Re: [oe] [meta-oe] xf86-input-tslib: Use correct name for checksum calculation

2011-12-07 Thread Ulf Samuelsson

On 2011-12-07 15:45, Koen Kooi wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op 07-12-11 15:19, u...@emagii.com schreef:

From: Ulf Samuelsson

Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson

Please don't send patches against stale repos that don't apply.

Good practice of course, Then again:

Several times when I have run "./oebb.sh update", the git trees become 
non-functional

which is kind of negative feedback.

The "stale" tree I used was from yesterday so it is not that old.
Ulf



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk7ffBYACgkQMkyGM64RGpGj6wCdFhKh+e4m+pGqa/Ajy4CUWWom
CXYAniSOS2oeQWYRXPf72ZJM3qECeeR6
=z7en
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [OE-core] Feedback on building openembedded-core for qemuarm. Excerpts from buildlog

2011-12-07 Thread Khem Raj
On (04/12/11 11:35), Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 12:20 +0100, Henning Heinold wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:03:46PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > > Have made some further tests with the same machine, but now running
> > > Ubuntu 11.04 x64
> > > 
> > > bitbake console-image
> > > 
> > > PARALLEL_TASKSBB_NUMBER_TASKSBUILD TIME
> > > 2  2
> > > 1:24:16
> > > 4  4
> > > 0:48:22
> > > 6  6
> > > 0:45:00
> > > 2424
> > > C++ compiler fails with --sysroot problem
> > > after ~2200 out of 2400 tasks.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > BR
> > > Ulf
> > 
> > Hi Ulf,
> > 
> > can you try the attached patch if it solves the problem?

Does this really fix the problem.

> 
> Can someone please explain to me how this would fix the problem?
> 
> If this were the issue shouldn't it either always work or always fail?
> 
> I'm worried that even if this does "fix" the problem, there is a deeper
> issue lurking somewhere :(

We use --with-local-prefix and then also --with-gxx-include-dir which
points to /usr/include/c++ 

Now the documentation says that --with-gxx-include-dir is an absolute
path but if sysroot gets prepended to it or not I am not clear yet
if sysroot gets prepended to it then we should be in safe spot


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
-Khem

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-efl] places: add autopoint

2011-12-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:53:48PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi 
> ---
>  meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb |6 +-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Martin Jansa 

> 
> diff --git a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb 
> b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> index 0abe138..103d720 100644
> --- a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> +++ b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> @@ -2,9 +2,13 @@ LICENSE = "BSD"
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=344895f253c32f38e182dcaf30fe8a35"
>  
>  PV = "0.1.0+svnr${SRCPV}"
> -PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.1"
>  
>  require e-module.inc
>  
> +do_configure_prepend() {
> + autopoint || touch config.rpath
> +}
> +
>  # Calls /usr/bin/eject for media
>  RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "eject"
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 
> 
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] Documentation problems

2011-12-07 Thread Khem Raj
On (07/12/11 00:01), Bill Traynor wrote:
> > Hi,
> > today I wanted to create a Template:We-move-to-oe-core (something like
> > this artikle is a stub) to mark all pages which needs a change and inform
> > new users about the move to oe-core. I created an account but I am unable
> > to edit anything. I even cannot edit my user page.
> >
> 
> This is fixed now.
> 
> I've just implemented  Email Confirmation for New Users to the wiki with
> auto-promotion to the 'User' group to allow for editing.  I also switched
> the Captcha from recaptcha to QuestyCaptcha with a simple question about
> Linux that's easily google-able.  This scheme has worked well for a number
> of months on elinux.org, so it seemed prudent to try it here as well.
> 

Thanks Bill this should solve our spammy problems

> More wiki improvements to come.

looking forward to it.

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] Adding sumtool to a JFFS2 build to speed up first boot

2011-12-07 Thread Andrea Adami
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Khem Raj  wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Andrea Adami  wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Tom Rini  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Ulf Samuelsson
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Trying to solve another problem I came up with
>>> > changing IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 defined in conf/bitbake.conf
>>> > by redefining it in conf/local.conf.
>>> >
>>> > During that process I noticed the "sumtool" utility
>>> > which works on the jffs2 image, doing some
>>> > bookkeeping which then does not have to be
>>> > done on the target.
>>> >
>>> > I unserstand, this can speed up loading significantly.
>>> > Any reason not using this in OE?
>>>
>>> Last time I looked at this, the reason was that you had to re-jigger
>>> the IMAGE_CMD a bit and you also have to take care as not all of the
>>> options are the same between mkfs.jffs2 and sumtool.  At least the
>>> first part might be easier with oe-core and the reworked image class.
>>> The latter part is just annoying.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> FWIW we are defining our jffs2-summary in
>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/conf/machine/include/zaurus.inc
>>
>> This works beautifully in oe-dev but not using oe-core for it sets
>> IMAGE_CMD_jffs2 = and this can  not be overriden
>> We would just need a weak assignment in image_types.bbclass or maybe a new
>> image type like IMAGE_CMD_jffs2-summary and related commands.
>>
>
> I would say port patches to oe-core for it.

