On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:07 PM, J. L. <vwyodap...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:09 PM, J. L. <vwyodap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I originally posted this on the gumstix mailing list and was told I >> should ask here. I was wondering how come there is no libgcc-dev.ipk >> that gets created though its in the work directory? I was trying to >> compile a program on my machine and was giving me complaints about >> libgcc-dev missing. Is this suppose to happen or? Thanks for any info >> or help on this. >> >> JL > > Is there an easy way to gcc to build the libgcc-dev package? I am > honestly clueless as to how to even attempt to getting that to be > added into the builds. > > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Steve Sakoman <sako...@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM >> Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] question about libgcc-dev >> To: "General mailing list for gumstix users." >> <gumstix-us...@lists.sourceforge.net> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:07 PM, J. L. <vwyodap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Steve Sakoman <sako...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:20 AM, J. L. <vwyodap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I was trying to install libpcap-dev and libpcre-dev and when I did >>>>> they both said that libgcc-dev was an unmet dependency. I have tried >>>>> searching and can not seem to figure out what provides that? I am sure >>>>> this is a really basic one that I am missing. Thanks if you can let me >>>>> know what to build to get that. >>>> >>>> The gcc recipe provides libgcc-dev >>> >>> I checked in the tmp and it only builds a libgcc1_4.3.3 which I >>> already had on the system when it gave that error. I also dont see >>> anything saying its a dev for anything in the gcc tmp build. Am I >>> still missing something obvious here? >> >> I found it by searching through the tmp directory: >> >> $ ls -l >> tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-4.3.3-r17.1/packages-split/ >> | grep libgcc-dev >> >> drwxrwxr-x 2 sakoman sakoman 4096 2010-09-17 20:22 libgcc-dev >> >> But you are correct, the recipe doesn't seem to put an ipk in the >> deploy directory. Not sure why! >> >> Might be better to ask this question to the experts on the OE mailing list. >> >> Steve >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >> accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gumstix-us...@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> >
I have also noticed 4.5 does not produce the libgcc-dev.ipk ? _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel