On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-08-29 02:41 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
This commit
- updates the KMACHINE definition to vexpress.
- updates the branch to qemuarma9.
Signed-off-by: Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/qemuarma9-standard.scc |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/qemuarma9-standard.scc
b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/qemuarma9-standard.scc
index c71fe1c..83911ff 100644
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/qemuarma9-standard.scc
+++ b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/qemuarma9-standard.scc
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-define KMACHINE qemuarma9
+define KMACHINE vexpress
There's no reason to delete the old machine, they are all valid
and additive. Think of them as aliases. You can have as many
as you want :)
In the kernel, there is no qemuarma9 machine. The corresponding
kernel machine is vexpress .. I checked the kernel sources, ..
correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the intent of the KMACHINE
variable was to map to the correct machine defined in the kernel.
define KTYPE standard
define KARCH arm
include ktypes/standard/standard.scc
-branch arm-versatile-926ejs
+branch qemuarma9
There's no reason for a custom branch as well. Unless patches are
being maintained that break compatibility with other boards.
If we plan on having multiple arm architecture support (A8, A8, A15) to
QEMU, perhaps its better to rename this branch to qemuarm.
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
