I haven't taken the previous pull > request. > sent - armin > Cheers, > > Richard > > > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
