[oe] SDK confusion Was: [meta-oe] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support

2012-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:28:08AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:11:27AM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
  Hi Martin,
  
  Le Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:17:26 +0100,
  Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com a écrit :
   OE @ ~ $ ls 
   /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/
   oecore-x86_64-arm
   OE @ ~ $ ls 
   /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/
   oecore-x86_64-x86_64
   
  using Angstrom I don't have the same directories here :
  [ebenard@eb-e6520 setup-scripts]$ ls
  build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-angstromsdk-linux/usr/local/
  angstrom-eglibc-x86_64-armv5te
 
 I usually don't build SDKs, so I'm not really not familiar with
 oesdk-linux-nativesdk and nativesdk-oesdk-linux differences :/
 
 But I'll try your patch for oe-core
 http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/17129/
 with oe-core only (and distroless) and if it behaves the same I'll
 report on oe-core ML.

It fails the same when building from scratch for qemuarm in distroless
oe-core:

bitbake -k gdb-cross-canadian-arm
...
| checking whether to use python... 
/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/python
| checking for python2.7... no
| configure: error: no usable python found at 
/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/python
...

from config.log
configure:10465: checking whether to use python
configure:10467: result: 
/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/python
configure:10685: checking for python2.7
configure:10703: x86_64-oesdk-linux-gcc  
--sysroot=/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux -o 
conftest 
-isystem/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/include
 -O2 -pipe 
-isystem/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/include
  
-I/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/include/python2.7/
  
-L/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi
 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi
 
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi
 -Wl,-O1 
-L/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/lib
 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/lib
 -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/lib 
-Wl,-O1 conftest.c -lncurses -lz -lm
-L/OE/oe-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi/python2.7/config/config
 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 5
conftest.c:91:20: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory

OE @ ~/oe-core/tmp-eglibc $ find sysroots/ -name python2.7
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/python2.7
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/python2.7
sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include/python2.7
sysroots/qemuarm/usr/lib/python2.7
sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/python2.7
sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/include/python2.7

in x86_64-oesdk-linux there are only gcc+binutils crosssdk
binutils-crosssdk-2.22-r2  gcc-crosssdk-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
gcc-crosssdk-initial-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
gcc-crosssdk-intermediate-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22
the rest is in 
x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux

gdb-cross-canadian-arm is only package were exec_prefix points to 
oecore-x86_64-arm
./gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/temp/run.do_configure.1688
export 
exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr

while all nativesdk packages are using oecore-x86_64-x86_64
./python-nativesdk-2.7.2-r0.5/temp/run.do_configure.14043
export 
exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr

So I think that using exec_prefix/libdir is wrong to when cross-canadian-arm is 
looking 
for nativesdk headers/libs. Don't know what are correct variables to use...

Cheers,

 
 Cheers,
 
  
   OE @ ~ $ find 
   /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk/usr/local/ -name 
   python2.7
   OE @ ~ $ find 
   /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/ -name 
   python2.7
   /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/python2.7
   

[oe] [PATCH] jakarta-libs: fixed SRC_URI for avalon-framework-api-4.3

2012-02-03 Thread Steffen Sledz
Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch-fe.de
---
 recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb 
b/recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb
index 06fde62..3340f5b 100644
--- a/recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb
+++ b/recipes/jakarta-libs/avalon-framework-api_4.3.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ LICENSE = AL2.0
 AUTHOR = Apache Software Foundation
 
 SRC_URI = \
-   
http://www.apache.org/dist/excalibur/avalon-framework/source/${BP}-src.tar.gz;name=archive
 \
+   
http://archive.apache.org/dist/excalibur/framework/source/${BP}-src.tar.gz;name=archive
 \

http://www.apache.org/dist/avalon/logkit/source/logkit-1.2.2-src.tar.gz;name=logkit
 \

 
-- 
1.7.7


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] SDK confusion Was: [meta-oe] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support

2012-02-03 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi Martin,

Le Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:41:05 +0100,
Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com a écrit :
 in x86_64-oesdk-linux there are only gcc+binutils crosssdk
 binutils-crosssdk-2.22-r2  gcc-crosssdk-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
 gcc-crosssdk-initial-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
 gcc-crosssdk-intermediate-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22
 the rest is in 
 x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux
 
 gdb-cross-canadian-arm is only package were exec_prefix points to 
 oecore-x86_64-arm
 ./gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/temp/run.do_configure.1688
 export 
 exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr
 
 while all nativesdk packages are using oecore-x86_64-x86_64
 ./python-nativesdk-2.7.2-r0.5/temp/run.do_configure.14043
 export 
 exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr
 
here is the big difference when using Angstrom :
python-nativesdk-2.7.2-r0.5/temp/run.do_configure.30951:73:export
exec_prefix=/usr/local/angstrom-eglibc-x86_64-armv7a/sysroots/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/usr
I don't yet know where this difference comes from.

Eric
-- 
http://eukrea.com/en/news/104-2012

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] bluez4: fix checksums for bluez-4.95.tar.gz

2012-02-03 Thread Steffen Sledz
Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch-fe.de
---
 recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb |4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb b/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb
index 290dff6..23275e4 100644
--- a/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb
+++ b/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ SRC_URI = \
   ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/bluetooth/bluez-${PV}.tar.gz \
   file://bluetooth.conf \
 
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = 341294b2849a04a4afff5c96bfbf30b2
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
d6ea9de410fc2bcd2620d709c2202893b218e2e6a55c3c0ce6bebd27fa4120f6
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 3e6e77ae06aad73bbedbabed3f0d508e
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
795dc8eb45e07c7848c58e2f2d730a404179ecce3dd1cd7b822cdec5ea7b69c8
 
 DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = -1
 DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_angstrom = 1
-- 
1.7.7


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [OE-core] SDK confusion Was: [meta-oe] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support

2012-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:20:37AM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
 Hi Martin,
 
 Le Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:41:05 +0100,
 Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com a écrit :
  in x86_64-oesdk-linux there are only gcc+binutils crosssdk
  binutils-crosssdk-2.22-r2  gcc-crosssdk-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
  gcc-crosssdk-initial-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22  
  gcc-crosssdk-intermediate-4.6.2+svnr181430-r22
  the rest is in 
  x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux
  
  gdb-cross-canadian-arm is only package were exec_prefix points to 
  oecore-x86_64-arm
  ./gdb-cross-canadian-arm-7.3.1-r5.1/temp/run.do_configure.1688
  export 
  exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-arm/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr
  
  while all nativesdk packages are using oecore-x86_64-x86_64
  ./python-nativesdk-2.7.2-r0.5/temp/run.do_configure.14043
  export 
  exec_prefix=/usr/local/oecore-x86_64-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr
  
 here is the big difference when using Angstrom :
 python-nativesdk-2.7.2-r0.5/temp/run.do_configure.30951:73:export
 exec_prefix=/usr/local/angstrom-eglibc-x86_64-armv7a/sysroots/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/usr
 I don't yet know where this difference comes from.

I also don't really understand using oecore-x86_64-x86_64 when building
for qemuarm

Last part should be TARGET_ARCH from
conf/bitbake.conf:SDK_NAME = oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}

but TARGET_ARCH is defined couple of times:
conf/bitbake.conf:TARGET_ARCH = ${TUNE_ARCH}

classes/native.bbclass:TARGET_ARCH = ${BUILD_ARCH}
classes/crosssdk.bbclass:TARGET_ARCH = ${SDK_ARCH}
classes/nativesdk.bbclass:TARGET_ARCH = ${SDK_ARCH}

So it looks like TARGET_ARCH from bitbake.conf wins for you and here
it's using TARGET_ARCH = ${SDK_ARCH} from nativesdk.bbclass

With following modification I was able to configure and build it fine,
but seems like your oecore-x86_64-arm correct and oecore-x86_64-x86_64
should be used only e.g. for qemux86-64 not qemuarm

Cheers,

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
index b5746ce..bac63b7 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc
@@ -10,12 +10,18 @@ RDEPENDS += python-nativesdk-core python-nativesdk-lang 
python-nativesdk-re \

