Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-18 Thread akuster808 


On 06/18/2018 11:00 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj  wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy  wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle  
>>> wrote:
 On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy  > wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj  > wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle  > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> > From: André Draszik  >
> >> >
> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik  >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton  >
> >> > (cherry picked from commit 
> 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy  >
> >> > ---
> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 000..ded8897
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> > +
> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or 
> without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 
> are met:
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
> notice,
> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS 
> IS"
> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
> THE
> >>
> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes 
> sense to
> list
> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>
> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>
> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> versions are inconsistent too:
>
> We should report that to spdx folks since they
> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
 Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then 
 use
 them once they are fixed.

 As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "" (as 
 in the
 BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>>> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
>>> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
>>> updated first?
>> It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
> The current version of the BSD-1 license text has been in master since
> January. It's already been released in sumo.

got it.

in stable/rocko-nmut

- armin

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-18 Thread Andre McCurdy 
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj  wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy  wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle  wrote:
>> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy > >> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj > >> > wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle > >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> >> >> > From: André Draszik > >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> >> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik > >> >
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton > >> >
>> >> >> > (cherry picked from commit 
>> >> 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy > >> >
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
>> >> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> >> > index 000..ded8897
>> >> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
>> >> >> > +All rights reserved.
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or 
>> >> without
>> >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 
>> >> are met:
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
>> >> notice,
>> >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS 
>> >> IS"
>> >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
>> >> THE
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes 
>> >> sense to
>> >> list
>> >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
>> >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>> >>
>> >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
>> >> versions are inconsistent too:
>> >>
>> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they
>> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>> >
>> > Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then 
>> > use
>> > them once they are fixed.
>> >
>> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "" (as 
>> > in the
>> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>>
>> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
>> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
>> updated first?
>
> It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.

The current version of the BSD-1 license text has been in master since
January. It's already been released in sumo.
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-18 Thread Khem Raj 
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle  wrote:
> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy  >> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj  >> > wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle  >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> >> > From: André Draszik  >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik  >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton  >> >
> >> >> > (cherry picked from commit 
> >> 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy  >> >
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
> >> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> >> > index 000..ded8897
> >> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
> >> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or 
> >> without
> >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 
> >> met:
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
> >> notice,
> >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS 
> >> IS"
> >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
> >> THE
> >> >>
> >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes 
> >> sense to
> >> list
> >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
> >>
> >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> >> versions are inconsistent too:
> >>
> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they
> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
> >
> > Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
> > them once they are fixed.
> >
> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "" (as in 
> > the
> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>
> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
> updated first?

It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-18 Thread Andre McCurdy 
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle  wrote:
> On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy > > wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj > > wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle > > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> >> > From: André Draszik > >
>> >> >
>> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik > >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton > >
>> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy > >
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
>> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> > index 000..ded8897
>> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
>> >> > +All rights reserved.
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 
>> met:
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
>> notice,
>> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> >>
>> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes 
>> sense to
>> list
>> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
>> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>>
>> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
>> versions are inconsistent too:
>>
>> We should report that to spdx folks since they
>> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>
> Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
> them once they are fixed.
>
> As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "" (as in 
> the
> BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.

Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
updated first?

>>
>> 
>> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
>> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>>
>> 
>> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
>> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
>> "AS IS"
>>
>> etc...
>>
>> >
>> >> --Mark
>> >>
>> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> PURPOSE ARE
>> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
>> FOR ANY
>> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 
>> DAMAGES
>> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR 
>> SERVICES;
>> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER 
>> CAUSED
>> AND ON
>> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR 
>> TORT
>> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE 
>> OF THIS
>> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> >> > +
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> ___
>> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> 
>> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-18 Thread Mark Hatle 
On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy  > wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj  > wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle  > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> > From: André Draszik  >
> >> >
> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik  >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton  >
> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy  >
> >> > ---
> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 000..ded8897
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> > +
> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 
> met:
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
> notice,
> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >>
> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense 
> to
> list
> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>
> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
> 
> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> versions are inconsistent too:
> 
> 
> We should report that to spdx folks since they 
> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this 

Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
them once they are fixed.

As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "" (as in the
BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.

--Mark

> 
> 
> 
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> 
> 
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS"
> 
> etc...
> 
> >
> >> --Mark
> >>
> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE
> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
> FOR ANY
> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 
> DAMAGES
> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR 
> SERVICES;
> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
> AND ON
> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE 
> OF THIS
> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> >> > +
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> ___
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> 
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Khem Raj 
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy  wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj  wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> > From: André Draszik 
> >> >
> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
> >> > ---
> >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 000..ded8897
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> > +
> >> > +Copyright (c) , 
> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >>
> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense
> to list
> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>
> >> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>
> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> versions are inconsistent too:


We should report that to spdx folks since they
Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this

>
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS"
>
> etc...
>
> >
> >> --Mark
> >>
> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE
> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
> FOR ANY
> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
> DAMAGES
> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
> SERVICES;
> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
> AND ON
> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> OF THIS
> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> >> > +
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> ___
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Andre McCurdy 
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj  wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle  wrote:
>>
>> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> > From: André Draszik 
>> >
>> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
>> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
>> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
>> > ---
>> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
>> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause 
>> > b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000..ded8897
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> > +
>> > +Copyright (c) , 
>> > +All rights reserved.
>> > +
>> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
>> > modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> > +
>> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, 
>> > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND 
>> > ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>>
>> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense to 
>> list
>> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>>
>> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
>>
>
> I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text

It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
versions are inconsistent too:

https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"

https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
"AS IS"

etc...

>
>> --Mark
>>
>> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 
>> ARE
>> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR 
>> ANY
>> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
>> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND 
>> ON
>> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
>> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
>> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> > +
>> >
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Khem Raj 
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle  wrote:
>
> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > From: André Draszik 
> >
> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
> > ---
> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause 
> > b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..ded8897
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +
> > +Copyright (c) , 
> > +All rights reserved.
> > +
> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
> > modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> > +
> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, 
> > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND 
> > ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>
> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense to list
> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>
> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
>

I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text

> --Mark
>
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> > +
> >
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Andre McCurdy 
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mark Hatle  wrote:
> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> From: André Draszik 
>>
>> Some projects are starting to use it.
>>   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
>> (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
>> ---
>>  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause 
>> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..ded8897
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> +
>> +Copyright (c) , 
>> +All rights reserved.
>> +
>> +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
>> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> +
>> +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this 
>> list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY 
>> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>
> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense to list
> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.

You're right.

There doesn't seem to be much consistency in the various BSD licenses
in meta/files/common-licenses. We currently have:

  BSD : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' ...

  BSD-0-Clause : THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" ...

  BSD-1-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software
Design, Inc. "AS IS" ...

  BSD-2-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE FREEBSD PROJECT ``AS IS`` ...

  BSD-3-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" ...

  BSD-4-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY  ``AS IS`` ...

Every one slightly different!

> Maybe a  would be more appropriate.
>
> --Mark
>
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> +
>>
>
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Mark Hatle 
On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> From: André Draszik 
> 
> Some projects are starting to use it.
>   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
> (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
> ---
>  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> 
> diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause 
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..ded8897
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +
> +Copyright (c) , 
> +All rights reserved.
> +
> +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> +
> +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this 
> list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY 
> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE 

Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense to list
BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.

Maybe a  would be more appropriate.

--Mark

IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> +
> 

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

[OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

2018-06-15 Thread Andre McCurdy 
From: André Draszik 

Some projects are starting to use it.
  https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html

Signed-off-by: André Draszik 
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
(cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy 
---
 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause

diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause 
b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
new file mode 100644
index 000..ded8897
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+
+Copyright (c) , 
+All rights reserved.
+
+Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
+
+Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this 
list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED 
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE 
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY 
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES 
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; 
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON 
ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT 
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS 
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
-- 
1.9.1

-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core