Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-07 Thread Robert Yang


Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?

// Robert

On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:

Hi,

Background:
If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
be manually updated to keep in sync.

Idea:
Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
possible. The basic idea is to:
- Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
   ${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
- By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
that tarball

The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
other.

I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
of.

Cheers,
Erik Botö

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core




___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-07 Thread Erik Botö
Hi,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang  wrote:
>
> Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?
>
> // Robert

I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.

The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
to build their software from source, and in this build process the
files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
generate some extra files.

Cheers,
Erik


>
>
> On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Background:
>> If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
>> library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
>> on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
>> that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
>> This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
>> development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
>> be manually updated to keep in sync.
>>
>> Idea:
>> Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
>> possible. The basic idea is to:
>> - Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
>>${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
>> - By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
>> that tarball
>>
>> The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
>> recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
>> source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
>> other.
>>
>> I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
>> you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
>> of.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erik Botö
>>
>> ___
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-08 Thread Robert Yang



On 05/08/2013 02:36 PM, Erik Botö wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang  wrote:


Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?

// Robert


I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.



Hi Erik,

Sorry, I meant this one meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass :-)

// Robert


The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
to build their software from source, and in this build process the
files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
generate some extra files.

Cheers,
Erik





On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:


Hi,

Background:
If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
be manually updated to keep in sync.

Idea:
Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
possible. The basic idea is to:
- Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
- By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
that tarball

The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
other.

I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
of.

Cheers,
Erik Botö

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core









___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-08 Thread Erik Botö
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Yang  wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2013 02:36 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?
>>>
>>> // Robert
>>
>>
>> I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.
>>
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Sorry, I meant this one meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass :-)
>
> // Robert

Oh, hadn't seen that one. That could definitely be useful, the only
thing left to do is to try to automate the generation of the recipe
that uses the binary package.

Thanks,
Erik

>
>
>> The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
>> to build their software from source, and in this build process the
>> files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
>> generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
>> wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
>> the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
>> generate some extra files.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:


 Hi,

 Background:
 If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
 library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
 on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
 that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
 This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
 development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
 be manually updated to keep in sync.

 Idea:
 Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
 possible. The basic idea is to:
 - Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
 ${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
 - By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
 that tarball

 The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
 recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
 source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
 other.

 I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
 you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
 of.

 Cheers,
 Erik Botö

 ___
 Openembedded-core mailing list
 Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


>>>
>>
>>
>

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-08 Thread Robert Yang



On 05/08/2013 03:35 PM, Erik Botö wrote:

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Yang  wrote:



On 05/08/2013 02:36 PM, Erik Botö wrote:


Hi,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang 
wrote:



Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?

// Robert



I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.



Hi Erik,

Sorry, I meant this one meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass :-)

// Robert


Oh, hadn't seen that one. That could definitely be useful, the only
thing left to do is to try to automate the generation of the recipe
that uses the binary package.



How about the scripts/create-recipe ? It works fine with the tarball, but
not very well with .rpm/.deb/ipk.

// Robert


Thanks,
Erik





The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
to build their software from source, and in this build process the
files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
generate some extra files.

Cheers,
Erik





On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:



Hi,

Background:
If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
be manually updated to keep in sync.

Idea:
Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
possible. The basic idea is to:
- Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
 ${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
- By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
that tarball

The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
other.

I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
of.

Cheers,
Erik Botö

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core














___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [RFC] bbclass for automatic generation of binary recipes

2013-05-08 Thread Erik Botö
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Robert Yang  wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 03:35 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Yang 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2013 02:36 PM, Erik Botö wrote:


 Hi,

 On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Robert Yang 
 wrote:
>
>
>
> Is it similar to meta/classes/package.bbclass ?
>
> // Robert



 I would say it's in addition to package.bbclass.

>>>
>>> Hi Erik,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I meant this one meta/classes/bin_package.bbclass :-)
>>>
>>> // Robert
>>
>>
>> Oh, hadn't seen that one. That could definitely be useful, the only
>> thing left to do is to try to automate the generation of the recipe
>> that uses the binary package.
>>
>
> How about the scripts/create-recipe ? It works fine with the tarball, but
> not very well with .rpm/.deb/ipk.
>
> // Robert

What I have in mind is that the recipes will be created automatically
when building a source recipe that inherits a certain class. The
recipe and tarball would then be placed in a layer structure together
with other recipes that includes that class. Fields like RDEPENDS,
LICENSE; PR etc should be carried over from the source recipe.

Maybe it should be done in a way similar to populate_sdk, so if I
bitbake an image with e.g. -c populate_binary_layer it would create a
meta-layer with binary recipes for all packages inheriting that class.

-- Erik

>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>>>
>>>
 The idea is that the developers of the closed source software uses OE
 to build their software from source, and in this build process the
 files needed for a binary distribution in OE is automatically
 generated. These generated files can be distributed to others that
 wish to use that closed source software in OE. So it would use some of
 the output from package.bbclass, like the package split, but then
 generate some extra files.

 Cheers,
 Erik


>
>
> On 05/08/2013 01:53 PM, Erik Botö wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Background:
>> If you use OE to build software which includes e.g. a closed source
>> library, but still want to others to be able to build software based
>> on that library in a OE environment you would have to create recipes
>> that contains a binary version of your library + headers manually.
>> This would have to be done manually for each package, and as the
>> development of the library continues the binary recipes will have to
>> be manually updated to keep in sync.
>>
>> Idea:
>> Create a new bbclass that handles this automatically as much as
>> possible. The basic idea is to:
>> - Create a tarball of ${WORKDIR}/image/ alternatively
>>  ${WORKDIR}/packages-split/
>> - By parsing the "source recipe", create a "binary recipe" that uses
>> that tarball
>>
>> The binary recipe should work as a drop in replacement of the source
>> recipe. This means that the other recipes depending on the closed
>> source software shouldn't need to be adapted to work with one or the
>> other.
>>
>> I'd like feedback on whether you think the idea is feasible, and if
>> you think it could be useful for others. And anything else you think
>> of.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erik Botö
>>
>> ___
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>


>>>
>>
>>
>



--
=
Erik Botö
Senior Software Engineer
Pelagicore AB
Ekelundsgatan 4, 6tr, SE-411 18 Gothenburg, Sweden
Mobile: +46 (0)76 881 72 03
E-Mail: erik.b...@pelagicore.com
=

___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core