 EXTRA_OECONF_append = --with-python=${WORKDIR}/python

+NATIVESDK_NAME = oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${SDK_ARCH}
+NATIVESDK_PATH = /usr/local/${NATIVESDK_NAME}
+NATIVESDK_PATHNATIVE = ${NATIVESDK_PATH}/sysroots/${SDK_SYS}
+NATIVESDK_LIBDIR = ${NATIVESDK_PATHNATIVE}${libdir_nativesdk}
+NATIVESDK_INCLUDEDIR = ${NATIVESDK_PATHNATIVE}${includedir_nativesdk}
+
 do_configure_prepend() {
 cat  ${WORKDIR}/python  EOF
 #! /bin/sh
 case \$2 in
---includes) echo 
-I${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}${exec_prefix}/include/python${PYTHON_BASEVERSION}/
 ;;
---ldflags) echo 
-L${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}${libdir}/python${PYTHON_BASEVERSION}/config/config
 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpython${PYTHON_BASEVERSION} ;;
+--includes) echo 
-I${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}${NATIVESDK_INCLUDEDIR}/python${PYTHON_BASEVERSION}/
 ;;
+--ldflags) echo 
-L${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}${NATIVESDK_LIBDIR}/python${PYTHON_BASEVERSION}/config
 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpython${PYTHON_BASEVERSION} ;;
 --exec-prefix) echo /usr ;;
 *) exit 1 ;;
 esac

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] liblockfile: fix SRC_URI for version 1.06

2012-02-03 Thread Steffen Sledz
Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch-fe.de
---
 recipes/liblockfile/liblockfile_1.06.bb |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/liblockfile/liblockfile_1.06.bb 
b/recipes/liblockfile/liblockfile_1.06.bb
index 0235dbd..5d540cb 100644
--- a/recipes/liblockfile/liblockfile_1.06.bb
+++ b/recipes/liblockfile/liblockfile_1.06.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ SECTION = libs
 LICENSE = LGPL
 PR =r1
 
-SRC_URI = ${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/libl/liblockfile/liblockfile_${PV}.tar.gz \
+SRC_URI = 
http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libl/liblockfile/liblockfile_${PV}.tar.gz
 \
   file://install.patch \
   file://configure.patch \
   file://ldflags.patch \
-- 
1.7.7


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:04:41AM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
 Module: meta-openembedded.git
 Branch: master
 Commit: c029d4a268de1ac7076fbeb9e337e96fdb1b226d
 URL:
 http://git.openembedded.org/?p=meta-openembedded.gita=commit;h=c029d4a268de1ac7076fbeb9e337e96fdb1b226d
 
 Author: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
 Date:   Tue Jan 31 17:38:57 2012 +
 
 systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd
 
 Packages that uses the systemd class need to have systemd build
 otherwise they might fail to detect systemd as available or fail to
 generate rootfs.

Can we move this only to packages which are really depending on systemd
compiled?

I have use-case where
small cpio image has busybox
busybox depends on systemd just because of this
systemd depends on kernel (because RRECOMMENDS on modules)
kernel depends on that cpio image which is used as ramdisk

So in order to finish cpio.do_rootfs I have to finish kernel and kernel
fails to build because doesn't have cpio available yet (DEPENDS = cpio
is not enough because doesn't need do_rootfs to finish AFAIK).

Cheers,

 
 Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
 
 ---
 
  meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass |2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass b/meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass
 index 2ca7bfc..094a12c 100644
 --- a/meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass
 +++ b/meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -DEPENDS_append =  systemd-systemctl-native
 +DEPENDS_append =  systemd systemd-systemctl-native
  
  systemd_postinst() {
  OPTS=
 
 
 ___
 Openembedded-commits mailing list
 openembedded-comm...@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-commits

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [OE-core] SDK confusion Was: [meta-oe] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support

2012-02-03 Thread Eric Bénard
Le Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:44:51 +0100,
Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com a écrit :
 I also don't really understand using oecore-x86_64-x86_64 when building
 for qemuarm
 
I may be totally wrong but isn't that what is expected : building a gdb
which will run on the SDK_ARCH (ie x86_64 in my case), so isn't python
expected to run on the x86_64 and target x86_64 (and not arm) ?

Eric
-- 
http://eukrea.com/en/news/104-2012

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:14, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

 Can we move this only to packages which are really depending on systemd
 compiled?

 I have use-case where
 small cpio image has busybox
 busybox depends on systemd just because of this
 systemd depends on kernel (because RRECOMMENDS on modules)
 kernel depends on that cpio image which is used as ramdisk

 So in order to finish cpio.do_rootfs I have to finish kernel and kernel
 fails to build because doesn't have cpio available yet (DEPENDS = cpio
 is not enough because doesn't need do_rootfs to finish AFAIK).


I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to override
it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not the
rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not
available in case a rootfs generation.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:30:37PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:14, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Can we move this only to packages which are really depending on systemd
  compiled?
 
