Re: [oe] State of Java on OE
On 22-04-17 00:25, Steven Osborn wrote: Is anyone using Java on OE devices right now? Yes! meta-oracle-java has a Morty branch, but the URI for the binaries is bad so it fails to install. We are using oracle for several years now. And yes, we pay for it. This URI is not bad, you need an account for some of the binaries. -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] uftp: Add recipe
From 1a011e1f1c2ca60749018394130a7860ae7ed816 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaap de Jong <jaap.dej...@nedap.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:17:09 +0200
Subject: [meta-networking][PATCH] uftp: Add recipe
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
---
meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
b/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..1166f9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "Encrypted UDP based FTP with multicast"
+HOMEPAGE = "https://sourceforge.net/projects/uftp-multicast;
+SECTION = "libs/network"
+
+LICENSE = "GPLv3"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.txt;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
+
+SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/uftp-multicast/source-tar/uftp-${PV}.tar.gz"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "231d6ba7820d89a712fe7d727ab0f8e6"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"9e9215af0315257c6cc4f40fbc6161057e861be1fff10a38a5564f699e99c78f"
+
+DEPENDS = "openssl"
+
+do_install () {
+ oe_runmake install DESTDIR=${D}
+}
--
2.7.4
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-networking][morty][PATCH] uftp: Add recipe
From cba20c0df65dcdd711009c5587142d2606deb1a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaap de Jong <jaap.dej...@nedap.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:47:17 +0200
Subject: [meta-networking][morty][PATCH] uftp: Add recipe
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
---
meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
b/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..a6eeceb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/uftp/uftp_4.9.3.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "Encrypted UDP based FTP with multicast"
+HOMEPAGE = "https://sourceforge.net/projects/uftp-multicast;
+SECTION = "libs/network"
+
+LICENSE = "GPLv3"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.txt;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
+
+SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/uftp-multicast/source-tar/uftp-${PV}.tar.gz"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "231d6ba7820d89a712fe7d727ab0f8e6"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"9e9215af0315257c6cc4f40fbc6161057e861be1fff10a38a5564f699e99c78f"
+
+do_install () {
+ oe_runmake install DESTDIR=${D}
+}
--
2.7.4
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] opkg v0.3.2 bug
Hi All, I've already put this in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/opkg-devel but I really want to hear what your experiences are. I have this package A for which package B has a dependency? I was using v0.2.3 before and 'opkg remove A' did not remove it. With v0.3.2 the same errors: Removing package A from root... Collected errors: * print_dependents_warning: Package A is depended upon by packages: * print_dependents_warning: B * print_dependents_warning: These might cease to work if package A is removed. * print_dependents_warning: Force removal of this package with --force-depends. * print_dependents_warning: Force removal of this package and its dependents * print_dependents_warning: with --force-removal-of-dependent-packages. But package A is removed nevertheless This sounds as a severe error! Or is it me doing something wrong?? Thanks, Jaap -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] Migrating from OE-classic to OE-core
Hi All, (not sure if this is the right place to ask this) Does anyone have experience with migrating from OE-classic to OE-core? Did you? How did you do it? As I see it now, my only option seems to be flashing the unit, but perhaps there is another approach? Thanks, Jaap -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] transitional packages
On 27-03-14 12:33, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, for one project I'm still using oe-classic. Would like to upgrade that! I know a simple update will not work because (among others?) package names are changed. Is there any effort made to create transitional packages? I don't know about any. If not, would it be a tough job? Yes, maybe not so bad if you have exactly one starting point and one final, but to provide upgrade path from some state of binary feeds in oe-core to some state of binary feeds built with oe-core is very close to impossible (as you cannot test every combination). Thanks for your explanation. So then I would go for the one starting point (my oe-classic build) to one end point (my oe-core build). The easiest approach then perhaps could be migrating oe-classic to oe-core. Then look at the differences between the two. And finally write a transition package that would be able to upgrade. Would that be possible at all? Some versions went backwards, you need to migrate LOCALCOUNTs to PRSERV db a lot of packages were renamed or removed without replacement Is there perhaps some list for this? (so they will be stuck in your target image unless you explicitly RCONFLICT RREPLACE them from your transitional package), there are upgrade path issues even between oe-core revisions. It would really be nice if there wouldn't be issues between revisions or transition packages available... -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] transitional packages
Hi All, for one project I'm still using oe-classic. Would like to upgrade that! I know a simple update will not work because (among others?) package names are changed. Is there any effort made to create transitional packages? If not, would it be a tough job? Thanks, Jaap -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] how to delay postinst script
Hi, is there a way to delay the postinstall script until next boot? I don't want the postinstall script to run when I update my package at install time, but it should install at the next boot. Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] error when bitbaking console-base-image (danny)
Hi All, I've been experimenting with images, and every time I get this error even with a completely fresh build directory: log_check: There were error messages in the logfile log_check: Matched keyword: [Collected errors] Configuring connman. Configuring connman-systemd. Configuring tinylogin. Configuring angstrom-version. Configuring angstrom-packagegroup-boot. Collected errors: * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to 'volatile/log': File exists. * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File exists. + '[' '!' -z '' ']' + package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk + multilib_tryout_dirs= Could really use some help here... Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] error when bitbaking console-base-image (danny)
On 04/11/2013 02:33 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, I've been experimenting with images, and every time I get this error even with a completely fresh build directory: log_check: There were error messages in the logfile log_check: Matched keyword: [Collected errors] Configuring connman. Configuring connman-systemd. Configuring tinylogin. Configuring angstrom-version. Configuring angstrom-packagegroup-boot. Collected errors: * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to 'volatile/log': File exists. * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File exists. Looks like you have inconsistency between fs-perms.txt (e.g. default openembedded-core/meta/files/fs-perms.txt) and what .ipk files are packaging as /var/log and /var/run (probably from base-files, but /var/run is also included in dbus and other packages). No differences with denzil. I did a bitbake core-image-base and that compiles without a problem. Thanks for sharing our thoughts! + '[' '!' -z '' ']' + package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk + multilib_tryout_dirs= Could really use some help here... Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] dropbear
Hi All, dropbear 2013.56 is currently the most recent version. Although not documented, they left out the functionality patched in with allow-nopw.patch in the 2013.56 release. I would like to update to this new version, but is this functionality important? Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] dropbear
On 04/10/2013 04:04 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 14:55:02 Jaap de Jong wrote: dropbear 2013.56 is currently the most recent version. Although not documented, they left out the functionality patched in with allow-nopw.patch in the 2013.56 release. How did you find this out? the patch fails and inspection of the code learns that it can't be applied. I found some other way to accomplish the same though.. diff -urN a/svr-runopts.c b/svr-runopts.c --- a/svr-runopts.c2013-03-21 16:29:35.0 +0100 +++ b/svr-runopts.c2013-04-10 15:11:51.0 +0200 @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ svr_opts.norootlogin = 0; svr_opts.noauthpass = 0; svr_opts.norootpass = 0; -svr_opts.allowblankpass = 0; +svr_opts.allowblankpass = 1; svr_opts.inetdmode = 0; svr_opts.portcount = 0; svr_opts.hostkey = NULL; Cheers, Paul ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] dropbear
On 04/10/2013 04:50 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 15:47:09 Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 16:37:33 Jaap de Jong wrote: On 04/10/2013 04:04 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 14:55:02 Jaap de Jong wrote: dropbear 2013.56 is currently the most recent version. Although not documented, they left out the functionality patched in with allow-nopw.patch in the 2013.56 release. How did you find this out? the patch fails and inspection of the code learns that it can't be applied. Ah right - to explain what has happened, I developed a new patch to change dropbear so that the functionality is now controlled through a command-line switch, and that is now configured in the image using a script in /etc/default/; if you look at the dropbear recipe in master you can see how it works. This avoids the need to rebuild dropbear depending upon the value of IMAGE_FEATURES which was not really ideal. If you want to use the latest version of dropbear with an older branch I'd suggest just taking the dropbear recipe in master, removing the nopw-option patch (which has been applied). Seems that the nopw-option.patch is added to dropbear rev 2013.56, so that one should be remove also from the list of patches to apply. If you do do this you'll also need to apply this patch: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=0937054e6e3e02565f57e60a8bdc14b0ad62e249 Ok. Thanks for your help! Cheers, Paul ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] machinename with dash in it
On 04/08/2013 10:15 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:53:34PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 08-04-13 15:17, Martin Jansa schreef: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in it: x-y If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not found. Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2 variants of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by an underscore: x-y and x_y In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the machinespecific packages are in x_y MACHINE_ARCH is MACHINE with s/-/_/g (because rpm had issues with -) so it's expected. Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found... Any ideas? It's probably caused by https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4102 do manual cleanup described there and it should work fine. The root cause was this one: https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-linaro.git;a=commit;h=30f353c072336ad764e9528ae3c508adb28fa4ad Heh, I was expecting that all MACHINEs in PACKAGE_ARCH died long time ago. Thanks for the hint, this is fixed now. (I have a new error though) Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] do_rootfs fails
I have this problem that do_rootfs finds.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Jaap
//
log_check: There were error messages in the logfile
log_check: Matched keyword: [Collected errors]
Configuring angstrom-packagegroup-boot.
Configuring util-linux-losetup.
Configuring util-linux.
Configuring sysvinit.
Collected errors:
* extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to
'volatile/log': File exists.
* extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to
'volatile/run': File exists.
+ '[' '!' -z '' ']'
+ package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk
+ multilib_tryout_dirs=
//
My image.bb contains:
inherit core-image
IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER = tinylogin shadow
IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER =
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = sysvinit sysvinit-pidof
IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = initscripts
export IMAGE_BASENAME = ${PN}
IMAGE_FEATURES += \
package-management \
debug-tweaks \
IMAGE_INSTALL += \
angstrom-packagegroup-boot \
initscripts \
busybox-mdev \
ca-certificates \
dropbear \
e2fsprogs-e2fsck \
ntp \
ntpdate \
openssl \
rsync \
screen \
shadow \
mtd-utils \
util-linux \
watchdog \
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] sysvinit?
Hi All,
I was wondering what the status is for sysvinit.
Is it maintained or not?
If I want to use it in my image how should it look like?
Something like this?
inherit core-image
IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER = tinylogin shadow
IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = busybox-mdev
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = sysvinit sysvinit-pidof
IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = initscripts
export IMAGE_BASENAME = ${PN}
IMAGE_FEATURES += \
package-management \
debug-tweaks \
IMAGE_INSTALL += \
${IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER} \
${IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER} \
${IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER} \
${IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS} \
Should I add more?
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] do_rootfs fails
adding
angstrom-packagegroup-boot
caused the trouble.
On 04/09/2013 10:07 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote:
I have this problem that do_rootfs finds.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Jaap
//
log_check: There were error messages in the logfile
log_check: Matched keyword: [Collected errors]
Configuring angstrom-packagegroup-boot.
Configuring util-linux-losetup.
Configuring util-linux.
Configuring sysvinit.
Collected errors:
* extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to
'volatile/log': File exists.
* extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to
'volatile/run': File exists.
+ '[' '!' -z '' ']'
+ package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk
+ multilib_tryout_dirs=
//
My image.bb contains:
inherit core-image
IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER = tinylogin shadow
IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER =
IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = sysvinit sysvinit-pidof
IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = initscripts
export IMAGE_BASENAME = ${PN}
IMAGE_FEATURES += \
package-management \
debug-tweaks \
IMAGE_INSTALL += \
angstrom-packagegroup-boot \
initscripts \
busybox-mdev \
ca-certificates \
dropbear \
e2fsprogs-e2fsck \
ntp \
ntpdate \
openssl \
rsync \
screen \
shadow \
mtd-utils \
util-linux \
watchdog \
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] machinename with dash in it
Hi All, something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in it: x-y If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not found. Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2 variants of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by an underscore: x-y and x_y In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the machinespecific packages are in x_y Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found... Any ideas? Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] opkg-make-index not found
On 02/19/2013 04:07 PM, Jaap de Jong wrote: On 02/19/2013 03:33 PM, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote: Then I recommend to look into log files. For my case, after executing commands: $ bitbake package-index -c cleansstate $ bitbake -D -D package-index bitbake-d-d.package-index 2 errlog I have at least four log files. 1. bitbake-d-d.package-index in current dir 2. errlog in current dir 3. run.do_package_index.* in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 4. log.do_package_index.* in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 (Actually, I skipped to generate 2., my build succeed.) I guess you can find some clue looking into 4., 3., and maybe 1. I attach mine to this mail, and hope they might be some help for you. Thanks for all your help! I've been comparing the run.do_package_index file from myself and from the buildserver. If I look at it the only real difference (besides paths etc) are in the SHELL export SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash-wrapper export SHELL=/bin/bash I will ask my administrator to change it and will retry. Adding export SHELL=/bin/bash to my ~/.bashrc did the trick. No problem anymore. Thanks for the support!! ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] opkg-make-index not found
On 02/18/2013 04:19 PM, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote: Hi, this may or may not help you: $ bitbake -e package-index bbenv.package-index $ grep PACKAGEINDEXES bbenv.package-index ( for me, the result was: # PACKAGEINDEXES= package_update_index_ipk; PACKAGEINDEXES=package_update_index_ipk; ) Then I tried searching package_update_index_ipk in bbenv.package-index using a text editor. It is a function, and in it, opkg-make-index is called in a line: flock $pkgdir/Packages.flock -c opkg-make-index -r $pkgdir/Packages -p $pkgdir/Packages -m $pkgdir/ What do you find in your box? For both I find the same results. The funny thing is that on the same machine my buildserver is running and that one is having no problems... Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] opkg-make-index not found
On 02/19/2013 03:33 PM, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote: Then I recommend to look into log files. For my case, after executing commands: $ bitbake package-index -c cleansstate $ bitbake -D -D package-index bitbake-d-d.package-index 2 errlog I have at least four log files. 1. bitbake-d-d.package-index in current dir 2. errlog in current dir 3. run.do_package_index.* in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 4. log.do_package_index.* in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 (Actually, I skipped to generate 2., my build succeed.) I guess you can find some clue looking into 4., 3., and maybe 1. I attach mine to this mail, and hope they might be some help for you. Thanks for all your help! I've been comparing the run.do_package_index file from myself and from the buildserver. If I look at it the only real difference (besides paths etc) are in the SHELL export SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash-wrapper export SHELL=/bin/bash I will ask my administrator to change it and will retry. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] opkg-make-index not found
On 02/16/2013 07:51 AM, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote:
if I do
bitbake package-index
it crashes with the message
| /bin/bash: opkg-make-index: command not found
This is on a 64 debian machine, possibly the wrong path is searched?
(there is a opkg-make-index under sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin)
If you doubt the PATH setting, you should check the output from:
$ bitbake -e | grep '^export PATH'
Well opkg-make-index is in the path.
Something strange is happening here.
If I edit package-index.bb and add a call to opkg-make-index
do_package_index() {
set -ex
opkg-make-index ### ADDED CODE
${PACKAGEINDEXES}
set +ex
}
it shows an error message when invoking bitbake package-index showing
that opkg-make-index is actualy working...
///
.../build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/opkg-make-index
[-h] [-s] [-m] [-l Packages.filelist] [-p Packages] [-r
Packages.old] [-L localesdir] [-v] packagesdir
NOTE: package package-index-1.0-r0: task do_package_index: Failed
///
Any idea?
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] opkg-make-index not found
Hi All, if I do bitbake package-index it crashes with the message | /bin/bash: opkg-make-index: command not found This is on a 64 debian machine, possibly the wrong path is searched? (there is a opkg-make-index under sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin) Is this a known problem? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] best practice for different projects on the same board
Hi All, I'm wondering what the best practice would be in the following situation. We have a board that is going to be used in several projects. The set of basic packages is the same but every project might have some minor and perhaps sometimes major differences in f.i. config files. I don't want to make a copy of the base project for every upcoming new project. I would really like to handle with the differences only. What is the best approach for this? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] libftdi
On 11/23/2012 03:31 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:20:56AM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, on my buildserver under debian, libftdi does not compile. Looks like some library issue. Anyone an idea how to solve? Thanks in advance! Jaap NOTE: package libftdi-0.19-r0: task do_compile: Started ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 for further information) ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 Log data follows: | DEBUG: SITE files ['endian-little', 'bit-32', 'arm-common', 'common-linux', 'common-glibc', 'arm-linux', 'arm-linux-gnueabi', 'common'] | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 for further information) | NOTE: make -j2 | make all-recursive | make[1]: Entering directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/libftdi-0.19' | Making all in src | make[2]: Entering directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/libftdi-0.19/src' | ../arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c -o ftdi.lo ftdi.c | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c ftdi.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ftdi.o | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c ftdi.c -o ftdi.o /dev/null 21 | ../arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -version-info 20:0:19 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -o libftdi.la -rpath /usr/lib ftdi.lo -L/lib -lusb ^^ Fix the Makefile to not use this. Bye Henning Fixed it. Probably not this best way to do it, but it works. Added a patch: diff -urN a/configure.in b/configure.in --- a/configure.in2012-11-26 14:59:05.084788496 +0100 +++ b/configure.in2012-11-26 14:59:21.665316347 +0100 @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ else AC_MSG_ERROR([*** libusb-config not found. You need a working libusb installation.]) fi +LIBS= dnl check for version of libusb AC_MSG_CHECKING([if libusb version is = 0.1.7]) ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] openjdk-7-vm-jamvm
On 11/23/2012 03:32 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, how can I build openjdk-7-vm-jamvm? If I bitbake openjdk-7 it is not added, while openjdk-7-vm-zero is added. I'm building for arm. Thanks! Jaap Add it to your image. bitbake openjdk-7-vm-jamvm fails: ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'openjdk-7-vm-jamvm' And so fails adding it to my images as well... | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package openjdk-7-vm-jamvm. Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] openjdk-7-vm-jamvm
On 11/26/2012 11:42 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:17:42AM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: On 11/23/2012 03:32 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, how can I build openjdk-7-vm-jamvm? If I bitbake openjdk-7 it is not added, while openjdk-7-vm-zero is added. I'm building for arm. Thanks! Jaap Add it to your image. bitbake openjdk-7-vm-jamvm fails: ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'openjdk-7-vm-jamvm' And so fails adding it to my images as well... | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package openjdk-7-vm-jamvm. Jaap Hi Jaap, I found two problems for building openjdk-7 with additional vms. They are now fixed in master. Bye Henning That's great news! Many thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] libftdi
Hi All, on my buildserver under debian, libftdi does not compile. Looks like some library issue. Anyone an idea how to solve? Thanks in advance! Jaap NOTE: package libftdi-0.19-r0: task do_compile: Started ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 for further information) ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 Log data follows: | DEBUG: SITE files ['endian-little', 'bit-32', 'arm-common', 'common-linux', 'common-glibc', 'arm-linux', 'arm-linux-gnueabi', 'common'] | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/temp/log.do_compile.21748 for further information) | NOTE: make -j2 | make all-recursive | make[1]: Entering directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/libftdi-0.19' | Making all in src | make[2]: Entering directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/libftdi-0.19/src' | ../arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c -o ftdi.lo ftdi.c | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c ftdi.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ftdi.o | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -c ftdi.c -o ftdi.o /dev/null 21 | ../arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -I/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/usr/include -version-info 20:0:19 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -o libftdi.la -rpath /usr/lib ftdi.lo -L/lib -lusb | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/ftdi.o -L/lib /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/lib/libusb.so -L=/lib -L/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/lib /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45/lib/libusb-1.0.so -lrt -march=armv5te -marm -mthumb-interwork -mtune=arm926ej-s --sysroot=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/nedap9g45 -O2 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libftdi.so.1 -o .libs/libftdi.so.1.19.0 | /data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/../../libexec/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/ld: warning: library search path /lib is unsafe for cross-compilation | /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: file not recognized: File format not recognized | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[2]: *** [libftdi.la] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/data/jenkins/jobs/oe-core/develop/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libftdi-0.19-r0/libftdi-0.19/src' | make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory
[oe] openjdk-7-vm-jamvm
Hi, how can I build openjdk-7-vm-jamvm? If I bitbake openjdk-7 it is not added, while openjdk-7-vm-zero is added. I'm building for arm. Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] sstate-cache
On 11/22/2012 03:56 PM, Jaap de Jong wrote:
I have a handful of openembedded clones on a single machine and I would
like to use as little diskspace as possible, so I'm wondering if it is
possible to share the directory build/sstate-cache among these different
clones?
To be a bit more precise, these are the variables to work with:
SSTATE_DIR ?= ${TOPDIR}/sstate-cache
SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= \
file://.* http://someserver.tld/share/sstate/ \n \
file://.* file:///some/local/dir/sstate/
Does every clone (which might be translated at the same time) has to
have its own local SSTATE_DIR?
Or is it ok to point every clone to one single directory, like:
SSTATE_DIR ?= ${HOME}/sstate-cache?
Or should I use SSTATE_MIRRORS for that purpose?
Thanks!
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] kernel image
Hi, does anyone know where the + (in kernel-2.6.35.14+_2.6.35-r14.6_mymachine.ipk) is added? It is added on my pc (running ubuntu); it is not added on my debian buildserver. Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] kernel image
On 11/22/2012 02:31 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, does anyone know where the + (in kernel-2.6.35.14+_2.6.35-r14.6_mymachine.ipk) is added? It is added on my pc (running ubuntu); it is not added on my debian buildserver. Check if you have oe-core 56fe5300 I'm using oe-classic for this... ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] kernel image
On 11/22/2012 02:54 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:36:25PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: On 11/22/2012 02:31 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, does anyone know where the + (in kernel-2.6.35.14+_2.6.35-r14.6_mymachine.ipk) is added? It is added on my pc (running ubuntu); it is not added on my debian buildserver. Check if you have oe-core 56fe5300 I'm using oe-classic for this... Then apply it in oe-classic kernel.bbclass or your recipe. Stupid question probably.. Where can I find it? And one more: does it make sense that the '+' is added under ubuntu and that is absent on my buildserver? ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] sstate-cache
Hi All, I have a handful of openembedded clones on a single machine and I would like to use as little diskspace as possible, so I'm wondering if it is possible to share the directory build/sstate-cache among these different clones? Any idea? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] kernel image
On 11/22/2012 04:17 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote:
On 11/22/2012 02:54 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:36:25PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote:
On 11/22/2012 02:31 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know where the + (in
kernel-2.6.35.14+_2.6.35-r14.6_mymachine.ipk) is added?
It is added on my pc (running ubuntu); it is not added on my debian
buildserver.
Check if you have oe-core 56fe5300
I'm using oe-classic for this...
Then apply it in oe-classic kernel.bbclass or your recipe.
Stupid question probably.. Where can I find it?
And one more: does it make sense that the '+' is added under ubuntu and
that is absent on my buildserver?
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass?id=56fe5300ab5ab072c20acd03d7fc26e9cae4e652
Try to compare those 3 commands on both builders.
That seems to help.
I added it to my local linux recipe
do_configure_prepend() {
touch .scmversion
}
Thanks for your support!
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] llvm issue
On 11/16/2012 08:49 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: On 11/15/2012 04:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 15 November 2012 15:06:30 Jaap de Jong wrote: when I checkout openjdk-7 on meta-java and bitbake anything I get these errors: ERROR: Unable to parse /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.9_2.9.bb | ETA: 00:00:15 ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1 NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.8_2.8.bb NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.9_2.9.bb Are you using the denzil branch of OE-Core perhaps? I suspect meta-java has been updated to use spaces for python function indentation which only works with danny/master. I don't see a denzil branch in meta-java, perhaps it would be worth adding one...? Yes, I'm using denzil. And for you second question: I'm probably not the one who should answer this, but: yes, that would help! What would be the way to use the 'danny' branch? I don't see any branch of that name under sources/*/ about danny: cd sources/openembedded-core git checkout danny Unfortunately: same problem... ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] llvm issue
On 11/16/2012 10:22 AM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:06:30PM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, when I checkout openjdk-7 on meta-java and bitbake anything I get these errors: ERROR: Unable to parse /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.9_2.9.bb | ETA: 00:00:15 ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1 NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.8_2.8.bb NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.9_2.9.bb Anyone already know what is wrong here? Cheers! Jaap Hi Jaap, khem posted some patches for the jdk7 branch unfornatly I dont have the much time to integrate them yet. Please look at the oe-dev patchwork or use his github repo. So what would be the combination to go? 1) openembedded-core -- danny 2) meta-java -- khem: openjdk-7 Or something different? Maybee in christmas holiday I will find some time to merge jdk7 branch into master. Sitting next to your Christmas tree! :-) ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] llvm issue
Hi All, when I checkout openjdk-7 on meta-java and bitbake anything I get these errors: ERROR: Unable to parse /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.9_2.9.bb | ETA: 00:00:15 ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1 NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.8_2.8.bb NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.9_2.9.bb Anyone already know what is wrong here? Cheers! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] llvm issue
On 11/15/2012 04:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 15 November 2012 15:06:30 Jaap de Jong wrote: when I checkout openjdk-7 on meta-java and bitbake anything I get these errors: ERROR: Unable to parse /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.9_2.9.bb | ETA: 00:00:15 ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1 NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.8_2.8.bb NOTE: Error expanding variable populate_packages NOTE: Error during finalise of /data/jenkins/jobs/myTest/workspace/sources/meta-java/recipes-core/llvm/llvm 2.9_2.9.bb Are you using the denzil branch of OE-Core perhaps? I suspect meta-java has been updated to use spaces for python function indentation which only works with danny/master. I don't see a denzil branch in meta-java, perhaps it would be worth adding one...? Yes, I'm using denzil. And for you second question: I'm probably not the one who should answer this, but: yes, that would help! What would be the way to use the 'danny' branch? I don't see any branch of that name under sources/*/ Thanks, Jaap Cheers, Paul ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] jni.h included
On 10/09/2012 07:51 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
As you are using icedtea6, I guess DEPENDS += icedtea6 should do it.
- Martin
I thought that might do the trick, but...
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'icedtea6'
So I tried
DEPENDS += icedtea6-native
and that ends with
jni.h: No such file or directory
Any other ideas?
On 10/08/12 16:49, Jaap de Jong wrote:
On 10/08/2012 04:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Jaap de Jong jaap.dej...@nedap.com
wrote:
Hi All!
probably a stupid question... my apologies!
If a source I'm working on #include jni.h what do I need to add in a
recipe
to get it translated?
DEPENDS += openjdk or something like that which denotes jdk
Tried
DEPENDS += openjdk
unfortunately errors out with
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'openjdk'
Tried with
DEPENDS += openjdk-6
but that errors out with
fatal error: jni.h: No such file or directory
So finally I ended up adding this:
CFLAGS += -I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include
-I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include/linux
But that just looks so ugly...
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] jni.h included
On 10/10/2012 08:51 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
Assuming you use meta-java, it seems like what you are looking for is:
DEPENDS += openjdk-6-jdk
as that at least contains the include, lib and bin directory.
- Martin
It just looks so simple... but does not work: jni.h not found
For now I will stay with changing CFLAGS; ugly, but works!
Thanks all for the support!
On 10/10/12 08:40, Jaap de Jong wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:51 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
As you are using icedtea6, I guess DEPENDS += icedtea6 should do it.
- Martin
I thought that might do the trick, but...
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'icedtea6'
So I tried
DEPENDS += icedtea6-native
and that ends with
jni.h: No such file or directory
Any other ideas?
On 10/08/12 16:49, Jaap de Jong wrote:
On 10/08/2012 04:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Jaap de Jong jaap.dej...@nedap.com
wrote:
Hi All!
probably a stupid question... my apologies!
If a source I'm working on #include jni.h what do I need to add in a
recipe
to get it translated?
DEPENDS += openjdk or something like that which denotes jdk
Tried
DEPENDS += openjdk
unfortunately errors out with
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'openjdk'
Tried with
DEPENDS += openjdk-6
but that errors out with
fatal error: jni.h: No such file or directory
So finally I ended up adding this:
CFLAGS += -I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include
-I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include/linux
But that just looks so ugly...
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] jni.h included
Hi All! probably a stupid question... my apologies! If a source I'm working on #include jni.h what do I need to add in a recipe to get it translated? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] jni.h included
On 10/08/2012 04:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Jaap de Jong jaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote:
Hi All!
probably a stupid question... my apologies!
If a source I'm working on #include jni.h what do I need to add in a recipe
to get it translated?
DEPENDS += openjdk or something like that which denotes jdk
Tried
DEPENDS += openjdk
unfortunately errors out with
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'openjdk'
Tried with
DEPENDS += openjdk-6
but that errors out with
fatal error: jni.h: No such file or directory
So finally I ended up adding this:
CFLAGS += -I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include
-I${STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE}/jvm/icedtea6-native/include/linux
But that just looks so ugly...
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] release
On 07/17/2012 10:51 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:17:47PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, are there any plans for an oe-core release? Is the software already stable enough to create one? Thanks! Jaap Hi Jaap, looks like you are niot subscribed at the oe-core mailing list, otherwise you would know about the release in the neat future. Bye Henning Shame on me :-) Will check there... ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] release
Hi All, are there any plans for an oe-core release? Is the software already stable enough to create one? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] openjdk-7
On 05/25/2012 04:13 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:00:07PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi all, I've seen openjdk-7 in oe-core meta-java. ANy plans to backport it to 2011.03-maintanance? Thanks! Jaap Not for free in my spare time. Bye Henning I can try to do it myself first. If you are willing to give some advice for free :-) What would be the best approach? I made a start on it by copying some of the files out of meta-java (openjdk-7 branch) and put them into the 2011.03 (oe-classic) branch. Translation stops at some point though. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] openjdk-7
Hi all, I've seen openjdk-7 in oe-core meta-java. ANy plans to backport it to 2011.03-maintanance? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] update from 2010.12 to 2011.03
I have this device in the field with 2010.12 installed (glibc) Suppose I'm going to upgrade it to 2011.03 (eglibc). Is this possible at all? Or should I stay with glibc based packages Glibc and eglibc are totally compatible so I don't see a reason why it won't work you will see ant upgrade related issues as you would see if you were to upgrade from say glibc 2.10 to 2.1 Well, I tried upgrading from glibc-2010.12 to eglibc-2011.03 ... and failed. Then I thought maybe they weren't that compatible. /// Upgrading opkg on root from 0.1.8+svnr554-r31.6 to 0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/opkg_0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9_armv5te.ipk. Upgrading libopkg0 on root from 0.1.8+svnr554-r31.6 to 0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/libopkg0_0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9_armv5te.ipk. Removing obsolete file /etc/rcS.d/S98configure. Upgrading wget on root from 1.11.4-r8.05.6 to 1.11.4-r8.05.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/wget_1.11.4-r8.05.9_armv5te.ipk. Upgrading libssl1.0.0 on root from 1.0.0b-r13.1.6 to 1.0.0e-r15.0.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-r15.0.9_armv5te.ipk. wget: /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_0.9.8' not found (required by wget) wget: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0) wget: /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_0.9.8' not found (required by wget) wget: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0) /// So, I build glibc based repository and surprise, surprise... same error! /// Upgrading libopkg0 on root from 0.1.8+svnr554-r31.6 to 0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/libopkg0_0.1.8+svnr609-r51.9_armv5te.ipk. Removing obsolete file /etc/rcS.d/S98configure. Upgrading wget on root from 1.11.4-r8.05.6 to 1.11.4-r8.05.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/wget_1.11.4-r8.05.9_armv5te.ipk. Upgrading libssl1.0.0 on root from 1.0.0b-r13.1.6 to 1.0.0e-r15.0.9... Downloading http://myrepository/ipk/armv5te/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-r15.0.9_armv5te.ipk. wget: /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_0.9.8' not found (required by wget) wget: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0) wget: /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_0.9.8' not found (required by wget) wget: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0) /// Any hint is appreciated! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] openssl (2011.03) on ubuntu 12.04
Hi All!
anybody ran into this error?
Looks like a path missing or so.
(I'm building 2011.03 from ground op on a fresh ubuntu 12.04)
If needed I can sent the complete log
Thanks!
Jaap
gcc -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall
-Wa,--noexecstack -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM
-DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM
-isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/oe/develop/build/tmp_angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include
-c -o openssl.o openssl.c
rm -f openssl
shlib_target=; if [ -n libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libssl.so.1.0.0 ]; then \
shlib_target=linux-shared; \
fi; \
LIBRARIES=-L.. -lssl -L.. -lcrypto ; \
make -f ../Makefile.shared -e \
APPNAME=openssl OBJECTS=openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o
dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o gendh.o errstr.o ca.o pkcs7.o
crl2p7.o crl.o rsa.o rsautl.o dsa.o dsaparam.o ec.o ecparam.o x509.o
genrsa.o gendsa.o genpkey.o s_server.o s_client.o speed.o s_time.o
apps.o s_cb.o s_socket.o app_rand.o version.o sess_id.o ciphers.o nseq.o
pkcs12.o pkcs8.o pkey.o pkeyparam.o pkeyutl.o spkac.o smime.o cms.o
rand.o engine.o ocsp.o prime.o ts.o \
LIBDEPS= $LIBRARIES -lgcc -ldl \
link_app.${shlib_target}
make[2]: Entering directory
`/media/OpenEmbedded/oe/develop/build/tmp_angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/openssl-native-1.0.0b-r13.1/openssl-1.0.0b/apps'
openssl.o: In function `main':
openssl.c:(.text+0x199): undefined reference to `BIO_s_file'
openssl.c:(.text+0x1a1): undefined reference to `BIO_new'
openssl.c:(.text+0x1e1): undefined reference to `BIO_ctrl'
openssl.c:(.text+0x231): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_get_options'
openssl.c:(.text+0x23b): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_set_options'
openssl.c:(.text+0x245): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_free'
openssl.c:(.text+0x24f): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_realloc'
openssl.c:(.text+0x259): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_malloc'
openssl.c:(.text+0x261): undefined reference to
`CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions'
openssl.c:(.text+0x26d): undefined reference to
`CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_options'
openssl.c:(.text+0x29b): undefined reference to
`CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2a7): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_mem_ctrl'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2b5): undefined reference to
`CRYPTO_set_locking_callback'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2eb): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_set_mem_functions'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2f0): undefined reference to `ERR_load_crypto_strings'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2f5): undefined reference to
`OPENSSL_add_all_algorithms_noconf'
openssl.c:(.text+0x2fa): undefined reference to
`ENGINE_load_builtin_engines'
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] update from 2010.12 to 2011.03
Hi everybody! I have this device in the field with 2010.12 installed (glibc) Suppose I'm going to upgrade it to 2011.03 (eglibc). Is this possible at all? Or should I stay with glibc based packages? Thanks, Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] llvm fails to build
Hi all,
trying to compile openjdk-6, it fails with:
|
/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp:
In constructor '{anonymous}::StatSymbols::StatSymbols()':
|
/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp:69:67:
error: 'lseek64' was not declared in this scope
| make[2]: ***
[lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/CMakeFiles/LLVMJIT.dir/Intercept.cpp.o] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory
`/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/build'
| make[1]: *** [lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/CMakeFiles/LLVMJIT.dir/all] Error 2
| make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
I'm using master branches.
Is this a known issue?
Any ideas how to solve?
Thanks,
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] llvm fails to build
Thanks!
That helps a lot!!
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with submitting the patch... (shame on
me! You may sent me a link for the howto)
However this is the patch I used
diff --git a/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp
b/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp
index 274f816..a4e7eee 100644
--- a/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp
+++ b/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h
#include llvm/System/DynamicLibrary.h
#include llvm/Config/config.h
+#include unistd.h
using namespace llvm;
// AtExitHandlers - List of functions to call when the program exits,
Thanks again,
Jaap
On 05/03/2012 09:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote:
Hi all,
trying to compile openjdk-6, it fails with:
|
/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp:
In constructor '{anonymous}::StatSymbols::StatSymbols()':
|
/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp:69:67:
error: 'lseek64' was not declared in this scope
| make[2]: ***
[lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/CMakeFiles/LLVMJIT.dir/Intercept.cpp.o] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory
`/media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.8-2.8-r0/llvm-2.8/build'
| make[1]: *** [lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/CMakeFiles/LLVMJIT.dir/all] Error 2
| make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
I'm using master branches.
Is this a known issue?
Any ideas how to solve?
you are using gcc 4.7 I guess. Fix is to add #includeunistd.h in
Intercept.cpp
if that works then submit it to meta-java
Thanks,
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] how to rebuild packages
Probably a total stupid question... In oe-classic I used to use bitbake -c clean packageX bitbake packageX This does not seem to work on oe-core. Even removing the directory build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/packageX* does not help... What is the way to do this? Thanks, Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [oe-core] THISDIR usage
There is no file named: myfile.tar.gz
That it can't be found by bitbake is pretty clear then...
On 04/11/2012 02:49 PM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
I'm obtaining this error trying to rebuild the poky-edison repository
(http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1.1/poky-edison-6.
0.1.tar.bz2)
and the error is happening trying to build quilt-native package (indeed I'm
running ../script/bitbake -k core-image-sato), where I passed the tar.gz
directly using the instructions below.
This is the output of tree meta-yocto (snipped)
meta-yocto
recipes-devtools
quilt
files
quilt-0.48.tar.gz
quilt-native_0.48.bbappend
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Gary
Thomas
Sent: mercoledì 11 aprile 2012 13:06
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] [oe-core] THISDIR usage
On 2012-04-11 04:52, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Many thanks for the reply, I tried the suggestion but I obtained this:
Unable to fetch URL file://myfile.tar.gz from any source
What's happening?
Does your layer look like the pseudo tree quoted below? Can you send the
results of 'tree meta-giuseppe'?
One way to get a glimpse of where bitbake is looking for your file is to use
strace (GIANT hammer) like this:
% strace -o /tmp/xx.bb -f bitbake some-recipe
% grep myfile.tar.gz /tmp/xx.bb
This way you can see the paths being searched.
Il giorno mercoledì 11 aprile 2012, Gary Thomas ha scritto:
On 2012-04-11 04:23, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi, I moved to OE-Core (working on stable version dowloaded as tar
file from cgit.openembedded.org).
I'm in trouble trying to include a source through .bbappend file,
located
under my meta-personalsubtree.
FILESPATHBASE_prepend := ${THISDIR}/files:
SRC_URI += file://myfile.tar.gz
results in a no such file or directory. Please can you tell me if
I'm missing anything?
Assuming your tree looks something like this [partial]:
meta-giuseppe:
recipes:
some-recipe:
some-recipe_1.2.3.bbappend
files:
myfile.tar.gz
Try using this instead
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := ${THISDIR}/files:
--
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates |Embedded world
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] foreign repository
Anyone? Any idea? On 03/22/2012 02:27 PM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All! I have this repository filled with about 50 packages. It is not created with openembedded. Still I would like to include them in my rootfs. What are my options? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] foreign repository
Thanks! It was never my intention to create new recipes for all the packages that are in this foreign repository. I would have to update every 2 weeks or so to keep in sync with that repository. Don't want that! I only want to install the package that is in that repository and its dependencies. This is what I did. Added the foreign repository in: angstrom-feed-configs.bbappend So with 'opkg update' it is read. Created an empty 'placeholder' recipe for the package to include. When I bitbake my image this empty package is included in the rootfs. Now i only have to 'opkg update/upgrade' to get the actual packages in. This is by far the easiest solution (I think...) Thanks again! Jaap On 03/26/2012 12:31 PM, Sergey Lapin wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote: Anyone? Any idea? You can read OE wiki regarding overlays/layers. Also, you can use Koen's Angstrom scripts for no-brains configuration process. Also, bitbake manual and OE existing layers are your friends. S. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] foreign repository
Hi All! I have this repository filled with about 50 packages. It is not created with openembedded. Still I would like to include them in my rootfs. What are my options? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] remove dbg and dev packages
On 03/19/2012 04:54 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 3/16/12 3:54 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi! is there an option (in local.conf?) to not build (or not add to the repository of) the dbg and dev packages? You have to build the dev packages, otherwise you can't (cross) compile the software in the development environment. Clear! The dbg packages are optional, but if you disable them then things may or may not be stripped and the filesizes on the target may increase. (It's been a while since I tried it w/o dbg packages...) Don't want that. Is there a reason why you don't want the dev and dbg packages to be generated? They should only be installed onto a target filesystem if you've requested them (or a package has a dependency on them). Normal, non-dev, filesystems shouldn't be installed any of those components... if they are, there is a packaging bug in something. The only simple reason is to keep the repository's and the Packages* files smaller. Thanks for your comments! ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] remove dbg and dev packages
That was my first guess too. If I remove them from the build/deploy/glibc/ipk/* directories and then do 'bitbake package-index' that would do the trick? But I would have to remove them after every package I build... On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:54:15AM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi! is there an option (in local.conf?) to not build (or not add to the repository of) the dbg and dev packages? Thanks! Jaap Why dont write a shell skript which deletes all dbg and dev packages and calles the opkg index command afterwards? Bye Henning ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] remove dbg and dev packages
Hi! is there an option (in local.conf?) to not build (or not add to the repository of) the dbg and dev packages? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [oe-classic][PATCH 00/12] openjdk
What would be the best approach to backport to 2010.12? I volunteer to backport and do some testing... On 02/19/2012 07:44 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 04:27:34PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: On (18/02/12 22:20), Henning Heinold wrote: Hi, in good old tradition I send this patches for review against older openembedded.dev branch. It makes openjdk buildable again and updates it to version 1.11.1. Work was sponsored by Koan s.a.s. If nobody objects I will commit it on monday. the patches look sane. Two things I would think will be nice is 1. are these patches needed on 2011.03 branch ? if yes please submit the pull request for the maintenance branch too When there is someone who needs them in 2011.03 he can test and make a pull request. 2. Are any of these patches needed for meta-java or any other layer then they should be forwarded ported to respective layer as well As beeing the meta-java maintainer only the 1.11.1 recipe will be soon in meta-oe, when I find the time. Bye Henning ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] build error
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:50:32AM +0100, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, not sure if this is the right list... Running into a failure: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base // // | + rm -f /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-all /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-armv5te /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-at91sam9263ek | + true | + '[' -eq 0 ']' | /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_rootfs.20251: line 214: [: -eq: unary operator expected | + set +x | log_check: Using /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.20251 as logfile 213if true; then 214if [ $runtime_script_required -eq 0 ]; then 215# All packages were successfully configured. 216# update-rc.d, base-passwd are no further use, remove them now No error when: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base try this http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/20111/ That helped! A bit... until the next error | Configuring task-base-extended. | Configuring run-postinsts. | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/run to 'volatile/run': File exists. | + '[' '!' -z '' ']' | + package_tryout_install_multilib_ipk | + multilib_tryout_dirs= Which is true: $ ll /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/ total 40 drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 backups drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 cache drwxr-xr-x 6 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-25 09:27 lib drwxr-sr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 local drwxr-xr-x 3 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-25 09:26 lock drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 log drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 run drwxr-xr-x 3 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-25 09:26 spool drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 tmp drwxr-xr-x 7 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:39 volatile $ ll /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/volatile/ total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 cache drwxrwxrwt 3 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-25 09:26 lock drwxr-xr-x 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 log drwxr-xr-x 3 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-25 09:26 run drwxrwxrwt 2 jdj jdj 4096 2012-01-24 13:45 tmp Any ideas? Jaap Cheers, Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] build error
Sorry! Last line should read MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-minimal On 01/25/2012 08:50 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi, not sure if this is the right list... Running into a failure: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base // // | + rm -f /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-all /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-armv5te /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-at91sam9263ek | + true | + '[' -eq 0 ']' | /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_rootfs.20251: line 214: [: -eq: unary operator expected | + set +x | log_check: Using /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.20251 as logfile 213if true; then 214if [ $runtime_script_required -eq 0 ]; then 215# All packages were successfully configured. 216# update-rc.d, base-passwd are no further use, remove them now No error when: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] build error
Hi, not sure if this is the right list... Running into a failure: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base // // | + rm -f /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-all /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-armv5te /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/rootfs/var/lib/opkg/lists/oe-at91sam9263ek | + true | + '[' -eq 0 ']' | /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_rootfs.20251: line 214: [: -eq: unary operator expected | + set +x | log_check: Using /media/OpenEmbedded/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/at91sam9263ek-oe-linux-gnueabi/core-image-base-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.20251 as logfile 213if true; then 214if [ $runtime_script_required -eq 0 ]; then 215# All packages were successfully configured. 216# update-rc.d, base-passwd are no further use, remove them now No error when: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake console-image-base Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] Plans for OE classic future
On 11/01/2011 02:00 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:38:33AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: 2011-10-27 14:27, Martin Jansa skrev: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:56:43PM +0200, Henning Heinold wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:53:13AM +, Mats K?rrman wrote: Hi, Are there any plans for new releases and/or maintenance branches of OE classic? BR / Mats Hi, http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/log/?h=org.openembedded.dev and http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/log/?h=2011.03-maintenance Bye Henning Are you showing that maintenance ibranch is not so old and that only few things changed in old OE-classic since then? :) Afaik: nobody plans to do another release from OE-classic and oe-core/meta-oe/BSP's/... are veryclose to first release What repository is used for the BSP's ? Each BSP in own repository - http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/LayerIndex Does anybody know where the atmel boards are? (at91sam9263ek) ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] Creating an ejre receipe
I added a few lines for mine version
# no gnu_hash in any file, so skip QA...
INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
inherit update-alternatives
ALTERNATIVE_NAME = java
ALTERNATIVE_PATH = ${libdir}/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java
ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = 4
On 10/25/2011 09:23 PM, itodroid wrote:
Greetings all. I'm not sure of the frequency of posting to this list, but I
thought I would ask all of you a question regarding creating a recipe for
Oracle/Sun's embedded JRE. I can't seem to figure out the syntax needed to
create an appropriate recipe for automatically including the ejre in my
image.
Everytime I try to bitbake, my deployment packet (ipk) is 1000 bytes. In
other words, I think its empty. The recipe should simply untar the .tar.gz
file and put it into a format that can be distributed into the sysroot (I'm
picking /usr/java for its destination). I'd appreciate any
feedback/comments/fixes to the following:
DESCRIPTION = Oracle/Sun Embedded JRE
PV = 1.6.0
PR = 27
SRC_URI =
file://ejre-1_6_0_27-fcs-b07-linux-arm-vfp-eabi-headless-18_jul_2011.tar.gz
S = ${WORKDIR}
SRC_URI[md5sum]=b30175c5168e1df394bc79474583f2a3
SRC_URI[sha256sum]=d8b02bd16c95435d9c460cea060bc10b6eda00a2e8864d6412074903
dd73243c
do_compile() {
}
do_install() {
install -d ${D}/usr/java
cp -R ${S}/ejre${PV}_${PR}/* ${D}/usr/java
}
do_qa_staging() {
}
do_package_qa() {
}
FILES_${PN} = \
${D}/usr/java/* \
PACKAGE = ${PN}
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] exclude (r)depends
Hi All, this is probably simple but I don't know how. I've build a simple recipe. Bitbake figures it depends on libsqlite0 and libsqlite3-0; which is correct by the way... For some reason I don't want the dependencies in the ipk file. Is there some flag for this? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] exclude (r)depends
On 08/04/2011 12:07 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 04 August 2011 10:46:53 Jaap de Jong wrote:
I've build a simple recipe.
Bitbake figures it depends on libsqlite0 and libsqlite3-0; which is
correct by the way...
For some reason I don't want the dependencies in the ipk file.
Is there some flag for this?
There's no flag for this because just taking away the shlibdeps-generated
RDEPEND will almost certainly break the application/library at runtime. There
are a few correct ways to solve it:
1) If the part of the binary output that needs sqlite is a plugin or otherwise
optional module, just put it into a separate package (e.g. using
PACKAGES_prepend = ${PN}-sqlitemodule then FILES_${PN}-sqlitemodule =
${libdir}/libsomethingsqlite.so.*. Then your main package (${PN}) should not
depend on sqlite anymore, as long as it doesn't have a hard dependency on the
sqlite-using module.
2) Disable the sqlite dependency during configure, or if that can't be done,
patch the source to acheive the same effect.
3) Depending on how complex the program is, with extra effort you could patch
the source to turn it into an optional runtime dependency by using dlopen(3)
instead of linking to sqlite during the build.
Probably the easiest way for me is to remove the specific *.so files
after building.
Thanks for your support!
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH] ptpd: added recipe for v1.1.0.
On 08/04/2011 03:32 PM, Chris Verges wrote:
Signed-off-by: Chris Vergeskg4...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/ptpd/ptpd_1.1.0.bb | 19 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/ptpd/ptpd_1.1.0.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/ptpd/ptpd_1.1.0.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/ptpd/ptpd_1.1.0.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..87e0a69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/ptpd/ptpd_1.1.0.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+DESCRIPTION = Precision Time Protocol (PTP) as defined by the IEEE 1588
standard
+HOMEPAGE = http://sourceforge.net/projects/ptpd;
+LICENSE = BSD
+SECTION = network
+PR = r1
+
+SRC_URI = ${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/project/ptpd/ptpd/${PV}/ptpd-${PV}.tar.gz
+
+S = ${WORKDIR}/ptpd-${PV}/src
+
+do_install() {
+install -d ${D}${bindir} ${D}${mandir}/man8
+install -m 4555 ptpd ${D}${bindir}
+install -m 644 ptpd.8 ${D}${mandir}/man8
+}
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = faa4823576dd49ccc94b741ff32b03f5
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
a7c6ea83bd53da75ae04a7b7a25fe7c597b4e9ff1f93d46f4502e3fa8a2cb950
+
Why not jump to version 2.1.0 right away...
DESCRIPTION = Precision Time Protocol (PTP) as defined by the IEEE 1588
standard
HOMEPAGE = http://sourceforge.net/projects/ptpd;
LICENSE = BSD
SECTION = network
PR = r0
SRC_URI = \
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ptpd/ptpd/${PV}/${P}.tar.gz \
S = ${WORKDIR}/${P}/src
CFLAGS += -Dlinux
LDFLAGS += -lm -lrt
do_install() {
install -d ${D}${bindir}
install -m 4555 ptpd2 ${D}${bindir}
install -d ${D}${mandir}/man8
install -m 644 ptpd.8 ${D}${mandir}/man8
}
SRC_URI[md5sum] = 9c2ba065476f3377a0b380a56c9dd8c9
SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
80f271a58d2751824c8448a08178053a712aad1cc74d29250c0d6bf23ad12c00
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] bblayers and PRINC
Hi All,
if created my own udev_151.bbappend to change some of the files in the
original package:
THISDIR := ${@os.path.dirname(bb.data.getVar('FILE', d, True))}
FILESPATHBASE_prepend := ${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:
#PRINC = 1
PR .= .1
PRINC doesn't seem to work.
So I tried to fool around with PR and PR_append; It works ok with my
other bbappend recipes.
bitbake base-image fails!
If I look at the udev files/directories created I see ipk's without '.1'
and 2 directories: 1 with and 1 without '.1'
(I removed everything before)
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dbg_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dev_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/udev-151-r21
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/udev-151-r21.1
Without PR .= .1 I get more files:
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dbg_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dev_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-doc_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-utils_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/udev-151-r21
Any ideas?
Jaap
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.12.0
METADATA_BRANCH = release-2010.12
METADATA_REVISION = dec3967
TARGET_ARCH = arm
TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi
MACHINE = at91sam9263ek
DISTRO= angstrom
DISTRO_VERSION= 2010.12
TARGET_FPU= soft
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
NOTE: Running task 540 of 4063 (ID: 497,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_setscene)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_setscene: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_setscene: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3807 of 4063 (ID: 496,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_fetch)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_fetch: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_fetch: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3808 of 4063 (ID: 489,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_unpack)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_unpack: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_unpack: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3809 of 4063 (ID: 490,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_patch)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_patch: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_patch: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3810 of 4063 (ID: 498,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_configure)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_configure: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_configure: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3811 of 4063 (ID: 499,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_qa_configure)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_qa_configure: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_qa_configure: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3812 of 4063 (ID: 500,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_compile)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_compile: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_compile: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3813 of 4063 (ID: 491,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_install)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_install: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_install: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3814 of 4063 (ID: 492,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_populate_sysroot)
NOTE: Running task 3815 of 4063 (ID: 501,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_package)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_populate_sysroot: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_package: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_populate_sysroot: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 3952 of 4063 (ID: 493,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_qa_staging)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_qa_staging: Started
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_qa_staging: Succeeded
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_package: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 4002 of 4063 (ID: 502,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_package_write_ipk)
NOTE: package udev-151-r21.1: task do_package_write_ipk: Started
Packaged contents of udev-dbg into
/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dbg_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
Packaged contents of udev-dev into
/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/udev-dev_151-r21.6_armv5te.ipk
NOTE: package udev-151-r21: task do_package_write_ipk: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 4058 of 4063 (ID: 494,
/oe/sources/openembedded/recipes/udev/udev_151.bb, do_package_write)
NOTE: Running task 4059 of 4063 (ID: 18,
/oe/sources/mylayer/recipes/my-tweaks/base-image.bb,
Re: [oe] bblayers and PRINC
On 08/01/2011 12:02 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 01-08-11 11:59, Jaap de Jong schreef:
Hi All,
if created my own udev_151.bbappend to change some of the files in the original
package:
THISDIR := ${@os.path.dirname(bb.data.getVar('FILE', d, True))} FILESPATHBASE_prepend
:= ${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:
#PRINC = 1 PR .= .1
PRINC doesn't seem to work.
PRINC only works with an OE-core setup similar like this one:
http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-angstrom/tree/README
I know PRINC only works with oe-core, that's why I'm using `PR .= .1`
That works with all my other *.bbappend recipes but not for udev; if you
look at the bitbake log at the end you can see that it does some strange
things...
At this moment I must stay with release-2010.12.
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] how to apply bbappend selectively
Hi All, I.m creating a special image with for instance a modified udev package. I've created a udev-xxx.bbappend for that purpose. But for all the other images I build for other hardware I still want to use the original udev-xxx. There is probably a simple solution but I don't see it... Any ideas? Thanks in advance! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] strange error
funny error when the OE_BASE dirname contains -OS It looks like it all occurrences in the gcc line with -OS are replaced by -O1S leading to a wrong path... | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1' | Making all in mpi | make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1/mpi' | make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. | make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1/mpi' | Making all in cipher | make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1/cipher' | `echo /bin/sh ../i686-linux-libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src -isystem/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -I/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -isystem/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -O2 -g -fvisibility=hidden -Wall -Wpointer-arith -c ./tiger.c | sed -e 's/-O[2-9s]*/-O1/g' ` | i686-linux-libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src -isystem/home/jdj/OE-O1S/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -I/home/jdj/OE-O1S/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -isystem/home/jdj/OE-O1S/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/include -O1 -g -fvisibility=hidden -Wall -Wpointer-arith -c ./tiger.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/tiger.o | In file included from ../src/visibility.h:245:0, | from ../src/g10lib.h:39, | from ./tiger.c:26: | ../src/gcrypt.h:29:23: fatal error: gpg-error.h: No such file or directory | compilation terminated. | make[2]: *** [tiger.lo] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1/cipher' | make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jdj/OE-OS/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/i686-linux/libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0/libgcrypt-1.4.1' | make: *** [all] Error 2 | + die 'oe_runmake failed' | + oefatal 'oe_runmake failed' | + echo FATAL: 'oe_runmake failed' | FATAL: oe_runmake failed | + exit 1 NOTE: package libgcrypt-native-1.4.1-r0: task do_compile: Failed ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] best practice .inc files
Hi All, I was wondering what the best way is to do this. I'm using the 2010.12 release. I've created my own u-boot_2010.09.bb file in my local repository. In it is aline require u-boot.inc (every u-boot*.bb recipe has it) Now I need a copy of the openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot.inc in my local repository to get it bitbaked. (Well actually I've symlinked the file) I think both solutions are not optimal. Is there a way to this in a more gentle way? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] bbappend
Hi all!
I need some help concerning bbappend.
I've created a bbappend file:
FILESEXTRAPATHS := ${THISDIR}/files
SRC_URI += file://xyzzy.patch
If I run a bitbake it complains about missing /xyzzy.patch
When I change the bbappend file to this:
SRC_URI += file:///absolute-path-to-the-file/files/xyzzy.patch
then everything works fine...
(As a workaround this will do)
Any help is appreciated!!
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] how to change system files
On 06/28/2011 01:46 PM, Anders Darander wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:49, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote:
On 06/28/2011 11:23 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
Yeah, but what if I decide at a certain point in time to change the
/etc/network/interfaces file?
Normally I would increment PR in the bb file and then build it.
And finally at the target I would do opkg upgrade.
Just as Phil said, you increment PR in your .bbappend-file.
I'm oftend appending to the PR in my .bbappend-files.
I'm having some trouble with it...
If I want to use .bbappend do I need to add bblayers as well?
If I don't I get this error message:
ERROR: /home/jdj/oe/mystuff/recipes/netbase/netbase_4.21.bbappend is
not a BitBake file while parsing
/home/jdj/oe/mystuff/recipes/netbase/netbase_4.21.bbappend
Where /home/jdj/oe/mystuff/recipes/netbase/netbase_4.21.bbappend is:
FILESEXTRAPATHS := ${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}
PRINC = 1
If I do use bblayers, I'm not sure about my local.conf. It contains some
BBFILES, BBFILE_COLLECTIONS, BBFILE_PATTERN_xxx and
BBFILE_PRIORITY_xxx lines
If I remove these lines then it looks like bitbake can't find any recipe.
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] how to change system files
Hi All, annoying question here... What is the best way to change files like /etc/network/interfaces? I have about 5 files or so that already are supplied by (default) packages; they are not in 1 package. I would like to have them in one package that I own so that I can easily update them, but this is not necessary. Is overlays the way to go? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] how to change system files
On 06/28/2011 11:23 AM, Anders Darander wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:35, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote: What is the best way to change files like /etc/network/interfaces? I have about 5 files or so that already are supplied by (default) packages; they are not in 1 package. I would like to have them in one package that I own so that I can easily update them, but this is not necessary. Is overlays the way to go? I'm handling this by using .bbappend's in a local layer. This won't give you one package, rather the ability to replace/add files (e.g. /etc/network/interfaces) in the standard packages. Yeah, but what if I decide at a certain point in time to change the /etc/network/interfaces file? Normally I would increment PR in the bb file and then build it. And finally at the target I would do opkg upgrade. Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] how to change system files
On 06/28/2011 01:46 PM, Anders Darander wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:49, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote: On 06/28/2011 11:23 AM, Anders Darander wrote: Yeah, but what if I decide at a certain point in time to change the /etc/network/interfaces file? Normally I would increment PR in the bb file and then build it. And finally at the target I would do opkg upgrade. Just as Phil said, you increment PR in your .bbappend-file. I'm oftend appending to the PR in my .bbappend-files. Thanks! I will try it. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] x86_64
Hi All, is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines? And if so, how to build for them? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] x86_64
On 05/10/2011 12:06 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:00 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
Hi All,
is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines?
And if so, how to build for them?
Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for
testing x86_64?
x8664
amd64
...
Opinions?
x86_64 seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If
you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like
x86_64-generic would do. I don't think there's any prohibition
against underscores in machine names.
p.
So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment?
Jaap.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] x86_64
is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines?
And if so, how to build for them?
Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for
testing x86_64?
x8664
amd64
...
Opinions?
x86_64 seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If
you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like
x86_64-generic would do. I don't think there's any prohibition
against underscores in machine names.
p.
So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment?
Depends what you mean by not possible. There doesn't seem to be any
existing machine config file which targets x86_64, but I don't think
there is any reason that you couldn't trivially create one; something
along the lines of:
$ catconf/machine/x84_64-generic.confEOF
TARGET_ARCH = x86_64
GLIBC_ADDONS = nptl
GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF = --with-tls
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = linux
KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = bzImage
EOF
$
p.
Will try that; is there any 64 bit output to be expected?
Jaap.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] x86_64
is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines?
And if so, how to build for them?
Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for
testing x86_64?
x8664
amd64
...
Opinions?
x86_64 seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If
you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like
x86_64-generic would do. I don't think there's any prohibition
against underscores in machine names.
p.
So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment?
Depends what you mean by not possible. There doesn't seem to be any
existing machine config file which targets x86_64, but I don't think
there is any reason that you couldn't trivially create one; something
along the lines of:
$ catconf/machine/x84_64-generic.confEOF
TARGET_ARCH = x86_64
GLIBC_ADDONS = nptl
GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF = --with-tls
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = linux
KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = bzImage
EOF
$
p.
Will try that; is there any 64 bit output to be expected?
Jaap.
bitbake ends with
|
/media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/x86_64/x86_64-angstrom-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find /lib64/libc.so.6 inside
/media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-angstrom-linux
There is only a lib directory and no lib64 directory...
