Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Bitbake build failure of Angstrom

2011-07-18 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 18 jul 2011, om 07:16 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven:

 Hi,
 
 I am attempting to manually rebuild the BeagleBoard validation image
 using bitbake.
 
 For this, I used the revision found in /etc/angstrom-version of an
 image I built with Narcissus. The OE revision I used referring to the
 above version file is: a1f31c757d2514e946737d60789c6f9f05ce38eb (Which
 happens to be my fix for GPIO)
 
 Now, when I run a bitbake beagleboard-validation-gnome-image -k 

Why are you using -k ?

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Bitbake build failure of Angstrom

2011-07-18 Thread Joel A Fernandes
Hi Koen,

Nice to hear from you.

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:

 Op 18 jul 2011, om 07:16 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven:

 Hi,

 I am attempting to manually rebuild the BeagleBoard validation image
 using bitbake.

 For this, I used the revision found in /etc/angstrom-version of an
 image I built with Narcissus. The OE revision I used referring to the
 above version file is: a1f31c757d2514e946737d60789c6f9f05ce38eb (Which
 happens to be my fix for GPIO)

 Now, when I run a bitbake beagleboard-validation-gnome-image -k 

 Why are you using -k ?

Not sure if it matters? Even if I don't pass -k, the errors still show up.

Thanks,
Joel

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel