Re: [oe] libeigen: Backport license fix to kirkstone

2024-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:03 AM Fabio Estevam  wrote:
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> Can dff417630f26 ("libeigen: Update GPL-3.0-only to GPL-2.0-only") be
> backported to kirkstone?
>
> Akash sent a kirkstone backport sometime ago:
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/105451

seems Armin missed it in his list.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabio Estevam

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110251): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110251
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105893530/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [oe] libeigen: Backport license fix to kirkstone

2024-05-03 Thread Tim Orling
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:03 AM Fabio Estevam via lists.openembedded.org
 wrote:

> Hi Khem,


Khem is not the kirkstone branch maintainer. Armin (cc’d) is.


>
> Can dff417630f26 ("libeigen: Update GPL-3.0-only to GPL-2.0-only") be
> backported to kirkstone?
>
> Akash sent a kirkstone backport sometime ago:
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/105451
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabio Estevam
>
> 
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110250): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110250
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105893530/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[oe] libeigen: Backport license fix to kirkstone

2024-05-03 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Khem,

Can dff417630f26 ("libeigen: Update GPL-3.0-only to GPL-2.0-only") be
backported to kirkstone?

Akash sent a kirkstone backport sometime ago:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/105451

Thanks,

Fabio Estevam

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110249): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110249
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105893530/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [oe] [PATCH] nodejs-oe-cache: fix offline install of dependencies

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:52 AM Martin Jansa via
lists.openembedded.org 
wrote:
>
> Thanks, perfect timing, I've just sent e-mail reply to nodejs upgrade
> that npm-10.5.0 upgrade broke this. Will test your change now. Thanks!

And it works for me, thanks again.

Cheers,

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110248): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110248
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105884883/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [oe] [PATCH] nodejs-oe-cache: fix offline install of dependencies

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Jansa
Thanks, perfect timing, I've just sent e-mail reply to nodejs upgrade
that npm-10.5.0 upgrade broke this. Will test your change now. Thanks!

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:42 AM Martin Hundeb?ll via
lists.openembedded.org 
wrote:
>
> Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
> lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
> install in do_compile() from npm.bbclass.
>
> Fix it by updating the fake cache entry to match the newest behaviour
> from npm.
>
> Note that npm doesn't agree with itself, as it still uses the previous
> header value when doing `npm cache add `, but the new value when
> doing `npm install `.
>
> Bug submitted upstream:
> https://github.com/npm/cli/issues/7465
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll 
> ---
>  .../recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache  | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git 
> a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
> index f59620764..eb0f143ea 100755
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ const xlate = {
> time: Date.now(),
> url:  key,
> reqHeaders: {
> -   'accept': 'application/vnd.npm.install-v1+json; q=1.0, 
> application/json; q=0.8, */*',
> +   'accept': 'application/json',
> },
> resHeaders: {
> "content-type": "application/json",
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110247): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110247
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105884883/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 1/1] nodejs: upgrade 20.11.1 -> 20.12.2

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Jansa
Hi,

since this update I'm seeing couple of npmsw:// recipes failing with
ENOTCACHED for various dependencies, e.g.:

npm ERR! code ENOTCACHED
npm ERR! request to https://registry.npmjs.org/documentation failed:
cache mode is 'only-if-cached' but no cached response is available.
--
npm ERR! code ENOTCACHED
npm ERR! request to https://registry.npmjs.org/@babel%2feslint-plugin
failed: cache mode is 'only-if-cached' but no cached response is
available.

reverting npm upgrade from 10.3.0 to 10.5.0 from:
https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/208dd887a5
https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/51913
seems to fix this issue. Refreshing the shrinkwrap with 10.5.0 npm
produces identical shrinkwrap.

Is anyone else seeing this issue?

Cheers,


On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:25 AM Polampalli, Archana via
lists.openembedded.org
 wrote:
>
> From: Archana Polampalli 
>
> License-Update:
> Copyright year updated
> zlib version updated
> GN files License update
>
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/b5bc597871ca701bab750c46d31ed626decd7f89
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/c8233912e9fd7464898b549d6762130722bf0bf4
>
> Changelog:
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/releases/tag/v20.12.2
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/releases/tag/v20.12.1
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/releases/tag/v20.12.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli 
> ---
>  .../oe-npm-cache  | 0
>  ...-cache-native_20.11.bb => nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.12.bb} | 0
>  .../nodejs/{nodejs_20.11.1.bb => nodejs_20.12.2.bb}   | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/{nodejs-oe-cache-20.11 => 
> nodejs-oe-cache-20.12}/oe-npm-cache (100%)
>  rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/{nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.11.bb => 
> nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.12.bb} (100%)
>  rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/{nodejs_20.11.1.bb => 
> nodejs_20.12.2.bb} (97%)
>
> diff --git 
> a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.11/oe-npm-cache 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
> similarity index 100%
> rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.11/oe-npm-cache
> rename to meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.11.bb 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.12.bb
> similarity index 100%
> rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.11.bb
> rename to meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-native_20.12.bb
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.11.1.bb 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.12.2.bb
> similarity index 97%
> rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.11.1.bb
> rename to meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.12.2.bb
> index 9a61cfcf7..d86c38f2f 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.11.1.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_20.12.2.bb
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  DESCRIPTION = "nodeJS Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript"
>  HOMEPAGE = "http://nodejs.org;
>  LICENSE = "MIT & ISC & BSD-2-Clause & BSD-3-Clause & Artistic-2.0 & 
> Apache-2.0"
> -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=78ad16dab3c1d15d4878c81770be0be7"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=9a7fcce64128730251dbc58aa41b4674"
>
>  CVE_PRODUCT = "nodejs node.js"
>
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ SRC_URI:append:toolchain-clang:x86 = " \
>  SRC_URI:append:toolchain-clang:powerpc64le = " \
> file://0001-ppc64-Do-not-use-mminimal-toc-with-clang.patch \
> "
> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "77813edbf3f7f16d2d35d3353443dee4e61d5ee84d9e3138c7538a3c0ca5209e"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "d7cbcc5fbfb31e9001f3f0150bbeda59abe5dd7137aaa6273958cd59ce35ced7"
>
>  S = "${WORKDIR}/node-v${PV}"
>
> --
> 2.40.0
>
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110246): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110246
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105726620/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [oe] [PATCH] nodejs-oe-cache: fix offline install of dependencies

