On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christoph Schäfer wrote: >> > Hi Dave, >> > >> > in other circumstances I'd enjoy a detailed discussion, but a dictum >> > stating a font is "not legally redistributable" simply because the >> > creator uses a modified license defies not only common sense, but also >> > the "spirit" of open licensing. >> >> I think Dave may be interpreting the provision that says a font >> licensed OFL cannot be redistributed under a modified license to mean >> that no one can modify the OFL license. > > If that were the case I wouldn't have raised any objection! :)
"In my experience, Vimes, you argue with anything" (c) Havelock Vetinari :) Alexandre