Done, patch sent to oe-core

Regards
Andrea

>> ___
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/1] connman: update to 0.78

2011-12-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 19:54, Saul Wold  wrote:

> On 12/07/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> We moved to GIT repository as the tarball releases are not available
>> since kernel.org compromise.
>>
>>  Any reason this can't be updated in OE-core?
>

Sure not; for it I'd need to test connman-gnome but I don't have the
required time to do that.

As far as I know the xuser patch ought to apply fine but others might need
checking.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/1] connman: update to 0.78

2011-12-07 Thread Saul Wold

On 12/07/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:

We moved to GIT repository as the tarball releases are not available
since kernel.org compromise.


Any reason this can't be updated in OE-core?

Sau!


Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
  .../connman/{connman_0.77.bb =>  connman_0.78.bb}   |   13 ++---
  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
  rename meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/{connman_0.77.bb =>  
connman_0.78.bb} (75%)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
similarity index 75%
rename from meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb
rename to meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
index 9ef368b..f486f95 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
  require connman.inc
-PR = "r4"

  EXTRA_OECONF += "\
--disable-gtk-doc \
@@ -18,13 +17,13 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "\
--with-ntpd=${bindir}/ntpd \
  "

-SRC_URI  = "\
-  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/network/connman/connman-${PV}.tar.gz \
-  file://connman \
-"
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+# 0.78 tag
+SRCREV = "02f5d5fe2d7c71514a6387ba2b772b42d8e8d297"

-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "2e95edb0ead4fff3e84458f7fa192a64"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"df6e926c4b0ccbab26d6e21b9935ab72fa5adf275eb7ac2b48540117ae84cbcc"
+SRC_URI  = "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/connman/connman.git \
+file://connman"

  # alg-test doesn't build, so disable that and test for if_alg.h as this 
header is only in 2.6.39
  do_configure_prepend() {


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-efl] places: add autopoint

2011-12-07 Thread Khem Raj
On (07/12/11 13:53), Koen Kooi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi 
> ---
>  meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb |6 +-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb 
> b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> index 0abe138..103d720 100644
> --- a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> +++ b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
> @@ -2,9 +2,13 @@ LICENSE = "BSD"
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=344895f253c32f38e182dcaf30fe8a35"
>  
>  PV = "0.1.0+svnr${SRCPV}"
> -PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.1"
>  
>  require e-module.inc
>  
> +do_configure_prepend() {
> + autopoint || touch config.rpath
> +}
> +
>  # Calls /usr/bin/eject for media
>  RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "eject"
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5

you could also do

EXTRA_AUTORECONF = ""

which would remove --exclude=autopoint being passed down to autoreconf 

-- 
-Khem

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/1] connman: update to 0.78

2011-12-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
We moved to GIT repository as the tarball releases are not available
since kernel.org compromise.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador 
---
 .../connman/{connman_0.77.bb => connman_0.78.bb}   |   13 ++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 rename meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/{connman_0.77.bb => 
connman_0.78.bb} (75%)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
similarity index 75%
rename from meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb
rename to meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
index 9ef368b..f486f95 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.77.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_0.78.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 require connman.inc
-PR = "r4"
 
 EXTRA_OECONF += "\
   --disable-gtk-doc \
@@ -18,13 +17,13 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "\
   --with-ntpd=${bindir}/ntpd \
 "
 
-SRC_URI  = "\
-  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/network/connman/connman-${PV}.tar.gz \
-  file://connman \
-"
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+# 0.78 tag
+SRCREV = "02f5d5fe2d7c71514a6387ba2b772b42d8e8d297"
 
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "2e95edb0ead4fff3e84458f7fa192a64"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"df6e926c4b0ccbab26d6e21b9935ab72fa5adf275eb7ac2b48540117ae84cbcc"
+SRC_URI  = "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/connman/connman.git \
+file://connman"
 
 # alg-test doesn't build, so disable that and test for if_alg.h as this header 
is only in 2.6.39
 do_configure_prepend() {
-- 
1.7.2.5


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-core][PATCH] gcc-4.6.inc: remove gcc-arm-set-cost.patch merged upstream

2011-12-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:18:11PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> gcc-arm-set-cost.patch is not needed anymore as it has been merged
> upstream, remove it.

I belive this is because you're using meta-oe from where this patch was
moved to oe-core and it wasn't removed from meta-oe at the same time when 
it was applied in oe-core.

