Re: [oe] [OE-core] [PATCH 09/22] update-rcd.bbclass: handle both sysvinit and systemd features being present

2013-03-22 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:38:29PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
 Run the helper if the sysvinit feature is present, or if the systemd feature 
 is
 present but the systemd class hasn't been inherited.  We want to run in the
 latter case as systemd has sysvinit compatibility, but we don't want to always
 run so that pure systemd images don't have redundant sysvinit files.
 
 Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com
 ---
  meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass  |9 ++---
  meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb |4 ++--
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass 
 b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
 index 65bf022..06b91c1 100644
 --- a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
 +++ b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
 @@ -75,9 +75,12 @@ python populate_packages_updatercd () {
  postrm += d.getVar('updatercd_postrm', True)
  d.setVar('pkg_postrm_%s' % pkg, postrm)
  
 -# If the systemd class has also been inherited, then don't do anything as
 -# the systemd units will override anything created by update-rc.d.
 -if not d.getVar(SYSTEMD_BBCLASS_ENABLED, True):
 +# Run if the sysvinit feature is present, or if the systemd feature is 
 present
 +# but the systemd class hasn't been inherited.  We want to run in the 
 latter case
 +# as systemd has sysvinit compatibility, but we don't want to always so 
 that
 +# pure systemd images don't have redundent sysvinit files.
 +if sysvinit in d.getVar(DISTRO_FEATURES).split() or \
 +   (systemd in d.getVar(DISTRO_FEATURES).split() and not 
 d.getVar(SYSTEMD_BBCLASS_ENABLED, True)):
  pkgs = d.getVar('INITSCRIPT_PACKAGES', True)
  if pkgs == None:
  pkgs = d.getVar('UPDATERCPN', True)
 diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb 
 b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb
 index b9183a8..e73b46e 100644
 --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb
 +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb
 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = task-core-boot
  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager ?= udev
  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_login_manager ?= tinylogin
  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager ?= ${DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN}
 -VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts ?= ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 
 'sysvinit', 'initscripts', '',d)}
 +VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts ?= ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN', 
 'sysvinit', 'initscripts', '',d)}
  VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_keymaps ?= keymaps
  
  RDEPENDS_${PN} = \
 @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN} = \
  ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_login_manager} \
  ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager} \
  ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts} \
 -${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd', 'systemd-compat-units', 
 '',d)} \
 +${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN', 'systemd', 
 'systemd-compat-units', '',d)} \
  ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager} \
  ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives} \
  ${MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS}

Isn't DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN removed later in this series?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


Re: [oe] [OE-core] [PATCH 09/22] update-rcd.bbclass: handle both sysvinit and systemd features being present

2013-03-22 Thread Burton, Ross
On 22 March 2013 19:04, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
 Isn't DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN removed later in this series?

Yes.  I reviewed this series entirely twice and still this slipped
through.  Consider the chunks mentioning INITMAN gone.

Ross

___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel