[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.5
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 741142c50..8c49b4674 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" -PV = "3.4" +SRCREV = "3b9eef2259a70f412ab02fbe6b3a4d313d09c38a" +PV = "3.5" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Hi, anyone had time to look into this? Is the patch ok now? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 15:21, Paolo Valente > ha scritto: > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente > --- > meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > index 706a55e11..741142c50 100644 > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" > LICENSE = "GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" > > -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" > -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" > +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" > +PV = "3.4" > SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" > > S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > -- > 2.20.1 > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 14:20, Adrian Bunk ha > scritto: > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 02:15:21PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >> >> >>> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 13:14, Adrian Bunk ha >>> scritto: >>> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >>>> --- >>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644 >>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" >>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>> >>>> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" >>>> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" >>>> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" >>>> +PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}" >>>> SRC_URI = >>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>> ... >>> >>> The problem was already there before, but the upgrade gives the >>> opportunity to get rid of the +git${SRCPV}, which is incorrect >>> when exactly the release is packaged. >>> >> >> Sorry, >> you pointed this out already, but then I thought I had solved it. Now >> I also understand why the previous push-up to 3.3 was not it. >> >> And now, I'm sorry, but I think I'd better to ask for your help >> explicitly: how should I fix this exactly? > > Just remove the +git${SRCPV} from the PV line: > > -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" > -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" > +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" > +PV = "3.4" > Ok, making and sending a V2. Thank you, Paolo >> Thanks for your patience, >> Paolo > > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out >of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 706a55e11..741142c50 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" +PV = "3.4" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 13:14, Adrian Bunk ha > scritto: > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >> --- >> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" >> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >> >> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" >> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" >> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" >> +PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}" >> SRC_URI = >> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >> ... > > The problem was already there before, but the upgrade gives the > opportunity to get rid of the +git${SRCPV}, which is incorrect > when exactly the release is packaged. > Sorry, you pointed this out already, but then I thought I had solved it. Now I also understand why the previous push-up to 3.3 was not it. And now, I'm sorry, but I think I'd better to ask for your help explicitly: how should I fix this exactly? Thanks for your patience, Paolo > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out >of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f" +PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.2
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 47d21d36c..706a55e11 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6" -PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" +SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" +PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.2
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 47d21d36c..78d299e3b 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6" +SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd" PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.1
Hi, have you guys had time to look into this? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 28 mar 2019, alle ore 23:04, Paolo Valente > ha scritto: > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente > --- > meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > index 8bd0afc49..47d21d36c 100644 > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" > LICENSE = "GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" > > -SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" > +SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6" > PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" > SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" > > -- > 2.20.1 > -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.1
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 8bd0afc49..47d21d36c 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" +SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6" PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" -- 2.20.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Yep, sorry. I've just sent a V2 which should hopefully work. Thanks for your patience, Paolo > Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 22:33, Khem Raj ha > scritto: > > btw. it fails on mips/musl > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/211648/ > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:59 PM Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:13 AM Paolo Valente >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:24, Khem Raj ha >>>> scritto: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Paolo Valente >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha >>>>>> scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj >>>>>>>> ha scritto: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj >>>>>>>>>> ha scritto: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- >>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 >>>>>>>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for >>>>>>>>>>> storage I/O" >>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>>>>>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >>>>>>>>>>> "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >>>>>>>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" >>>>>>>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >>>>>>>>>>> SRC_URI = >>>>>>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { >>>>>>>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio >>>>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat" >>>>>>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio >>>>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat \ >>>>>>>>>>> + psmisc git" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> why these new rdeps >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think busybox provides killall too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I'll remove this dep. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the >>>>>>>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall >>>>>>>>> or git. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such >>>>>>> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this >>>>>>> dep too. >>>>>> >>>>>> they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning >>>>>> changes. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep? >>>> >>>> I think it will be good to understand why killall went missing without >>>> ps-misc package. As such patch is ok. Since I think killall should always >>>> be there, either from ps-misc or a backfill from busybox. >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, I created a lot of confusion. >>> >>> 1) killall *was not* missing in any of the oe rootfs that I tested >>> (rootfs made by Anders, in CC). killall was missing on a non-oe >>> remote machine, made available for my tests by a company. So, I added >>> that dependency (in my S suite) to make it work on that machine. For >>> this reason, I thought of adding this dependency to this recipe. But, >>> if it is not needed, I'll remove it. >> >> ok lets remove it >> >>> >>> 2) git is needed only if you want to run kernel-development tests. >>> >> >> lets keep it. >> >>> That said, just tell me whether the patch is ok, or tell me what >>> dependencies to remove, and I'll make a V2. >> >> yes please. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paolo >>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Paolo >>> -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- Changes v1 -> v2: - Removed useless psmisc dep - Fixed stale install commands meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 77d172814..8bd0afc49 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ do_install() { install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/* ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i) done +install -m0755 ${S}/def_config.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite -install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite +install -m0755 ${S}/process_config.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite } -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat" +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat \ + git" FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" -- 2.16.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:24, Khem Raj ha > scritto: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Paolo Valente > wrote: >> >> >> >>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha >>> scritto: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha >>>>> scritto: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha >>>>>>> scritto: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage >>>>>>>> I/O" >>>>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >>>>>>>> "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >>>>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" >>>>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >>>>>>>> SRC_URI = >>>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { >>>>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio >>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat" >>>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio >>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat \ >>>>>>>> + psmisc git" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> why these new rdeps >>>>>> >>>>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :) >>>>> >>>>> I think busybox provides killall too. >>>> >>>> Ok, I'll remove this dep. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the >>>>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall >>>>>> or git. >>>>> >>>>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in >>>>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ? >>>>> >>>>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ? >>>>> >>>> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such >>>> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this >>>> dep too. >>> >>> they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning >>> changes. >>> >> >> So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep? > > I think it will be good to understand why killall went missing without > ps-misc package. As such patch is ok. Since I think killall should always > be there, either from ps-misc or a backfill from busybox. > Sorry, I created a lot of confusion. 1) killall *was not* missing in any of the oe rootfs that I tested (rootfs made by Anders, in CC). killall was missing on a non-oe remote machine, made available for my tests by a company. So, I added that dependency (in my S suite) to make it work on that machine. For this reason, I thought of adding this dependency to this recipe. But, if it is not needed, I'll remove it. 2) git is needed only if you want to run kernel-development tests. That said, just tell me whether the patch is ok, or tell me what dependencies to remove, and I'll make a V2. Thanks, Paolo >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha > scritto: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente > wrote: >> >> >> >>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha >>> scritto: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha >>>>> scritto: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >>>>>> --- >>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 >>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage >>>>>> I/O" >>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>>>> >>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" >>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >>>>>> SRC_URI = >>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>>>> >>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { >>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >>>>>> sysstat" >>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >>>>>> sysstat \ >>>>>> + psmisc git" >>>>> >>>>> why these new rdeps >>>> >>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :) >>> >>> I think busybox provides killall too. >> >> Ok, I'll remove this dep. >> >>>> >>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the >>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall >>>> or git. >>> >>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in >>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ? >>> >>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ? >>> >> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such >> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this >> dep too. > > they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning changes. > So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep? Thanks, Paolo -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha > scritto: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente > wrote: >> >> >> >>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha >>> scritto: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >>>> --- >>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 >>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" >>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>> >>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" >>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >>>> SRC_URI = >>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>> >>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { >>>>install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>> } >>>> >>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >>>> sysstat" >>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >>>> sysstat \ >>>> + psmisc git" >>> >>> why these new rdeps >> >> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :) > > I think busybox provides killall too. Ok, I'll remove this dep. >> >> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the >> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall >> or git. > > OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in > busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ? > > git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ? > In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this dep too. Thanks, Paolo >> >> If these dependencies are certainly useless for oe, then I'll remove them. >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo >> >>>> >>>> FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 2.16.1 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ___ >>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha > scritto: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente > wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente >> --- >> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" >> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >> >> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" >> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >> SRC_URI = >> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >> >> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { >> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >> } >> >> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >> sysstat" >> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >> sysstat \ >> + psmisc git" > > why these new rdeps psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :) Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall or git. If these dependencies are certainly useless for oe, then I'll remove them. Thanks, Paolo >> >> FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" >> >> -- >> 2.16.1 >> >> -- >> ___ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce" PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() { install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite } -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat" +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat \ + psmisc git" FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" -- 2.16.1 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] add a storage I/O benchmark test suite