So right fix is to update your meta-oe checkout
http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=9e0a23fcb4e2c0c57de5e7b0ee8ed253b11d15b8

Regards,
 
> Having it around breaks compilation with messages like:
> 
> .../gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:7945:5: 
> error: duplicate case value
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite 
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> please review this one with extra care ;)
> 
> Thanks,
>Antonio Ospite
>http://ao2.it
> 
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc  |3 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch |   34 
> 
>  2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
> index 18e0536..e6a9b1a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  require gcc-common.inc
>  
> -PR = "r19"
> +PR = "r20"
>  
>  # Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release
>  # happens from this branch on gcc e.g. currently its 4.6.0
> @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ SRC_URI = 
> "svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches;module=${BRANCH};proto=http \
>  file://pr46934.patch \
>  file://pr32219.patch \
>  file://pr47551.patch \
> -file://gcc-arm-set-cost.patch \
> "
>  
>  SRC_URI_append_sh3  = " file://sh3-installfix-fixheaders.patch "
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 04dabaf..000
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
> -2011-08-18  Richard Sandiford  
> -
> - gcc/
> - Backport from mainline:
> - 
> - 2011-08-18  Richard Sandiford  
> -
> - * config/arm/arm.c (arm_rtx_costs_1): Don't modify the costs of SET.
> - (arm_size_rtx_costs): Likewise.
> -
> -=== modified file 'gcc/config/arm/arm.c'
>  old/gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2011-08-12 08:08:31 +
> -+++ new/gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2011-08-18 13:53:37 +
> -@@ -7464,6 +7464,9 @@
> - *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (4);
> -   return true;
> - 
> -+case SET:
> -+  return false;
> -+
> - default:
> -   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (4);
> -   return false;
> -@@ -7811,6 +7814,9 @@
> -   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (1) + 1;
> -   return true;
> - 
> -+case SET:
> -+  return false;
> -+
> - default:
> -   if (mode != VOIDmode)
> - *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (ARM_NUM_REGS (mode));
> -
> -- 
> 1.7.7.3
> 
> 
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [oe-core][PATCH] gcc-4.6.inc: remove gcc-arm-set-cost.patch merged upstream

2011-12-07 Thread Antonio Ospite
gcc-arm-set-cost.patch is not needed anymore as it has been merged
upstream, remove it.

Having it around breaks compilation with messages like:

.../gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:7945:5: error: 
duplicate case value

Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite 
---

Hi,

please review this one with extra care ;)

Thanks,
   Antonio Ospite
   http://ao2.it

 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc  |3 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch |   34 
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
index 18e0536..e6a9b1a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require gcc-common.inc
 
-PR = "r19"
+PR = "r20"
 
 # Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release
 # happens from this branch on gcc e.g. currently its 4.6.0
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ SRC_URI = 
"svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches;module=${BRANCH};proto=http \
   file://pr46934.patch \
   file://pr32219.patch \
   file://pr47551.patch \
-  file://gcc-arm-set-cost.patch \
  "
 
 SRC_URI_append_sh3  = " file://sh3-installfix-fixheaders.patch "
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 04dabaf..000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/gcc-arm-set-cost.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-2011-08-18  Richard Sandiford  
-
-   gcc/
-   Backport from mainline:
- 
-   2011-08-18  Richard Sandiford  
-
-   * config/arm/arm.c (arm_rtx_costs_1): Don't modify the costs of SET.
-   (arm_size_rtx_costs): Likewise.
-
-=== modified file 'gcc/config/arm/arm.c'
 old/gcc/config/arm/arm.c   2011-08-12 08:08:31 +
-+++ new/gcc/config/arm/arm.c   2011-08-18 13:53:37 +
-@@ -7464,6 +7464,9 @@
-   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (4);
-   return true;
- 
-+case SET:
-+  return false;
-+
- default:
-   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (4);
-   return false;
-@@ -7811,6 +7814,9 @@
-   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (1) + 1;
-   return true;
- 
-+case SET:
-+  return false;
-+
- default:
-   if (mode != VOIDmode)
-   *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (ARM_NUM_REGS (mode));
-
-- 
1.7.7.3


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH] Fix git URL to linux-omap git repo.

2011-12-07 Thread Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo

Hi,

I will send a patch V2 with all URLs fixed.

Guillaume


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe] xf86-input-tslib: Use correct name for checksum calculation

2011-12-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op 07-12-11 15:19, u...@emagii.com schreef:
> From: Ulf Samuelsson 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson 

Please don't send patches against stale repos that don't apply.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk7ffBYACgkQMkyGM64RGpGj6wCdFhKh+e4m+pGqa/Ajy4CUWWom
CXYAniSOS2oeQWYRXPf72ZJM3qECeeR6
=z7en
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe] xf86-input-tslib: Use correct name for checksum calculation

2011-12-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:19:14PM +0100, u...@emagii.com wrote:
> From: Ulf Samuelsson 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson 
> ---
>  .../xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb  |6 --
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
> index de0eb6f..768453a 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
> @@ -17,12 +17,14 @@ SRC_URI = 
> "http://www.pengutronix.de/software/xf86-input-tslib/download/xf86-inp
> file://99-xf86-input-tslib.rules \
> file://xf86-input-tslib-port-ABI-12-r48.patch \
>  "
> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "b7a4d2f11637ee3fcf432e044b1d017f"
> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "5f46fdef095a6e44a69e0f0b57c7d665224b26d990d006611236d8332e85b105"
> +
> +SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "b7a4d2f11637ee3fcf432e044b1d017f"
> +SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = 
> "5f46fdef095a6e44a69e0f0b57c7d665224b26d990d006611236d8332e85b105"

This is not correct after
http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=2162f0140d72a5976278d63e7eb2d4eb032ded4f

Cheers,

>  
>  do_configure_prepend() {
>  rm -rf ${S}/m4/ || true
>  }
> +
>  do_install_append() {
>  install -d ${D}/${datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty
>  install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/10-x11-input-tslib.fdi 
> ${D}/${datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
> 
> 
> ___
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-oe] xf86-input-tslib: Use correct name for checksum calculation

2011-12-07 Thread ulf
From: Ulf Samuelsson 

Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson 
---
 .../xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb  |6 --
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
index de0eb6f..768453a 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-input-tslib_0.0.6.bb
@@ -17,12 +17,14 @@ SRC_URI = 
"http://www.pengutronix.de/software/xf86-input-tslib/download/xf86-inp
file://99-xf86-input-tslib.rules \
file://xf86-input-tslib-port-ABI-12-r48.patch \
 "
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "b7a4d2f11637ee3fcf432e044b1d017f"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"5f46fdef095a6e44a69e0f0b57c7d665224b26d990d006611236d8332e85b105"
+
+SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "b7a4d2f11637ee3fcf432e044b1d017f"
+SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = 
"5f46fdef095a6e44a69e0f0b57c7d665224b26d990d006611236d8332e85b105"
 
 do_configure_prepend() {
 rm -rf ${S}/m4/ || true
 }
+
 do_install_append() {
 install -d ${D}/${datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty
 install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/10-x11-input-tslib.fdi 
${D}/${datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty
-- 
1.7.4.1


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH v2] Fix git URL to linux-omap git repo.

2011-12-07 Thread Guillaume GARDET
Signed-off-by: Guillaume GARDET 
---
 recipes/linux/linux-kexecboot_2.6.32.bb |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap2_git.bb|2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.26.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.27.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.28.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.29.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.31.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.32.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.37.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.38.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.39.bb  |2 +-
 recipes/linux/linux-omap_git.bb |2 +-
 12 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-kexecboot_2.6.32.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-kexecboot_2.6.32.bb
index 4c3294a..0c0d2af 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-kexecboot_2.6.32.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-kexecboot_2.6.32.bb
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ SRC_URI += 
"${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=k
 SRC_URI[kernel.md5sum] = "260551284ac224c3a43c4adac7df4879"
 SRC_URI[kernel.sha256sum] = 
"5099786d80b8407d98a619df00209c2353517f22d804fdd9533b362adcb4504e"
 
-SRC_URI_append_omap3 = " 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;protocol=git;rev=6833f1a8cdcb65a370f898bde6b6af63f81962df
 \
+SRC_URI_append_omap3 = " 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;protocol=git;rev=6833f1a8cdcb65a370f898bde6b6af63f81962df
 \
 file://defconfig \
 file://sctp-fix.patch \
 file://cm-t35/0001-omap3-cm-t35-add-mux-initialization.patch \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap2_git.bb b/recipes/linux/linux-omap2_git.bb
index cb427e3..ad3a7eb 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap2_git.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap2_git.bb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ PV = "2.6.26"
 #PV = "2.6.26+2.6.27-rc1+${PR}+git${SRCREV}"
 PR = "r64"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;protocol=git
 \
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;protocol=git
 \
   file://defconfig"
 
 SRC_URI_append_beagleboard = " file://no-harry-potter.diff \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.26.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.26.bb
index 0c8dcd9..0d74820 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.26.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.26.bb
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SRCREV = "d6daf8d8cc5ccf90247def5551ee9c3e8555e848"
 PV = "2.6.26"
 PR = "r65"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;protocol=git
 \
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;protocol=git
 \
   file://defconfig"
 
 SRC_URI_append_beagleboard = " file://no-harry-potter.diff \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.27.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.27.bb
index fdf0fdd..36f86d9 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.27.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.27.bb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = 
"omap5912osk|omap1710h3|omap2430sdp|omap2420h4|beagleboard|
 SRCREV = "2a3408be17f287fdb5809c9b6c68e7ad96d25b74"
 PR = "r14"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;protocol=git
 \
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;protocol=git
 \
   file://defconfig"
 
 SRC_URI_append = " \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.28.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.28.bb
index 622a38d..53fcc83 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.28.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.28.bb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ SRCREV = "79d042a081d3e467c735bb0d9569ed6296f85a3c"
 
 PV = "2.6.28"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;branch=omap-2.6.28;protocol=git
 \
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;branch=omap-2.6.28;protocol=git
 \
   file://defconfig"
 
 SRC_URI_append = " \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.29.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.29.bb
index a87fb25..3248dc3 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.29.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.29.bb
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ SRCREV = "58cf2f1425abfd3a449f9fe985e48be2d2555022"
 # The main PR is now using MACHINE_KERNEL_PR, for omap3 see 
conf/machine/include/omap3.inc
 PR_append = "+gitr${SRCREV}"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;protocol=git
 \
+SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git;protocol=git
 \
   file://defconfig"
 
 SRC_URI_append = " \
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.31.bb 
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.31.bb
index 0f1e79b..2b627ca 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.31.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.31.bb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ SRCREV = "945044d157dd63c6af0f2ed40a5346382af94eb4"
 #PV = "2.6.30+2.6.31-rc8+gitr${SRCREV}"
 PV = "2.6.31"
 
-SRC_URI = 
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-

[oe] [master/2011.03-maintenance] module-init-tools-cross-3.12-r6: task do_compile: Failed

2011-12-07 Thread Steffen Sledz
This problem occurs with the current master 
(a4f35de0f6ca17e92763d5a5f32422c56e5d8882) *and* the 2011.03-maintenance branch 
(672af8093cf33d8b90e9186986ba5c95fc7a0a0a).

To reproduce it i used the current Kaeilos setup and made a clean build.

--->snip<
14:11 sledz@~/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos $ MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake 
module-init-tools-cross
...
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= "1.12.0"
METADATA_BRANCH   = "2011.03-maintenance"
METADATA_REVISION = "672af80"
TARGET_ARCH   = "arm"
TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE   = "beagleboard"
DISTRO= "kaeilos"
DISTRO_VERSION= "2009.2-test-20111207"
TARGET_FPU= "hard"
...
| gcc  
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -O2 -g -Wunused -Wall -static 
-L/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib
 
-Wl,-rpath,/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib
 -Wl,-O1 -o insmod.static insmod.o libmodtools.a
| /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: 
cannot find -lc
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| make: *** [insmod.static] Error 1
| make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
| mv -f .deps/tables.Tpo .deps/tables.Po
| + die 'oe_runmake failed'
| + oefatal 'oe_runmake failed'
| + echo FATAL: 'oe_runmake failed'
| FATAL: oe_runmake failed
| + exit 1
NOTE: package module-init-tools-cross-3.12-r6: task do_compile: Failed
ERROR: Function 'do_compile' failed (see 
/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/work/armv7a-kaeilos-linux-gnueabi/module-init-tools-cross-3.12-r6/temp/log.do_compile.5337
 for further information)
--->snip<

(complete compile log is attached)

Any ideas?

Regards,
Steffen

-- 
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sl...@dresearch-fe.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058
+ do_compile
+ base_do_compile
+ '[' -e Makefile -o -e makefile -o -e GNUmakefile ']'
+ oe_runmake
+ oenote make -j 4
+ echo NOTE: 'make -j 4'
NOTE: make -j 4
+ make -j 4
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"module-init-tools\" 
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"module-init-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.12\" 
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"module-init-tools\ 3.12\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
-DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"module-init-tools\" -DVERSION=\"3.12\" -I.   
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -ffunction-sections 
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -O2 -g -Wunused -Wall -MT libmodtools_a-util.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/libmodtools_a-util.Tpo -c -o libmodtools_a-util.o `test -f 'util.c' || 
echo './'`util.c
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"module-init-tools\" 
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"module-init-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.12\" 
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"module-init-tools\ 3.12\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
-DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"module-init-tools\" -DVERSION=\"3.12\" -I.   
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -ffunction-sections 
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -O2 -g -Wunused -Wall -MT libmodtools_a-logging.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/libmodtools_a-logging.Tpo -c -o libmodtools_a-logging.o `test -f 
'logging.c' || echo './'`logging.c
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"module-init-tools\" 
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"module-init-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.12\" 
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"module-init-tools\ 3.12\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
-DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"module-init-tools\" -DVERSION=\"3.12\" -I.   
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -ffunction-sections 
-isystem/home/sledz/work/kaeilos/build/kaeilos/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include
 -O2 -g -Wunused -Wall -MT libmodtools_a-index.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/libmodtools_a-index.Tpo -c -o libmodtools_a-index.o `test -f 'index.c' || 
echo './'`index.c
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"module-init-tools\" 
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"module-init-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.12\" 
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"module-init-tools\ 3.12\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
-DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"module-init-tools\" -DVERSION=\"3.