  I have use-case where
  small cpio image has busybox
  busybox depends on systemd just because of this
  systemd depends on kernel (because RRECOMMENDS on modules)
  kernel depends on that cpio image which is used as ramdisk
 
  So in order to finish cpio.do_rootfs I have to finish kernel and kernel
  fails to build because doesn't have cpio available yet (DEPENDS = cpio
  is not enough because doesn't need do_rootfs to finish AFAIK).
 
 
 I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to override
 it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not the
 rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not
 available in case a rootfs generation.

Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
polkit, something else?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [PATCH] ltrace: switch from 0.5.3-2 to 0.5.3-2.1

2012-02-03 Thread Steffen Sledz
Version 0.5.3-2 is no longer fetchable.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch-fe.de
---
 recipes/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.bb |6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.bb b/recipes/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.bb
index 53f4892..c9ff0ab 100644
--- a/recipes/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.bb
+++ b/recipes/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.bb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS = (?!sh[34])
 
 SRC_URI = \
   ${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/l/ltrace/ltrace_${PV}.orig.tar.gz;name=archive \
-  ${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/l/ltrace/ltrace_${PV}-2.diff.gz;name=patch \
+  ${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/l/ltrace/ltrace_${PV}-2.1.diff.gz;name=patch \
   file://add-sysdep.patch \
   file://ltrace-compile.patch \
   file://ltrace-mips-remove-CP.patch \
@@ -76,5 +76,5 @@ do_install() {
 
 SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = 3fa7fe715ab879db08bd06d1d59fd90f
 SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = 
5c6627d6d5a98a92ca4661cfc16378b182cc46a9ec479ebf7e6121ee3fe2be32
-SRC_URI[patch.md5sum] = 969baa0900646c0262b2d505b9fef154
-SRC_URI[patch.sha256sum] = 
f647d7c2f2b0d1dbddd632f3a17fef670aed3ebf5fbe6c167acac1eba8e3
+SRC_URI[patch.md5sum] = 38bc944c53ab602a7854aa4fa71c1f46
+SRC_URI[patch.sha256sum] = 
4c57df94020f2bed90d948f757ca7786796ca9218274764b24f61c502d9ef4f6
-- 
1.7.7


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 13:47, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

  I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to
 override
  it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not
 the
  rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not
  available in case a rootfs generation.

 Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
 polkit, something else?


At this moment I know about polkit, I didn't check newer udev but I think
it ought to depends on it as well.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] tmux: Add initial recipe for vesion 1.6.

2012-02-03 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2012, 20:22 +0100 schrieb Peter Tworek:
 From: Piotr Tworek ptwo...@opera.com

Some configuration changed in your setup. Please try to avoid that so
that so that changelog statistics can be more meaningful.

There is the typo ve*r*sion in the summary.

 Run tested on netbook pro.
 
 Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com

Should you resend patches you can add the following.

Acked-by: Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net

 ---
  meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb |   18 ++
  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] Commit access for Peter Tworek

2012-02-03 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear OE developers,


only OE-Classic can be pushed to and everything else is set up around a
pull based model.

Nevertheless Peter is quite active with sending patches and it would be
nice if he could be promoted OpenEmbedded developer [1].

Sending this many patches Peter should probably set up some Git
repository people can fetch from. I do not know if the OE infrastructure
serves that purpose or not.

To sum it up, I do not know if the New Dev procedure is still needed,
but it would be nice to have something like that in the future.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/New_Dev


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] Can't build openembedded: fail in picosam9_git.bb

2012-02-03 Thread Леонид Титов

That's helped. Thanks a lot, Khem!

01.02.2012 23:46, Khem Raj пишет:

2012/2/1 Leonid Titovleonid.ti...@gmail.com:

I do have a conf/machine/picosam9.conf. It and recipe are exact as in
repo (http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/conf/machine/picosam9.conf
and 
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/linux/picosam9_git.bb).


in picosam9_git.bb you have


COMPATIBLE_HOST = arm.*-linux

make it

COMPATIBLE_HOST = arm.*-linux*

that said your problem is with fetching and I have seen
problems with fetching from gitorious using bitbake
It happens for efikamx kernel which was also hosted on
gitorious. Is there any other place this repo is mirrored ?
if yes use that.


2012/2/1, Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com:

2012/2/1 Leonid Titovleonid.ti...@gmail.com:

I've got a problem with building console-image for MACHINE=picosam9. It
fails while processing picosam9_git.bb with these messages:

do you have machine conf file for picosam9 ?
recipes and machine confs  are different files.
you have to show us both files here. That said
your error is a fetching error which means something
is wrong with either your SRC_URI or the remote server
which is feeding the sources of this recipe

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



--
С уважением,
  Леонид.

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 2/2] tzcode-native_2011i: remove and use oe-core recipe

2012-02-03 Thread Andrea Adami
* there are no evident reasons justifying the presence in meta-oe layer.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami andrea.ad...@gmail.com
---
 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native.inc  |   18 --
 .../recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011i.bb |   20 
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native.inc
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011i.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native.inc 
b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native.inc
deleted file mode 100644
index 2f9f176..000
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native.inc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-DESCRIPTION = tzcode, timezone zoneinfo utils -- zic, zdump, tzselect
-INC_PR = r5
-
-SRC_URI =  \
-
http://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzcode${PV}.tar.gz;name=tzcode-${PV};subdir=${BPN}-${PV}
 \
-
http://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzdata${TZDATA_PV}.tar.gz;name=tzdata-${TZDATA_PV};subdir=${BPN}-${PV}
 \
-   
-
-inherit native
-
-do_install () {
-install -d ${D}${bindir}
-install -m 755 zic ${D}${bindir}/
-install -m 755 zdump ${D}${bindir}/
-install -m 755 tzselect ${D}${bindir}/
-}
-
-NATIVE_INSTALL_WORKS = 1
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011i.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011i.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index 8ab4504..000
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011i.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-require tzcode-native.inc
-
-LICENSE = PD
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = file://README;md5=3ae8198f82258417ce29066d3b034035
-
-# Note that elsie.nci.nih.gov removes old versions when new is coming out
-# So if this doesn't build for you because of missing source file, just
-# bump it to the latest available version, removing old one
-# Also, tzdata (and it is needed to build tzcode) version can differ from
-# tzcode version, thus this variable
-
-TZDATA_PV = 2011i
-
-PR = ${INC_PR}.2
-
-SRC_URI[tzcode-2011i.md5sum] = cf7f4335b7c8682899fa2814e711c1b2
-SRC_URI[tzcode-2011i.sha256sum] = 
f0dd991de3f8d6c599c104e294377c9befa1ef40aa5a1d09e2e295a453f3c1ec
-SRC_URI[tzdata-2011i.md5sum] = c7a86ec34f30f8d6aa77ef94902a3047
-SRC_URI[tzdata-2011i.sha256sum] = 
f8dde7ca5e61f21ac34c8cdbef5568d00c829981211098f059d8104964c81ffa
-
-- 
1.7.3.4


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/2] tzdata_2011g: remove and use the updated recipe in oe-core.

2012-02-03 Thread Andrea Adami
* The tzdata_2011n recipe in oe-core now provides sane defaults,
* as committed with id 5304ce429f2c05857f04fbe3b47a067983ca96be

Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami andrea.ad...@gmail.com
---
 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata.inc  |  177 ---
 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata_2011g.bb |   12 --
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata.inc
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata_2011g.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata.inc 
b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata.inc
deleted file mode 100644
index 94f73d8..000
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata.inc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,177 +0,0 @@
-DESCRIPTION = Timezone data
-SECTION = base
-DEPENDS = tzcode-native
-
-INC_PR = r11
-
-DEFAULT_TIMEZONE ?= Europe/London
-
-RCONFLICTS_${PN} = timezones timezone-africa timezone-america 
timezone-antarctica \
- timezone-arctic timezone-asia timezone-atlantic \
- timezone-australia timezone-europe timezone-indian \
- timezone-iso3166.tab timezone-pacific timezone-zone.tab
-
-SRC_URI = 
http://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzdata${PV}.tar.gz;subdir=${BPN}-${PV};
-
-TZONES= africa antarctica asia australasia europe northamerica southamerica  \
- factory solar87 solar88 solar89 etcetera backward systemv \
-
-#pacificnew \
-
-CONFFILES_${PN} = ${sysconfdir}/timezone ${sysconfdir}/localtime
-
-do_compile () {
-mkdir -p build
-for zone in ${TZONES}; do \
-${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/zic -d ${S}/build${datadir}/zoneinfo -L 
/dev/null \
--y ${S}/yearistype.sh ${S}/${zone} ; \
-${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/zic -d 
${S}/build${datadir}/zoneinfo/posix -L /dev/null \
--y ${S}/yearistype.sh ${S}/${zone} ; \
-${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/zic -d 
${S}/build${datadir}/zoneinfo/right -L ${S}/leapseconds \
--y ${S}/yearistype.sh ${S}/${zone} ; \
-done
-}
-
-do_install () {
-install -d ${D}${prefix} ${D}${datadir}/zoneinfo
-cp -pPR ${S}/build${prefix}/* ${D}${prefix}
-# Only eglibc is removing zoneinfo files from package
-if [ ${LIBC}x = eglibcx ] ; then
-  cp -pP ${S}/zone.tab ${D}${datadir}/zoneinfo
-  cp -pP ${S}/iso3166.tab ${D}${datadir}/zoneinfo
-fi
-
-# Install a sane default for timezones
-install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}
-echo ${DEFAULT_TIMEZONE}  ${D}${sysconfdir}/timezone
-cp -pPR ${S}/build${datadir}/zoneinfo/${DEFAULT_TIMEZONE} 
${D}${sysconfdir}/localtime
-}
-
-inherit allarch
-# Packages primarily organized by directory with a major city
-# in most time zones in the base package
-
-PACKAGES = ${PN}-dbg tzdata tzdata-misc tzdata-posix tzdata-right 
tzdata-africa \
-tzdata-americas tzdata-antarctica tzdata-arctic tzdata-asia \
-tzdata-atlantic tzdata-australia tzdata-europe tzdata-pacific
-
-ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dbg = 1
-
-FILES_tzdata-africa += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Africa/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-africa = tzdata-africa
-
-FILES_tzdata-americas += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/America/*  \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/US/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Brazil/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Canada/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Mexico/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Chile/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-americas = tzdata-americas
-
-FILES_tzdata-antarctica += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Antarctica/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-antarctica = tzdata-antarctica
-
-FILES_tzdata-arctic += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Arctic/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-arctic = tzdata-arctic
-
-FILES_tzdata-asia += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Asia/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Indian/*\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Mideast/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-asia = tzdata-asia
-
-FILES_tzdata-atlantic += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Atlantic/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-atlantic = tzdata-atlantic
-
-FILES_tzdata-australia += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Australia/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-australia = tzdata-australia
-
-FILES_tzdata-europe += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Europe/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-europe = tzdata-europe
-
-FILES_tzdata-pacific += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Pacific/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-pacific = tzdata-pacific
-
-FILES_tzdata-posix += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/posix/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-posix = tzdata-posix
-
-FILES_tzdata-right += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/right/*
-RPROVIDES_tzdata-right = tzdata-right
-
-
-FILES_tzdata-misc += ${datadir}/zoneinfo/Cuba   \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Egypt\
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Eire \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Factory  \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/GB-Eire  \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Hongkong \
-${datadir}/zoneinfo/Iceland  \
-

[oe] Java: meta-java, meta-oracle-java

2012-02-03 Thread Ivan Kuten
Hello,

I noticed an activity around meta-java layer (OpenJDK based)
https://github.com/woglinde/meta-java
and recently around Oracle JRE: 
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oracle-java/

Any plans to combine or coordinate these efforts?
Because now we are working on Java PowerPC e500v2 support and finally would 
like to upstream
to mainline our work.

Best regards,
Ivan Kuten, head of RD at Promwad


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] tmux: Add initial recipe for vesion 1.6.

2012-02-03 Thread Peter Tworek

On 02/03/2012 06:53 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:

Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2012, 20:22 +0100 schrieb Peter Tworek:

From: Piotr Tworekptwo...@opera.com

Some configuration changed in your setup. Please try to avoid that so
that so that changelog statistics can be more meaningful.

There is the typo ve*r*sion in the summary.


Thanks, both issues fixed in v3.

Run tested on netbook pro.

Signed-off-by: Peter Tworektworaz...@gmail.com

Should you resend patches you can add the following.

Acked-by: Paul Menzelpaulepan...@users.sourceforge.net


---
  meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb |   18 ++
  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb

[…]


Thanks,

Paul



___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] tmux: Add initial recipe for version 1.6.

2012-02-03 Thread Peter Tworek
Run tested on netbook pro.

Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
---
 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb |   18 ++
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..fa58065
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+DESCRIPTION = Terminal multiplexer
+HOMEPAGE = http://tmux.sourceforge.net;
+SECTION = console/utils
+
+LICENSE = ISC
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
file://tmux.c;startline=3;endline=17;md5=f36d9c9e6c1c24996a88891fdf783d04
+
+DEPENDS = ncurses libevent sed-native
+
+SRC_URI = ${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/tmux/${P}.tar.gz
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 3e37db24aa596bf108a0442a81c845b3
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
faee08ba1bd8c22537cd5b7458881d1bdb4985df88ed6bc5967c56881a7efbd6
+
+inherit autotools
+
+do_configure_prepend () {
+   sed -i -e 's:-I/usr/local/include::' Makefile.am || bb_fatal sed 
failed
+}
-- 
1.7.3.4


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-xfce][PATCH] xfce4-power-manager: Add initial recipe for version 1.0.10.

2012-02-03 Thread Peter Tworek
Run tested on netbook pro.

Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com
---
 .../xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb  |   28 
 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb

diff --git 
a/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb 
b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..4641178
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+DESCRIPTION = Power manager for the Xfce desktop environment
+HOMEPAGE = http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-power-manager;
+SECTION = x11
+
+LICENSE = GPLv2+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552
+
+inherit xfce
+
+DEPENDS = gtk+ glib-2.0 dbus-glib xfconf libxfce4ui libxfce4util libnotify \
+   libxrandr virtual/libx11 libxext xfce4-panel
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = networkmanager udisks upower polkit
+
+EXTRA_OECONF =  \
+--enable-polkit \
+--enable-network-manager \
+--enable-panel-plugins \
+
+
+PACKAGES += xfce4-brightness-plugin
+FILES_${PN} += ${datadir}/polkit-1
+FILES_xfce4-brightness-plugin =  \
+${libdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-brightness-plugin \
+${datadir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-brightness-plugin.desktop \
+
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 38cbd272eb30e36ae538d9f38858bd38
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
80e4bb44f81c485ec09654dde432d6e28667d49a787625632a4413aac30422f0
-- 
1.7.3.4


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Andrea Adami
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 13:47, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

  I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to
 override
  it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not
 the
  rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not
  available in case a rootfs generation.

 Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
 polkit, something else?


 At this moment I know about polkit, I didn't check newer udev but I think
 it ought to depends on it as well.

 --
 Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
 E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
 Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
 ___
 Openembedded-devel mailing list
 Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Unfortunately the patch has a bad side-effect:

http://paste.debian.net/154741/

(I removed /systemd to show the culprit)

Sadly enough freedesktop git is down, so I've been obliged to revert that patch.

Andrea

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op 04-02-12 01:15, Andrea Adami schreef:
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
 wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 13:47, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to
 override
 it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception,
 not
 the
 rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being
 not available in case a rootfs generation.
 
 Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about 
 polkit, something else?
 
 
 At this moment I know about polkit, I didn't check newer udev but I
 think it ought to depends on it as well.
 
 -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail:
 ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53
 9981-7854  http://projetos.ossystems.com.br 
 ___ Openembedded-devel
 mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org 
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
 
 Unfortunately the patch has a bad side-effect:
 
 http://paste.debian.net/154741/
 
 (I removed /systemd to show the culprit)
 
 Sadly enough freedesktop git is down, so I've been obliged to revert that
 patch.

only cgit, not the actual git server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk8sfH8ACgkQMkyGM64RGpFOKACgk2/B+ac8q6HOs2ctoJff3KrN
D7cAn2w+6lseVIR15bhtOywS9gUvdUFd
=2BCI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Andreas Müller
 Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
 polkit, something else?

udisks [1]

[1] 
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-January/037230.html

Andreas

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] tmux: Add initial recipe for version 1.6.

2012-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
On (04/02/12 00:10), Peter Tworek wrote:
 Run tested on netbook pro.
 
 Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com
 Acked-by: Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
 ---
  meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb |   18 ++
  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb
 
 diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb 
 b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb
 new file mode 100644
 index 000..fa58065
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/tmux/tmux_1.6.bb
 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
 +DESCRIPTION = Terminal multiplexer
 +HOMEPAGE = http://tmux.sourceforge.net;
 +SECTION = console/utils
 +
 +LICENSE = ISC

what is ISC license ? I thought tmux is more like BSD license here is
what I read in NOTES files

tmux is intended to be a simple, modern, BSD-licensed alternative

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Peter Bigot
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
 polkit, something else?

 udisks [1]

Yeah, but that might be a consequence of udisks depending on polkit.
It was a libsystemd-login reference in a polkit .la file dependency
that made me install that patch so I could get udisks to build.


 [1] 
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-January/037230.html

 Andreas

 ___
 Openembedded-devel mailing list
 Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
On (03/02/12 20:15), Peter Bigot wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Andreas Müller
 schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
  polkit, something else?
 
  udisks [1]
 
 Yeah, but that might be a consequence of udisks depending on polkit.
 It was a libsystemd-login reference in a polkit .la file dependency
 that made me install that patch so I could get udisks to build.


polkit should also become a distro feature FWIW

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

2012-02-03 Thread Joshua Lock



On 03/02/12 18:18, Khem Raj wrote:

On (04/02/12 03:00), Andreas Müller wrote:

Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
polkit, something else?


why not make it a globally selectable ?
so we can make sure that autoconf does not try to guess
but we tell it if systemd features should {en|dis}abled
explicitly and something like virtual/init-manager or something
since I think it has to coexist with sysvinit or upstart
whatever one chooses.


We should definitely do this, I've not had enough time to figure out. I 
think it's going to have to be a distro level thing as so far as I can 
tell we need to be able to:

o set the init system
o include certain packages
o potentially enable/disable configure flags

I've not had much opportunity to look into this yet but we need to be 
certain whichever mechanism we enable works for systemd, sysvinit, 
upstart, s6, whatever.


Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project Johannes factotum
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] Java: meta-java, meta-oracle-java

2012-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
On (04/02/12 02:05), Ivan Kuten wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I noticed an activity around meta-java layer (OpenJDK based)
 https://github.com/woglinde/meta-java
 and recently around Oracle JRE: 
 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oracle-java/
 
 Any plans to combine or coordinate these efforts?

these are two different layers so they will exist. What coordination
would you like to see that will help you

 Because now we are working on Java PowerPC e500v2 support and finally would 
 like to upstream
 to mainline our work.
 
 Best regards,
 Ivan Kuten, head of RD at Promwad
 
 
 ___
 Openembedded-devel mailing list
 Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
-Khem

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [meta-xfce][PATCH] xfce4-power-manager: Add initial recipe for version 1.0.10.

2012-02-03 Thread Andreas Müller
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Run tested on netbook pro.

 Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek tworaz...@gmail.com
 ---
  .../xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb                  |   28 
 
  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 
 meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb

 diff --git 
 a/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb 
 b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
 new file mode 100644
 index 000..4641178
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
 +DESCRIPTION = Power manager for the Xfce desktop environment
 +HOMEPAGE = 
 http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-power-manager;
 +SECTION = x11
 +
 +LICENSE = GPLv2+
 +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552
 +
 +inherit xfce
 +
 +DEPENDS = gtk+ glib-2.0 dbus-glib xfconf libxfce4ui libxfce4util libnotify \
 +           libxrandr virtual/libx11 libxext xfce4-panel
 +RDEPENDS_${PN} = networkmanager udisks upower polkit
 +
 +EXTRA_OECONF =  \
 +    --enable-polkit \
 +    --enable-network-manager \
networkmanager conflicts with conman. I don't if this makes sense to
use conman with xfce (am using networkmanager too). What happens if
this option is not set?
 +    --enable-panel-plugins \
 +    
 +
 +PACKAGES += xfce4-brightness-plugin
 +FILES_${PN} += ${datadir}/polkit-1
 +FILES_xfce4-brightness-plugin =  \
 +    ${libdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-brightness-plugin \
 +    ${datadir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-brightness-plugin.desktop \
 +    
 +
 +SRC_URI[md5sum] = 38cbd272eb30e36ae538d9f38858bd38
 +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
 80e4bb44f81c485ec09654dde432d6e28667d49a787625632a4413aac30422f0
 --
 1.7.3.4


This was part of my TODO - Thanks. Give it a test next week.

Andreas

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[oe] [meta-smartphone][PATCH] drm: Rename bbappend to match oe-core updates

2012-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
 ...bdrm_2.4.29.bbappend = libdrm_2.4.30.bbappend} |0
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 rename meta-openmoko/recipes-graphics/drm/{libdrm_2.4.29.bbappend = 
libdrm_2.4.30.bbappend} (100%)

diff --git a/meta-openmoko/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.29.bbappend 
b/meta-openmoko/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.30.bbappend
similarity index 100%
rename from meta-openmoko/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.29.bbappend
rename to meta-openmoko/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.30.bbappend
-- 
1.7.8.3


___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel