Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCHv2 0/4] Various package additions/upgrades
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 07-07-11 15:35, Michael Lippautz schreef: Find attached the revised additions/upgrades for python-pyudev, python-sqlalchemy, audiofile and s-sd. Pull URL: git://github.com/zoidrr/meta-openembedded.git Branch: master Browse: https://github.com/zoidrr/meta-openembedded/commits/master Thanks, Michael Lippautz michael.lippa...@gmail.com --- Michael Lippautz (4): python-pyudev: Add version 0.11 (initial recipe) python-sqlalchemy: Add version 0.7.1 (initial recipe) audiofile: Update 0.2.6 to 0.2.7 start-stop-daemon: Add version 1.16.0.2 (initial recipe) Thanks, merged -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOGCD8MkyGM64RGpERAniSAJ4z+tlg86nMKNqZLZkroDRlXKi+xwCePHQs m/FMFKzUbQjKG6eLv3QDdIQ= =u7lV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH v2] pulseaudio: Run as system-wide instance instead of per-user
Dear Joel, Am Freitag, den 08.07.2011, 19:29 -0500 schrieb Joel A Fernandes: Can we ignore this patch and use one I just submitted titled pulseaudio: Switch to version version 0.9.22 for Angstrom 2011.03? yes of course. Could you please update the state of your patches in OE’s patch queue [1]? You have to register and for example use the following command [2]. $ pwclient update -s Superseded 7115 If a patch has been committed you can also pass the commit ID with `-c`. Thanks for reviewing my patch, No problem. Thanks, Paul PS: Please never top post to lists. If interleaved style is not useful, since you do not need to take reference to anything, just delete the quote all together. [1] http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/ [2] http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Patchwork signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Re: [PATCH] pulseaudio: Switch to version version 0.9.22 for Angstrom 2011.03
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 09-07-11 02:21, Joel A Fernandes schreef: This fixes all the issues noticed earlier with pulseaudio 0.9.15: * Pulseaudio keeping audio devices busy when run as per-user instance * Failure of pactl, pacmd etc to connect to the pulseaudio server Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com Acked-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net Tom, do you want to take this directly or should I do a pull request with this in it? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOGCFbMkyGM64RGpERAiB+AJ9VdbP77X9RB9ticvZt1nza9HncegCgqJ97 iZVhWtlMPB8HG1QTtjsE41Q= =29tt -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Switch to version version 0.9.22 for Angstrom 2011.03
Am Freitag, den 08.07.2011, 19:21 -0500 schrieb Joel A Fernandes:
I do not know if the commit summary is correct and if it should be
prepended with »angstrom«.
This fixes all the issues noticed earlier with pulseaudio 0.9.15:
* Pulseaudio keeping audio devices busy when run as per-user instance
* Failure of pactl, pacmd etc to connect to the pulseaudio server
Please always include links to corresponding list threads if they are
available.
Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com
---
Notes:
* This has to go into the OpenEmbedded 2011.03-maintenance branch as there is
no such configration file in the master branch
$ git grep pulse conf/distro
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_gst-pulse
= 0.9.7
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio
= 0.9.15
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_gst-pulse
= 0.9.7
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio
= 0.9.22
[…]
So you your change could actually be applied to master?
* Please ignore the earlier patch pulseaudio: Run as system-wide instance
instead of per-user
Applying this and the patch titled beagleboard-test-scripts: Add a script
flash-fs.sh for flashing NAND will mark the
Alpha build of the C5 image. Can this be tagged?
Things to go into Beta:
* User button fixes (kernel and flashing scripts)
* U-boot fixes for EHCI timeouts when doing a tftpboot
Great, but this should have gone to a separate thread.
conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf |3 +++
.../include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
index ae1ed4c..7b4f25a 100644
--- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
+++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils_avr32 = 2.17
PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross_avr32 = 2.17
PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross-sdk_avr32 = 2.17
+ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION = 0.9.15
+ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION_armv7a = 0.9.22
+
1. Where did you find this syntax?
$ git grep PULSE conf/distro/
does not find anything in branch master.
2. Could you add an explanation, why 0.9.22 is not used for everything
and only for armv7a. Is that because of commit cce5e648 [1]?
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib = dbus-glib
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_hotplug = udev
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_opkg ?= opkg
diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
index b5b524a..e4b8bf1 100644
--- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
+++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_pango-native = 1.24.4
#PREFERRED_VERSION_pixman= 0.13.2
PREFERRED_VERSION_pkgconfig = 0.23
PREFERRED_VERSION_pkgconfig-native = 0.23
-PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio = 0.9.15
+PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio = ${ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION}
PREFERRED_VERSION_python-pycairo = 1.8.0
PREFERRED_VERSION_qt4-tools-native = ${ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION}
PREFERRED_VERSION_qt4-tools-sdk = ${ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION}
So I would prefer, if you would change the version just in this file and
such a patch could go into branch master first.
Even better would be the following.
1. Package PA 0.9.23 for oe-dev. If I remember correctly I send all
patches upstream and it should work for all architectures(?).
2. Prefer PA 0.9.23 for Ȧngström and other distributions.
3. Remove older PA versions.
4. Cherry pick these changes into branch 2011.03-maintenance.
Joel, do you have time and motivation to do that?
Thanks,
Paul
[1]
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=cce5e648222525a0619f454ddc4f2253afca2821
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] update proposals
Hello, This archive contain some updates for recipes. Could you integrate it ? All are ok but I cannot rebuild jamvm 1.5.4 since icedted build fails. Could you fix icedted if you want that I test jamvm again (i did it few month before and it worked) ? I hope that it will help some users. Fabien updates.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] update proposals
Dear Fabien, Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 14:17 +0100 schrieb fabien comte: This archive contain some updates for recipes. Could you integrate it ? thank you for your updates. Unfortunately we cannot integrate those as is, because they do not follow our commit policy [1]. Please submit each change separately with a description of the problem, the solution and your Signed-off-by line. All are ok but I cannot rebuild jamvm 1.5.4 since icedted build fails. Could you fix icedted if you want that I test jamvm again (i did it few month before and it worked) ? Please open a new thread for this problem with a descriptive subject line so that people can help you [3]. I hope that it will help some users. Thank you for your improvements and hopefully you can spend another our to format your updates correctly so that we can include them. Thanks, Paul [1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded [2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy [3] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/08/2011 07:17 AM, George C. Huntington III wrote: Cherry-pick: 0f0ee32d7045bc75ce9759805d04874499f1c958 Tested-by: George C. Huntington III gch...@mtiemail.com please add this to the 2011.03-maintenance branch (sorry, i think i screwed up my last attempt to send this request) Robert Schuster (1): cacao-native_hg: Fix cacao-shutdownguard.patch recipes/cacao/cacao-native_hg.bb |2 +- recipes/cacao/files/cacao-shutdownguard.patch | 32 +--- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Applied, thanks! - -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOGHBNAAoJEI4NMjfc3nJxuOsH/1O/ZfgfQgeBC1LsPmlMFAIN KZZORUK8fr1fTnkX6ANcCm3vSGWlxLG+1M3K0tr877aQ6Zi9FCqfHQHwVo328wlW r/sU5sipDQksaIhRkbgjUSr2wojTDd2OLaHcn0SOGdQ30ZAOMffK+uh9p4SwUbDF ccVX9SyOJzS/jZ2JlbVzKGsVh9TeL0XQuScx/+YZ2/s98bp7VFxNixktQSXBh9Vf Rn6hD9lTInPQKZtX02JFCyyyNzcG+r6auV+GkBD5FPFjkY1oPar+mNPFoEBhKOFl rxrWiDCiHz+y08WW1s17wRaHr9VunGhZH5qF1MwK59jUVIcYWmhmg4SbGZcXqg4= =gHu5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] Using ${DATE} in PR
Update on this ... it turns out that touching the recipe file (i.e.
updating the last accessed timestamp on the file) is what caused
things to rebuild. Is there a way to tell bitbake to ignore caching a
recipe and/or always reevaluate the PR value in the recipe itself?
Thanks,
Chris
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Chris Verges kg4...@gmail.com wrote:
Using ${DATE} didn't work, but I was able to use a similar trick to
get this working:
BUILD_DATE ?= ${@time.strftime('%Y%m%d', time.gmtime())}
PR = r5.${BUILD_DATE}.0
Perhaps because ${DATE} in bitbake.conf is declared without the ${@
tag this causes a more static interpretation of the variable?
Hope this helps someone else in the future,
Chris
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Chris Verges kg4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to use the ${DATE} variable from
openembedded/conf/bitbake.conf in the PR value of a local overlay
recipe. The idea is to create a recipe that will automatically
rebuild each day. (The recipe itself is creates a small text file in
/etc that tracks the build date.) BitBake is at 1.12.0, and OE is on
2011.03-maintenance.
Unfortunately, the following didn't work as I expected:
PR = r5.${DATE}.0
(I use the r5 prefix field to increment in case I make any major
changes to the PR format, and the 0 suffix field to increment any
minor changes to the recipe itself.)
The expected behavior is that the recipe will automatically rebuild
each day. The actual behavior is that the recipe does not rebuild.
Does anyone have any ideas on what I'm overlooking?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [Fwd: help]
Forwarding to the appropriate address,
please use openembedded-devel-ow...@lists.openembedded.org for
administrative purposes only.
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: Rizwan Shaik rizwanco...@gmail.com
An: openembedded-devel-ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Betreff: help
Datum: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:35:34 +0530
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am building the Angstrom for pxa300 machine. I am building a image
which supports gui and I am getting the following error.
guile-native_1.8.5.bb do_compile failed.
When I looked into the log message the message was as of follows.
guile-procedures.texi || { rm guile-procedures.texi; false; }
ERROR: unknown doc attribute: (location (string . alist.c) (int . 36)
(hash . hash))
The following is the error please help me..
Thanks and Regards,
Rizwan.
--
:M:
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] Re : update proposals
Hello, Does a wiki page exist with all the informations to do the job right ? About the icedtea bug, the bugtracker is closed so how to report ??? Thank you, Fabien De : Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net À : openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Envoyé le : Samedi 9 Juillet 2011 15h55 Objet : Re: [oe] update proposals Dear Fabien, Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 14:17 +0100 schrieb fabien comte: This archive contain some updates for recipes. Could you integrate it ? thank you for your updates. Unfortunately we cannot integrate those as is, because they do not follow our commit policy [1]. Please submit each change separately with a description of the problem, the solution and your Signed-off-by line. All are ok but I cannot rebuild jamvm 1.5.4 since icedted build fails. Could you fix icedted if you want that I test jamvm again (i did it few month before and it worked) ? Please open a new thread for this problem with a descriptive subject line so that people can help you [3]. I hope that it will help some users. Thank you for your improvements and hopefully you can spend another our to format your updates correctly so that we can include them. Thanks, Paul [1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded [2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy [3] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] update proposals
Dear Fabien, please do not top post. Please read the netiquette [3]. Although it is not common in France(?) I suggest that you use a mail program like Evolution, Thunderbird, notmuch or Mutt instead of you Web mailer interface. Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 18:06 +0100 schrieb fabien comte: Does a wiki page exist with all the informations to do the job right ? I hope the pages I gave you in my last reply [1][2] are good enough. If something is unclear please ask on this mailing list. I suggest that you create a patch for one problem first so that we can see if that is fine. You can take a look at the commit log (`git log`) to see how commits look like. About the icedtea bug, the bugtracker is closed so how to report ??? Please just send a message to this list with a short informative subject line and the important log files included. Thanks, Paul [1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded [2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy [3] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Switch to version version 0.9.22 for Angstrom 2011.03
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 09-07-11 12:09, Paul Menzel schreef: 1. Package PA 0.9.23 for oe-dev. That could work, apart from oe-dev being a dead-end. OE-core has .23 already 2. Prefer PA 0.9.23 for Ȧngström and other distributions. 3. Remove older PA versions. 4. Cherry pick these changes into branch 2011.03-maintenance. That won't work, the gcc 4.3.x angstrom is using in maintenance lacks the needed atomic ops (even after the merge from buglabs) to build it for !armv7a. To keep things single I'd recommend the following: * enable .22 for armv7a, leave the rest as-is -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOGM1lMkyGM64RGpERAjjzAJ9KvJaiB0ypsZFQwChE3PV6Q7Ph7wCdEXpO zofD3v8F8h1/xzgpFvNFnJw= =a6bP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Switch to version version 0.9.22
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments.
I do not know if the commit summary is correct and if it should be
prepended with ?angstrom?.
Why do say that the commit summary is not correct? The conf file being
patched is for the Angstrom 2011.03 distribution.
This fixes all the issues noticed earlier with pulseaudio 0.9.15:
* Pulseaudio keeping audio devices busy when run as per-user instance
* Failure of pactl, pacmd etc to connect to the pulseaudio server
Please always include links to corresponding list threads if they are
available.
Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com
---
Notes:
* This has to go into the OpenEmbedded 2011.03-maintenance branch as there
is no such configration file in the master branch
$ git grep pulse conf/distro
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_gst-pulse
= 0.9.7
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio
= 0.9.15
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_gst-pulse
= 0.9.7
conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio
= 0.9.22
[?]
So you your change could actually be applied to master?
I was trying to say that the conf file involved doesn't exist in the
master branch
conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf | 3 +++
.../include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
index ae1ed4c..7b4f25a 100644
--- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
+++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils_avr32 = 2.17
PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross_avr32 = 2.17
PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross-sdk_avr32 = 2.17
+ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION = 0.9.15
+ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION_armv7a = 0.9.22
+
1. Where did you find this syntax?
$ git grep PULSE conf/distro/
does not find anything in branch master.
Yes, I didn't either because I was the first one to add it. :) There
are other variables in the same conf file that provide overrides in a
similar way. Why do you think is the syntax not correct?
2. Could you add an explanation, why 0.9.22 is not used for everything
and only for armv7a. Is that because of commit cce5e648 [1]?
I'm not sure which commit causes a problem, but Koen can explain more.
From what I understand, the compiler doesn't support building this
version of pulseaudio for armv7a. Koen?
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib = dbus-glib
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_hotplug = udev
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_opkg ?= opkg
diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
index b5b524a..e4b8bf1 100644
--- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
+++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2008-preferred-versions.inc
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_pango-native = 1.24.4
#PREFERRED_VERSION_pixman = 0.13.2
PREFERRED_VERSION_pkgconfig = 0.23
PREFERRED_VERSION_pkgconfig-native = 0.23
-PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio = 0.9.15
+PREFERRED_VERSION_pulseaudio = ${ANGSTROM_PULSEAUDIO_VERSION}
PREFERRED_VERSION_python-pycairo = 1.8.0
PREFERRED_VERSION_qt4-tools-native = ${ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION}
PREFERRED_VERSION_qt4-tools-sdk = ${ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION}
So I would prefer, if you would change the version just in this file and
such a patch could go into branch master first.
master doesn't have a conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf so I'm not sure
how I can create a patch for the master branch?
Even better would be the following.
1. Package PA 0.9.23 for oe-dev. If I remember correctly I send all
patches upstream and it should work for all architectures(?).
2. Prefer PA 0.9.23 for ?ngstr?m and other distributions.
3. Remove older PA versions.
4. Cherry pick these changes into branch 2011.03-maintenance.
Joel, do you have time and motivation to do that?
Motivation is there, but time isn't ;). I can make an effort to do
this at some point though. Thanks,
Regards,
Joel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] Using ${DATE} in PR
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Chris Verges wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Chris Verges kg4...@gmail.com wrote:
Using ${DATE} didn't work, but I was able to use a similar trick to
get this working:
BUILD_DATE ?= ${@time.strftime('%Y%m%d', time.gmtime())}
PR = r5.${BUILD_DATE}.0
Update on this ... it turns out that touching the recipe file (i.e.
updating the last accessed timestamp on the file) is what caused
things to rebuild. Is there a way to tell bitbake to ignore caching a
recipe and/or always reevaluate the PR value in the recipe itself?
Hi list,
Apologies for the top posting before. The only mail client I had
available was gmail's web interface, which isn't too netiquette
friendly.
I did some more digging into the BitBake sources. I found the
__BB_DONT_CACHE variable declared in bitbake/lib/bb/cache.py, and have
set it to a value of 1 in the recipe that is using a dynamically
generated PR value. I'll test tomorrow to see if it truly fixed things.
The recipe so far:
# Prevent BitBake from caching this recipe
__BB_DONT_CACHE = 1
# The PR value is formatted as 'rX.DATE.Y' where 'X' is incremented
# only if the PR format changes, 'DATE' is dynamically generated by
# BitBake itself, and 'Y' should be incremented each time the recipe
# is manually changed.
PR = r3.${DATE}.7
Hope this helps anyone else looking to do tracking on nightly builds.
Chris
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
