Re: [OE-core] Query for multilib support in Yocto
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your comments.
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Hatle
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:47 PM
On 5/23/13 3:46 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
For gcc with multilib support running on target board 1. Can the same
gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different gcc
binaries(one is for 32b, the other is for 64b) are required?
As far as I'm aware the same issue above holds true here. You still need
multiple compiler binaries, one for each multilib. (Khem Raj would know
if this is still true however.)
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] I see an successful case of single gcc on target can build
both 32b and 64b app, https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1369.
Is that still true in recent Yocto?
I experienced following error when I use gcc(32bit rootfs with multilib
support) to do 64b build, I find the linker search libraries in /usr/lib
and /lib instead of /usr/lib64 and /lib64.
root@p5020ds:~# gcc -m64 my_test.c -o my_test
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.
2/libgcc.a when searching for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: cannot find -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible /lib/../lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching
for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible //lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for
libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: cannot find libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.
2/libgcc.a when searching for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/b
in/ld: cannot find libgcc.a
Ya, this is running the 'wrong' toolchain. From the errors it appears to
me that it's the 32-bit gcc, attempting to compile for 64-bit. There is
a command that will tell you what architectures gcc was built to support,
but unfortunately I don't remember it offhand.
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] The test program can be compiled and assembled correctly,
but link failed. Seems like -m64 influenced powerpc-poky-linux-gcc, but not
influenced powerpc-poky-linux-ld, LIBRARY_PATH is same for both 32b and 64b
build, how can the value of LIBRARY_PATH be set to different value if -m64 is
passed?
root@p5020ds:~# gcc -m64 -c my_test.c
root@p5020ds:~# ls -l
total 3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30 May 23 09:40 my_test.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1208 May 24 08:09 my_test.o
root@p5020ds:~# file my_test.o
my_test.o: ELF 64-bit MSB relocatable, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
root@p5020ds:~# cat my_test.c
int main()
{
return 0;
}
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] Query for multilib support in Yocto
Hi all,
I am trying the multilib feature of Yocto, and I want to make sure if below
scenarios are supported, who can help to clarify? Thanks in advance.
For standalone toolchain built by bitbake meta-toolchain
1. Can the same gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different
gcc binaries(one is for 32b, the other is for 64b) are required?
For gcc with multilib support running on target board
1. Can the same gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different
gcc binaries(one is for 32b, the other is for 64b) are required?
2. Can both 32b and 64b application be executed in the same rootfs image with
multilib support?
BTW, may I know how the default value of LIBRARY_PATH is set? I experienced
following error when I use gcc(32bit rootfs with multilib support) to do 64b
build, I find the linker search libraries in /usr/lib and /lib instead of
/usr/lib64 and /lib64.
root@p5020ds:~# gcc -m64 my_test.c -o my_test
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a
when searching for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching
for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /lib/../lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible //lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a
when searching for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching
for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find libgcc.a
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
root@p5020ds:~# cat my_test.c
int main()
{
int a=0;
return a;
}
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] Query for multilib support in Yocto
On 5/23/13 3:46 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying the multilib feature of Yocto, and I want to make sure if below
scenarios are supported, who can help to clarify? Thanks in advance.
For standalone toolchain built by bitbake meta-toolchain
1. Can the same gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different
gcc binaries(one is for 32b, the other is for 64b) are required?
As far as I know, you can create a multilib SDK, but you will need multilib gcc
binaries. We don't yet have singular gcc with multilib cflag options available.
(At Wind River we use a prebuilt binary toolchain that does allow this single
binary/multilib target behavior. Other then that we are using the standard SDK
support and it is working for us.)
For gcc with multilib support running on target board
1. Can the same gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different
gcc binaries(one is for 32b, the other is for 64b) are required?
As far as I'm aware the same issue above holds true here. You still need
multiple compiler binaries, one for each multilib. (Khem Raj would know if this
is still true however.)
It was discussed a while back that we really want to follow the single binary,
multilib target model -- but I don't know where that is from a development
perspective.
2. Can both 32b and 64b application be executed in the same rootfs image with
multilib support?
Yes. As long as the multilib support is configured properly (i.e. different
baselib for each tune) it works properly today. I've been building 1.4 (and
master) recently for x86/x86_64 systems with multilib support and as far as I
can tell it is working correctly.
On Power there have been some issues reported in the past with the prelinker and
PPC64 binaries. But other then that, it should be working fine.
BTW, may I know how the default value of LIBRARY_PATH is set? I experienced
following error when I use gcc(32bit rootfs with multilib support) to do 64b
build, I find the linker search libraries in /usr/lib and /lib instead of
/usr/lib64 and /lib64.
root@p5020ds:~# gcc -m64 my_test.c -o my_test
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a
when searching for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching
for -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /lib/../lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible //lib/libgcc_s.so.1 when searching for libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find libgcc_s.so.1
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a
when searching for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /usr/lib/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/libgcc.a when searching
for libgcc.a
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-poky-linux/4.7.2/../../../../powerpc-poky-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find libgcc.a
Ya, this is running the 'wrong' toolchain. From the errors it appears to me
that it's the 32-bit gcc, attempting to compile for 64-bit. There is a command
that will tell you what architectures gcc was built to support, but
unfortunately I don't remember it offhand.
At one point we had installed the full canonical name of the gcc binary, so
powerpc-poky-linux-gcc would be 32-bit, and powerpc64-poky-linux-gcc would
be the 64-bit version. I don't know if that is still true however.
--Mark
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
root@p5020ds:~# cat my_test.c
int main()
{
int a=0;
return a;
}
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
