Re: [oe] jdk 6 u26+
openjdk7 is comming soon. Good new. Getting Caciocavallo started should be much easier this way ... Cheers Dirk ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-java] Compiling log4j1.2-native fails
With latest git of meta-java compiling log4j1.2-native-1.2.15-r0 fails while building openjdk-6, main problem seems to be: | 32. ERROR in src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/net/SMTPAppender.java (at line 1) | /* | ^ | The type javax.mail.MessagingException cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files Any ideas? Cheers Dirk ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-java] Compiling log4j1.2-native fails
With latest git of meta-java compiling log4j1.2-native-1.2.15-r0 fails while building openjdk-6, main problem seems to be: | 32. ERROR in src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/net/SMTPAppender.java | (at line 1) | /* | ^ | The type javax.mail.MessagingException cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files Any ideas? Cheers Dirk Hi, I never before saw this problem. What did you choose as java-native compiler? Bye Henning I am using angstrom distribution. bitbake -e says: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/java-native=jamvm-native PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/javac-native=ecj-bootstrap-native Cheers Dirk ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-java] Compiling log4j1.2-native fails
With latest git of meta-java compiling log4j1.2-native-1.2.15-r0 fails while building openjdk-6, main problem seems to be: | 32. ERROR in src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/net/SMTPAppender.java (at line 1) | /* | ^ | The type javax.mail.MessagingException cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files Any ideas? Rebuilding with a freshly checked out system without parallelization did not show this bug. So maybe one of this nasty parallelization issues... Cheers Dirk ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel