Re: [oe] spca5xx does not build

2010-07-17 Thread J. L.
I just tried adding EXTRA_CFLAGS in the bb file and still errors in
the same way. I also cleaned it to make sure before building.

Also there is an error stating an implasibly old time stamp from 1964?



On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Holger Freyther  wrote:
>
>> | make[1]: Entering directory
>> `/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/sysroots/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/kernel'
>> | scripts/Makefile.build:49: *** CFLAGS was changed in
>> "/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/work/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/spca5xx-20060501-r81/spca5xx-20060501/Makefile".
>> Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS.  Stop.
>>
>
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] spca5xx does not build

2010-07-17 Thread J. L.
i tried editing the make file its self where it says but when I
rebuilt it it just un tared it again and rewrote my change. Do I need
to figure out how to make it use that in the bb file itself? Sorry for
the basic questions just unsure

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Holger Freyther  wrote:
>
>> | make[1]: Entering directory
>> `/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/sysroots/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/kernel'
>> | scripts/Makefile.build:49: *** CFLAGS was changed in
>> "/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/work/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/spca5xx-20060501-r81/spca5xx-20060501/Makefile".
>> Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS.  Stop.
>>
>
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] busybox mdev

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Blundell
I'm not familiar with that recipe and I don't seem to have a
micro-base.bb in my tree.  But, if it's sucking in udev, it sounds like
a bogus dependency somewhere.  You can use bitbake -g to find out where.

p.

On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 17:09 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me?
> 
> On 17 Jul 2010 15:39, "Phil Blundell"  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 02:06 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > (what's the reason micro-base u...
> Er, does it?  My copy of micro-base-image.bb says:
> 
> # Include minimum init and init scripts
> 
> IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev"
> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof"
> IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = ""
> 
> If it's using udev then that is definitely a bug.
> 
> p.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-deve...
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] busybox mdev

2010-07-17 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 17-07-10 17:09, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me?

And does it end up in your image? Bitbaking something also builds quilt
for me, yet it doesn't show up in the image.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMQfoSMkyGM64RGpERAklNAKCn1Xv01ajA1KLNqmqiJZ7npEi9CwCgnh1v
f8JqNkn0Vk3ASdabEZ/Mjvc=
=Qhvx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 14:17 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> And I was saying that the 8GB of git, if a bug in git, not with gdb3. I
> know gdb3 makes unstripped executables bigger and don't deny that.
> 
> I do take offence with you saying that the root cause is -ggdb3, when
> it's actually git being buggy. And as you have seen, instead of fixing
> git, people are removing -ggdb3 :(

It may well be true that the 8GB total folder size is due to a
deficiency in git.  But, if the individual binaries are coming out at
101MB, that's still an increase of something like 1% compared to an
equivalent build without debugging.

Obviously it's up to angstrom to make its own policies, but I do wonder
how many of its users actually find themselves debugging -native
packages on a regular basis and, for those that do, how much benefit
they are really gaining from -ggdb3 versus plain -g.

p.



___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] Configuration of kernel image

2010-07-17 Thread saleh usman

I am bitbaking console-image for DM6446 to build a kernel image and root file 
system. I using davinci kernel , which file exactly is used for the 
configuration of this  kernel iamge ?

Saleh
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH] keymaps: remove initscripts dependency

2010-07-17 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Acked-by: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer 

-- 
:M:


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] busybox mdev

2010-07-17 Thread pieterg
On Saturday 17 July 2010 17:09:28 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me?

Many packages (R)DEPEND on udev, it's very hard to build anything these days 
without dragging in udev.

What I usually do is add

PROVIDES += "udev"
RPROVIDES_${PN}-mdev += "udev"

to the busybox recipe, and just assume that whatever all those packages 
claim they need udev for, is provided by mdev as well...

And set a

PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev = "busybox"

(I do that from the distro. People might argue this has to be an image 
decision instead of a distro decision, but I prefer to set 
IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER in the distro instead of the image..)

Rgds, Pieter

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] busybox mdev

2010-07-17 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me?

On 17 Jul 2010 15:39, "Phil Blundell"  wrote:

On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 02:06 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> (what's the reason micro-base u...
Er, does it?  My copy of micro-base-image.bb says:

# Include minimum init and init scripts

IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev"
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof"
IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = ""

If it's using udev then that is definitely a bug.

p.




___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-deve...
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] fix pulling initscripts in keymaps

2010-07-17 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli

Hi,
I've an issue with initscripts(instead of my specific distro initscript)
 beeing pulled by keymaps.

As it may be considered core, Here's a patch attached.

Denis.


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] keymaps: remove initscripts dependency

2010-07-17 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Multiple initscripts version exist,for instance
  initscripts-shr,initscripts-openmoko,initscripts etc...
Depending on a particular initscript is not a good idea:

For instance on SHR(distro) and htcdream(machine)
  it install initscripts instead of initscripts-shr in
  shr-image,which result in having the /etc/init.d/devices which
  is,according to mickeyl, an init script for devfs.
  if this init script is present(with the corresponding rc links) it get
  executed,which causes some devices nodes to lack.
  which prevent sound,modem and maybe other driver from working on the
  htcdream.

Thanks mrmoku in #openmoko-cdevel in Freenode
  for helping me finding the offending recipe.
Thanks mickeyl in #openmoko-cdevel in Freenode for telling me
  that usually packages don't depend on the initscripts

Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli 
---
 recipes/keymaps/keymaps_1.0.bb |4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/keymaps/keymaps_1.0.bb b/recipes/keymaps/keymaps_1.0.bb
index 25a93c2..f8cd77f 100644
--- a/recipes/keymaps/keymaps_1.0.bb
+++ b/recipes/keymaps/keymaps_1.0.bb
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 DESCRIPTION = "Keyboard map"
 SECTION = "base"
-RDEPENDS_${PN} = "initscripts console-tools"
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "console-tools"
 LICENSE = "GPL"
 PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE}"
-PR = "r24"
+PR = "r25"
 
 inherit update-rc.d
 
-- 
1.7.0.4


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] busybox mdev

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 02:06 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> (what's the reason micro-base uses udev instead of mdev, btw?)

Er, does it?  My copy of micro-base-image.bb says:

# Include minimum init and init scripts
IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev"
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof"
IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = ""

If it's using udev then that is definitely a bug.

p.



___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

2010-07-17 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 17-07-10 04:06, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Koen Kooi  wrote:
> On 16-07-10 17:23, Khem Raj wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Paul Menzel
  wrote:
> Dear OE folks,
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
>
>> I ran out of space and noticed
>>
>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4
>>
>> is 8,1G big.
>>
>> Some of the executable files in
>>
>> 
>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4/sysroot-destdir/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/
>>
>> are 101 MB big.

 its most probably the -g3/-ggdb3 bloat.
> 
> No, it's git not creating (hard)links but copies of the same app. Run an
> md5sum on the binaries, they will all match. I suggest you stop
> spreading FUD about -ggdb3, it is not being appriciated.
> 
>> Hi Koen
> 
>> Its not FUD and I only speak of what I see with my eyes. I have data
>> to prove it. Compile uclibc with ggdb3 and it ends up with 202M of
>> shared library and without its only ~600K. (with gcc 4.4 and 4.5) I
>> have similar experience with 4.3 but I dont
>> have a build handy to see how big the binaries got.

And I was saying that the 8GB of git, if a bug in git, not with gdb3. I
know gdb3 makes unstripped executables bigger and don't deny that.

I do take offence with you saying that the root cause is -ggdb3, when
it's actually git being buggy. And as you have seen, instead of fixing
git, people are removing -ggdb3 :(

regards,

Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMQZ9yMkyGM64RGpERAvrYAJ0XYJZ40fAfTpWs5eCdEuWZlidzQgCgnDiw
sWRwYL9QbYfPDgdyp47pwzk=
=hKZ3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

2010-07-17 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 17-07-10 10:35, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
>> On 16-07-10 17:23, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Paul Menzel
>>>  wrote:
> 
 Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> I ran out of space and noticed
>
> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4
>
> is 8,1G big.
>
> Some of the executable files in
>
> 
> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4/sysroot-destdir/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/
>
> are 101 MB big.
>>>
>>> its most probably the -g3/-ggdb3 bloat.
>>
>> No, it's git not creating (hard)links but copies of the same app. Run an
>> md5sum on the binaries, they will all match. I suggest you stop
>> spreading FUD about -ggdb3, it is not being appriciated.
> 
> I do not know anything about the technical background. I can only report
> that removing `-ggdb3` fixed it for me.

Are you saying that removing -ggdb3 made git create proper (hard)links?

regards.

Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMQZ7PMkyGM64RGpERAilSAJ0Xh7q/84Ls1fu9SiqPiX4FcOS+9ACfRG/L
0sRjnr5z7xFxOVC7oSc1aG8=
=MEay
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc-git: oe_runmake failed: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections' (was: oe_runmake failed: error: '__a1' undeclared (first use in this function))

2010-07-17 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 22:16 +0200 schrieb Henning Heinold:
>
>> its pushed now.
>
>Henning and Khem, thank you for your fast and great help!
>
>I hit the next problem with `uclibc-git.bb`. This time it fails with the
>distribution angstrom-2008.1 (-ggdb3 removed) but works with the
>distribution minimal-uclibc.
>
>arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 
> -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -c 
> libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S -o 
> libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o -include 
> ./include/libc-symbols.h -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing 
> -Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-format-attribute 
> -Wformat=2 -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations 
> -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition -Wnonnull -Wundef 
> -funsigned-char -fno-builtin -fno-asm -mlittle-endian -mtune=arm9tdmi 
> -march=armv4t -fno-stack-protector -nostdinc -I./include -I./include -I. 
> -I./libc/sysdeps/linux -I./libc/sysdeps/linux/arm -fexpensive-optimizations 
> -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb3 -Os -funit-at-a-time 
> -fmerge-all-constants -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-dominator-opts 
> -fno-strength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing -DHAVE_FORCED_UNWIND 
> -I./libpthread/nptl -I./libpthread/nptl 
> -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ 
> -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sy
>sv/linux/arm -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm 
>-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux 
>-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux 
>-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/generic -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread 
>-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/bits -I./ldso/ldso/arm -I./ldso/include 
>-I./libc/sysdeps/linux/common 
>-I/tmp/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/usr/include/ 
>-isystem 
>/tmp/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/lib/gcc/arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/4.3.3/include-fixed
> -isystem 
>/tmp/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/lib/gcc/arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/4.3.3/include
> -DNDEBUG -D__USE_STDIO_FUTEXES__ -MT 
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o -MD -MP -MF 
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/.open.o.dep -D__ASSEMBLER__ 
>-Wa,--noexecstack -D_LIBC_REENTRANT
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S: Assembler messages:
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S:8: Error: unknown 
> pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections'

binutils too old?
qemuarm builds fine with 2.20.1, which version of binutils are you
trying to use?
See uclibc.org/FAQ#upstream_versions
We support the last two official upstream versions of binutils/gcc, so
that'd be binutils >= 2.20.latest and gcc-4.5.latest (i usually use both
HEADs plus eventual fixups/tweaks myself).
angstrom-2008.1.conf mentions 2.18 which is definitely way too old for
uClibc master by now, fyi.

>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.S: Assembler messages:
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.S:9: Error: unknown 
> pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections'
>make: *** [libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o] Error 1
>make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>make: *** [libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.o] Error 1
>libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/jmp-unwind.c:29: warning: no 
> previous prototype for '_longjmp_unwind'
>FATAL: oe_runmake failed
>
>The full log is attached compressed. Uncompressed it was 1.7 MB big.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paul





>___
>Openembedded-devel mailing list
>Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] Udev not creating mtdblock**

2010-07-17 Thread Holger Freyther
On 07/17/2010 01:14 AM, John Tobias wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The udev is not working correctly on my beagleboard, it doesn't create
> a device node for mtdblock and loop. Is there any quick fix on these
> problem?.

Is your kernel detecting the mtdblock at all? Do you have loop in loaded
as well?

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] spca5xx does not build

2010-07-17 Thread Holger Freyther

> | make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/sysroots/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/kernel'
> | scripts/Makefile.build:49: *** CFLAGS was changed in
> "/home/vdubhack/overo-oe/tmp/work/overo-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/spca5xx-20060501-r81/spca5xx-20060501/Makefile".
> Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS.  Stop.
> 

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc-git: oe_runmake failed: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections' (was: oe_runmake failed: error: '__a1' undeclared (first use in this function))

2010-07-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 22:16 +0200 schrieb Henning Heinold:

> its pushed now.

Henning and Khem, thank you for your fast and great help!

I hit the next problem with `uclibc-git.bb`. This time it fails with the
distribution angstrom-2008.1 (-ggdb3 removed) but works with the
distribution minimal-uclibc.

arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 
-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -c libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S 
-o libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o -include 
./include/libc-symbols.h -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing 
-Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-format-attribute 
-Wformat=2 -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wold-style-declaration 
-Wold-style-definition -Wnonnull -Wundef -funsigned-char -fno-builtin -fno-asm 
-mlittle-endian -mtune=arm9tdmi -march=armv4t -fno-stack-protector -nostdinc 
-I./include -I./include -I. -I./libc/sysdeps/linux -I./libc/sysdeps/linux/arm 
-fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb3 
-Os -funit-at-a-time -fmerge-all-constants -fno-tree-loop-optimize 
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-strength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing 
-DHAVE_FORCED_UNWIND -I./libpthread/nptl -I./libpthread/nptl 
-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ 
-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm 
-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux 
-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/generic 
-I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread -I./libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/bits 
-I./ldso/ldso/arm -I./ldso/include -I./libc/sysdeps/linux/common 
-I/tmp/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/usr/include/ 
-isystem 
/tmp/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/lib/gcc/arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/4.3.3/include-fixed
 -isystem 
/tmp/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/lib/gcc/arm-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/4.3.3/include
 -DNDEBUG -D__USE_STDIO_FUTEXES__ -MT 
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o -MD -MP -MF 
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/.open.o.dep -D__ASSEMBLER__ 
-Wa,--noexecstack -D_LIBC_REENTRANT
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S: Assembler messages:
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.S:8: Error: unknown 
pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections'
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.S: Assembler messages:
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.S:9: Error: unknown 
pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections'
make: *** [libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/open.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make: *** [libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/close.o] Error 1
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/jmp-unwind.c:29: warning: no 
previous prototype for '_longjmp_unwind'
FATAL: oe_runmake failed

The full log is attached compressed. Uncompressed it was 1.7 MB big.


Thanks,

Paul


log.do_compile.18181.7z
Description: application/7z-compressed


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

2010-07-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> On 16-07-10 17:23, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Paul Menzel
> >  wrote:

> >> Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> >>
> >>> I ran out of space and noticed
> >>>
> >>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4
> >>>
> >>> is 8,1G big.
> >>>
> >>> Some of the executable files in
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4/sysroot-destdir/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/
> >>>
> >>> are 101 MB big.
> > 
> > its most probably the -g3/-ggdb3 bloat.
> 
> No, it's git not creating (hard)links but copies of the same app. Run an
> md5sum on the binaries, they will all match. I suggest you stop
> spreading FUD about -ggdb3, it is not being appriciated.

I do not know anything about the technical background. I can only report
that removing `-ggdb3` fixed it for me.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/3] glibc 2.9: cleaned up; patches only in local dir

2010-07-17 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/7/17 Khem Raj 

> On (15/07/10 22:46), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> > moved all patches to glibc-2.9
> > removed references to other dirs.
>
>
> Well you forgot to copy glibc-2.4/etc dir into glibc-2.9
> this will render glibc 2.9 unbuildable.
>

Thanks for noticing this. Fixed.
(apparently forgot the -r when copying the dir over)

Frans

>
> Thx
> -Khem
>
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] Could not find dbus-daemon in our root file system

2010-07-17 Thread Soumya R
Hi All,
   
I am working on openembedded form past few days for Au1350 mipsel 
architecture. I need to include
dbus-daemon where should i include this?. I have included 
dbus-deamon-proxy_git.bb in dbus in recipes and also
in task-qte-toolcain-target.bb..I have build a root file system and toolchain 
from it.. But i could not find the dbus-deamon 
binary in our rfs.. Please suggest me if i am doing anything wrong..


Regards,
soumya 


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/3] glibc 2.9: cleaned up; patches only in local dir

2010-07-17 Thread Khem Raj
On (15/07/10 22:46), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> moved all patches to glibc-2.9
> removed references to other dirs.


Well you forgot to copy glibc-2.4/etc dir into glibc-2.9
this will render glibc 2.9 unbuildable.

Thx
-Khem

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] angstrom-2008.1, uclibc: git-native: sysroot-destdir 6, 4 GB big, since some executables are 100 MB each

2010-07-17 Thread Khem Raj
On (17/07/10 01:03), Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 16-07-10 17:23, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Paul Menzel
> >  wrote:
> >> Dear OE folks,
> >>
> >>
> >> Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> >>
> >>> I ran out of space and noticed
> >>>
> >>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4
> >>>
> >>> is 8,1G big.
> >>>
> >>> Some of the executable files in
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> /angstrom-dev/work/i686-linux/git-native-1.7.0.2-r4/sysroot-destdir/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/
> >>>
> >>> are 101 MB big.
> > 
> > its most probably the -g3/-ggdb3 bloat.
> 
> No, it's git not creating (hard)links but copies of the same app. Run an
> md5sum on the binaries, they will all match. I suggest you stop
> spreading FUD about -ggdb3, it is not being appriciated.

Hi Koen


I built minimal-image/uclibc from scratch on a ubuntu maverick (gcc 4.4.4)
host
once with -g and secong time using -ggdb3 instead
in both FULL_OPTIMIZATION and BUILD_OPTIMIZATION



Total tmp size with -g = 15G
Total tmp size with -ggdb3 = 70G

Total sysroot size with -g = 1.1G (868M is native sysroot )
Total sysroot size with -ggdb3 = 13.4G ( 12.7G is native sysroot )

Total size of cross directory with -g = 158M
Total size of cross directory with -gdb3 = 567M

Because I did not strip the binaries

Total size of deploy with -g = 135M
Total size of deploy with -ggdb3 = 521M

Attached is a list of files in sysroot which are larger than 2M in size
sorted in increasing size order for both -g and -ggdb

generated by using

find . -type f -size +2000k -exec ls -lh {} \; 2> /dev/null | awk '{ print
$NF ": " $5 }' | sort -nk 2,2

btw git-native build tree is 24G which is a problem
but if we ignore that tmp still is ~45G for a minimal-image

Does that clear the FUD ? :)

anyway my point was that users know what to expect. If we put it in
minimum requirement to build a distro its fine atleast it sets expectation
on how much disk space would be needed.

btw. now may I request you for some emperical evidence on
"gcc 4.4 is slow on ARMv7" or is it another FUD or hearsay ? :)

Thanks

-Khem

ps: I also noticed that the build with -ggdb3 took noticeable longer time. I 
wish I
had timed it but may be next time.
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: 2.0M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/usr/lib/libgcrypt.a: 2.1M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.1: 2.4M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1: 2.4M
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libncurses.a: 2.5M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.26.14.12: 2.6M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-cris: 2.8M
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.1: 2.8M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-sh4: 3.0M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/lib/libuClibc-0.9.32-git.so: 3.1M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-microblaze: 3.1M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-sh4eb: 3.1M
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1: 3.1M
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libcrypto.a: 3.3M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-m68k: 3.4M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-sparc: 3.4M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/qemu-alpha: 3.5M
./x86_64-linux/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.7.7: 3.9M
./mipsel-oe-linux-uclibc/usr/lib/libgnutls.a: 4.1M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/git: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/git-receive-pack: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/bin/git-upload-archive: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-add: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-annotate: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-apply: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-archive: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-bisect--helper: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-blame: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-branch: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-bundle: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-cat-file: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-check-attr: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-checkout: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-checkout-index: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-check-ref-format: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-cherry: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-cherry-pick: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-clean: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-clone: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-commit: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-commit-tree: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-config: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-count-objects: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-describe: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-diff: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-diff-files: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-diff-index: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-diff-tree: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-fast-export: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-fetch: 4.2M
./x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/git-core/git-fetch-