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] x86_64
On 05/10/2011 04:38 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:57 +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote: bitbake ends with | /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/x86_64/x86_64-angstrom-linux/bin/ld: cannot find /lib64/libc.so.6 inside /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-angstrom-linux There is only a lib directory and no lib64 directory... It seems that there is some disagreement between binutils and your C library about where the libs should be stored. Which DISTRO configuration are you using? Build Configuration: BB_VERSION= 1.8.18 METADATA_BRANCH = release-2010.12 METADATA_REVISION = dec3967 TARGET_ARCH = x86_64 TARGET_OS = linux MACHINE = x86_64-generic DISTRO= angstrom DISTRO_VERSION= 2010.12 If you make a symlink from lib - lib64 inside the sysroot, does that allow the build to continue? Tried that one... | /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/x86_64/x86_64-angstrom-linux/bin/ld: cannot find /lib64/libc.so.6 inside /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-angstrom-linux so the answer is: no... Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] release-2011.3
Hi,
I've been building release-2011.3 with DISTRO=angstrom-2008.1.
Builds without problems.
If I use DISTRO=angstrom-2010.x and start a complete new fresh build, I get
NOTE: Handling BitBake files: - (0263/7348) [ 3 %]ERROR: EOL while
scanning string literal (expansion, line 1) while parsing
/OpenEmbedded/release-2011.3/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/uclibc/uclibc_0.9.31.bb
NOTE: type 'exceptions.SyntaxError':EOL while scanning string literal
(expansion, line 1) while evaluating:
${@oe_filter_out('(-L\S+|-l\S+)', '-Wl,-O1 ${TARGET_LINK_HASH_STYLE}', d)}
ERROR: EOL while scanning string literal (expansion, line 1) while
parsing
/OpenEmbedded/release-2011.3/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/uclibc/uclibc_0.9.31.bb
Probably something stupid I have missed
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Jaap
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] release-2011.3
If I use DISTRO=angstrom-2010.x and start a complete new fresh build, I get Seems like a different bitbake must be used. You better start from the Angstrom web site Getting Started notes as that's the only place where this is up-to-date. Don't know what went wrong in the previous attempt but a new fresh start helped a lot... and please use uclibc-git, they other versions dont have nptl support. How should I accomplish that? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] findclass failure
You are so right, sorry for the noise... On 02/22/2011 03:46 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: Hi Jaap, better ask on the cacao-ml. Thats no oe specific. Bye Henning ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] findclass failure
Hi All, I'm having some trouble running sqlitejdbc. With the zero jvm it runs ok, but with cacao it won't. # java -zero -classpath .:/usr/share/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni Test name = Gandhi job = politics name = Turing job = computers name = Wittgenstein job = smartypants # java -cacao -classpath .:/usr/share/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni Test Exception in thread main java.sql.SQLException: no SQLite library found at org.sqlite.Conn.init(Conn.java:84) at org.sqlite.JDBC.connect(JDBC.java:64) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:620) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:222) at Test.main(Test.java:6) Tracking this, I've come to this statement in NativeDB.c (jni) dbclass = (*env)-FindClass(env, org/sqlite/NativeDB); It looks like cacao uses a different way handling its classpath? Adding code: dbclass = (*env)-FindClass(env, java/lang/String); does find the class... So, FindClass does not always fail. Any ideas? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded 2011.3 Release: Request for targets!
Please add at91sam9263ek (angstrom-2008.1 / angstrom-2010.x) On 02/08/2011 03:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, As March is fast approaching I want to gather the list of DISTRO / MACHINE / BBPKGS targets that the various distributions would like to see at least compile tested (volunteers for HW testing welcome!). Today, I have the following setup to be built: minimal / minimal-uclibc: qemux86/ppc/arm/mips/mips64/sh4/mipsel, mpc8315e-rdb, p2020ds, p2020rdb + nas-server-image/native-sdk-image/console-image/minimal-image/x11-image/meta-toolchain/qt4-x11-demo-image/qt4e-demo-image angstrom-2008.1 / angstrom-2010.x: hawkboard, mini2440, mini6410, beagleboard + console-image / qt4-x11-demo-image / qt4e-demo-image slugos / ucslug: nslu2be/le + slugos-image I'm building all of these for 32bit Ubuntu 8.04, RHEL5 and will be adding Ubuntu 10.04 for the next run. What more do people want added? I'm looking to fill this matrix out to something that runs over the weekend and I've still got plenty of room to spare (which is why I've bcc'd everyone in the MAINTAINERS file with a Distro by their name). And of course if you wish to handle building what you care about yourself instead, that's great! Please just take this as a gentle reminder that there's a release coming up so it's time to crank the builders up and make sure your stuff is working. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] OpenEmbedded 2011.3 Release: Request for targets!
For me personally: console-image would do. I can run some builds here. On 02/08/2011 04:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On 02/08/2011 08:02 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Please add at91sam9263ek (angstrom-2008.1 / angstrom-2010.x) Added (just console-image? Or do you want qt*demo-image too? Or some other image?). ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] chattr not found?
Tim, Thanks! But... at boot I get: update-alternatives: Error: cannot register alternative chattr to /usr/bin/chattr since it is already registered to /bin/chattr Not a big deal, I guess... Jaap On 01/14/2011 03:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On 01/14/2011 02:57 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All! for some reason chattr is linked to chattr.e2fsprogs instead of ../usr/bin/chattr.e2fsprogs # ls -l /bin/chattr* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2011-01-14 10:37 /bin/chattr - chattr.e2fsprogs # ls -l /usr/bin/chattr* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7304 2010-12-10 01:12 /usr/bin/chattr.e2fsprogs I have no time to investigate this. Look simple... I'm pushing a fix for this now, thanks for the report. ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] chattr not found?
Hi All! for some reason chattr is linked to chattr.e2fsprogs instead of ../usr/bin/chattr.e2fsprogs # ls -l /bin/chattr* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2011-01-14 10:37 /bin/chattr - chattr.e2fsprogs # ls -l /usr/bin/chattr* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7304 2010-12-10 01:12 /usr/bin/chattr.e2fsprogs I have no time to investigate this. Look simple... Regards, Jaap de Jong ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] strange usb behavior
Hi All! I'm observing some strange usb behavior. I have a board with an onboard ftdi usb chip acting as 2 rs232 ports. And I have on the same board an external usb device with again a ftdi chip on board, this time acting as a single rs485 port. Build Configuration: BB_VERSION= 1.8.18 METADATA_BRANCH = release-2010.12 METADATA_REVISION = dec3967 TARGET_ARCH = arm TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi MACHINE = at91sam9263ek-special DISTRO= angstrom DISTRO_VERSION= 2010.7-test-20101210 TARGET_FPU= soft So when I boot with the external device in the connector the internal and external devices are detected as expected. [1.28] usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using at91_ohci and address 2 [1.46] usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [1.47] ftdi_sio 1-1:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected [1.47] usb 1-1: Detected FT2232C [1.48] usb 1-1: Number of endpoints 2 [1.48] usb 1-1: Endpoint 1 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.49] usb 1-1: Endpoint 2 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.49] usb 1-1: Setting MaxPacketSize 64 [1.50] usb 1-1: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to ttyUSB0 [1.51] ftdi_sio 1-1:1.1: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected [1.51] usb 1-1: Detected FT2232C [1.52] usb 1-1: Number of endpoints 2 [1.52] usb 1-1: Endpoint 1 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.53] usb 1-1: Endpoint 2 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.53] usb 1-1: Setting MaxPacketSize 64 [1.54] usb 1-1: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to ttyUSB1 [1.68] usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using at91_ohci and address 3 [1.86] usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [1.87] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected [1.88] usb 1-2: Detected FT232RL [1.88] usb 1-2: Number of endpoints 2 [1.89] usb 1-2: Endpoint 1 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.89] usb 1-2: Endpoint 2 MaxPacketSize 64 [1.90] usb 1-2: Setting MaxPacketSize 64 [1.90] usb 1-2: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to ttyUSB2 But if I look at the /dev directory ttyUSB2 is missing! # ls -l /dev/ttyU* crw-rw1 root dialout 188, 0 Jan 1 1970 /dev/ttyUSB0 crw-rw1 root dialout 188, 1 Jan 1 1970 /dev/ttyUSB1 # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0403:6010 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT2232C Dual USB-UART/FIFO IC Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0403:6001 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT232 USB-Serial (UART) IC So, why is ttyUSB2 gone and are ttyUSB[01] still available?? If I then remove (mark the second line!) [ 103.60] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 3 [ 103.61] ftdi_sio ttyUSB2: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now disconnected from ttyUSB2 [ 103.63] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: device disconnected and re-enter the external device life is OK! [ 140.02] usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using at91_ohci and address 4 [ 140.20] usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 140.23] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected [ 140.25] usb 1-2: Detected FT232RL [ 140.25] usb 1-2: Number of endpoints 2 [ 140.25] usb 1-2: Endpoint 1 MaxPacketSize 64 [ 140.26] usb 1-2: Endpoint 2 MaxPacketSize 64 [ 140.26] usb 1-2: Setting MaxPacketSize 64 [ 140.27] usb 1-2: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to ttyUSB2 # ls -l /dev/ttyU* crw-rw1 root dialout 188, 0 Jan 1 1970 /dev/ttyUSB0 crw-rw1 root dialout 188, 1 Jan 1 1970 /dev/ttyUSB1 crw-rw1 root dialout 188, 2 Dec 10 02:18 /dev/ttyUSB2 # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0403:6010 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT2232C Dual USB-UART/FIFO IC Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0403:6001 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT232 USB-Serial (UART) IC Any ideas?? Thanks! Jaap ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] alignment errors
Hi, I'm working on a recipe for ptpd2. When I run it on my armv5te I get traps: [ 5034.41] Alignment trap: ptpd2 (523) PC=0xe7cc Instr=0xe5870004 Address=0x0001d459 FSR 0x801 What is the best way to tackle this? Do I have to add __attribute__ ((packed)) on critical places? Thanks! ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] openjdk-6 fails to translate
As I've noticed now, it has to do with distro angstrom-2010.x (or eglibc vs glibc?) With angstrom-2008.1 openjdk-6 translates without problems. On 11/04/2010 10:34 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, I've been trying to tackle this myself, but no luck so far... What I can make of it is that -lz is translated into a reference to /usr/lib/libz.so Any help is appreciated! Jaap $ bitbake openjdk-6 mv -f .deps/cacaoh.Tpo .deps/cacaoh.Po /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -D__ARM__ -D__LINUX__ -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o cacaoh cacaoh.o libcacaoh.la -lz -lpthread -ldl arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -D__ARM__ -D__LINUX__ -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o cacaoh cacaoh.o ./.libs/libcacaoh.a /usr/lib/libz.so -lpthread -ldl /usr/lib/libz.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [cacaoh] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/cacao-0.99.4/src/cacaoh' | Making install in cacao | make[4]: Entering directory `/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/cacao-0.99.4/src/cacao' | /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -D__ARM__ -D__LINUX__ -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb2 -fno-strict-aliasing -avoid-version -Xlinker --version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o libjvm.la -rpath /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/install/lib ../../src/fdlibm/libfdlibm.la ../../src/mm/libmm.la ../../src/native/libnative.la ../../src/threads/libthreads.la ../../src/toolbox/libtoolbox.la ../../src/vm/libvm.la ../../src/vmcore/libvmcore.la -lz -lpthread -ldl | mkdir .libs | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -shared -Wl,--whole-archive ../../src/fdlibm/.libs/libfdlibm.a ../../src/mm/.libs/libmm.a ../../src/native/.libs/libnative.a ../../src/threads/.libs/libthreads.a ../../src/toolbox/.libs/libtoolbox.a ../../src/vm/.libs/libvm.a ../../src/vmcore/.libs/libvmcore.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive /usr/lib/libz.so -lpthread -ldl -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -Wl,--version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,-soname -Wl,libjvm.so -o .libs/libjvm.so | /usr/lib/libz.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[4]: *** [libjvm.la] Error 1 | make[4]: Leaving directory `/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/cacao-0.99.4/src/cacao' NOTE: Task failed: /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/temp/log.do_compilestepone.14829 ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting ERROR: Build of /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/openjdk/openjdk-6_6b18-1.8.bb do_compilestepone failed ERROR: Task 18 (/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/openjdk/openjdk-6_6b18-1.8.bb, do_compilestepone) failed NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 3501 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed. ERROR: '/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/openjdk/openjdk-6_6b18-1.8.bb' failed ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] bitbake error?
That fixes it... If relevant: org.openembedded/conf/sanity.conf needs to be patched? -BB_MIN_VERSION = 1.8.18 +BB_MIN_VERSION = 1.10.1 Thanks! -Original Message- From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on behalf of James Ronald Sent: Fri 10/10/29 17:20 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] bitbake error? Pierluigi, Thanks! Installing bitbake-1.10.1 fixed my problem. - Jim On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Pierluigi Passaro pierluigi.pass...@phoenixsoftware.it wrote: Not sure this is the best solution, but I solved same issue using latest bitbake 1.10.1 downloaded from http://download.berlios.de/bitbake/bitbake-1.10.1.tar.gz James Ronald wrote: Jaap de Jong jaap.dejong at nedap.com writes: I'm probably totally stupid... What am doing wrong? (I'm working on a fresh unstable branch) When I bitbake I get: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake u-boot Traceback (most recent call last): File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/bin/bitbake, line 143, in module main() File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/bin/bitbake, line 123, in main cooker.parseConfiguration() File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py, line 68, in parseConfiguration self.parseConfigurationFile( os.path.join( conf, bitbake.conf ) ) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py, line 402, in parseConfigurationFile bb.fetch.fetcher_init(self.configuration.data) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch/__init__.py, line 93, in fetcher_init pd = persist_data.PersistData(d) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/persist_data.py, line 52, in __init__ bb.mkdirhier(self.cachedir) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/__init__.py, line 133, in mkdirhier debug(3, mkdirhier(%s) % dir) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/__init__.py, line 103, in debug bb.msg.debug(lvl, None, ''.join(args)) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/msg.py, line 100, in debug bb.event.fire(MsgDebug(msg, None)) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/event.py, line 67, in fire if tmpHandler(event) == Handled: File tmpHandler(e), line 8, in tmpHandler NameError: global name 'msg' is not defined I'm getting the exact same error. I'm new to OE and just going through the Getting started wiki entry. Ubuntu 10.04 installing bitbake via apt-get install bitbake. bitbake --version BitBake Build Tool Core version 1.8.18, bitbake version 1.8.18 OE is current as of a few minutes ago. j...@ubuntu-xpc:~/oe/build$ bitbake nano Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/bitbake, line 143, in module main() File /usr/bin/bitbake, line 123, in main cooker.parseConfiguration() File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/cooker.py, line 67, in parseConfiguration self.parseConfigurationFile( os.path.join( conf, bitbake.conf ) ) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/cooker.py, line 401, in parseConfigurationFile bb.fetch.fetcher_init(self.configuration.data) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/fetch/__init__.py, line 93, in fetcher_init pd = persist_data.PersistData(d) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/persist_data.py, line 52, in __init__ bb.mkdirhier(self.cachedir) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/__init__.py, line 133, in mkdirhier debug(3, mkdirhier(%s) % dir) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/__init__.py, line 103, in debug bb.msg.debug(lvl, None, ''.join(args)) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/msg.py, line 100, in debug bb.event.fire(MsgDebug(msg, None)) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/bb/event.py, line 67, in fire if tmpHandler(event) == Handled: File tmpHandler(e), line 8, in tmpHandler NameError: global name 'msg' is not defined - Jim ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel winmail.dat___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] bitbake error?
I'm probably totally stupid... What am doing wrong? (I'm working on a fresh unstable branch) When I bitbake I get: MACHINE=at91sam9263ek bitbake u-boot Traceback (most recent call last): File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/bin/bitbake, line 143, in module main() File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/bin/bitbake, line 123, in main cooker.parseConfiguration() File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py, line 68, in parseConfiguration self.parseConfigurationFile( os.path.join( conf, bitbake.conf ) ) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py, line 402, in parseConfigurationFile bb.fetch.fetcher_init(self.configuration.data) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch/__init__.py, line 93, in fetcher_init pd = persist_data.PersistData(d) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/persist_data.py, line 52, in __init__ bb.mkdirhier(self.cachedir) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/__init__.py, line 133, in mkdirhier debug(3, mkdirhier(%s) % dir) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/__init__.py, line 103, in debug bb.msg.debug(lvl, None, ''.join(args)) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/msg.py, line 100, in debug bb.event.fire(MsgDebug(msg, None)) File /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/bitbake/lib/bb/event.py, line 67, in fire if tmpHandler(event) == Handled: File tmpHandler(e), line 8, in tmpHandler NameError: global name 'msg' is not defined ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [PATCH] cacaoh: patches to get do_install do its work
Hi, my initial patch was only intended to show the error I got while building openjdk-6 and I hoped to trigger the maintainers to get it fixed. If this patch has caused any inconvenience to anyone, I apologize for that. Jaap On 10/28/2010 09:44 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 23:36, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Stefan Schmidt ste...@datenfreihafen.org wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 10:11, Jaap de Jong wrote: From 60a5f60af4ad65112452f98d99350fce45332e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:28:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] cacaoh: patches to get do_install do its work Signed-off-by: Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com This patch broke the openjdk-6 testing build for me. Openjdk did not compile due to missing header files. This is with angstrom-2008.1 so no libtool 2.4. I guess that you are using angstrom-2010 and therefor the 2.4 libtool? I tested it with both 2.2 ad 2.4 libtools but what Enrico suggested might be a better fix. Hmm, that works against my theory. :) I need to wait until my build on master is ready and if it fails as well I try to implement Enricos suggestion. regards Stefan Schmidt ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] -lz gets translated into /usr/lib/libz.so
Building openjdk-6 still ends in an error (or again?) Looking at the log file reveals that the -lz option is somehow replaced by /usr/lib/libz.so Is there anyone with a hint in the right direction? Is this a libtool issue? | /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -D__ARM__ -D__LINUX__ -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb2 -fno-strict-aliasing -avoid-version -Xlinker --version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o libjvm.la -lz -lpthread -ldl -rpath /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/install/lib ../../src/fdlibm/libfdlibm.la ../../src/mm/libmm.la ../../src/native/libnative.la ../../src/threads/libthreads.la ../../src/toolbox/libtoolbox.la ../../src/vm/libvm.la ../../src/vmcore/libvmcore.la | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -shared -Wl,--whole-archive ../../src/fdlibm/.libs/libfdlibm.a ../../src/mm/.libs/libmm.a ../../src/native/.libs/libnative.a ../../src/threads/.libs/libthreads.a ../../src/toolbox/.libs/libtoolbox.a ../../src/vm/.libs/libvm.a ../../src/vmcore/.libs/libvmcore.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive */usr/lib/libz.so* -lpthread -ldl -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -Wl,--version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,-soname -Wl,libjvm.so -o .libs/libjvm.so | /usr/lib/libz.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] -lz gets translated into /usr/lib/libz.so
On 10/25/2010 10:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Jaap de Jongjaap.dej...@nedap.com wrote: Building openjdk-6 still ends in an error (or again?) Looking at the log file reveals that the -lz option is somehow replaced by /usr/lib/libz.so Is there anyone with a hint in the right direction? Is this a libtool issue? are you using libtool 2.4 ? i.e. if you are using angstrom-2010 then you are. In this case the libtool macros used for concerned package might need upgrade. Yep: angstrom 2010 libtool 2.4 Where should I find this macro's? And what should I change? There is a zlib.m4; can't find any clue there... | /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -D__ARM__ -D__LINUX__ -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -isystem/media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/sysroots/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb2 -fno-strict-aliasing -avoid-version -Xlinker --version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o libjvm.la -lz -lpthread -ldl -rpath /media/OpenEmbedded/unstable/tmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/openjdk-6-jre-6b18-1.8-r10.7/icedtea6-1.8.2/build/cacao/install/lib ../../src/fdlibm/libfdlibm.la ../../src/mm/libmm.la ../../src/native/libnative.la ../../src/threads/libthreads.la ../../src/toolbox/libtoolbox.la ../../src/vm/libvm.la ../../src/vmcore/libvmcore.la | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -shared -Wl,--whole-archive ../../src/fdlibm/.libs/libfdlibm.a ../../src/mm/.libs/libmm.a ../../src/native/.libs/libnative.a ../../src/threads/.libs/libthreads.a ../../src/toolbox/.libs/libtoolbox.a ../../src/vm/.libs/libvm.a ../../src/vmcore/.libs/libvmcore.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive */usr/lib/libz.so* -lpthread -ldl -march=armv5te -mtune=arm926ej-s -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -Wl,--version-script=../../contrib/mapfile-vers-product -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,-soname -Wl,libjvm.so -o .libs/libjvm.so | /usr/lib/libz.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
