On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:20:58AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:11:22PM +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi all,
There is a significant volume of patches in the OE patchwork [1] that are
intended to apply to OE-Classic. Apart from the 2011.3-maintenance branch,
OE-
Classic is no longer maintained in favour of OE-Core + layers, so the
question
is what should we do with these patches? At the moment I'm thinking we
should
just mark them as archived so that they disappear from the queue; people
can
still get access to them if needed.
Thoughts?
There is also 70 patches from chase maupin just updating LICENSE to
contain also version.
I'm not using oe-classic anymore, but I believe he prepared them
carefully and it's worth merging.
I'll create bundle from it and apply it tomorrow if nobody objects.
Can we fix patchwork to show bundles marked as public to public users?
I've few bundles
NameProject Public Link Patches DownloadDelete
in-test oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/in-test/
21
oe-classic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic/
61
oe-classic-lic oe
http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic-lic/ 70
2011.03-maintenance oe
http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/2011.03-maintenance/1
denzil oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/denzil/
6
danny oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/danny/
5
meta-handheld oe
http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handheld/ 1
meta-java oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-java/
15
meta-opie oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/
1
But without sharing link to bundle, nobody will find it (AFAIK) maybe
there is newer version of Patchwork which shows public bundles
somewhere?
oe-classic bundle is now marked as archived - so not listed by default.
oe-classic-lic also marked as archived and I'll apply it later today.
It would be great if we agree to mark patches as archived when they get
assigned
to some bundle to keep main patchwork list relatively clean and layer/release
maintainers can still see all patches with New state in corresponding bundle.
I've also marked some patches with review comments without reply as
Changes requested + archived. Pity that some patches had rather
trivial issues, but submitter never responded with v2..
And there were some patches for oe-core already applied in oe-core.. so
marked as Not applicable + archived.
I'm testing few more patches from PW in world build, some with small
modifications:
pick ba53658 udev: remove from meta-oe
pick 04c9cd0 modemmanager: update to 0.6.0.0
pick 00d02ae samba: added gnu-configize for AArch64 support
pick e793760 dialog: added gnu-configize for AArch64 support
pick c1d541c xterm: added gnu-configize for AArch64 support
pick 1bc2922 florence: added gnome-doc-utils and libnotify to dependencies
pick 66b86e2 meta-oe: Fix erroneous use of startline in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM
pick 0caaf89 meta-networking: Fix erroneous use of startline in
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM
pick 36d093e libnl: remove
pick a8f4d0c gtk+3: add libxi dependency
pick 7506e1c libsdl-image: update to upstream version 1.2.12
pick 0480f25 samba: Fix build on Fedora 17
pick 437acf3 fakeroot: update to upstream version 1.18.4
pick 852e1cf python-numpy: add missing runtime dependencies
pick c538fa9 geos: add recipe
pick 56fe334 libspatialite: add recipe
pick f0f428e wpa-supplicant, gcc-common-4.6, packagegroup-qte-toolchain-target:
use correct PRINC form
pick a254473 lua: update to upstream version 5.1.5
pick a89eaca postgresql: disable spinlocks for AArch64
pick 5f1b851 libgcc: s/virtclass/class/ to make it up-to-date
pick 62895de gcc-cross-canadian 4.6: fix dependencies to be nativesdk-* not
*-nativesdk
pick e0f0453 Add recipe for krb5
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