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Hundeb?ll
Sorry, forgot the [meta-oe] prefix.

// Martin

On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 11:42 +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
> lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
> install in do_compile() from npm.bbclass.
> 
> Fix it by updating the fake cache entry to match the newest behaviour
> from npm.
> 
> Note that npm doesn't agree with itself, as it still uses the
> previous
> header value when doing `npm cache add `, but the new value when
> doing `npm install `.
> 
> Bug submitted upstream:
> https://github.com/npm/cli/issues/7465
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll 
> ---
>  .../recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache  | 2
> +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-
> 20.12/oe-npm-cache b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-
> 20.12/oe-npm-cache
> index f59620764..eb0f143ea 100755
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-
> cache
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-
> cache
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ const xlate = {
>   time: Date.now(),
>   url:  key,
>   reqHeaders: {
> -     'accept': 'application/vnd.npm.install-v1+json;
> q=1.0, application/json; q=0.8, */*',
> +     'accept': 'application/json',
>   },
>   resHeaders: {
>       "content-type": "application/json",


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110245): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110245
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105884883/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[oe] [PATCH] nodejs-oe-cache: fix offline install of dependencies

2024-05-03 Thread Martin Hundeb?ll
Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
install in do_compile() from npm.bbclass.

Fix it by updating the fake cache entry to match the newest behaviour
from npm.

Note that npm doesn't agree with itself, as it still uses the previous
header value when doing `npm cache add `, but the new value when
doing `npm install `.

Bug submitted upstream:
https://github.com/npm/cli/issues/7465

Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll 
---
 .../recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache 
b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
index f59620764..eb0f143ea 100755
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs-oe-cache-20.12/oe-npm-cache
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ const xlate = {
time: Date.now(),
url:  key,
reqHeaders: {
-   'accept': 'application/vnd.npm.install-v1+json; q=1.0, 
application/json; q=0.8, */*',
+   'accept': 'application/json',
},
resHeaders: {
"content-type": "application/json",
-- 
2.44.0


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110244): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110244
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105884883/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fwupd: fix uefi capsule update build error

2024-05-03 Thread Mikko Rapeli
plugin_uefi_capsule_splash does not provide "enabled" or "disabled"
options but only basic bool "true" and "false". Fixes do_configure()
failure with
PACKAGECONFIG:append = " plugin_tpm plugin_uefi_pk plugin_uefi_capsule ":

| ../fwupd-1.9.18/meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Value disabled is not boolean (true 
or false).

Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli 
---
 meta-oe/recipes-bsp/fwupd/fwupd_1.9.18.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-bsp/fwupd/fwupd_1.9.18.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-bsp/fwupd/fwupd_1.9.18.bb
index d20d5ed2a..e6c276ba4 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-bsp/fwupd/fwupd_1.9.18.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-bsp/fwupd/fwupd_1.9.18.bb
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_synaptics_mst] = 
"-Dplugin_synaptics_mst=enabled,-Dplugin_s
 PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_synaptics_rmi] = 
"-Dplugin_synaptics_rmi=enabled,-Dplugin_synaptics_rmi=disabled"
 PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_tpm] = 
"-Dplugin_tpm=enabled,-Dplugin_tpm=disabled,tpm2-tss"
 # Turn off the capsule splash as it needs G-I at buildtime, which isn't 
currently supported
-PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_uefi_capsule] = "-Dplugin_uefi_capsule=enabled 
-Dplugin_uefi_capsule_splash=disabled,-Dplugin_uefi_capsule=disabled,efivar 
fwupd-efi"
+PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_uefi_capsule] = "-Dplugin_uefi_capsule=enabled 
-Dplugin_uefi_capsule_splash=false,-Dplugin_uefi_capsule=disabled,efivar 
fwupd-efi"
 PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_uefi_pk] = 
"-Dplugin_uefi_pk=enabled,-Dplugin_uefi_pk=disabled"
 PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_uf2] = "-Dplugin_uf2=enabled,-Dplugin_uf2=disabled"
 PACKAGECONFIG[plugin_upower] = 
"-Dplugin_upower=enabled,-Dplugin_upower=disabled"
-- 
2.34.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110243): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110243
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105883191/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-