[oe] [meta-efl] places: add autopoint

2011-12-07 Thread Koen Kooi
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi 
---
 meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb |6 +-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb 
b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
index 0abe138..103d720 100644
--- a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
+++ b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/places_svn.bb
@@ -2,9 +2,13 @@ LICENSE = "BSD"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=344895f253c32f38e182dcaf30fe8a35"
 
 PV = "0.1.0+svnr${SRCPV}"
-PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
+PR = "${INC_PR}.1"
 
 require e-module.inc
 
+do_configure_prepend() {
+   autopoint || touch config.rpath
+}
+
 # Calls /usr/bin/eject for media
 RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "eject"
-- 
1.7.2.5


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH v2] libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run from being volatile

2011-12-07 Thread Mats Kärrman
New version with less differences to oe-core. Honestly I have not been able to 
test this version but I have reviewed it and think it is equivalent to the 
patch I had before. // Mats


The libpam make install creates a /var/run/sepermit folder that prevents
the later creation of a sym-link /var/run --> /var/volatile/run. This is
a problem because it causes additional wear to FLASH file systems.

The solution here is roughly the same as the solution applied in the libpam
recipes of oe-core but v1.1.1 does not exist there and the corresponding fix
was already a part of the original recipes for later versions.

Signed-off-by: Mats Kärrman 

--

diff --git a/recipes/pam/files/99_libpam b/recipes/pam/files/99_libpam
new file mode 100644
index 000..5ae0c8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/pam/files/99_libpam
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Create sepermit folder in volatile fs
+d root root 0755 /var/run/sepermit none
+
diff --git a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
index 09bc554..2b679a1 100644
--- a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
+++ b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ DEPENDS = "flex flex-native"
 # PAM is not a lot of use without configuration files and the plugins
 RRECOMMENDS_${PN} = "libpam-meta libpam-base-files"
 
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 
 # The project is actually called Linux-PAM but that gives
 # a bad OE package name because of the upper case characters
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/${p}"
 SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/${p}.tar.bz2 \
file://pam-nodocs.patch \
file://define-HAVE_DBM.patch \
+   file://99_libpam \
   "
 
 UCLIBC_PATCHES = " file://Linux-PAM-1.1.0-uclibc.patch \
@@ -71,6 +72,17 @@ python populate_packages_prepend () {
packages.append(metapkg)
bb.data.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(packages), d)
 }
+
+do_install_append () {
+# Remove erroneously created /var/run dir
+rm -rf ${D}${localstatedir}/run
+
+# Install volatiles specification to make sure dir is created in run-time
+install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default
+install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles
+install -m 0644  ${WORKDIR}/99_libpam  ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/
+}
+
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9b3d952b173d5b9836cbc7e8de108bee"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "608d3eb9d7a5e1a7505fff62e6a583fdb6e52dc05bf54dc9661c5f395
 

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCHv2][meta-oe] mplayer2: fix DSO issue with new binutils

2011-12-07 Thread Martin Jansa
* 
/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/armv4t-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/4.6.3/ld:
  libmpdemux/demux_ogg.o: undefined reference to symbol '_ilog'
  
/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/armv4t-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/4.6.3/ld:
  note: '_ilog' is defined in DSO
  /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/om-gta02/usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0 so try 
adding it to the linker command line
  /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/om-gta02/usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0: could not 
read symbols: Invalid operation

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa 
---
 meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer/mplayer2_git.bb |4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer/mplayer2_git.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer/mplayer2_git.bb
index 7d2d258..81d3376 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer/mplayer2_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/mplayer/mplayer2_git.bb
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SRCREV = "e3f504326d8b4b0731c6a8b42a8fda5535ac"
 ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "ARM"
 
 PV = "2.0+gitr${SRCPV}"
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 
 PARALLEL_MAKE = ""
 
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = " \
--enable-select \
--enable-libass \
\
-   --extra-libs=' -lXext -lX11 -lBasicUsageEnvironment -lUsageEnvironment 
-lgroupsock -lliveMedia -lstdc++' \
+   --extra-libs=' -lXext -lX11 -lBasicUsageEnvironment -lUsageEnvironment 
-lgroupsock -lliveMedia -lstdc++ -lvorbis ' \
 "
 
 EXTRA_OECONF_append_armv6 = " --enable-armv6"
-- 
1.7.8


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH] libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run from being volatile

2011-12-07 Thread Mats Kärrman
> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org 
> [openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Paul Menzel 
> [paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:58 AM
> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run 
> from being volatile
> 
> Dear Mats,
> 
> 
> thank you for sending the patch for OE-classic master.
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2011, 09:37 + schrieb Mats Kärrman:
> > The libpam make install creates a /var/run/sepermit folder that prevents
> > the later creation of a sym-link /var/run --> /var/volatile/run. This is
> > a problem because it causes additional wear to FLASH file systems.
> >
> > The solution is ~equivalent to the solution applied in libpam recipes of
> 
> Does the ~ have any meaning or is it just a typo?

~ = roughly, more-or-less, approximately (like 05 != 99...)

> 
> > oe-core but v1.1.1 does not exist there and the corresponding fix was a
> > part of the original recipes for later versions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mats Kärrman 
> >
> > --
> >
> > diff --git a/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..5ae0c8e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
> > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > +# Create sepermit folder in volatile fs
> > +d root root 0755 /var/run/sepermit none
> > +
> 
> In OE-core the file name is `99_pam` [1]. Why did the leading number
> needed to be changed? Should that be also `05` in OE-core?

Number sets the order that files are parsed to create volatile directories. I 
fixed and tested my build without looking at oe-core and thought that 05 was a 
good number as there were only a 00 file to begin with. Only later I decided to 
contribute back and then I found that the problem was already solved in oe-core 
but I didn't bother to change my fix to match oe-core because I didn't think it 
matter, sorry...

> 
> > diff --git a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> > index 09bc554..ba35d0c 100644
> > --- a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> > +++ b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ DEPENDS = "flex flex-native"
> >  # PAM is not a lot of use without configuration files and the plugins
> >  RRECOMMENDS_${PN} = "libpam-meta libpam-base-files"
> >
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >
> >  # The project is actually called Linux-PAM but that gives
> >  # a bad OE package name because of the upper case characters
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/${p}"
> >  SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/${p}.tar.bz2 \
> > file://pam-nodocs.patch \
> > file://define-HAVE_DBM.patch \
> > +   file://05_libpam \
> >"
> >
> >  UCLIBC_PATCHES = " file://Linux-PAM-1.1.0-uclibc.patch \
> > @@ -71,6 +72,17 @@ python populate_packages_prepend () {
> > packages.append(metapkg)
> > bb.data.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(packages), d)
> >  }
> > +
> > +do_install_append () {
> > +# Remove erroneously created /var/run dir
> > +rm -rf ${D}${localstatedir}/run
> > +
> > +# Install volatiles specification to make sure dir is created in 
> > run-time
> > +install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default
> > +install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles
> > +install -m 0644  ${WORKDIR}/05_libpam  
> > ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/
> > +}
> > +
> >  SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9b3d952b173d5b9836cbc7e8de108bee"
> >  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> > "608d3eb9d7a5e1a7505fff62e6a583fdb6e52dc05bf54dc9661c5f395
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/99_pam?id=698cef8322e5a5f18e50ce62f6c9d1f1f846677a
> 

I'll send a new patch shortly.

// Mats

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [PATCH] libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run from being volatile

2011-12-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Mats,


thank you for sending the patch for OE-classic master.

Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2011, 09:37 + schrieb Mats Kärrman:
> The libpam make install creates a /var/run/sepermit folder that prevents
> the later creation of a sym-link /var/run --> /var/volatile/run. This is
> a problem because it causes additional wear to FLASH file systems.
> 
> The solution is ~equivalent to the solution applied in libpam recipes of

Does the ~ have any meaning or is it just a typo?

> oe-core but v1.1.1 does not exist there and the corresponding fix was a
> part of the original recipes for later versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mats Kärrman 
> 
> --
> 
> diff --git a/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..5ae0c8e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +# Create sepermit folder in volatile fs
> +d root root 0755 /var/run/sepermit none
> +

In OE-core the file name is `99_pam` [1]. Why did the leading number
needed to be changed? Should that be also `05` in OE-core?

> diff --git a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> index 09bc554..ba35d0c 100644
> --- a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> +++ b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ DEPENDS = "flex flex-native"
>  # PAM is not a lot of use without configuration files and the plugins
>  RRECOMMENDS_${PN} = "libpam-meta libpam-base-files"
> 
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
> 
>  # The project is actually called Linux-PAM but that gives
>  # a bad OE package name because of the upper case characters
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/${p}"
>  SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/${p}.tar.bz2 \
> file://pam-nodocs.patch \
> file://define-HAVE_DBM.patch \
> +   file://05_libpam \
>"
> 
>  UCLIBC_PATCHES = " file://Linux-PAM-1.1.0-uclibc.patch \
> @@ -71,6 +72,17 @@ python populate_packages_prepend () {
> packages.append(metapkg)
> bb.data.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(packages), d)
>  }
> +
> +do_install_append () {
> +# Remove erroneously created /var/run dir
> +rm -rf ${D}${localstatedir}/run
> +
> +# Install volatiles specification to make sure dir is created in run-time
> +install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default
> +install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles
> +install -m 0644  ${WORKDIR}/05_libpam  
> ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/
> +}
> +
>  SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9b3d952b173d5b9836cbc7e8de108bee"
>  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "608d3eb9d7a5e1a7505fff62e6a583fdb6e52dc05bf54dc9661c5f395


Thanks,

Paul


[1] 
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/99_pam?id=698cef8322e5a5f18e50ce62f6c9d1f1f846677a


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-java] openjdk-6-common: move java2-vm to RRECOMMENDS

2011-12-07 Thread Henning Heinold
Hi Koen,

did not yet find the time to look at it in details.

Bye Henning

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run from being volatile

2011-12-07 Thread Mats Kärrman
The libpam make install creates a /var/run/sepermit folder that prevents
the later creation of a sym-link /var/run --> /var/volatile/run. This is
a problem because it causes additional wear to FLASH file systems.

The solution is ~equivalent to the solution applied in libpam recipes of
oe-core but v1.1.1 does not exist there and the corresponding fix was a
part of the original recipes for later versions.

Signed-off-by: Mats Kärrman 

--

diff --git a/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
new file mode 100644
index 000..5ae0c8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/pam/files/05_libpam
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Create sepermit folder in volatile fs
+d root root 0755 /var/run/sepermit none
+
diff --git a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
index 09bc554..ba35d0c 100644
--- a/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
+++ b/recipes/pam/libpam_1.1.1.bb
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ DEPENDS = "flex flex-native"
 # PAM is not a lot of use without configuration files and the plugins
 RRECOMMENDS_${PN} = "libpam-meta libpam-base-files"

-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"

 # The project is actually called Linux-PAM but that gives
 # a bad OE package name because of the upper case characters
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/${p}"
 SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/${p}.tar.bz2 \
file://pam-nodocs.patch \
file://define-HAVE_DBM.patch \
+   file://05_libpam \
   "

 UCLIBC_PATCHES = " file://Linux-PAM-1.1.0-uclibc.patch \
@@ -71,6 +72,17 @@ python populate_packages_prepend () {
packages.append(metapkg)
bb.data.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(packages), d)
 }
+
+do_install_append () {
+# Remove erroneously created /var/run dir
+rm -rf ${D}${localstatedir}/run
+
+# Install volatiles specification to make sure dir is created in run-time
+install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default
+install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles
+install -m 0644  ${WORKDIR}/05_libpam  ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/
+}
+
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9b3d952b173d5b9836cbc7e8de108bee"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "608d3eb9d7a5e1a7505fff62e6a583fdb6e52dc05bf54dc9661c5f395


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request for libpam

2011-12-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2011, 15:40 + schrieb Mats Kärrman:
> > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org 
> > [openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Paul 
> > Menzel [paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 3:35 PM

> > Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2011, 07:55 + schrieb Mats Kärrman:
> > > > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org 
> > > > [openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Tom 
> > > > Rini [tom.r...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 8:49 PM
> > > > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request for libpam
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Mats Kärrman  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hello Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please pull this commit from here:
> > > > >
> > > > > git://github.com/mkarrman/openembedded
> > > > > Branch: maintenance
> > > > >
> > > > > Mats Kärrman (1):
> > > > >  368c68a  libpam_1.1.1: remove directory preventing /var/run from 
> > > > > being volatile.
> > > >
> > > > Where is this a backport from?  Thanks!
> > 
> > > My local project...
> > > Maybe I went ahead of myself but the solution is ~equivalent to the
> > > solution applied in libpam recipes of oe-core but 1.1.1 does not exist
> > > there and the corresponding fix was a part of the original recipes for
> > > later versions.
> > 
> > so why not push it to OE-classic master first?
> 
> Perhaps I missed the consensus of the "Plans for OE classic future" thread?
> To my understanding pull requests from "somewhere" and master will 
> sooner-than-later die was the way to go.

True. And a lot of developers answered they are still using OE-classic
including master. So they would profit from your fix too.

> Also, pushing requires write access to the repo (that I don't have) but I can 
> send a patch to the mailing list, if you like.

I would push it for you.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel