subject:"\[oe\] \[RFC\]\[meta\-oe\]\[PATCH 1\/3\] kernel.bbclass\: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality"

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

2012-07-17 Thread Martin Jansa

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:55:44AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  There is also this change
  http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-April/021608.html
  which never made it to oe-core version..
 
 I missed that part. That would need an enhancement in OE-Core to
 provide a variable to override uImage if a machine asks for.

I've sent kernel.bbclass patches from oe-core to update meta-oe copy, so
that the diff will be smaller again.. then we can try to replace it with
machine_kernel_pr.bbclass..

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

[oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

2012-07-16 Thread Khem Raj

Diffing with the OE-Core's kernel.bbclass only difference is setting of
machine kernel pr. So lets convert it to a separate class which provides
the added functionality and let everyone use kernel.bbclass from kernel

It needs the dependent layers to inherit this class in addition to
kernel.bbclass

It leaves up with one less conflict with OE-Core

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
 meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass|  559 -
 meta-oe/classes/machine_kernel_pr.bbclass |7 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 559 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/classes/machine_kernel_pr.bbclass

diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
deleted file mode 100644
index b30ed36..000
--- a/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,559 +0,0 @@
-inherit linux-kernel-base module_strip
-
-PROVIDES += virtual/kernel
-DEPENDS += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc kmod-native 
virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} update-modules
-
-# we include gcc above, we dont need virtual/libc
-INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = 1
-
-KERNEL_IMAGETYPE ?= zImage
-INITRAMFS_IMAGE ?= 
-INITRAMFS_TASK ?= 
-
-python __anonymous () {
-kerneltype = d.getVar('KERNEL_IMAGETYPE', True) or ''
-if kerneltype == 'uImage':
-depends = d.getVar(DEPENDS, True)
-depends = %s u-boot-mkimage-native % depends
-d.setVar(DEPENDS, depends)
-
-image = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_IMAGE', True)
-if image:
-d.setVar('INITRAMFS_TASK', '${INITRAMFS_IMAGE}:do_rootfs')
-
-machine_kernel_pr = d.getVar('MACHINE_KERNEL_PR', True)
-
-if machine_kernel_pr:
-d.setVar('PR', machine_kernel_pr)
-}
-
-inherit kernel-arch deploy
-
-PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-module-*
-PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-image-*
-PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-firmware-*
-
-export OS = ${TARGET_OS}
-export CROSS_COMPILE = ${TARGET_PREFIX}
-
-KERNEL_PRIORITY ?= 
${@int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[0]) * 1 + \
-   
int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[1]) * 100 + \
-   
int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[-1])}
-
-KERNEL_RELEASE ?= ${KERNEL_VERSION}
-
-KERNEL_CCSUFFIX ?= 
-KERNEL_LDSUFFIX ?= 
-
-# Set TARGET_??_KERNEL_ARCH in the machine .conf to set architecture
-# specific options necessary for building the kernel and modules.
-#FIXME: should be this: TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}
-TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= 
-HOST_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH}
-TARGET_LD_KERNEL_ARCH ?= 
-HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}
-
-KERNEL_CC = ${CCACHE}${HOST_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} 
${HOST_CC_KERNEL_ARCH}${TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS}
-KERNEL_LD = ${HOST_PREFIX}ld${KERNEL_LDSUFFIX} 
${HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}${TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS}
-
-# Where built kernel lies in the kernel tree
-KERNEL_OUTPUT ?= arch/${ARCH}/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
-KERNEL_IMAGEDEST = boot
-
-#
-# configuration
-#
-export CMDLINE_CONSOLE = console=${@d.getVar(KERNEL_CONSOLE,1) or ttyS0}
-
-KERNEL_VERSION = ${@get_kernelversion('${B}')}
-
-KERNEL_LOCALVERSION ?= 
-
-# kernels are generally machine specific
-PACKAGE_ARCH = ${MACHINE_ARCH}
-
-# U-Boot support
-UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT ?= 20008000
-UBOOT_LOADADDRESS ?= ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}
-
-# For the kernel, we don't want the '-e MAKEFLAGS=' in EXTRA_OEMAKE.
-# We don't want to override kernel Makefile variables from the environment
-EXTRA_OEMAKE = 
-
-KERNEL_ALT_IMAGETYPE ??= 
-
-KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE = ${@(lambda s: s[:-3] if s[-3:] == .gz else 
s)(d.getVar('KERNEL_IMAGETYPE', True))}
-
-kernel_do_compile() {
-   unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
-   oe_runmake include/linux/version.h CC=${KERNEL_CC} LD=${KERNEL_LD}
-   oe_runmake ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE} ${KERNEL_ALT_IMAGETYPE} 
CC=${KERNEL_CC} LD=${KERNEL_LD}
-   if test ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE}.gz = ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}; then
-   gzip -9c  ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE}  ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}
-   fi
-}
-
-do_compile_kernelmodules() {
-   unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
-   if (grep -q -i -e '^CONFIG_MODULES=y$' .config); then
-   oe_runmake ${PARALLEL_MAKE} modules CC=${KERNEL_CC} 
LD=${KERNEL_LD}
-   else
-   bbnote no modules to compile
-   fi
-}
-addtask compile_kernelmodules after do_compile before do_install
-
-kernel_do_install() {
-   #
-   # First install the modules
-   #
-   unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
-   if (grep -q -i -e '^CONFIG_MODULES=y$' .config); then
-   oe_runmake DEPMOD=echo INSTALL_MOD_PATH=${D} modules_install
-   rm -f ${D}/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/modules.order
-   rm -f ${D}/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/modules.builtin
-   rm ${D}/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/build
-   rm

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

2012-07-16 Thread Martin Jansa

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:38:34AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
 Diffing with the OE-Core's kernel.bbclass only difference is setting of
 machine kernel pr. So lets convert it to a separate class which provides
 the added functionality and let everyone use kernel.bbclass from kernel

There is also this change
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-April/021608.html
which never made it to oe-core version..

Cheers,

 
 It needs the dependent layers to inherit this class in addition to
 kernel.bbclass
 
 It leaves up with one less conflict with OE-Core
 
 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
 ---
  meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass|  559 
 -
  meta-oe/classes/machine_kernel_pr.bbclass |7 +
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 559 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
  create mode 100644 meta-oe/classes/machine_kernel_pr.bbclass
 
 diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
 deleted file mode 100644
 index b30ed36..000
 --- a/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
 +++ /dev/null
 @@ -1,559 +0,0 @@
 -inherit linux-kernel-base module_strip
 -
 -PROVIDES += virtual/kernel
 -DEPENDS += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc kmod-native 
 virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} update-modules
 -
 -# we include gcc above, we dont need virtual/libc
 -INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = 1
 -
 -KERNEL_IMAGETYPE ?= zImage
 -INITRAMFS_IMAGE ?= 
 -INITRAMFS_TASK ?= 
 -
 -python __anonymous () {
 -kerneltype = d.getVar('KERNEL_IMAGETYPE', True) or ''
 -if kerneltype == 'uImage':
 -depends = d.getVar(DEPENDS, True)
 -depends = %s u-boot-mkimage-native % depends
 -d.setVar(DEPENDS, depends)
 -
 -image = d.getVar('INITRAMFS_IMAGE', True)
 -if image:
 -d.setVar('INITRAMFS_TASK', '${INITRAMFS_IMAGE}:do_rootfs')
 -
 -machine_kernel_pr = d.getVar('MACHINE_KERNEL_PR', True)
 -
 -if machine_kernel_pr:
 -d.setVar('PR', machine_kernel_pr)
 -}
 -
 -inherit kernel-arch deploy
 -
 -PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-module-*
 -PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-image-*
 -PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += kernel-firmware-*
 -
 -export OS = ${TARGET_OS}
 -export CROSS_COMPILE = ${TARGET_PREFIX}
 -
 -KERNEL_PRIORITY ?= 
 ${@int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[0]) * 1 + 
 \
 -   
 int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[1]) * 100 + \
 -   
 int(d.getVar('PV',1).split('-')[0].split('+')[0].split('.')[-1])}
 -
 -KERNEL_RELEASE ?= ${KERNEL_VERSION}
 -
 -KERNEL_CCSUFFIX ?= 
 -KERNEL_LDSUFFIX ?= 
 -
 -# Set TARGET_??_KERNEL_ARCH in the machine .conf to set architecture
 -# specific options necessary for building the kernel and modules.
 -#FIXME: should be this: TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}
 -TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= 
 -HOST_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH}
 -TARGET_LD_KERNEL_ARCH ?= 
 -HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ${TARGET_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}
 -
 -KERNEL_CC = ${CCACHE}${HOST_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} 
 ${HOST_CC_KERNEL_ARCH}${TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS}
 -KERNEL_LD = ${HOST_PREFIX}ld${KERNEL_LDSUFFIX} 
 ${HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}${TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS}
 -
 -# Where built kernel lies in the kernel tree
 -KERNEL_OUTPUT ?= arch/${ARCH}/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
 -KERNEL_IMAGEDEST = boot
 -
 -#
 -# configuration
 -#
 -export CMDLINE_CONSOLE = console=${@d.getVar(KERNEL_CONSOLE,1) or 
 ttyS0}
 -
 -KERNEL_VERSION = ${@get_kernelversion('${B}')}
 -
 -KERNEL_LOCALVERSION ?= 
 -
 -# kernels are generally machine specific
 -PACKAGE_ARCH = ${MACHINE_ARCH}
 -
 -# U-Boot support
 -UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT ?= 20008000
 -UBOOT_LOADADDRESS ?= ${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}
 -
 -# For the kernel, we don't want the '-e MAKEFLAGS=' in EXTRA_OEMAKE.
 -# We don't want to override kernel Makefile variables from the environment
 -EXTRA_OEMAKE = 
 -
 -KERNEL_ALT_IMAGETYPE ??= 
 -
 -KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE = ${@(lambda s: s[:-3] if s[-3:] == .gz else 
 s)(d.getVar('KERNEL_IMAGETYPE', True))}
 -
 -kernel_do_compile() {
 - unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
 - oe_runmake include/linux/version.h CC=${KERNEL_CC} LD=${KERNEL_LD}
 - oe_runmake ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE} ${KERNEL_ALT_IMAGETYPE} 
 CC=${KERNEL_CC} LD=${KERNEL_LD}
 - if test ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE}.gz = ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}; then
 - gzip -9c  ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE}  ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}
 - fi
 -}
 -
 -do_compile_kernelmodules() {
 - unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
 - if (grep -q -i -e '^CONFIG_MODULES=y$' .config); then
 - oe_runmake ${PARALLEL_MAKE} modules CC=${KERNEL_CC} 
 LD=${KERNEL_LD}
 - else
 - bbnote no modules to compile
 - fi
 -}
 -addtask compile_kernelmodules after do_compile before do_install
 -
 -kernel_do_install() {
 - #
 - # First install the modules
 - #
 - unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS MACHINE
 - if (grep -q -i -e '^CONFIG_MODULES=y$' .config); then
 -

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

2012-07-16 Thread Khem Raj

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is also this change
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-April/021608.html
 which never made it to oe-core version..

I missed that part. That would need an enhancement in OE-Core to
provide a variable to override uImage if a machine asks for.

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

[oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

Re: [oe] [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality

4 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information