Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:18:30 Koen Kooi wrote:
 Omap3-sgx-modules has no place in OE-core, so it should get deleted.

Sounds good, would you mind sending a patch that does that?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-05 Thread Joshua Lock
On 02/12/11 11:20, Joshua Lock wrote:
 NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
 otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...

This patch has now been merged into BitBake master.

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project Johannes factotum
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
 NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
 otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
 
 Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
 in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an
 error.
 
 Cheers,
 Joshua

What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things
explode?

Cheers,

Richard


___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-05 Thread Joshua Lock
On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
 NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
 otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...

 Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
 in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an
 error.

 Cheers,
 Joshua
 
 What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things
 explode?

Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you...

Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project Johannes factotum
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-05 Thread Joshua Lock


On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote:
 On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
 NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
 otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...

 Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
 in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an
 error.

 Cheers,
 Joshua

 What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things
 explode?
 
 Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you...

Two recipes in oe-core require checksums adding, puzzles and
omap3-sgx-modules - a v2 of this request with those patches is incoming.

Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project Johannes factotum
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make missing checksums an error

2011-12-05 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 6 dec. 2011, om 03:13 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven:

 
 
 On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote:
 On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
 NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
 otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
 
 Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
 in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises 
 an
 error.
 
 Cheers,
 Joshua
 
 What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things
 explode?
 
 Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you...
 
 Two recipes in oe-core require checksums adding, puzzles and
 omap3-sgx-modules - a v2 of this request with those patches is incoming.

Omap3-sgx-modules has no place in OE-core, so it should get deleted.

regards,

KOen

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core