> Il giorno 25 ott 2018, alle ore 20:17, Randy MacLeod > ha scritto: > > On 10/25/18 1:46 PM, Paolo Valente wrote: >> [RESENDING: FIRST ATTEMPT REJECTED BECAUSE I WAS NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE LIST] >>> Il giorno 23 ott 2018, alle ore 15:33, Anders Roxell >>> ha scritto: >>> >>> CCing in the package maintainer. >>> >> Thanks Anders, hi everybody, >>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 AM Randy MacLeod >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 10/19/18 10:54 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .../recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 30 +++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) >>>>>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index ..77d172814065 >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ >>>>>> +SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" >>>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2" >>>>>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" >>>>>> +PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" >>>>>> +SRC_URI = >>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +# installing in /opt/S-suite since the package has >>>>>> +# dependencies to the directory structure. >>>>>> +do_install() { >>>>>> +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>> +for i in $(find ${S}/* -type d); do >>>>>> +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i) >>>>>> +install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/* >>>>>> ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i) >>>>>> +done >>>>>> + >>>>>> +install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>> +install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev >>>>>> sysstat" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +# added to INSANE_SKIP since s-suite have an runtime >>>>>> +# dependency (RDEPENDS) on libaio-dev. >>>>>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-deps" >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the submission but from: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/Algodev-github/S >>>>> >>>>> "These benchmarks have been written just for internal use, >>>>>and are more a yard than a well-finished work." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't lead to a lot of confidence that these suite will >>>>> be maintained for years. >> Gosh. I put that disclaimer in the README when I first wrote it more >> than 10 years ago. After then, thousands of changes have been made by >> me and many other contributors. Unfortunately, I put the suite on >> GitHub only recently. But as you can see from the log, there have >> been 448 commits in (less than) the last five months. >> In addition, the S suite is now used in a new Phoronix benchmark and >> in a new mmtests benchmark. > > Ah, good to know. > >> So, believe me, the S suite ATM is definitely in good shape, and seems >> to be here to stay. >> I'll remove that line, right after finishing a non-trivial new commit >> I'm working on. >>>>> What's the value to meta-oe users to add >>>>> this recipe compared to something that has been around for years >>>>> if not decades such as Bonnie++: >>>>> https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/864/ >&
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] add a storage I/O benchmark test suite
[RESENDING: FIRST ATTEMPT REJECTED BECAUSE I WAS NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE LIST] > Il giorno 23 ott 2018, alle ore 15:33, Anders Roxell > ha scritto: > > CCing in the package maintainer. > Thanks Anders, hi everybody, > On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 AM Randy MacLeod >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/19/18 10:54 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell --- .../recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 30 +++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb new file mode 100644 index ..77d172814065 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O" +LICENSE = "GPLv2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3" + +SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d" +PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}" +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master" + +S = "${WORKDIR}/git" + +# installing in /opt/S-suite since the package has +# dependencies to the directory structure. +do_install() { +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite +for i in $(find ${S}/* -type d); do +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i) +install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/* ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i) +done + +install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite +install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite +} + +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat" + +FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/" + +# added to INSANE_SKIP since s-suite have an runtime +# dependency (RDEPENDS) on libaio-dev. +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-deps" >>> >>> Thanks for the submission but from: >>> >>> https://github.com/Algodev-github/S >>> >>> "These benchmarks have been written just for internal use, >>>and are more a yard than a well-finished work." >>> >>> >>> That doesn't lead to a lot of confidence that these suite will >>> be maintained for years. Gosh. I put that disclaimer in the README when I first wrote it more than 10 years ago. After then, thousands of changes have been made by me and many other contributors. Unfortunately, I put the suite on GitHub only recently. But as you can see from the log, there have been 448 commits in (less than) the last five months. In addition, the S suite is now used in a new Phoronix benchmark and in a new mmtests benchmark. So, believe me, the S suite ATM is definitely in good shape, and seems to be here to stay. I'll remove that line, right after finishing a non-trivial new commit I'm working on. >>> What's the value to meta-oe users to add >>> this recipe compared to something that has been around for years >>> if not decades such as Bonnie++: >>> https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/864/ >>> >> The added value is that bonnie++ does not perform *any* of the benchmarks in the S suite, apart from that on throughput. I have made the S suite, many years ago, because I needed to run benchmarks that no suite provided. Here are some examples: - start-up times of real applications under real background workloads - playback quality (drop rate) of video and audio under real background workloads - speed of code-development tasks (make, git checkout, git merge, git grep) under real background workloads, plus measurement of system responsiveness while one of these dev tasks is executed - minimum per-client bandwidth guaranteed to a set of clients doing any possible type of I/O - maximum per-client latency guaranteed to a set of clients doing any possible type of I/O For any doubt, here I am. Thanks, Paolo >> how I read this is that they have not made proper installation >> targets and its dependencies or letting user know of the dependencies >> which actually is not a problem with OE since both >> of these would be taken care of in the recipe with >> do_install and DEPENDS > > Do you mean DEPENDS or RDEPENDS? > > Cheers, > Anders -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel